Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BEIJING2978
2009-10-26 09:09:00
SECRET
Embassy Beijing
Cable title:
DOE DEPUTY SECRETARY DISCUSSES INTERNATIONAL
how-toVZCZCXRO0978 PP RUEHCN RUEHDH RUEHGH RUEHHM RUEHPB RUEHSL RUEHTM RUEHTRO RUEHVC DE RUEHBJ #2978/01 2990909 ZNY SSSSS ZZH P 260909Z OCT 09 FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6613 INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 1826 RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 0529 RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 9774 RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 0786 RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA 2019 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 3613 RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 0771 RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 0647 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 9414 RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 4962 RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0001 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 4643 RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE 0862 RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA 0500 RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 1078 RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 1387 RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM 1648 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0089 RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 0013 RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC RUEAEPA/HQ EPA WASHDC RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC RHMFISS/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 BEIJING 002978
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/CM-BRAUNOHLER, EAP/CM
STATE FOR OES DAS MIOTKE
STATE FOR S/SECC-STERN, S/P-GREEN
USDOE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY/MCGINNIS
USDOE FOR NNSA/SCHEINMAN, GOOREVICH, WHITNEY
STATE PASS TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (DOANE)
USDOE FOR INTERNATIONAL/YOSHIDA, BISCONTI, HUANGFU
USDOE FOR INTERNATIONAL
NSC FOR HOLGATE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2019
TAGS: ENERG ECON ETTC TRGY KNNP IAEA KTIA CVIS CH
SUBJECT: DOE DEPUTY SECRETARY DISCUSSES INTERNATIONAL
NUCLEAR ENERGY FRAMEWORK WITH CHINA'S NATIONAL ENERGY
ADMINISTRATION
Classified By: ESTH Counselor Brent Christensen. Reason 1.4 (b) and (d)
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 BEIJING 002978
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/CM-BRAUNOHLER, EAP/CM
STATE FOR OES DAS MIOTKE
STATE FOR S/SECC-STERN, S/P-GREEN
USDOE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY/MCGINNIS
USDOE FOR NNSA/SCHEINMAN, GOOREVICH, WHITNEY
STATE PASS TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (DOANE)
USDOE FOR INTERNATIONAL/YOSHIDA, BISCONTI, HUANGFU
USDOE FOR INTERNATIONAL
NSC FOR HOLGATE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2019
TAGS: ENERG ECON ETTC TRGY KNNP IAEA KTIA CVIS CH
SUBJECT: DOE DEPUTY SECRETARY DISCUSSES INTERNATIONAL
NUCLEAR ENERGY FRAMEWORK WITH CHINA'S NATIONAL ENERGY
ADMINISTRATION
Classified By: ESTH Counselor Brent Christensen. Reason 1.4 (b) and (d)
1. (S) SUMMARY: Department of Energy (DOE) Deputy Secretary
(DEPSEC) Daniel Poneman met privately with the head of
China's National Energy Administration (NEA) ZHANG Guobao on
the margins of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP)
Ministerial in Beijing on October 23. The two discussed the
U.S. proposal to construct an enhanced international
framework for civil nuclear cooperation, including
cradle-to-grave nuclear fuel management and supply services
so that countries can access nuclear power without increasing
the risks of proliferation. The proposal also calls for a
renaming of GNEP to the International Nuclear Energy
Framework (INEF). Zhang said that he "wants to make the U.S.
idea a reality" and that China and the U.S. should take
practical and joint measures to persuade other GNEP members
of the proposal's merit. END SUMMARY.
2. (S) The DEPSEC began by asking for China's help and
support in working closely with the U.S. to ensure that he
INEF proposal is not perceived as a decision being imposed by
one country or a small group of countries on the other
partners (the nuclear haves versus nuclear have-nots). Zhang
reminded the DEPSEC that GNEP was originally a U.S.-initiated
efforts and that China's hosting of the GNEP Ministerial was
proof of its commitment to the principles embodied by the
partnership. Moreover, China and the U.S. share the same
fundamental interests when it comes to energy security and
nonproliferation; therefore, as a practical matter,
minimizing access to fuel cycle and reprocessing capabilities
would be better for nonproliferation efforts and global
stability, said Zhang.The DEPSEC began by asking for China's
help and support in working closely with the U.S. to ensure
that he INEF proposal is not perceived as a decision being
imposed by one country or a small group of countries on the
other partners (the nuclear haves versus nuclear have-nots).
Zhang reminded the DEPSEC that GNEP was originally a
U.S.-initiated efforts and that China's hosting of the GNEP
Ministerial was proof of its commitment to the principles
embodied by the partnership. Moreover, China and the U.S.
share the same fundamental interests when it comes to energy
security and nonproliferation; therefore, as a practical
matter, minimizing access to fuel cycle and reprocessing
capabilities would be better for nonproliferation efforts and
global stability, said Zhang.
3. (S) Zhang suggested that the Chinese and U.S. Governments
take practical steps and work together to make the proposal a
reality, beginning with a jointly-developed draft framework
that could be rolled out to other key nuclear partners
including France, the UK, Japan, and Russia. Zhang indicated
that Japan is sensitive to the proposal, but assessed that as
long as these key countries (including China) are able to
retain reprocessing capabilities, they will ultimately go
BEIJING 00002978 002 OF 002
along with the proposal, including Japan. Zhang also
suggested that additional thought be given as to how to
address sensitive countries in this proposal including India
and Pakistan.
4. (S) Finally, Zhang agreed with the DEPSEC that it did not
make economic sense for nuclear energy-aspiring countries to
develop their own fuel cycle and their own reprocessing
capabilities. Later, Zhang even reiterated this point to the
GNEP plenary during his closing remarks.
5. (S) COMMENT: Despite Zhang's surprisingly strong support
of the U.S. proposal, it is not clear how much, if any, of
his stated position and recommendations have been vetted with
other key Chinese players, including the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs (MFA). As head of NEA and Vice Chairman of the
National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC),Zhang
would have a leading role in the GoC's decision to support
U.S. efforts to recraft GNEP, but this would still require
interagency discussion and concurrence. END COMMENT.
HUNTSMAN
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/CM-BRAUNOHLER, EAP/CM
STATE FOR OES DAS MIOTKE
STATE FOR S/SECC-STERN, S/P-GREEN
USDOE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY/MCGINNIS
USDOE FOR NNSA/SCHEINMAN, GOOREVICH, WHITNEY
STATE PASS TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (DOANE)
USDOE FOR INTERNATIONAL/YOSHIDA, BISCONTI, HUANGFU
USDOE FOR INTERNATIONAL
NSC FOR HOLGATE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2019
TAGS: ENERG ECON ETTC TRGY KNNP IAEA KTIA CVIS CH
SUBJECT: DOE DEPUTY SECRETARY DISCUSSES INTERNATIONAL
NUCLEAR ENERGY FRAMEWORK WITH CHINA'S NATIONAL ENERGY
ADMINISTRATION
Classified By: ESTH Counselor Brent Christensen. Reason 1.4 (b) and (d)
1. (S) SUMMARY: Department of Energy (DOE) Deputy Secretary
(DEPSEC) Daniel Poneman met privately with the head of
China's National Energy Administration (NEA) ZHANG Guobao on
the margins of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP)
Ministerial in Beijing on October 23. The two discussed the
U.S. proposal to construct an enhanced international
framework for civil nuclear cooperation, including
cradle-to-grave nuclear fuel management and supply services
so that countries can access nuclear power without increasing
the risks of proliferation. The proposal also calls for a
renaming of GNEP to the International Nuclear Energy
Framework (INEF). Zhang said that he "wants to make the U.S.
idea a reality" and that China and the U.S. should take
practical and joint measures to persuade other GNEP members
of the proposal's merit. END SUMMARY.
2. (S) The DEPSEC began by asking for China's help and
support in working closely with the U.S. to ensure that he
INEF proposal is not perceived as a decision being imposed by
one country or a small group of countries on the other
partners (the nuclear haves versus nuclear have-nots). Zhang
reminded the DEPSEC that GNEP was originally a U.S.-initiated
efforts and that China's hosting of the GNEP Ministerial was
proof of its commitment to the principles embodied by the
partnership. Moreover, China and the U.S. share the same
fundamental interests when it comes to energy security and
nonproliferation; therefore, as a practical matter,
minimizing access to fuel cycle and reprocessing capabilities
would be better for nonproliferation efforts and global
stability, said Zhang.The DEPSEC began by asking for China's
help and support in working closely with the U.S. to ensure
that he INEF proposal is not perceived as a decision being
imposed by one country or a small group of countries on the
other partners (the nuclear haves versus nuclear have-nots).
Zhang reminded the DEPSEC that GNEP was originally a
U.S.-initiated efforts and that China's hosting of the GNEP
Ministerial was proof of its commitment to the principles
embodied by the partnership. Moreover, China and the U.S.
share the same fundamental interests when it comes to energy
security and nonproliferation; therefore, as a practical
matter, minimizing access to fuel cycle and reprocessing
capabilities would be better for nonproliferation efforts and
global stability, said Zhang.
3. (S) Zhang suggested that the Chinese and U.S. Governments
take practical steps and work together to make the proposal a
reality, beginning with a jointly-developed draft framework
that could be rolled out to other key nuclear partners
including France, the UK, Japan, and Russia. Zhang indicated
that Japan is sensitive to the proposal, but assessed that as
long as these key countries (including China) are able to
retain reprocessing capabilities, they will ultimately go
BEIJING 00002978 002 OF 002
along with the proposal, including Japan. Zhang also
suggested that additional thought be given as to how to
address sensitive countries in this proposal including India
and Pakistan.
4. (S) Finally, Zhang agreed with the DEPSEC that it did not
make economic sense for nuclear energy-aspiring countries to
develop their own fuel cycle and their own reprocessing
capabilities. Later, Zhang even reiterated this point to the
GNEP plenary during his closing remarks.
5. (S) COMMENT: Despite Zhang's surprisingly strong support
of the U.S. proposal, it is not clear how much, if any, of
his stated position and recommendations have been vetted with
other key Chinese players, including the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs (MFA). As head of NEA and Vice Chairman of the
National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC),Zhang
would have a leading role in the GoC's decision to support
U.S. efforts to recraft GNEP, but this would still require
interagency discussion and concurrence. END COMMENT.
HUNTSMAN