Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BELGRADE645
2009-07-07 09:21:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Belgrade
Cable title:  

SERBIA: REGIONAL SUMMIT TRUMPETS CQERATION BUT YIELDS

Tags:  PREL PGOV AL AU BK BU EZ HR IT KV LO MD MK MW PL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0010
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBW #0645/01 1880919
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 070921Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY BELGRADE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0054
INFO RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/EUCOM POLAD VAIHINGEN GE
RUCXJAC/JAC MOLESWORTH JCDX RAF MOLESWORTH UK
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHBW/AMEMBASSY BELGRADE
C O N F I D E N T I A L BELGRADE 000645 

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2019/07/07
TAGS: PREL PGOV AL AU BK BU EZ HR IT KV LO MD MK MW PL
SI, UP, SR
SUBJECT: SERBIA: REGIONAL SUMMIT TRUMPETS CQERATION BUT YIELDS
LITTLE

CLASSIFIED BY: Deborah Mennuti, Political Chief, DOS, POL; REASON:
1.4(D)

Summary

-------



C O N F I D E N T I A L BELGRADE 000645

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2019/07/07
TAGS: PREL PGOV AL AU BK BU EZ HR IT KV LO MD MK MW PL
SI, UP, SR
SUBJECT: SERBIA: REGIONAL SUMMIT TRUMPETS CQERATION BUT YIELDS
LITTLE

CLASSIFIED BY: Deborah Mennuti, Political Chief, DOS, POL; REASON:
1.4(D)

Summary

--------------




1. (C) Serbia hosted over a dozen Central European presidents at
a June 19-21 summit focusing on regional cooperation in the realms
of energy, economics and European integration. Though hailed as a
success for Serbia's regional policy, the summit yielded little
beyond symbolism and rhetoric. The bilateral meetings between
President Boris Tadic and his Slovenian and Croatian counterparts
were the most significant signs during the summit of a continued
thaw between Serbia and these two neighbors. Ongoing tensions
between President Tadic and Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic were
unintentionally highlighted at the summit and afterward. End
Summary.



Meeting of the Presidents

--------------




2. (SBU) Serbia on June 19-21 hosted fourteen European leaders at
the annual summit of Central European heads of state. Convening
this year in the city of Novi Sad, summit participants included the
presidents of Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Moldova, the Czech
Republic, Italy, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia,
and Ukraine. Tri-Presidency member Vladimir Radmanovic represented
Bosnia-Herzegovina. Albanian President Topi cancelled his
previously planned participation because the President of Kosovo
was not invited to the gathering. Billed as the largest summit in
Serbia since the Non-Aligned Movement days of Yugoslavia, the
summit was entitled "Joint Efforts for Overcoming the Challenges of
the 3 E's: Economics, Energy, and European Integration." No joint
communique was issued at the conclusion of the gathering.





3. (SBU) President Tadic held fourteen bilateral meetings during
the course of the summit, including widely-reported meetings with
Slovenian President Daniel Turk and Croatian President Stejpan
Mesic. A statement from the Slovenian president's office described
relations between Serbia and Slovenia as "reaching a new level" as
both sides discussed economic ties, Slovenia's assistance to Serbia
in achieving visa liberalization, and preparations for an official
visit by President Tadic to Slovenia later this year. Croatian
President Mesic said his country's foreign policy ambitions "would
not be satisfied without the entrance of all countries of the
region into the EU." Tadic and Mesic told reporters that they
agreed to launch a process "on all levels" to end secret war crimes
indictments by Croatian courts against Serbs, which had impeded
Serbs from returning to Croatia to settle property claims. Tadic
also accepted an invitation to visit Croatia in early September.





Belgrade Claims Foreign Policy Success

--------------




4. (SBU) Serbian officials were quick to hail the summit as a
sign of Serbia' successful regional diplomacy. Foreign Minister
Vuk Jeremic said that the Novi Sad summit showed that Serbia's
foreign policy, in all questions regarding regional policy, was
conducted in a way that brought results. Jeremic added that the
decision to hold the summit in Novi Sad was the result of Serbia's
foreign policy and sent the joint message of essential progress on
European integration for Serbia. Aleksandar Knezevic, deputy to
Tadic foreign policy advisor Jovan Ratkovic, told us that the Novi
Sad summit was more successful than previous regional summits and
largely focused attention on regional energy cooperation as well as
on migration, organized crime, and the need to continue the
enlargement process. Knezevic added that the summit demonstrated
Serbia's commitment to regional cooperation as one of Belgrade's
top three foreign policy priorities. (Protecting Serbia's
territorial integrity and European integration are Serbia's other
two foreign policy priorities.)




5. (C) Others, however, questioned the significance of the Novi
Sad summit. Officials from the Serbian Progressive Party (an
opposition party) and the Serbian Renewal Movement (a governing
coalition member) expressed similar sentiments to us that the Novi
Sad summit was "just a show" and that little of substance was
achieved. Other contacts suggested to us that the presence of only
presidents ensured that no substantive deliverables would be
achievable. Macedonian Embassy Political Counselor Aleksandar
Novotni strongly objected to Serbian assertions that the summit
signified success for Serbia's regional policy, telling us that the
decision to hold the summit in Novi Sad was made last year prior to
the formation of the current Serbian government. Credit for
holding the summit in Serbia should actually go to Macedonia, which
lobbied the regional presidents last year at the summit in Skopje
to give Serbia a chance to host, Novotni added.



Rivalries Below the Surface

--------------




6. (C) The summit also revealed underlying rivalries in Serbia's
foreign policy establishment. Our contacts told us that Tadic
foreign policy advisor Ratkovic organized and was present for the
entire summit, while Jeremic only attended the formal closing
dinner. Knezevic indicated to us that Tadic's office was
responsible for organizing the summit, suggesting that the Foreign
Ministry had been sidelined. The Belgrade daily "Blic," citing an
unnamed source, reported on July 1 that Tadic complained to Prime
Minister Cvetkovic and Belgrade Mayor Djilas that Jeremic had not
assisted at all with preparations for the Novi Sad summit but
nonetheless took credit in the media for the summit's success.
Snezana Miljanic, the GOS Deputy Secretary General, told us that
Jeremic had been effectively sidelined from government discussions
of foreign policy over the past several months because Jeremic was
often traveling when the government chose to discuss foreign policy
issues. Jeremic rarely spoke up at government sessions when he was
present, particularly over the past two months, Miljanic said.



Comment

--------------




7. (C) While Serbia's role as host of the Novi Sad summit
should not be considered a triumph of Serbian foreign policy, the
summit was another sign that Belgrade is taking regional
cooperation seriously. With the multilateral aspects yielding no
substantive accomplishments aside from pledges to deepen energy
cooperation, the greatest value for Serbia came from the photo ops
and bilateral meetings. This was particularly true of the Turk and
Mesic meetings, which signaled progress in the thaw in Serbia's
bilateral relations with Slovenia and Croatia. In stark contrast
with the often confrontational approach of the MFA, the
Presidency's constructive handling of the summit once again
demonstrated that it deserves the credit for recent progress in
regional relations. End Comment.
BRUSH