Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BANGKOK499
2009-02-27 08:16:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Bangkok
Cable title:  

THAILAND: TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS REPORT - 2008

Tags:  ASEC ELAB KCRM KFRD KTIP KWMN PGOV PHUM PREF SMIG TH 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7720
PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHJO RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH RUEHPB
RUEHPOD
DE RUEHBK #0499/01 0580816
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 270816Z FEB 09 ZDK CTG MULTIPLE SVCS
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6182
INFO RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI 6215
RUEHZU/ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION
RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RUEHXI/LABOR COLLECTIVE
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 1571
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH 0258
RUEHMK/AMEMBASSY MANAMA 0337
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA 1308
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1858
RUEHSV/AMEMBASSY SUVA 0403
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 32 BANGKOK 000499 

Department for G/TIP, EAP/RSP, INL, DRL, PRM
Labor for ILAB

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KTIP, ELAB, KCRM, KWMN, PGOV, PHUM, PREF, SMIG, KFRD, ASEC,
TH
SUBJECT: Thailand: Trafficking in Persons Report - 2008

REF A: 08 STATE 132759 (REPORTING REQUEST)
REF B: STATE 5577 (ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FOR REPORTING)
REF C: BANGKOK 237 (CHILD LABOR REPORT INPUT)
REF D: 08 BANGKOK 3588 (PROGRESS ON TIP LAW)

BANGKOK 00000499 001.4 OF 032


Sensitive But Unclassified. For Official Use Only.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 32 BANGKOK 000499

Department for G/TIP, EAP/RSP, INL, DRL, PRM
Labor for ILAB

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KTIP, ELAB, KCRM, KWMN, PGOV, PHUM, PREF, SMIG, KFRD, ASEC,
TH
SUBJECT: Thailand: Trafficking in Persons Report - 2008

REF A: 08 STATE 132759 (REPORTING REQUEST)
REF B: STATE 5577 (ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FOR REPORTING)
REF C: BANGKOK 237 (CHILD LABOR REPORT INPUT)
REF D: 08 BANGKOK 3588 (PROGRESS ON TIP LAW)

BANGKOK 00000499 001.4 OF 032


Sensitive But Unclassified. For Official Use Only.

1. (SBU) Summary: Despite various and sometimes mounting
challenges, the Royal Thai Government (RTG) made significant efforts
to combat human trafficking (TIP) in 2008. Although Thailand's
political turmoil resulted in five changes in Prime Minister over
the course of the year, the RTG made considerable strides in the
implementation of Thailand's comprehensive new anti-TIP law that
came into force in June (ref. D). They include making the drafting
of multiple subordinate regulations to the law, the signing of two
new regional MOUs by provincial authorities, and the development of
operational guidelines for victim identification and for labor
trafficking cases. Thai authorities trained thousands of
individuals (police, social workers, prosecutors, non-governmental
organization representatives, etc.) on the new TIP law and how to
most effectively put it to use through multidisciplinary teams. In
recognition of the status of adult males as TIP victims (codified by
the new law),the RTG opened a new shelter for men (three others are
planned) and expanded by 39 its existing network of temporary
shelters for all victims. Proceedings in the Ranya Paew case
advanced, with a labor court ordering in November that $3,600,000
baht (USD 109,010) in compensation be paid to the victims. To
develop their criminal case, law enforcement officials finished
taking testimony from the 66 victims, paving the way for their
repatriation by December. In September, a Labor Court ordered that
38 surviving crew members from the Prapha Navee fishing case receive
3.8 million baht (108,571 USD) in back wages. The criminal case
involving the Anoma shrimp case advanced with defendants and victims
providing statements to the court in February 2009. In 2008, the
RTG also signed a new TIP-related agreement with the government of
Vietnam. End Summary.

2. (SBU) Answers to questions provided by ref. A, paragraph 23
follow:

I. THE COUNTRY'S TIP SITUATION:

>-- A. WHAT IS (ARE) THE SOURCE(S) OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON
TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS? WHAT PLANS ARE IN PLACE (IF ANY) TO
UNDERTAKE FURTHER DOCUMENTATION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING? HOW RELIABLE
ARE THESE SOURCES?

Information on trafficking in persons is widely available from many
NGOs, UN agencies, and other international organization activities
in Thailand, as well as from various Thai government agencies (e.g.,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Social Development and
Social Security, the Children and Women Protection Division (CWD) of
the Royal Thai Police, Ministry of Labor, Office of the Attorney
General, etc). While most information collected from these
organizations is reliable, information from the media is not always
reliable and must be confirmed by other sources.

-- B. IS THE COUNTRY A COUNTRY OF ORIGIN, TRANSIT, AND/OR
DESTINATION FOR INTERNATIONALLY TRAFFICKED MEN, WOMEN, OR CHILDREN?
DOES TRAFFICKING OCCUR WITHIN THE COUNTRY'S BORDERS? IF SO, DOES
INTERNAL TRAFFICKING OCCUR IN TERRITORY OUTSIDE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S
CONTROL (E.G. IN A CIVIL WAR SITUATION)? TO WHERE ARE PEOPLE
TRAFFICKED? FOR WHAT PURPOSES ARE THEY TRAFFICKED? PROVIDE, WHERE
POSSIBLE, NUMBERS OR ESTIMATES FOR EACH GROUP OF TRAFFICKING
VICTIMS. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN THE TIP SITUATION SINCE THE
LAST TIP REPORT (E.G. CHANGES IN DESTINATIONS)?

Thailand is a country of origin, transit and destination for persons
subjected to the worst forms of trafficking as defined by the
Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA). Trafficking occurs both
across international borders and internally between rural and urban
areas. Migrants from neighboring countries (mostly from Burma,
Cambodia, and Laos) are trafficked into Thailand. Thai citizens are

BANGKOK 00000499 002.4 OF 032


trafficked into other countries in Northeast Asia, the Middle East,
Africa, and Europe, and elsewhere. Trafficking activity occurs in
the area around the Thailand-Malaysia border where political unrest
hinders the RTG's ability to combat all crime.

As a source country, in 2008, Thais were found to be trafficked,
mostly for the sex trade and construction work, to Malaysia,
Bahrain, Japan, South Africa, United Kingdom, Singapore, Australia,
Hong Kong, Brunei, Taiwan, Vietnam, the United States, Turkey,
Libya, Spain. As transit countries, people from North Korea, China,
Vietnam, and Burma pass through Thailand to third countries such as
Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Russia, Western Europe, South Korea,
and the United States. As a destination country, people from
neighboring countries (Cambodia, Burma, Laos, China, and Vietnam)
and others as far off as Russia and Fiji are found to be trafficked
into Thailand, mostly into urban areas such as Bangkok, Chiang Mai,
Pattaya, Samut Prakarn, Samut Sakorn, and Songkla.

There was no reliable estimate of the magnitude of the trafficking
phenomenon in Thailand. While NGOs reported a growing number of
Burmese smuggled into Thailand seeking employment, they did not
report human trafficking to be on the rise. There was general
agreement among United Nation agencies, NGOs, and the RTG that only
a small percentage of those engaged in prostitution in Thailand are
either underage or are in involuntary servitude or debt bondage as
defined by the TVPA, although serious problems remain. While women
and children (especially girls) have in the past tended to be the
most frequent trafficking victims in Thailand, cases of labor
exploitation involving migrant workers indicated that men are also
at risk for labor trafficking.

Evidence suggested that the trafficking of men, women and children
into labor sectors such as commercial fisheries, fishing-related
industries, or sweatshop work was a significant portion of all
trafficking in Thailand. Children were also found to be trafficked
into Bangkok or other urban areas and forced to sell flowers, beg,
or work in domestic service, according to the NGO World Vision. Thai
women were found to be trafficked abroad for sexual exploitation
especially in Japan, UK and Australia.

Studies done by United Nations agencies and NGOs found evidence of
exploitation (including human trafficking) of Burmese migrants in
the seafood processing sector, sometimes through debt bondage. The
NGO Rak Thai Foundation in Mahachai reported that Burmese women were
targeted by rape gangs due to their illegal status and lack of
knowledge about their rights and protections under Thai law. UNIAP
also reported that migrant workers were found to be vulnerable due
to their language barrier, limited knowledge of Thai laws, as well
as the withholding of travel documents, migrant registration cards,
and/or work permits by employers.

According to UNESCO and NGO studies, ethnic minorities resident in
Thailand, such as an estimated 350,000 northern hill tribe people
who have not received legal residency or citizenship, were at
particular risk for trafficking. Although absolute numbers of
ethnic minority trafficking victims were not high, they were found
in numbers disproportionate to their share of the population in
Thailand.

The Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSDHS)
reported it assisted 622 TIP victims in 2008, 520 foreigners and 102
Thai citizens. Of the 622, 306 (roughly 50 percent) agreed to
cooperate with law enforcement authorities on their cases
investigation and prosecution. Only 35 of the 102 Thai victims
agreed to cooperate on their cases investigation and prosecution.

Number of trafficking victims assisted by MSDHS (Jan-Dec 2008)
(Unit: Number of Persons):

Victims Proceed with Prosecution Do Not Proceed

-------------- -------------- --------------
Thai trafficking 44 6 38

BANGKOK 00000499 003.4 OF 032


victims abroad

Thai trafficking 58 29 29
victims in Thailand

Foreign trafficking 520 271 249 victims in
Thailand

Total 622 306 316
(Source: Dept. of Social Development and Welfare, MSDHS)

The Children and Women Protection Division of the Royal Thai Police
(CWD) reported that CWD alone (not including other police divisions)
investigated 54 offenders of human trafficking cases, involving 82
TIP victims. Out of 54 offenders, 34, 12 and 8 were charged with
forced prostitution, procuring prostitutes, and forced child labor,
respectively. Statistics by types of crime and nationality follow:


Number of TIP investigations by CWD (Jan-Dec 2008)
(Unit: Number of Persons)
Number of offenders Number of victims
-------------- --------------
Forced prostitution 34 19
(33 Thai,1 Lao) (17 Thai,2 Lao)

Procuring for prostitution 12 29

Forced child labor 8 34
(3 Thai, 5 Burm.)(2 Thai, 28 Burmese, 4 Lao)

Total 54 82
(36 Thai, 1 Lao, 5 Burm.) (19 Thai, 6 Lao, 28 Burm.)
(Source: Children and Women Protection Division (CWD))

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) Department of Consular Affairs
reported 443 Thai nationals were classified as TIP victims abroad
and repatriated to Thailand with MFA assistance in fiscal year 2008
(October 2007-September 2008),compared to 403 and 397 victims in
FY2007 and FY2006, respectively. The breakdown by destination
country follows:

Number of Thai TIP victims abroad who were repatriated back to
Thailand (Oct 07-Sep 08)
(Unit: Number of Persons)
Destination FY 2006 FY2007 FY 2008
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Bahrain 236 368 360
Singapore 9 14 3
Malaysia 39 12 73
South Africa 20 3 1
Saudi Arabia 0 3 0
Hong Kong 2 2 1
Japan 3 1 0
United Kingdom 5 0 0
Taiwan 0 0 5
Total 397 403 443
(Source: Department of Consular Affairs, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs)

The Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSDHS)
reported that 3,772 foreign women and children were classified as
TIP victims in Thailand and received assistance and protection at
MSDHS shelters between 1999-2008, that 2,553 (68 percent) were
repatriated back to their home country, and approximately 292 people
remained in MSDHS shelters at the end of 2008. The breakdown by
country of origin follows:

Number of Foreign TIP victims in the government shelters. (1999 -
Dec 2008)(Unit: Number of Persons)
Nationality Assisted Repatriated Other* Remain in shelters
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Cambodia 1,235 968 245 22

BANGKOK 00000499 004.4 OF 032


Burma 1,121 623 308 190

Laos 1,336 915 347 74
China 32 21 10 1

Vietnam 26 20 3 3
Other 22 6 14 2
Total 3,772 2,553 927 292
* victims referred/transferred to other agencies, fled from the
shelter, etc.
(Source: Department of Social Development and Welfare, MSDHS)

-- C. WHAT KIND OF CONDITIONS ARE THE VICTIMS TRAFFICKED INTO?

Thai and foreign victims found themselves in situations of forced or
bonded labor, forced commercial sexual exploitation, domestic
servitude, or other exploitive conditions.

UNIAP reported that the sectors in which trafficked persons were
most commonly found in Thailand were those involving sexual
exploitation, begging, domestic work, factory work, agriculture,
fishing, and fishing-related industries. The conditions that
victims were trafficked into varied from mild to severe. In some
cases, factory workers were forced to work long hours with few
safety precautions, experienced health problems, were vulnerable to
violence, and worked without pay or less pay than promised. In
fishing-related industries, workers at times remained at sea for
long periods (3 months to 1 year),did not receive pay, and were
threatened or physically beaten. In the commercial sex industry,
women were at times locked-up and forced to work with multiple
clients.

-- D. VULNERABILITY TO TIP: ARE CERTAIN GROUPS OF PERSONS MORE AT
RISK OF BEING TRAFFICKED (E.G. WOMEN AND CHILDREN, BOYS VERSUS
GIRLS, CERTAIN ETHNIC GROUPS, REFUGEES, IDPS, ETC.)?

Women, children, migrants, ethnic minorities, and stateless people
along the Thai-Burmese border were more at risk. The majority of
people trafficked to Thailand were migrants from Burma, Laos, and
Cambodia who often had no valid visa or work permit, did not speak
Thai, had no knowledge of Thai Law, nor understand how to access to
Thai justice system, according to the UNIAP. Newly arrived migrants
were generally more at risk. UNESCO identified lack of citizenship
as the greatest risk factor for highland girls and women in Thailand
to being trafficked or otherwise exploited. Regarding Cambodian
victims, many appeared to be males (especially those newly arrived)
trafficked onto fishing boats. Women trafficked were found in
sweatshops, the sex trade, and domestic service while children were
found in the agricultural sector and in small-scale shops. Boys and
adult male victims were mostly found in the fishing (and related)
industries, agriculture, and construction work.

-- E. TRAFFICKERS AND THEIR METHODS: WHO ARE THE
TRAFFICKERS/EXPLOITERS? ARE THEY INDEPENDENT BUSINESS PEOPLE?
SMALL OR FAMILY-BASED CRIME GROUPS? LARGE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZED
CRIME SYNDICATES? WHAT METHODS ARE USED TO APPROACH VICTIMS? FOR
EXAMPLE, ARE THEY OFFERED LUCRATIVE JOBS, SOLD BY THEIR FAMILIES, OR
APPROACHED BY FRIENDS OF FRIENDS? WHAT METHODS ARE USED TO MOVE THE
VICTIMS (E.G., ARE FALSE DOCUMENTS BEING USED?). ARE EMPLOYMENT,
TRAVEL, AND TOURISM AGENCIES OR MARRIAGE BROKERS INVOLVED WITH OR
FRONTING FOR TRAFFICKERS OR CRIME GROUPS TO TRAFFIC INDIVIDUALS?

Traffickers ranged from opportunistic individuals to organized
networks. According to UNIAP, traffickers bringing victims into
Thailand generally did not need a high level of organization,
whereas those bringing victims from Thailand to foreign destinations
required more organized networks and financing. As a destination
country, Thailand's somewhat porous borders made undocumented entry
from Burma, Laos, and Cambodia relatively easy. False documents are
reportedly used considerably in Thailand, which is made easier by
the complex registration system for migrant workers. Regarding
migrant children, traffickers reportedly offered cash to the child's
parents (especially those in Cambodia or Burma) to take their child

BANGKOK 00000499 005.4 OF 032


to a city to earn money by selling flowers or begging.

A study conducted by UNIAP in collaboration with an NGO on brokers
and agents in Samut Sakorn indicated that brokers were sometimes a
family member, a friend, or a stranger. They acted as a legitimate
work-oriented service facilitator, or as an exploiter and/or a
trafficker. The study found that brokers were of both Thai and
Burmese origin and worked in networks, collaborating with employers
and at times with individual law enforcement officials.
Exploitation was found in cases of brokers charging excessive
transportation fees, charging high release fees for workers who
wanted to change their place of work, selling trafficked victims to
employers, or charging workers for work registration services.
Brokers and employers could further increase their control over
workers by withholding their identity documents so that workers
could not change employers (thereby limiting their freedom of
movement). Some migrants had to pay fees before their journey to
Thailand and worked to pay off their recruitment and transportation
fees after beginning to earn income.

Selling of victims by family members went virtually unreported in
Thailand.

As a source country, CWD reported that most Thai trafficking victims
were lured by traffickers who were friends, relatives or employment
agents and who promised legitimate work. Most Thai victims
trafficked abroad used air transport and fraudulent documents.

II. SETTING THE SCENE FOR THE GOVERNMENT'S ANTI-TIP EFFORTS:

-- A. DOES THE GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT TRAFFICKING IS A PROBLEM
IN THE COUNTRY? IF NOT, WHY NOT?

The Thai government acknowledges human trafficking is a serious
problem in Thailand and has made substantial efforts to address it.
In 1997, the government passed the Measures in Prevention and
Suppression of Trafficking in Women and Children Act which aims to
protect women and children from sexual exploitation. In June 2008,
the new Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act came into force and replaced
the 1997 Act. The new law criminally prohibits all forms of TIP,
including forced child labor, other forms of forced labor, and the
trafficking of males (ref A). The law provides the basis for an
improved anti-TIP architecture within the Royal Thai Government
(RTG) and new tools to combat trafficking. The law provides for
assistance to women, children and men who have become victims of
trafficking through activities related to prostitution, pornography,
sexual abuse, forced labor and forced organ trade. It intensifies
punishment against traffickers, shields victims from prosecution,
provides victims with legal rehabilitation, and provides for the
concealment of their identities and those of their families.

Since the 2008 law came into force, the Royal Thai Government (RTG)
has taken substantial steps to implement it (ref. D). The RTG
identified $1.7 million to endow a new anti-TIP fund available to
government and non-governmental organizations. The RTG is
establishing exclusively for male TIP victims four new shelters, one
of which is already in use. With the help of members of civil
society, relevant RTG ministries published guidelines to improve the
victim identification process as well as TIP operations specifically
targeting labor trafficking cases. Thai law enforcement and
civilian officials trained thousands of individuals on the new TIP
law, including police officers, immigration officers, prosecutors,
social workers, and members of civil society.

The Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSHDS)
created a Coordinating and Monitoring of Anti-Trafficking in Persons
Committee (CMP) sub-committee to develop subordinate regulations to
the new TIP Law, essential to its effective implementation. The
sub-committee consists of government officials from relevant
agencies, academics, and representatives from civil society. The
six implementing regulations developed thus far aim to:
-- establish rules regarding the protection and use of documents or
information related to TIP offenses,

BANGKOK 00000499 006.4 OF 032


-- establish norms on the registration of non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and the assistance they provide during anti-TIP
operations,
-- establish, and manage the operation of, an Anti-Trafficking in
Persons Fund to finance anti-TIP programs of the RTG, provincial
governments, police, NGOs, and others.
-- improve the provision of temporary protection for trafficking
victims,
-- establish rules governing TIP victim assistance, repatriation,
and compensation, and
-- define "competent official" to determine which official has
authority to perform certain duties under the law.

According to MSDHS, in September 2005, the RTG allocated 100 million
baht (USD 2.85 million) to government activities to combat human
trafficking. From September 2005 to January 2009, 53.68 million
baht (USD 1.54 million) had been disbursed. Of the 53.68 million
baht, 47.76 million baht (89 percent) was used for 21 investigation
and interrogation activities, 60 trainings, and 8 awareness raising
campaigns. Another 5.03 million baht was provided to trafficking
victims and 0.8 million baht was used for the rescue and
repatriation of trafficking victims abroad. In 2008, 3.11 million
baht (88,857 USD) was used for both investigation and interrogation
activities (2 million baht) and for distribution to 124 trafficked
victims (1.1 million baht).

-- B. WHICH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE INVOLVED IN ANTI-TRAFFICKING
EFFORTS AND WHICH AGENCY, IF ANY, HAS THE LEAD?

The new TIP law stipulated the RTG must establish an
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Committee (ATP) chaired by the Prime
Minister and a Coordinating and Monitoring of Anti-Trafficking in
Persons Committee (CMP) chaired by a Deputy Prime Minister.
According to MSDHS, the RTG has set-up the two committees but, due
to Thailand's political turmoil in 2008, the committees' first
meetings were delayed. The first meeting of the ATP took place on
February 23, 2009.

The government agency responsible for coordinating the RTG's
anti-TIP work is the Ministry of Social Development and Human
Security (MSDHS). Other RTG entities involved include the Ministry
of Labor (MOL),the Ministry of Tourism and Sports, the Ministry of
Interior, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Justice,
the Ministry of Education, the Bureau of University Affairs, the
Ministry of Public Health, the Ministry of Industry, the Ministry of
Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives, the Attorney General's
office, the Royal Thai Police (RTP),the Department of Special
Investigation (DSI),the Office of the National Human Rights
Commission, and the Office of the Prime Minister.

Different agencies take the lead on different aspects of anti-TIP
work, depending on the nature of the activities involved. With
regard to investigation and prosecution, the Children and Women
Protection Division (CWD) of the Royal Thai Police (RTP) was
established in July 2005 as a specialized division for investigating
crimes involving children, juveniles, women, and laborers.
According to the MFA, in 2008, the Transnational Crime Coordination
Center (TCCC) was set up in the Royal Thai Police to be a
specialized unit responsible for collecting and analyzing
information, strategic planning, and coordinating work on eleven
types of transnational crimes (including human trafficking). The
Department of Special Investigations (DSI) also designated five
officers to work specifically on human trafficking. Likewise, the
Immigration Police Office designated officers in each province to
work with the MOL's Department of Employment to identify potential
victims and to provide them assistance with the support from MSDHS.

MSDHS' National Operation Center on Prevention and Suppression of
Human Trafficking (NOCHT) is a focal point to coordinate prevention
and suppression of TIP with relevant RTG agencies. This office, led
by the Deputy Permanent Secretary of MSDHS, is also assigned to be
the secretariat of the two national-level TIP committees (ATP and
CMP). At the provincial level, 75 Provincial Operation Centers on

BANGKOK 00000499 007.4 OF 032


Prevention and Suppression of Human Trafficking (POCHT) have been
formed, reporting to a central coordinating committee. MSDHS'
Bureau of Anti-Trafficking in Woman and Children (BATWC) is
responsible for providing general assistance, shelter, and
protection to victims of human trafficking. MSDHS is also
responsible for training the RTG's multi-disciplinary teams as well
as awareness raising campaigns nationwide to prevent human
trafficking.

-- C. WHAT ARE THE LIMITATIONS ON THE GOVERNMENT'S ABILITY TO
ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM IN PRACTICE? FOR EXAMPLE, IS FUNDING FOR
POLICE OR OTHER INSTITUTIONS INADEQUATE? IS OVERALL CORRUPTION A
PROBLEM? DOES THE GOVERNMENT LACK THE RESOURCES TO AID VICTIMS?

Thailand is a migration hub in Southeast Asia with a relatively
prosperous economy that attracts migrants from neighboring countries
who flee conditions of poverty and, in the case of Burma, political
and military repression as well. TIP-related transnational
organized crime has been facilitated by modern communications
technology and transportation links, allowing traffickers to take
advantage of income inequalities within Thailand and between
countries.

In Thailand, there were additional factors contributing to human
trafficking, including a lack of educational opportunities and
occupational training for migrants, budgetary shortfalls affecting
the provision of social services, strong demand for sexual services
in the tourism and entertainment sectors, and an increasing supply
of migrant laborers. In some sectors, especially domestic services
and fishing or fisheries related industries, employers relied on
migrant workers (registered or otherwise) to fill jobs in which Thai
citizens have shown little interest.

Police operations were limited by poorly centralized data collection
capabilities, limited funds, and a lack of continuity of
investigations due to frequent personnel rotations and turnover.
Similarly, prosecutors' offices are understaffed and lack sufficient
resources to effectively see cases through to conclusion. Resources
for protection, both financial and human, within the Ministry of
Labor were also limited. Observers reported that cooperation
between the police and prosecutors to effectively bring TIP cases to
successful prosecution is an area requiring improvement.

-- D. TO WHAT EXTENT DOES THE GOVERNMENT SYSTEMATICALLY MONITOR ITS
ANTI-TRAFFICKING EFFORTS (ON ALL FRONTS -- PROSECUTION, VICTIM
PROTECTION, AND PREVENTION) AND PERIODICALLY MAKE AVAILABLE,
PUBLICLY OR PRIVATELY AND DIRECTLY OR THROUGH REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS, ITS ASSESSMENTS OF THESE ANTI-TRAFFICKING EFFORTS?

According to section 16(5) of the 2008 Anti-Trafficking in Persons
Act, the ATP must direct and supervise the arrangement of study or
research projects and the development of an integrated database
system to benefit the prevention and suppression of trafficking in
persons. Section 40 of the Act stipulates that MSDHS shall prepare
an annual report regarding Thailand's TIP situation, including
guidelines for future activities.

Since 2007, the Thai government has increased its efforts to report
regularly on its anti-trafficking efforts in publications,
international forums and seminars. A website,
www.humantrafficking.go.th/en_index.php, is run by MHDHS and
includes news on government and NGOs activities as well as media
report on human trafficking. The Centre Against International Human
Trafficking in the Office of Attorney General (OAG) has been, since
mid-2008, developing a system to monitor the prosecution of human
trafficking cases on which it works. The system, however, is not
yet operational.

The RTG participated in research and monitoring programs run by
organizations such as the United Nations Inter-Agency Project on
Human Trafficking (UNIAP),the International Labor Organization's
International Program to Eliminate Child Labor (ILO-IPEC),the
International Organization for Migration (IOM),and the UN Office on

BANGKOK 00000499 008.4 OF 032


Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

III. INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKERS:

-- A. EXISTING LAWS AGAINST TIP: DOES THE COUNTRY HAVE A LAW OR LAWS
SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS -- BOTH FOR SEXUAL
EXPLOITATION AND LABOR? IF SO, PLEASE SPECIFICALLY CITE THE NAME OF
THE LAW(S) AND ITS DATE OF ENACTMENT AND PROVIDE THE EXACT LANGUAGE
[ACTUAL COPIES PREFERABLE] OF THE TIP PROVISIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE A
FULL INVENTORY OF TRAFFICKING LAWS, INCLUDING NON-CRIMINAL STATUTES
THAT ALLOW FOR CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ALLEGED TRAFFICKING CRIMES
(E.G., CIVIL FORFEITURE LAWS AND LAWS AGAINST ILLEGAL DEBT). DOES
THE LAW(S) COVER BOTH INTERNAL AND TRANSNATIONAL FORMS OF
TRAFFICKING? IF NOT, UNDER WHAT OTHER LAWS CAN TRAFFICKERS BE
PROSECUTED? FOR EXAMPLE, ARE THERE LAWS AGAINST SLAVERY OR THE
EXPLOITATION OF PROSTITUTION BY MEANS OF FORCE, FRAUD, OR COERCION?
ARE THESE OTHER LAWS BEING USED IN TRAFFICKING CASES?

Thailand passed a comprehensive new anti-TIP law in 2007 that came
into force on June 5, 2008 (ref D). Thailand's full complement of
laws regarding TIP follows:

Prevention and Suppression of Trafficking Act (2008)
--------------
-- This comprehensive anti-trafficking law replaced the 1997
Prevention and Suppression of Woman and Children Trafficking Law.
The new law allows for men to be classified as TIP victims (and
entitled to relevant legal protections) as well as women and
children, and covers both internal and external (transnational)
forms of TIP.

-- The forms of trafficking covered by the new law extend to
slavery, forced begging, forced labor and trade in organs, in
addition to those categories previously covered by the 1997 law such
as sexual exploitation, pornography production and distribution, and
other forms of sexual exploitation.

-- Other elements of the law include the imposition of heavier
penalties for all offenders involved in human trafficking; the
ability of victims to claim compensation from the offender for any
damages caused by human trafficking; measures to protect victims and
witnesses during court trials against traffickers; the provision of
shelter and other necessities for TIP victims, including physical,
psycho-social, legal, educational, and health care assistance; and
protection for victims and their immediate families within and
outside the country to ensure their security and well being.

-- The Act stipulates that a fund for protection and suppression of
human trafficking shall be established to (a) provide assistance and
welfare protection to trafficked victims, (b) support suppression
and prevention of human trafficking, and (c) assist trafficked
victims to return to their place of residence. The fund shall draw
upon annual budgetary support from the government, funding from
intergovernmental and international organizations, donations from
the private sector and confiscated assets of trafficking offenders.

Criminal Code (1956)
--------------
-- Defines punishment for a person who procures, lures, detains,
traffics, distributes, or transports aQan or woman for an indecent
sexual purpose, with or without his or her consent. It also defines
punishment for a pimp, a trafficker for labor exploitation, and
human smuggler.

Immigration Act (1979)
--------------
--Provides that foreigners who do not enter into Thailand through an
immigration checkpoint with a valid passport and visa (in cases in
which a visa is required) or other legal documents are considered
illegal immigrants. Personnel at immigration checkpoints can
prohibit any person from entering Thailand if it is suspected that
he/she is involved in prostitution, the trading of women, children,
drug smuggling, or other types of smuggling.

BANGKOK 00000499 009.4 OF 032



Prevention and Suppression of Prostitution Act (1996)
--------------
-- Prohibits all forms of prostitution and provides specific
penalties for cases involving children under the age of 18. Fines
and terms of imprisonment under the Act are based on the age of the
child involved, with more severe terms established for prostitution
involving younger children. Penalties are imposed for those
involved in child prostitution including customers, procurers,
brothel owners, and those who force children into prostitution,
including parents.

Criminal Code Amendment (no.14) (1997)
--------------
-- Imposes strong penalties on persons who sexually exploit women
and children (both boys and girls) under 18 years old. It also
penalizes violators who sell children to be beggars or to
establishments which employ labor in a "cruel or hazardous fashion."
It defines punishments for pimping, trafficking for labor
exploitation, and human smuggling. The law, however, does not cover
adult males.

Labor Protection Act (1998)
--------------
-- Protects child employees (under 18 years old) against the worst
forms of child labor by imposing penalties on those hire children
under 15 years old and those who employed children between 15-18
years old in hazardous work or without appropriate rest periods. In
addition, the law also imposes penalties on employers of child labor
who fail to notify labor inspectors regarding their employment of
young workers.

Money Laundering Control Act (1999)
--------------
-- Provides for the seizure of assets of persons who exploit
children in the (illegal) commercial sex and narcotics industries.
The Act also defines "predicate offense" to include any activities
relating to (i) procuring, seducing or transporting for an indecent
act a woman or child for sexual gratification of others; (ii)
transporting a child and a minor; (iii) seducing or transporting
such persons for prostitution, an offense while acting as an owner,
supervisor or manager of a prostitution business or establishment or
being a controller of prostitutes in a prostitution establishment.

Criminal Procedure Amendment Act (No. 20) (1999)
--------------
-- Revises the Criminal Procedure Code to protect children from
traumatic stress resulting from interviews, inquiries and the court
trial process. In its revised form, the law requires that there be
a social worker, a psychologist, an attorney, or a person requested
by the child during investigation and trial. Further, videotape
recording shall be used to take the statement of the child victim or
witness in order to prevent the child from repeated traumatic
interviews. It also allows a child to give testimony before the
offender or his peers have a chance to contact the child or the
child's family for the purpose of bribery or intimidation.

The Compulsory Education Act (2002)
--------------
-- States that education is compulsory for nine years (from grade
one until grade nine or from seven years old to sixteen years old).
Parents who neglect to send their children to school shall be
subjected to a fine of 1,000 baht (USD 29).

Child Protection Act (2003)
--------------
-- Provides for the prohibition and elimination of exploitation of
children in slave-like or bonded conditions, illicit activities,
hazardous and arduous work, prostitution, pornography, or other
similar activities. The Act defines the "child" as a person below
18 years of age, and makes him/her eligible to receive child
protection and welfare assistance. This definition also applies to
children with no legal status in Thai territory. The Act mandates

BANGKOK 00000499 010.4 OF 032


the establishment of a National Child Protection Committee, along
with the Bangkok Metropolitan and other Provincial Protection
Committees, to recommend policies, plans, budgets, measures, to
issue regulations and appoint sub-committees or working groups, and
to promote the social welfare, safety, and protection of children.

The Witness Protection Act (2003)
--------------
-- Provides support to child and adolescent victims who are to be a
witness or an informant in a trafficking or organized crime case.

Criminal Code Amendment Act no.19 (2007)
--------------
-- Extends the coverage of sexual exploitation to both boys and
girls.

The Protection of Victims of Violence in the Family Act (2007)
--------------
-- States that any member of a family, especially children and
women, are protected against all forms of abuse and exploitation.

The Promotion of Child and Youth Development Act (2007)
--------------
--Promotes programs and activities for children and youth to empower
and prevent them from becoming victims of all forms of
exploitation.

The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (2007)
--------------
-- Section 52 provides that children (as well as youth, women, and
members of families) shall have the right to be protected by the
State against violence and unfair treatment and shall also have the
right to receive rehabilitation in the event of such circumstances.
-- Section 84(7) of the Constitution states that the government
should pursue economic policies that protect child and female
laborers.

The Amendment of the Alien Employment Act (2008)
--------------
-- Systematizes workforce participation of migrant workers by
prohibiting an employer from hiring migrant workers who do not have
licenses to work with the employer. An employer who violates this
law shall be subject to a fine of 10,000-100,000 baht (285-2,857
USD) per migrant worker. The Act also states that migrants along
border areas who have travel documents under the Immigration Act
shall be allowed to temporarily work in the area around the border.
In addition, to ensure the safe repatriation of migrant workers, the
Act requires that an employer must make deductions from a migrant
worker's salary to contribute to a repatriation fund. The Act also
calls for an Alien Employment Committee to be set up in order to
develop policies regarding alien employment and monitor the
implementation progress of these policies.

-- B. PUNISHMENT OF SEX TRAFFICKING OFFENSES: WHAT ARE THE
PRESCRIBED AND IMPOSED PENALTIES FOR TRAFFICKING PEOPLE FOR SEXUAL
EXPLOITATION?

The Anti-TIP Act prescribes punishment for labor recruiters, labor
agents and employers if they commit TIP offenses in accordance with
three general elements of TIP, namely: actions, means and purposes
as provided in Section 6 of the Act.

For a trafficker who is an individual person:
- If a trafficking offense is committed against an adult, penalties
are 4-10 years imprisonment and a fine of 80,000 to 200,000 baht
(2,285-5,714 USD).
- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child between 15
to 18 years old, penalties are 6-12 years imprisonment and a fine of
120,000 to 240,000 baht (3,429-6,857 USD).
- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child below 15
years old, penalties are 8-15 years imprisonment and a fine of
160,000 to 300,000 baht (4,571 - 8,571 USD).


BANGKOK 00000499 011.4 OF 032


For a trafficker who/which is incorporated as a business
- a trafficker who/which is incorporated as a business shall be
liable to a fine of 200,000 to 1,000,000 baht (5,714-28,571 USD)
(NOTE: this provision is intended to be in addition to the penalty
on individuals above, not instead of it.
- if an incorporated person/entity commits an offense due to an
order or act of a person (e.g., the entity's Director),or through
this person's negligence, the Director shall be subjected to
penalties between 6-12 years and fine of 120,000-240,000 baht
(3,429-6,857 USD).

Criminal Code Amendment no.14 (1997) makes a distinction between
"voluntary" victims and "involuntary" victims (a "voluntary" victim
is defined as someone who entered his/her situation voluntarily,
despite the illegal exploitation he/she may have endured).

If the victims are voluntary, the Criminal Code prescribes penalties
for human trafficking for sexual exploitation as follows:
-- if victims are over 18 years old, 1-10 years imprisonment and
fines of 2,000-20,000 Baht (57-571 USD);
-- if victims are between 15 and 18 years old, 3-15 years
imprisonment and fines of 6,000-30,000 Baht (171-857 USD);
-- if victims are under 15 years old, 5-20 years imprisonment and
fines of 10,000-40,000 Baht (286-1,143 USD).

If the victims are involuntary, the Criminal Code prescribes
penalties for trafficking people for sexual exploitation as
follows:
-- if victims are over 18 years old, 5-20 years imprisonment and
fines of 10,000-40,000 Baht (286-1,143 USD);
-- if victims are between 15 and 18 years old, 7-20 years
imprisonment and fines of 14,000-40,000 Baht (400-1,143 USD),or
life imprisonment
-- if victims are under 15 years old, 10-20 years imprisonment and
fines of 20,000-40,000 Baht (571-1,143 USD),or life imprisonment.

-- C. PUNISHMENT OF LABOR TRAFFICKING OFFENSES: WHAT ARE THE
PRESCRIBED AND IMPOSED PENALTIES FOR TRAFFICKING FOR LABOR
EXPLOITATION, SUCH AS FORCED OR BONDED LABOR? IF YOUR COUNTRY IS A
SOURCE COUNTRY FOR LABOR MIGRANTS, DO THE GOVERNMENT'S LAWS PROVIDE
FOR CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT -- I.E. JAIL TIME -- FOR LABOR RECRUITERS
WHO ENGAGE IN RECRUITMENT OF WORKERS USING KNOWINGLY FRAUDULENT OR
DECEPTIVE OFFERS WITH THE PURPOSE OF SUBJECTING WORKERS TO
TRAFFICKING IN THE DESTINATION COUNTRY? IF YOUR COUNTRY IS A
DESTINATION FOR LABOR MIGRANTS, ARE THERE LAWS PUNISHING EMPLOYERS
OR LABOR AGENTS WHO CONFISCATE WORKERS' PASSPORTS OR TRAVEL
DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRAFFICKING, SWITCH CONTRACTS WITHOUT
THE WORKER'S CONSENT AS A MEANS TO KEEP THE WORKER IN A STATE OF
SERVICE, OR WITHHOLD PAYMENT OF SALARIES AS MEANS OF KEEPING THE
WORKER IN A STATE OF SERVICE?

Various Thai laws impose penalties for different aspects of labor
trafficking offenses:

Anti-Human Trafficking Act (2008)
--------------
The Anti-TIP Act prescribes punishment for labor recruiters, labor
agents and employers if they commit TIP offenses in accordance with
three general elements of TIP, namely: actions, means and purposes
as provided in Section 6 of the Act.

For a trafficker who is an individual person:
- If a trafficking offense is committed against an adult, penalties
are 4-10 years imprisonment and a fine of 80,000 to 200,000 baht
(2,286-5,714 USD).
- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child between 15
to 18 years old, penalties are 6-12 years imprisonment and a fine of
120,000 to 240,000 baht (3,429-6,857 USD).
- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child below 15
years old, penalties are 8-15 years imprisonment and a fine of
160,000 to 300,000 baht (4,571 - 8,571 USD).

For a trafficker who/which is incorporated as a business

BANGKOK 00000499 012.2 OF 032


- a trafficker who/which is incorporated as a business shall be
liable to a fine of 200,000 to 1,000,000 baht (5,714-28,571 USD)
(NOTE: this provision is intended to be in addition to the penalty
on individuals above, not instead of it.
- if an incorporated person/entity commits an offense due to an
order or act of a person (e.g., the entity's Director),or through
this person's negligence, the Director shall be subjected to
penalties between 6-12 years and fine of 120,000-240,000 baht
(3,428-6,857 USD).

Labor Employment Act
--------------
- If an individual lures a victim into work in Thailand (i.e.,
domestically, without crossing borders),the penalties are up to 3
years imprisonment or fines not exceeding 60,000 baht (1,714 USD) or
both.
-If an individual without a license lures a person to work abroad,
the penalties are 3-10 years imprisonment and fines 60,000- 200,000
baht (1,714-5,714 USD).
- If an individual lures a person to work or to be trained abroad
through fraud, the penalties are 3-10 years imprisonment and fines
60,000-200,000 baht (1,714-5,714 USD).

Labor Protection Act
--------------
- Employment of a child below the age of 15 carries a penalty of up
to 1 year imprisonment or fines up to 200,000 baht (USD 5,714) or
both.
- Failure to provide rest periods or forcing a child worker to
perform prohibited tasks results in a 6-month imprisonment or a fine
not exceeding 100,000 (USD 2,857) baht or both.
- Forcing a child to work during prohibited hours carries a penalty
of up to 1 year imprisonment or a fine of up to 200,000 baht (USD
5,714) or both.
- Forcing an adult to work more than 36 hours per week are subjected
to a penalty of not exceeding 6 months imprisonment or fines not
exceeding 100,000 baht (USD 2,857) or both.
- Forcing an adult to work continuously more than 5 hours per day
without at least 1 hour break shall be subjected to fines of not
exceeding 20,000 baht (571 USD).


The Criminal Code Act
--------------
The Criminal Code prescribes criminal penalties for a person who
detains, confines, lures, procures, traffics, or forces an
individual into slave-like situations as follows:

--Section 312:
- if victims are is an adult, an offender will be subjected to the
imprisonment not exceeding 7 years and fines not exceeding 14,000
baht (400 USD);

--Section 312(2):
- if victims are under 15 years old, an offender will be subjected
to 3-10 years imprisonment and fines not exceeding 20,000 baht (571
USD);
-if victims are abused physically or mentally, an offender will be
subjected to 5-15 years imprisonment and fines not exceeding 30,000
baht (857 USD);
-if victims are seriously injured, an offender will be subjected to
Life-time imprisonment or between 7-20 years imprisonment;
-if victims die, an offender will be subject to the death penalty or
life-time imprisonment or between 15-20 years imprisonment.

--Section 312(3):
-A person who receives, distributes, procures, lures or transports a
person 15-18 years old, shall be subjected to not exceeding 5 years
imprisonment or fines of not exceeding 10,000 baht (285 USD) or
both.
- A person who receives, distributes, procures, lures or transports
a person under 15 years old, shall be subjected to not exceeding 7
years imprisonment or fines of not exceeding 14,000 baht (400 USD)

BANGKOK 00000499 013.2 OF 032


or both.

-- D. WHAT ARE THE PRESCRIBED PENALTIES FOR RAPE OR FORCIBLE SEXUAL
ASSAULT?

In 2008, the RTG imposed stronger penalties on those who commit rape
or forcible sexual assault through the amended criminal code as
follows:

Criminal Code Amendment (no.19) (2008)
--------------
--Section 276 (amendment no.19, 2008):
-In the case of forced rape or forcible sexual exploitation, between
4-20 years imprisonment or fines between 8,000-40,000 baht
(229-1,143 USD). If an offender uses a weapon or is involved in a
group rape, between 15-20 years imprisonment and fines between
30,000-40,000 baht (857-1,143 USD),or life imprisonment.

--Section 277 (amendment no.19, 2008):
In the case of sexual exploitation:
-If the victims are under 13 years old, penalties are 7-20 years
imprisonment, and fines between 14,000-40,000 Baht (400-1,143 USD)
or life imprisonment.
-If the victims are under 15 years old, penalties are 4-20 years
imprisonment, and fines between 8,000-40,000 Baht (228-1,143 USD).
-If an offender uses a weapon or is involved in a group rape, life
imprisonment.

--If an offender who commits a crime under section 276 and 277 and
causes a victim to be seriously injured, the offender shall be
subjected to 15-20 years imprisonment and fines between
30,000-40,000 baht (857-1,143 USD) or life imprisonment.

--If an offender commits a crime under section 276 and 277 and
causes a victim to die, the offender shall be subjected to the death
penalty or life imprisonment.

--If an offender commits a crime under section 276 and 277 and uses
a weapon or is involved in a group rape that causes a victim to be
seriously injured, the offender shall be subjected to the death
penalty or life imprisonment.

--If an offender commits a crime under section 276 and 277 and uses
a weapon or is involved in a group rape that causes a victim to die,
the offender shall be subjected to the death penalty.

Prevention and Suppression of Prostitution Act (1996)
-------------- -
If a person detains, confines, threatens, forces, tortures or rapes
others into prostitution, the penalties are 10-20 years imprisonment
and fines of 200,000-400,000 baht (5,714-11,429 USD). The law also
provides for offenders to receive a life sentence if responsible for
serious injury to prostitutes and the death penalty if prostitutes
are killed. The law also punishes those who assist an offender who
harms a prostitute.

-- E. LAW ENFORCEMENT STATISTICS: DID THE GOVERNMENT PROSECUTE ANY
CASES AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING OFFENDERS DURING THE REPORTING
PERIOD? IF SO, PROVIDE NUMBERS OF INVESTIGATIONS, PROSECUTIONS,
CONVICTIONS, AND SENTENCES IMPOSED, INCLUDING DETAILS ON PLEA
BARGAINS AND FINES, IF RELEVANT AND AVAILABLE. PLEASE NOTE THE
NUMBER OF CONVICTED TRAFFICKERS WHO RECEIVED SUSPENDED SENTENCES AND
THE NUMBER WHO RECEIVED ONLY A FINE AS PUNISHMENT. PLEASE INDICATE
WHICH LAWS WERE USED TO INVESTIGATE, PROSECUTE, CONVICT, AND
SENTENCE TRAFFICKERS. ALSO, IF POSSIBLE, PLEASE DISAGGREGATE
NUMBERS OF CASES BY TYPE OF TIP (LABOR VS. COMMERCIAL SEXUAL
EXPLOITATION) AND VICTIMS (CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE VS.
ADULTS). IF IN A LABOR SOURCE COUNTRY, DID THE GOVERNMENT
CRIMINALLY PROSECUTE LABOR RECRUITERS WHO RECRUIT WORKERS USING
KNOWINGLY FRAUDULENT OR DECEPTIVE OFFERS OR BY IMPOSING FEES OR
COMMISSIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBJECTING THE WORKER TO DEBT
BONDAGE? DID THE GOVERNMENT IN A LABOR DESTINATION COUNTRY
CRIMINALLY PROSECUTE EMPLOYERS OR LABOR AGENTS WHO CONFISCATE

BANGKOK 00000499 014.2 OF 032


WORKERS' PASSPORTS/TRAVEL DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRAFFICKING,
SWITCH CONTRACTS OR TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT THE WORKER'S CONSENT
TO KEEP WORKERS IN A STATE OF SERVICE, USE PHYSICAL OR SEXUAL ABUSE
OR THE THREAT OF SUCH ABUSE TO KEEP WORKERS IN A STATE OF SERVICE,
OR WITHHOLD PAYMENT OF SALARIES AS A MEANS TO KEEP WORKERS IN A
STATE OF SERVICE? WHAT WERE THE ACTUAL PUNISHMENTS IMPOSED ON
PERSONS CONVICTED OF THESE OFFENSES? ARE THE TRAFFICKERS SERVING
THE TIME SENTENCED? IF NOT, WHY NOT?

The Thai Royal Police's Children and Women Protection Division (CWD)
reported that CWD alone (not including other police divisions)
investigated 54 offenders of human trafficking cases, involving 82
TIP victims. Out of the 54 offenders, 34, 12 and 8 were charged for
forced prostitution, procurement for the purpose of prostitution,
and forced child labor respectively. Statistics by type of crime and
nationality (when available) are as follows:

Number of TIP investigations by CWD (Jan-Dec 2008)
(Unit: Number of Persons)
Number of offenders Number of victims
-------------- --------------
Forced prostitution 34 19
(33 Thai,1 Lao) (17 Thai,2 Lao)

Procuring for prostitution 12 29

Forced child labor 8 34
(3 Thai, 5 Burm.)(2 Thai, 28 Burmese, 4 Lao)

Total 54 82
(36 Thai, 1 Lao, 5 Burm.) (19 Thai, 6 Lao, 28 Burm.)
(Source: Children and Women Protection Division (CWD))

Instances of major TIP cases prosecuted (both open and complete) in
2008, as well as details of other well-known cases with new
information during 2008, follow:

On March 10, 2008, the immigration police, NGOs and social workers
conducted a raid in a shrimp peeling factory, "Anoma." Out of 316
workers, 73 were identified as victims of trafficking. On September
18, 2008, the Ministry of Labor's Department of Labor Protection and
Welfare (DLPW) ordered the employers to provide compensation to
victims for unpaid wages, over time and holiday payments within 30
days. When the factory owner failed to comply, DLPW prepared civil
charges to bring before the courts. The police filed criminal
charges against six offenders (the factory owner and her brother, as
well as four Burmese labor brokers) with the Office of the Attorney
General on August 19, 2008. A preliminary hearing was conducted on
October 13, 2008. The defendants and victims provided statements to
the court in February 2009. The offenders are charged with forcing
people into a slave-like situation; procuring, transporting and
detaining a person; and assisting the smuggling of migrants into
Thailand illegally (under the Criminal Code Act, Immigration Act,
Alien Employment Act, Labor Protection Act, and the Prevention and
Suppression of Trafficking in Women and Children Act).

Chamroen Intrasombat, 41 years old from Udonthani, was arrested in
April 2008 for allegedly kidnapping a 10 year-old boy to sell
handicraft products to train passengers. The boy said he went with
Mr. Chamroen because he promised to buy him a toy gun. Mr. Chamroen,
who had been prosecuted three times on abduction charges, had been
released from jail in February 2007 after serving 4 years and 4
months for kidnapping children.

In June 2008, a criminal court sentenced a 63 year-old woman, Ms.
Jomsri Srisam-aung, to 14 years in prison for trafficking two young
women (in their 20s and 30s) to Italy for prostitution. The two
women were lured from their home town in northeast Thailand with the
promise of work in Ms. Jomsri's daughter's restaurant in Italy.
However, when they arrived in Italy, they were told no jobs existed
and they were forced to work as prostitutes. The women were later
rescued by Italian police and sent home in 2006.


BANGKOK 00000499 015.2 OF 032


On June 26, 2008, a female Thai labor broker, Ms. Luck Petchumpol,
was sentenced by the Bangkok Criminal Court to 94 years and 90
months imprisonment under the Thai Penal Code and the Prevention and
Suppression of Prostitution Act. The maximum imprisonment was later
reduced to 50 years imprisonment. Ms. Petchumpol was charged with
taking minors (ages eleven and fourteen) away from their parents
without permission for the purpose of sexual exploitation. An
American citizen, to whom the children were provided, was also
sentenced to 16 years for offenses related to sexual intercourse and
indecent acts with children, but was released on bond pending
appeal.

The Children and Women Protection Division (CWD) arrested a Burmese
woman on July 14, 2008 on charges of child exploitation and human
trafficking. The victim, a 16 year-old Burmese girl, was forced to
sell flowers at night in Bangkok since she was 10 years old. The
victim reported being beaten if she did not earn enough money.

On July 30 2008, a task force composed of police, social welfare
officers, and an NGO official rescued 10 girls and women from the
"Ice Karaoke" bar in Payao province. The team identified 6 victims
of trafficking among them, from 14-18 years old (one 14, one 15,
three 17, and one 18 years old). The victims remain in a government
welfare shelter. Criminal proceedings are underway against two
individuals, the owner of the establishment and an individual
charged with procuring for purposes of prostitution. Prosecutors
are also seeking damages in the amount of 100,000 baht (2,857 USD)
per victim.

On September 14, 2006, police raided the "Ranya Paew" shrimp
processing factory in Samut Sakhon after being tipped off by local
labor activists. Police identified 66 victims of trafficking in the
factory. Victims (mostly Burmese) lived in squalid conditions where
they were forced to work, beaten, and unable to leave. After being
rescued, all 66 victims (63 female and 3 male) were sent to MSDHS
shelters. Out of 66 victims, 4 were family members who were allowed
to live together in one of the shelters. In October 2008, a Thai
labor court awarded 3,600,000 Baht (USD 102,857) in compensation to
the 66 victims and the RTG helped pay the plaintiffs' attorney fees.
The police interviewed 66 victims between December 2006-March 2008
and other witnesses before filing with prosecutors, in July 2008,
criminal charges against three factory owners for (1) detaining or
confining workers (2) putting workers into slavery situations, (3)
receiving, distributing, procuring, or luring workers, and (4)
conspiring with more than 2 people to commit crimes against women
and children. The public prosecutor requested that the court allow
for pre-trial witness statements from 23 victims, while 43 victims
were sent back to Burma on October 16, 2008. To repatriate these 43
victims, the RTG coordinated with the Burmese government. The
repatriated victims were reportedly sent to the Mao Lum Yai shelter
in Burma where they stayed for 11 days before returning to their
homes. The 23 victims who volunteered to provide pre-trial
statements were repatriated on December 3, 2008 through a process
that involved NGOs and international organizations.

A fleet of six fishing vessels (called "Prapha Navee") returned to a
Thai port in July 2006, and reported 39 deaths among their
crewmembers of over 100. Survivors testified that the cause of
death was starvation and malnutrition due to the failure of the
fleet captains to provide food, and that the bodies of the 39
deceased were thrown overboard. In September 2008, a Labor Court
ordered 38 surviving crew members receive 3.8 million baht (108,571
USD) in back wages; the decision is under appeal. Meanwhile, new
police investigators have reportedly taken over the case as the
original criminal investigation stalled. To date, no arrests have
been made.

Christopher Paul Neil, a Canadian who was serving 3 years and 3
months in prison for sexually abusing a 13-year-old boy, was
sentenced November 14, 2008 to 9 years in prison on 3 additional
charges of abusing a 9 year-old-boy. The court ordered Neil to pay
50,000 baht (1,429 USD) compensation to the boy's family.


BANGKOK 00000499 016.2 OF 032


-- F. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE ANY SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN HOW TO RECOGNIZE, INVESTIGATE, AND PROSECUTE
INSTANCES OF TRAFFICKING? SPECIFY WHETHER NGOS, INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS, AND/OR THE USG PROVIDE SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR HOST
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.

In 2008, the RTG developed "Guidelines on Trafficked Victim
Identification" for use by police officers, immigration officers,
social workers and members of civil society to better identify
potential trafficking victims under Thailand's new TIP law. The
guidelines, in the form of a questionnaire to be used while
interviewing a potential victim during or after an anti-TIP
operation, provide a framework for interviewing officials to have a
clearer understanding of what defines a TIP victim. The guidelines
state that a person can be a victim of trafficking even if he/she
originally participated voluntarily in the activity in question and
regardless of one's immigration or worker registration status. They
also explain that debt bondage is considered a type of human
trafficking, and instruct that various types of supporting evidence
should be considered when identifying trafficking victims (i.e.,
evidence of physical abuse or psychological trauma, etc).

In addition, the Ministry of Labor (MOL),working with other
concerned ministries, developed "Operational Guidelines for Labor
Trafficking," formally agreed upon in April 2008. The guidelines
were established to improve coordination among members of
multi-disciplinary teams, consisting of both government and
non-government officials, during labor trafficking operations (i.e.,
rescue and protection). MOL contacts report that trainings on these
guidelines are being planned for officials within the ministry.

In light of the 2008 Anti-TIP laws and Guidelines on Trafficked
Victim Identification, the RTG conducted the following
anti-trafficking workshops and training sessions in 2008:

-- The Royal Thai Police and MSDHS co-conducted numerous one-day
trainings for police officers that focused on the Anti-TIP law and
victim identification process. MSDHS reported that 2,500 police
received training in FY 2008 and that an additional 2,500 would be
reached in FY 2009.

-- The Office of Welfare Promotion, Protection, and Empowerment of
Vulnerable Groups (OPP) under the Ministry of Social Development and
Human Security (MSDHS) organized two "National Trainings on Human
Trafficking" for approximately 80 frontline officers (members of
multidisciplinary teams, both governmental and civil society
members) in September 2008, to provide a better understanding on the
new anti-TIP law and related procedures. These trainings, part of
which Embassy officials attended, spanned three to five days with
the goal of developing lasting relationships among attendees to
improve their coordination efforts. From 2006 to June 2008 when the
new anti -TIP law came into force, MSDHS trained an additional 706
individuals on victim protection and assistance.

-- In 2008, the Center Against International Human Trafficking
(CAHT) of the Office of the Attorney General organized 10 workshops
for prosecutors nationwide, including 550 participants, on effective
prosecution of TIP cases. An Embassy-based prosecutor specializing
in TIP cases participated in 4 of these workshops.

-- The Ministry of Justice's Rights and Liberties Protection
Department trained approximately 25 victim/witness specialists, with
assistance from the Embassy. The one-day training course focused on
how to more effectively involve victims and witnesses of TIP cases
in the criminal justice process.

--MSDHS organized 3-day training courses for approximately 350
social workers who work at victim shelters.

--G. DOES THE GOVERNMENT COOPERATE WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTS IN THE
INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKING CASES? IF POSSIBLE,
PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF COOPERATIVE INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS ON
TRAFFICKING DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD.

BANGKOK 00000499 017.2 OF 032



The Thai government has strengthened cooperation against TIP through
bilateral and multilateral agreements among the countries in the
Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS),as follows:

-- Cambodia: the MOU between Thailand and Cambodia on Bilateral
Cooperation for Eliminating Trafficking in Children and Women and
Assisting Victim of Trafficking, was signed on May 31, 2003. This
MOU covers cooperation in 3 areas: 1) return and reintegration, 2)
prosecution process guidelines and 3) information sharing.

-- GMS: the MOU on Coordinated Mekong Ministerial Initiative against
Trafficking (COMMIT) was signed on October 29, 2004. This joint
declaration among six Mekong sub-region countries affirms a
political commitment to eradicating all forms of TIP in the Greater
Mekong sub region. Member countries reviewed the achievements of the
first Sub-regional Plan of Action (SPA) in 2005- 2007 and endorsed
the Second SPA 2008-2010 focusing on 7 areas: 1) Training and
Capacity Building, 2) National Plans of Action, 3) Multilateral and
Bilateral Partnerships, 4) Legal Frameworks, Law Enforcement, and
Justice, 5) Victim Identification, Protection, Recovery and
Reintegration, 6) Preventive Measures, and 9) Cooperation with the
Tourism Sector. In November 5-6 2008 COMMIT meetings, COMMIT
countries agreed to invite Malaysia to join the Initiative.

-- Laos: the MOU between Thailand and Laos on Cooperation to Combat
Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, was signed on
July 31, 2005. On February 6-8, 2006, Laos and Thailand endorsed
the Bilateral Action Plan and Guidelines on Procedures of Victim
Return and Victim Rehabilitation, Especially Women and Children.

-- Vietnam: the MOU between Thailand and Vietnam on Cooperation to
Combat Trafficking in Persons was signed on March 24, 2008. The
Prime Ministers of both countries signed an agreement regarding
future cooperation between Vietnam and Thailand in the fight against
human trafficking, especially of women and children. In September
2008, a bilateral meeting to develop a joint action plan took place.
The plan developed includes: (i) setting up a bilateral working
group to combat human trafficking, (ii) assessing the bilateral
human trafficking situation and providing recommendations for
preventive measures, (iii) collaborating on the provision of
protection and repatriation of TIP victims, and (iv) coordinating on
prevention measures as well as prosecution and investigation through
the sharing and exchange of information and experience.

-- Burma: In April 2008, the RTG and Burmese government agreed on a
draft MOU on Cooperation to Combat Trafficking in Persons. The draft
MOU covers prevention, protection, prosecution, repatriation, and
collaboration. The draft MOU is reportedly being reviewed by the
Burmese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. While the MOU was not yet in
effect, the Thai government worked closely with the Burmese
government in 2008 to repatriate the 66 TIP victims from the Ranya
Paew case.

-- Malaysia: The RTG proposed in July 2007 that Thailand and
Malaysia sign a MOU on Cooperation to Combat Trafficking in Persons.
The RTG sent a draft MOU to the Malaysian government for
consideration, although there was reportedly no progress in this
area. Nonetheless, after Thailand's new anti-TIP law came into
force in June 2008, Malaysian police and Thai CWD police jointly
participated in two trainings on TIP laws during 2008.

-- Australia: MSDHS and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) are
reportedly developing a draft MOU on cooperation on the repatriation
of trafficked victims and dissemination of information to the
public. In addition, on July 4, 2008, the RTG signed an MOU with the
Asia Regional Trafficking in Persons Project (ARTIP),funded by the
Australian government, to support law enforcement and capacity
building on investigatory and prosecution processes.

Moreover, CWD officers collaborated in the investigation and
prosecution of human trafficking cases with their counterparts in
countries such as England, Australia, Germany, Belgium, Cambodia,

BANGKOK 00000499 018.2 OF 032


Burma, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Sweden.

-- H. DOES THE GOVERNMENT EXTRADITE PERSONS WHO ARE PERSONS CHARGED
WITH TRAFFICKING IN OTHER COUNTRIES? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE THE
NUMBER OF TRAFFICKERS EXTRADITED DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD, AND
THE NUMBER OF TRAFFICKING EXTRADITIONS PENDING. IN PARTICULAR,
PLEASE REPORT ON ANY PENDING OR CONCLUDED EXTRADITIONS OF
TRAFFICKING OFFENDERS TO THE UNITED STATES.

According to the RTG, in 2008, the Office of the Attorney General
(OAG) dealt with 5 requests for mutual legal assistance and 1
request for TIP-related extradition. The extradition case remains
under consideration.

-Q. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN OR TOLERANCE OF
TRAFFICKING, ON A LOCAL OR INQTUTIONAL LEVEL? IF SO, PLEASE
EXPLAIN IN DETAIL.

TherQs no evidence of government involvement in or tolerance of
trafficking on an institutional level. Post has received some
information on allegations that one to two local government
officials were individually involved in a transnational human
trafficking case. A UN agency that received at least some of this
information deemed it too preliminary and incomplete to raise with
the RTG. Some observers suspected corruption at the local-level,
but credible and detailed information has not been forthcoming.

-- J. IF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ARE INVOLVED IN TRAFFICKING, WHAT
STEPS HAS THE GOVERNMENT TAKEN TO END SUCH PARTICIPATION? PLEASE
INDICATE THE NUMBER OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INVESTIGATED AND
PROSECUTED FOR INVOLVEMENT IN TRAFFICKING OR TRAFFICKING-RELATED
CORRUPTION DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD. HAVE ANY BEEN CONVICTED?
WHAT SENTENCE(S) WAS IMPOSED? PLEASE SPECIFY IF OFFICIALS RECEIVED
SUSPENDED SENTENCES, OR WERE GIVEN A FINE, FIRED, OR REASSIGNED TO
ANOTHER POSITION WITHIN THE GOVERNMENT AS PUNISHMENT. PLEASE
INDICATE THE NUMBER OF CONVICTED OFFICIALS THAT RECEIVED SUSPENDED
SENTENCES OR RECEIVED ONLY A FINE AS PUNISHMENT.

According to section 12 of the 2008 Anti-TIP law, government
officials who are involved in or commit crimes under the Act shall
be subjected to double the punishment stipulated for such offense.
Post was not aware of government officials investigated or
prosecuted for involvement in trafficking or trafficking-related
corruption during the reporting period.

-- K. IS PROSTITUTION LEGALIZED OR DECRIMINALIZED? SPECIFICALLY, ARE
THE ACTIVITIES OF THE PROSTITUTE CRIMINALIZED? ARE THE ACTIVITIES
OF THE BROTHEL OWNER/OPERATOR, CLIENTS, PIMPS, AND ENFORCERS
CRIMINALIZED? ARE THESE LAWS ENFORCED? IF PROSTITUTION IS LEGAL
AND REGULATED, WHAT IS THE LEGAL MINIMUM AGE FOR THIS ACTIVITY?
NOTE THAT IN COUNTRIES WITH FEDERALIST SYSTEMS, PROSTITUTION LAWS
MAY BE UNDER STATE OR LOCAL JURISDICTION AND MAY DIFFER AMONG
JURISDICTIONS.

In Thailand, prostitution is illegal under the "Prevention and
Suppression of Prostitution Act of 1996." This Act outlaws the
receipt, procurement, or owning of a venue for the purposes of,
prostitution. The activities of a prostitute are criminalized in
certain circumstances, but not in cases when a prostitute is forced
or influenced in a way that makes her/him unable to refuse.
However, these provisions are not strictly enforced. The penalties
as listed in the "Prevention and Suppression of Prostitution Act of
1996" follow:

-- Prostitutes
- If a person who, for the purpose of prostitution, solicits,
induces, introduces herself or himself to, follows or importunes a
person in a street, public place or any other place, which is
committed openly and shamelessly or causes nuisance to the public,
he/she shall be liable to a fine not exceeding 1,000 Baht (29 USD).
- If a person associates with another person in a prostitution
establishment for the purpose of prostitution of oneself or another
person, he/she shall be liable to up to 1 month imprisonment and

BANGKOK 00000499 019.2 OF 032


fines not exceeding 1,000 Baht (29 USD),or both.
-- Customers
-If prostitutes are between 15 - 18 years old, penalties are 1-3
years imprisonment and fines between 20,000-60,000 baht (571-1,714
USD).
-If prostitutes are under 15 years old, penalties are 2-6 years
imprisonment and fines between 40,000-100,000 baht (1,143-2,857
USD).

-- Procurers
-If prostitutes are over 18 years old, penalties are 1-10 years
imprisonment and fines between 20,000-200,000 Baht (571-5,714 USD).

-If prostitutes are 15-18 years old, penalties are 5-15 years
imprisonment and fines between 100,000-300,000 Baht (2,857-8,571
USD).
-If prostitutes are under 15 years old, penalties are 10-20 years
imprisonment and fines between 200,000-400,000 Baht (5,714-11,429
USD).

-- Venue Owners
-If prostitutes are over 18 years old, penalties are 3-15 years
imprisonment and fines between 60,000-300,000 baht (1,714-8,571
USD).
-If prostitutes are 15-18 years old, penalties are 5-15 years
imprisonment and fines between 100,000-300,000 baht (2,857-8,571
USD).
-If prostitutes are under 15 years old, penalties are 10-20 years
imprisonment and fines between 200,000-400,000 baht (5,714-11,429
USD).

-- Parents (if complicit in "selling" a minor)
-For prostitutes under 18 years old, penalties are 4-20 years
imprisonment and fines between 80,000-400,000 baht (2,286-11,429
USD).

If a person detains, confines, threatens, forces, tortures or rapes
others into prostitution, the penalties are 10-20 years imprisonment
and fines of 200,000-400,000 baht (5,714-11,429 USD). The law also
provides for offenders to receive a life sentence if responsible for
serious injury to prostitutes and the death penalty if prostitutes
are killed. The law also punishes those who assist an offender who
harms a prostitute. If offenders are government officials, the
penalties are 15-20 years imprisonment and fines between
300,000-400,000 baht (8,571-11,429 USD).

According to the RTG's National Statistics Office, the Ministry of
Justice reported that 514 cases were prosecuted under the Prevention
and Suppression of Prostitution Act of 1996 in the Criminal, Appeal
and Supreme Courts. Statistics are as follows:

Criminal Court Appeals Court Supreme Court
-------------- -------------- --------------
2006 12 54 353
2007 17 72 425

-- L. FOR COUNTRIES THAT CONTRIBUTE TROOPS TO INTERNATIONAL
PEACEKEEPING EFFORTS, PLEASE INDICATE WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT
VIGOROUSLY INVESTIGATED, PROSECUTED, CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
NATIONALS OF THE COUNTRY DEPLOYED ABROAD AS PART OF A PEACEKEEPING
OR OTHER SIMILAR MISSION WHO ENGAGED IN OR FACILITATED SEVERE FORMS
OF TRAFFICKING OR WHO EXPLOITED VICTIMS OF SUCH TRAFFICKING.

Per ref. A, paragraph 27 (G),not applicable.

-- M. IF THE COUNTRY HAS AN IDENTIFIED PROBLEM OF CHILD SEX TOURISTS
COMING TO THE COUNTRY, WHAT ARE THE COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN FOR SEX
TOURISTS? HOW MANY FOREIGN PEDOPHILES DID THE GOVERNMENT PROSECUTE
OR DEPORT/EXTRADITE TO THEIR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN? IF YOUR HOST
COUNTRY'S NATIONALS ARE PERPETRATORS OF CHILD SEX TOURISM, DO THE
COUNTRY'S CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE LAWS HAVE EXTRATERRITORIAL COVERAGE
(SIMILAR TO THE U.S. PROTECT ACT) TO ALLOW THE PROSECUTION OF
SUSPECTED SEX TOURISTS FOR CRIMES COMMITTED ABROAD? IF SO, HOW MANY

BANGKOK 00000499 020.2 OF 032


OF THE COUNTRY'S NATIONALS WERE PROSECUTED AND/OR CONVICTED DURING
THE REPORTING PERIOD UNDER THE EXTRATERRITORIAL PROVISION(S) FOR
TRAVELING TO OTHER COUNTRIES TO ENGAGE IN CHILD SEX TOURISM?

According to Embassy-based law enforcement officers, the countries
of origin for sex tourists are Germany, the U.K, the U.S.A, Canada,
New Zealand, Australia, and to a lesser extent, Japan. Approximately
20 child sex perpetrators were prosecuted in 2008 and at least 2
were deported back to their country of origin. In 2008, two Thai
women were convicted and sentenced to prison for brokering children
for prostitution.

According to the RTG, in 2008, the Office of the Attorney General
received three requests for mutual legal assistance and five
requests for extradition relating to child sexual abuse. Two
extradition cases are pending trial in court. One case involves a
fugitive. Two cases, which require additional documentation, are
under consideration by prosecutors.

IV) PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS:
-- A. WHAT KIND OF PROTECTION IS THE GOVERNMENT ABLE UNDER EXISTING
LAW TO PROVIDE FOR VICTIMS AND WITNESSES? DOES IT PROVIDE THESE
PROTECTIONS IN PRACTICE?

Under the Law
--------------
According to the 2008 Anti-TIP law, MSDHS shall provide assistance
as appropriate to a trafficked person, including food, shelter,
medical treatment, physical and mental rehabilitation, education,
training, legal aid, return to the country of origin or domicile,
and legal assistance with the processing of compensation.
Trafficking victims have the right to receive information regarding
the timeframe of the delivery of assistance, and their consultation
regarding the delivery of assistance is to be sought.

The Act also stipulates that officials shall provide for the safety
and protection of trafficking victims under their care, as well as
that of the victims' family members (if also trafficked).
Trafficking victims who cooperate with the prosecution of their case
as witnesses shall be protected under the law and will be allowed to
temporarily remain in Thailand and work while their case proceeds.


The Act states that for Thai nationals trafficked abroad who want to
return to Thailand or their country of residence, the RTG shall
assist without delay, and consider the victims safety and welfare.
For trafficking victims abroad who are not Thai, but reside, are
domiciled, and/or have been granted temporary status to remain in
Thailand under Thai law, the RTG shall assist their return to
Thailand should the victim desire.

Section 41 of the Act stipulates that unless the Minister of Justice
grants permission in writing, trafficking victims can not be
prosecuted for entering, leaving, or residing in Thailand illegally,
for giving false information to government officials, for forging or
using a forged travel document, for prostitution, or for working
illegally. Government officials, in providing assistance, may place
the trafficked person in the care of a government or private welfare
center.

In Practice
--------------
MSDHS operated 138 temporary shelters (up from 99 shelters in 2007),
located in every province to provide temporary shelter for victims
during the first 24 hours after their rescue or receipt of
assistance by the State (or 7 days with court permission). After 24
hours, victims are transferred to 8 main centers located throughout
Thailand. In addition, NGOs often also provide protection for
victims immediately after their rescue and may assist in the
prosecution of traffickers. According to the RTG, between 1999 and
2008, approximately 3,772 foreign TIP victims received protection
and assistance in government shelters. Of them, 2,553 were
eventually repatriated. Government shelters are able to provide

BANGKOK 00000499 021.2 OF 032


sufficient protection, rehabilitation, and training to trafficking
victims. While some victims are engaged in income generating
activities within the government shelters in which they reside, the
RTG has not yet developed a system through which victims can work
outside the shelters (many of whom are undocumented migrants). TIP
experts have suggested the first step toward addressing this
problem, should the RTG intend to do so, would be the provision of
identification cards. Should they have entered Thailand illegally,
victims could use these cards to leave the shelters unsupervised and
without fearing deportation.

Thai embassies provide consular protection to Thai citizens who face
difficulties overseas. Limited fund are available to assist the
repatriation of Thai victims of trafficking abroad. In 2008, Thai
embassies assisted the return of 443 Thais to Thailand. Most were
construction workers held in conditions of debt bondage and/or
indentured servitude. As called for in the new Anti-TIP law, MSDHS
reported a new anti-TIP fund of 60 million baht (approximately USD
1.7 million) should be available in March 2009 to finance anti-TIP
activities of both government agencies and NGOs.

-- B. DOES THE COUNTRY HAVE VICTIM CARE FACILITIES (SHELTERS OR
DROP-IN CENTERS) WHICH ARE ACCESSIBLE TO TRAFFICKING VICTIMS? DO
FOREIGN VICTIMS HAVE THE SAME ACCESS TO CARE AS DOMESTIC TRAFFICKING
VICTIMS? WHERE ARE CHILD VICTIMS PLACED (E.G., IN SHELTERS, FOSTER
CARE, OR JUVENILE JUSTICE DETENTION CENTERS)? DOES THE COUNTRY HAVE
SPECIALIZED CARE FOR ADULTS IN ADDITION TO CHILDREN? DOES THE
COUNTRY HAVE SPECIALIZED CARE FOR MALE VICTIMS AS WELL AS FEMALE?
DOES THE COUNTRY HAVE SPECIALIZED FACILITIES DEDICATED TO HELPING
VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING? ARE THESE FACILITIES OPERATED BY THE
GOVERNMENT OR BY NGOS? WHAT IS THE FUNDING SOURCE OF THESE
FACILITIES? PLEASE ESTIMATE THE AMOUNT THE GOVERNMENT SPENT (IN
U.S. DOLLAR EQUIVALENT) ON THESE SPECIALIZED FACILITIES DEDICATED TO
HELPING TRAFFICKING VICTIMS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD.

During 2008, the RTG, through MSDHS, operated 138 temporary shelters
(up from 99 in 2007) and 8 main welfare homes (four for adult women
and children, three homes for boys, and one new home for adult males
and their families) that provide assistance to both Thai and foreign
TIP victims. Baan Kredtakarn Protection and Occupational
Development Center is an internationally-prominent welfare home that
serves as a shelter, school, vocational learning center, and return
and reintegration facility for TIP victims. Through the shelters,
MSHDS's Bureau of Anti-Trafficking in Women and Children (BATWC)
provides support to TIP victims, responding to both their physical
and psychological needs.

The Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSDHS)
reported that 3,772 foreign women and children were classified as
TIP victims in Thailand and received assistance and protection at
MSDHS shelters between 1999 and 2008. Of them, 2,553 (68 percent)
were repatriated back to their home country, and approximately 292
remained in MSDHS shelters at the end of 2008. The breakdown by
country of origin follows:

Number of Foreign TIP victims in the government shelters. (1999 -
Dec 2008)(Unit: Number of Persons)
Nationality Assisted Repatriated Other* Remain in shelters
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Cambodia 1,235 968 245 22
Burma 1,121 623 308 190

Laos 1,336 915 347 74
China 32 21 10 1

Vietnam 26 20 3 3
Other 22 6 14 2
Total 3,772 2,553 927 292
* victims referred/transferred to other agencies, fled from the
shelter, etc.
(Source: Department of Social Development and Welfare, MSDHS)

-- C. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE TRAFFICKING VICTIMS WITH ACCESS

BANGKOK 00000499 022.2 OF 032


TO LEGAL, MEDICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES? IF SO, PLEASE SPECIFY
THE KIND OF ASSISTANCE PROVIDED. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE FUNDING
OR OTHER FORMS OF SUPPORT TO FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC NGOS AND/OR
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR PROVIDING THESE SERVICES TO
TRAFFICKING VICTIMS? PLEASE EXPLAIN AND PROVIDE ANY FUNDING AMOUNTS
IN U.S. DOLLAR EQUIVALENT. IF ASSISTANCE PROVIDED WAS IN-KIND,
PLEASE SPECIFY EXACT ASSISTANCE. PLEASE SPECIFY IF FUNDING FOR
ASSISTANCE COMES FROM A FEDERAL BUDGET OR FROM REGIONAL OR LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS.

Eight main government shelters provide several types of support to
trafficked victims as follows:
-- food and accommodations;
-- medical care;
-- counseling services;
-- psychological assistance programs;
-- education (e.g. computer training, English courses);
-- vocational training (e.g. sewing and knitting, dressmaking,
weaving, arts and crafts, cooking, painting, etc.);
-- recreational services and social activities (e.g. library,
entertainment room, music class, sport classes, religious
activities, sightseeing);
-- early childcare;
-- life-skills education (e.g. risk management and problem solving
techniques);
-- reintegration and family assistance programs to help prepare
victims before repatriation and reintegration with their families
during and after their stay in the shelter.

There is limited direct funding provided by the RTG to foreign or
domestic NGOs for services to victims. However, the government
provides in-kind assistance in the form of technical support,
personnel, and facilities to NGOs active in anti-trafficking
activities. For example, a joint NGO-government trafficking task
force in Chiang Mai is located in the provincial hall. Government
office space and stipends for volunteers are also provided to the
National Council for Child and Youth Development, a non-governmental
umbrella organization that includes anti-trafficking activities in
its mandate.

According to MSDHS, in September 2005, the RTG allocated 100 million
baht to government activities to combat human trafficking. In 2008,
3.11 million baht (88,857 USD) was used for both investigation and
interrogation activities (2 million baht) and for distribution to
124 trafficked victims (1.1 million baht).

In addition, as called for in the new Anti-TIP law, MSDHS reported a
new anti-TIP fund of 60 million baht (approximately USD 1.7 million)
should be available in March 2009 to finance anti-TIP activities of
both government agencies and NGOs.

-- D. DOES THE GOVERNMENT ASSIST FOREIGN TRAFFICKING VICTIMS, FOR
EXAMPLE, BY PROVIDING TEMPORARY TO PERMANENT RESIDENCY STATUS, OR
OTHER RELIEF FROM DEPORTATION? IF SO, PLEASE EXPLAIN.

The RTG allows those classified as foreign TIP victims to receive
shelter and social services pending repatriation to their country of
origin. Between 1999 and 2008, approximately 3,772 foreign TIP
victims received protection and assistance in government shelters.
Of them, 2,553 (68 percent) were repatriated. In 2008 alone,
shelter officials reported they provided protection and social
services for 520 foreign trafficking victims including 45 Cambodian,
252 Burmese, 214 Laotian, 3 Vietnamese, and 6 others. The RTG
provides the following assistance to foreigners trafficked into
Thailand:
-- temporary protection and rehabilitation as well as vocational
training
-- collaboration with families, other governments, and NGOs for safe
repatriation
-- immunity from charges of crimes associated with the TIP victims'
status (i.e., illegal immigration, prostitution, etc.).

Furthermore, RTG officials cooperated with other governments, NGOs,

BANGKOK 00000499 023.2 OF 032


and international organizations to facilitate safe repatriation
processes and follow-up monitoring overseas.

A 2005 Cabinet Resolution established guidelines for the return of
stateless residents abroad who have been identified as TIP victims
and who can be proved to have had prior residency in Thailand.
These stateless residents can be given residency status in Thailand
on a case-by-case basis.

-- E. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE LONGER-TERM SHELTER OR HOUSING
BENEFITS TO VICTIMS OR OTHER RESOURCES TO AID THE VICTIMS IN
REBUILDING THEIR LIVES?

During 2008, the RTG, through MSDHS, operated 138 temporary shelters
(up from 99 in 2007) and 8 main welfare homes (four for adult women
and children, three homes for boys, and one new home for adult males
and their families). With the Anti-Trafficking Act coming into
force in June 2008, the RTG determined to set-up four new shelters
exclusively for male TIP victims. One of them, in Thailand's
central province of Pathumthani, has been used since October 2008.
The three additional adult-male shelters are expected to be set up
in Chiang Rai (Northern region),Songkla (Southern region),and
Ranong (Eastern region) in FY 2009. RTG officials have allowed TIP
victims who are family members to remain together, with at least one
case of a male TIP victim living in the new male TIP victim shelter
with his family.

-- F. DOES THE GOVERNMENT HAVE A REFERRAL PROCESS TO TRANSFER
VICTIMS DETAINED, ARRESTED OR PLACED IN PROTECTIVE CUSTODY BY LAW
ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES TO INSTITUTIONS THAT PROVIDE SHORT- OR
LONG-TERM CARE (EITHER GOVERNMENT OR NGO-RUN)?

Thailand has regional MOUs (between provinces within one region) on
cooperation to combat human trafficking. These MOUs provide
practical guidelines on coordination of raid/rescue operations, and
protection and referral processes that involve relevant members of
government agencies and NGOs (working in what are referred to as
multidisciplinary teams). MOUs for the northeastern and eastern
regions were signed in 2006 and the MOUs for the northern and
southern regions were signed in 2007. MOUs covering the central
region were the last signed in 2008 (one covering the lower central
region signed in May and one covering the upper central region in
July). To ensure effective collaboration among agencies in
implementing these MOUs, MSDHS trained 706 individuals between 2006
and June 2008. Approximately 80 additional people were trained in
September 2008 using a curriculum updated since the new Anti-TIP Act
came into force.

The regional MOUs provide procedures to the Provincial Operation
Center on Prevention and Suppression of Human Trafficking (POCHT) in
each province. They generally state the POCHT shall coordinate with
members of their multidisciplinary teams (e.g., social workers,
health care officials, psychologists, etc.). Under these
procedures, trafficking victims are transferred to government or
NGO- run shelters as appropriate. If there is a reason to believe a
victim shall be endangered in a particular shelter, the chief of the
shelter or POCHT secretariat can request the police provide
protection under the 2003 Witness Protection Act.

In addition to the regional MOUs, the Ministry of Labor (MOL),
working with other concerned ministries, developed "Operational
Guidelines for Labor Trafficking," which were formally agreed upon
in April 2008. The guidelines were established to improve
coordination among members of multi-disciplinary teams, both
government and non-government officials, during labor trafficking
operations (i.e., rescue and protection). MOL officials reported
that trainings on these guidelines were being planned for officials
within the ministry.

-- G. WHAT IS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TRAFFICKING VICTIMS IDENTIFIED
DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD? OF THESE, HOW MANY VICTIMS WERE
REFERRED TO CARE FACILITIES FOR ASSISTANCE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUTHORITIES DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD? BY SOCIAL SERVICES

BANGKOK 00000499 024.2 OF 032


OFFICIALS? WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF VICTIMS ASSISTED BY
GOVERNMENT-FUNDED ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS AND THOSE NOT FUNDED BY THE
GOVERNMENT DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD?

There is no official estimate available for the number of
trafficking victims identified during the reporting period.
Information provided by the RTG indicated that the vast majority of
identified TIP victims, including those receiving services in
government shelters, are non-Thai citizens. In 2008, the shelters
reported they provided protection and social services for 622
trafficking victims, 520 foreigners (45 Cambodian, 252 Burmese, 214
Laotian, and 3 Vietnamese and 6 from other nations) and 102 Thai
citizens. Approximately 292 people remained in MSDHS shelters at
the end of 2008. The Children and Women Protection Division of the
Royal Thai Police (CWD) reported that CWD alone (not including other
police divisions) investigated 46 cases of human trafficking,
involving 82 TIP victims. These official numbers likely greatly
underestimate the total number of victims in Thailand.

According to MSDHS, in September 2005, the RTG allocated 100 million
baht to government activities to combat human trafficking. In 2008,
3.11 million baht (88,857 USD) was used for both investigation and
interrogation activities (2 million baht or 57,143 USD) and for
distribution to 124 trafficked victims (1.1 million baht or 31,429
USD).

-- H. DO THE GOVERNMENT'S LAW ENFORCEMENT, IMMIGRATION, AND SOCIAL
SERVICES PERSONNEL HAVE A FORMAL SYSTEM OF PROACTIVELY IDENTIFYING
VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING AMONG HIGH-RISK PERSONS WITH WHOM THEY COME
IN CONTACT (E.G., FOREIGN PERSONS ARRESTED FOR PROSTITUTION OR
IMMIGRATION VIOLATIONS)? FOR COUNTRIES WITH LEGALIZED PROSTITUTION,
DOES THE GOVERNMENT HAVE A MECHANISM FOR SCREENING FOR TRAFFICKING
VICTIMS AMONG PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE LEGAL/REGULATED COMMERCIAL SEX
TRADE?

In 2008, the RTG developed "Guidelines on Trafficked Victim
Identification" for use by police officers, immigration officers,
social workers and members of civil society to better identify
potential trafficking victims under Thailand's new TIP law. The
guidelines, in the form of a questionnaire to be used while
interviewing a potential victim during or after an anti-TIP
operation, provide a framework for interviewing officials to have a
clearer understanding of what defines a TIP victim. The guidelines
state that a person can be a victim of trafficking even if he/she
originally participated voluntarily in the activity in question and
regardless of one's immigration or worker registration status. They
also explain that debt bondage is considered a type of human
trafficking, and instruct that various types of supporting evidence
should be considered when identifying trafficking victims (i.e.,
evidence of physical abuse or psychological trauma, etc).

In order to provide government officials with sufficient knowledge
to identify TIP victims, the Royal Thai Police and MSDHS
co-conducted numerous one-day trainings for police officers that
focused on the Anti-TIP law and victim identification process.
MSDHS reported that 2,500 police received training in FY 2008 and
that an additional 2,500 would be reached in FY 2009

-- I. ARE THE RIGHTS OF VICTIMS RESPECTED? ARE TRAFFICKING VICTIMS
DETAINED OR JAILED? IF SO, FOR HOW LONG? ARE VICTIMS FINED? ARE
VICTIMS PROSECUTED FOR VIOLATIONS OF OTHER LAWS, SUCH AS THOSE
GOVERNING IMMIGRATION OR PROSTITUTION?

The 2008 Anti-TIP Law provided numerous rights to trafficking
victims (see question C above),which are generally respected.
Trafficking victims have the right to receive services from the
State and information regarding the timeframe of assistance
delivery. Illegal migrants who are trafficking victims are
repatriated through established RTG processes in cooperation with
foreign governments and civil society. The anti-TIP law stipulates
that unless the Minister of Justice grants permission in writing,
trafficking victims can not be prosecuted for entering, leaving, or
residing in Thailand illegally, for giving false information to

BANGKOK 00000499 025.2 OF 032


government officials, for forging or using a forged travel document,
for prostitution, or working illegally.

In practice, court proceedings are usually long, sometimes causing
trafficking victims who cooperate with prosecutions to remain in
shelters for extended periods of time. The RTG does, though, allow
for victims who have already given testimony to be repatriated
instead of remaining in shelters. NGOs have reported complaints by
foreign victims in shelters who believe the RTG does not arrange for
their repatriation in a timely fashion, and who feel compelled to
remain in shelters in order to assist with prosecutions. Another
factor contributing to the lengthy stays in shelters is the
difficulty in verifying the nationality of victims as part of the
repatriation process, especially of those without national identity
cards or who are ethnic minorities from Burma. Difficulties in
tracing families (for children),and in arranging documentation and
reception by officials or NGO workers in neighboring countries,
resulted in stays of up to six months. During this period victims
are protected at shelters, where they receive medical treatment and
food, counseling, and limited vocational and literacy training.

-- J. DOES THE GOVERNMENT ENCOURAGE VICTIMS TO ASSIST IN THE
INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKING? HOW MANY VICTIMS
ASSISTED IN THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKERS DURING
THE REPORTING PERIOD? MAY VICTIMS FILE CIVIL SUITS OR SEEK LEGAL
ACTION AGAINST TRAFFICKERS? DOES ANYONE IMPEDE VICTIM ACCESS TO
SUCH LEGAL REDRESS? IF A VICTIM IS A MATERIAL WITNESS IN A COURT
CASE AGAINST A FORMER EMPLOYER, IS THE VICTIM PERMITTED TO OBTAIN
OTHER EMPLOYMENT OR TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY PENDING TRIAL PROCEEDINGS?
ARE THERE MEANS BY WHICH A VICTIM MAY OBTAIN RESTITUTION?

The government generally encourages victims to participate in the
investigation and prosecution of trafficking. Relatively few opt to
do so, however, for a variety of reasons such as language barriers,
illiteracy, distrust of Thai officials, slow legal processes, and
fear of traffickers. Additionally, financial needs of victims who
need to earn income for their families also play a role in the low
level of victim participation in prosecutions. The Royal Thai
Police believes that fear of the criminal networks, which often
reach into their home communities, played an important role in the
reluctance to pursue legal action. Officials at government shelters
also reported instances when traffickers try to intimidate or
threaten victims or their families.

The Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSDHS)
reported it assisted 622 TIP victims in 2008, 520 foreigners and 102
Thai citizens. Of the 622, 306 (roughly 50 percent) agreed to
cooperate with law enforcement authorities on their cases
investigation and prosecution. Only 35 of the 102 Thai victims
agreed to cooperate on their cases investigation and prosecution.

Number of trafficking victims assisted by MSDHS (Jan-Dec 2008)
(Unit: Number of Persons):

Victims Proceed with Prosecution Do Not Proceed

-------------- -------------- --------------
Thai trafficking 44 6 38
victims abroad

Thai trafficking 58 29 29
victims in Thailand

Foreign trafficking 520 271 249 victims in
Thailand

Total 622 306 316
(Source: Dept. of Social Development and Welfare, MSDHS)

Regarding labor trafficking, during 2006-2008, approximately 140
trafficking victims from the Anoma and Ranya Paew cases have
participated in the investigation and prosecution of traffickers.
To encourage assistance in case investigation and prosecution in

BANGKOK 00000499 026.2 OF 032


forced labor cases, the 1998 Labor Protection Act allows for
compensatory damages from the employer. Department of Social
Welfare officials and NGOs use the threat of punitive sanctions
under this law to negotiate settlements with abusive employers using
foreign trafficking victims in sweatshops and in domestic work.

To create additional incentives for victims to assist with case
investigation and prosecution, the 2008 anti-TIP Law (Sections 34
and 35) requires victims be informed of their right to receive
compensation for damages and to the provision of legal aid from the
government. The public prosecutor must also help victims receive
compensation through the courts. Similarly, the law stipulates that
victims of TIP crimes are eligible to work while their case proceeds
through the courts.

-- K. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE ANY SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN IDENTIFYING TRAFFICKING VICTIMS AND IN THE
PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE TO TRAFFICKED VICTIMS, INCLUDING THE SPECIAL
NEEDS OF TRAFFICKED CHILDREN? DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE TRAINING
ON PROTECTIONS AND ASSISTANCE TO ITS EMBASSIES AND CONSULATES IN
FOREIGN COUNTRIES THAT ARE DESTINATION OR TRANSIT COUNTRIES? WHAT
IS THE NUMBER OF TRAFFICKING VICTIMS ASSISTED BY THE HOST COUNTRY'S
EMBASSIES OR CONSULATES ABROAD DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD? PLEASE
EXPLAIN THE TYPE OF ASSISTANCE PROVIDED (TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, REFERRALS
TO ASSISTANCE, PAYMENT FOR
TRANSPORTATION HOME).

Royal Thai police and MSDHS co-conducted numerous one-day trainings
that focused on the Anti-TIP law and victim identification process
using the new guidelines on trafficking victim identification.
MSDHS reported that 2,500 police received training in FY 2008 and
that an additional 2,500 will be reached in FY 2009. The attendees
were mostly police, although other multidisciplinary team members
also attended (NGO officials, social workers, psychologists, etc.).


According to CWD, there were several trainings specifically for
police officers as follows:
- A 6-day training course for 34 police trainees on TIP victim
rescuing operations
- A 5-day training regarding TIP for 30 Thai and Malaysian police
officers
- A UK-sponsored training for 15 CWD officers on combating human
trafficking.

The Ministry of Labor (MOL) also conducted training courses on
relevant child labor protection law to labor inspectors aiming to
raise awareness on this issue. In addition, the Ministry of Labor
established a woman and child labor protection network with relevant
NGOs, governmental agencies, and private sector members, to provide
information and guidelines on labor protection and assistance to
laborers, especially children. The MOL organized an annual meeting
with employers, manufacturers and NGOs to raise awareness on labor
rights protection and child labor protection.

In 2008, the Department of Consular Affairs of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs conducted various anti-TIP-related activities with
Royal Thai Embassies, Consulates, and Thai communities overseas,
including the following:

-- Coordinated activities with Thai Women Supportive Networks in
Norway and Sweden.
-- Distributed TIP-related pamphlets for Thais in Poland
-- Organized a "Thai Friends help Thais" project to develop a
network of volunteers to assist TIP victims in Singapore
-- Made donations to TIP victims shelters in South Africa.
-- Organized a seminar on "Related TIP laws in Switzerland and
Assistance/Protection provided to 66 Thais in Switzerland" organized
by the Royal Thai Embassy in Bern, Switzerland
-- Conducted consultation programs for 105 Thai victims of
trafficking persons in Switzerland.
-- Supported a volunteer network in the Netherlands
-- Conducted a TIP seminar for 130 Thai Women in Denmark

BANGKOK 00000499 027.2 OF 032


-- Provided 14 translators for TIP victims in South Africa
-- Conducted trainings regarding TIP to foreign service officers and
local staff in 15 embassies and consulates.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) Department of Consular Affairs
reported 443 Thai nationals were classified as TIP victims abroad
and repatriated to Thailand with MFA assistance in fiscal year 2008
(October 2007-September 2008),compared to 403 and 397 victims in
FY2007 and FY2006, respectively. The breakdown by destination
country follows:

Number of Thai TIP victims abroad who were repatriated back to
Thailand (Oct 07-Sep 08)
(Unit: Number of Persons)
Destination FY 2006 FY2007 FY 2008
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Bahrain 236 368 360
Singapore 9 14 3
Malaysia 39 12 73
South Africa 20 3 1
Saudi Arabia 0 3 0
Hong Kong 2 2 1
Japan 3 1 0
United Kingdom 5 0 0
Taiwan 0 0 5
Total 397 403 443
(Source: Department of Consular Affairs, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs)

-- L. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE ASSISTANCE, SUCH AS MEDICAL AID,
SHELTER, OR FINANCIAL HELP, TO ITS NATIONALS WHO ARE REPATRIATED AS
VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING?

In 2008, MSDHS officials reported the Ministry provided small travel
stipends for 44 Thai trafficked victims who were repatriated back to
Thailand. Medical aid, shelter (other than temporary residence at
one of six government shelters),and other financial help is not
available from the Thai government.

-- M. WHICH INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OR NGOS, IF ANY, WORK WITH
TRAFFICKING VICTIMS? WHAT TYPE OF SERVICES DO THEY PROVIDE? WHAT
SORT OF COOPERATION DO THEY RECEIVE FROM LOCAL AUTHORITIES?

Numerous NGOs, both Thai and international, are active in working
with trafficking victims. They provide different levels of support,
varying from organizations that identify victims and work with
authorities to rescue them, to those who support them through the
judicial process and return from Thailand to their home countries.
Working level cooperation with local authorities is generally good
and government funding was sometimes provided to NGOs. In-kind
assistance such as office space is often made available, as is the
case in models of cooperation created in Chiang Mai, Bangkok and
Chiang Rai. The RTG also provided office space to one NGO in the
Office of the Attorney General.

A partial list of NGOs active in Thailand and a brief description of
some of their key activities follows:

-- The Center for Protection of Children's Rights (CPCR) assists
abused, orphaned, neglected or trafficked children and counters
commercial sexual exploitation of children by legal and public
relations means. The NGO runs three rehabilitation homes for
children and young people rescued from trafficking, two are in
Bangkok, and one is in Chiang Rai. The Chiang Rai facility also
provides scholarships, vocational training and prevention programs
for young people at risk of entering the commercial sex industry or
at risk of being exploited for child labor.

-- Fight Against Child Exploitation (FACE) monitors cases of child
abuse and pursues prosecutions of pedophiles. FACE also provides
consultative services to Thai law enforcement entities on the
handling of trafficking victims.


BANGKOK 00000499 028.2 OF 032


-- Foundation for Child Development (FCD) provides emergency
assistance and support to victims of trafficking. It also runs
prevention campaigns and policy-level advocacy activities. FCD has
been a leading organization in providing assistance to victims in
the Ranya Paew case, and actively participates in policy level
discussions.

-- TRAFCORD: the Anti-Trafficking Coordination Unit based in Chiang
Mai, acts as a coordination center in Northern Thailand between
governmental and non-governmental agencies active in solving
problems of human trafficking. It was established in August, 2002,
largely with USG funding, and is a model of law enforcement and NGO
cooperation in initiating investigations, protecting victims, and
pursuing prosecutions of traffickers in the region.

-- The Labor Rights Promotion Network (LPN) is an NGO in the Samut
Sakhon province, on the Gulf of Thailand, in which seafood
processing and fisheries industries are based. LPN provides
counseling, vocational training and education programs for migrant
workers and their families, many of whom originate from Burma and
are vulnerable to exploitation or trafficking.

-- The Development and Education Program for Daughters and
Communities (DEPDC) in Mae Sai, near the border with Burma, works to
prevent at-risk children from being forced into the sex industry or
into other forms of child labor. DEPDC provides shelter, education,
vocational training, and employment opportunities to young girls at
risk. DEPDC also campaigns
against local interests that cater to child sex tourism.

-- The New Life Center (Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai) houses, feeds,
and educates women from hill tribes and other ethnic minorities who
have been rescued from trafficking or at risk of being trafficked.

-- The Buddha Kasetra School (Chiang Rai) is a shelter and school
for girls (both Thai and non-Thai) who cannot afford to continue
their education and are at risk of entering the sex industry.

-- The Foundation for Women (FFW) provides information, support,
referral and emergency financial assistance to women who are victims
of exploitation and violence. FFW also works with villagers in the
North and Northeast to oppose coerced prostitution and domestic
violence. FFW offers small-scale credit schemes for alternative
economic projects and conducts research on international migration
and trafficking, adolescent sexuality, and domestic violence.

-- The Mirror Art Group, through a project entitled, "The Missing
Person Center for Anti-Trafficking," provides counseling to victims
and their families and helps coordinate the activities of government
agencies, local authorities, and NGOs to assist victims.

-- The World Vision Foundation of Thailand (WVFT) concentrates its
activities on reducing the vulnerabilities of migrants through
prevention projects.

-- Agir Pour Les Femmes En Situation Precaire or Alliance Anti
Traffic (AFESIP) programs include the building of community-based
networks and the provision of support to victims, including health,
legal, and family tracing services prior to reintegration or
repatriation.

-- Other international NGOs such as The American Center for
International Labor Solidarity (Solidarity Center),Save the
Children UK, GATTW, Oxfam, Prevent Human Trafficking, and ECPAT
International have ongoing substantive anti-trafficking programs in
Thailand.

-- International organizations actively working on anti-trafficking
programs in Thailand include UNESCO, UNIAP, UNICEF, the ILO, and
IOM.

V) PREVENTION:


BANGKOK 00000499 029.2 OF 032


-- A. DID THE GOVERNMENT CONDUCT ANTI-TRAFFICKING INFORMATION OR
EDUCATION CAMPAIGNS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD? IF SO, BRIEFLY
DESCRIBE THE CAMPAIGN(S),INCLUDING THEIR OBJECTIVES AND
EFFECTIVENESS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE REACHED BY SUCH
AWARENESS EFFORTS, IF AVAILABLE. DO THESE CAMPAIGNS TARGET
POTENTIAL TRAFFICKING VICTIMS AND/OR THE DEMAND FOR TRAFFICKING
(E.G. "CLIENTS" OF PROSTITUTES OR BENEFICIARIES OF FORCED LABOR)?

Since the coming into force of the anti-TIP Law of 2008, the
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSDHS)
implemented several prevention-oriented activities as follows:
-- declared June 5 as National Anti-Human Trafficking Day
-- provided education scholarships to vulnerable children in
high-risk areas
-- set up 8 women vocational training centers in rural areas as well
as awareness raising campaigns on how Thai women can protect
themselves abroad as well as developed watchdog network in high-risk
areas
--organized "public dialogues" in seven provinces throughout
Thailand to raise awareness within the general public
-- sponsored a television advertisement to raise awareness on the
various forms of human trafficking
-- sponsored a television documentary on "solving human trafficking
problems" during prime time in December 2008
-- organized road shows to raise awareness to fight against human
trafficking in 7 high-risk areas such as transportation stations
(Bangkok's main train station, various bus and shuttle bus
terminals),and the tourist district in the city of Pattaya

Although the number of people reached by such awareness raising
activities by MSDHS is difficult to estimate, the television
campaign in particular reached a wide audience and the awareness
campaigns in high-risk areas reached more targeted audiences. The
Ministry of Foreign Affairs also conducted prevention activities
outside of Thailand, as listed in section IV, question K.

-- B. DOES THE GOVERNMENT MONITOR IMMIGRATION AND EMIGRATION
PATTERNS FOR EVIDENCE OF TRAFFICKING? DO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
SCREEN FOR POTENTIAL TRAFFICKING VICTIMS ALONG BORDER?

Thailand's topography and resource constraints make it impossible to
adequately monitor its borders. Although border security is a
national priority, the rugged terrain of much of the 2,900 miles of
land border greatly complicates efforts to control entry and exit.
An additional 1,600 miles of coastline provides further obstacles to
border control. Widespread smuggling of timber, oil, drugs and
people all occur. The government is sensitive to trends in labor
influxes. Cross-border labor movements, particularly from Burma,
are considered a national security issue. As a result of training
programs conducted during the reporting period, there was an
increasing understanding among police and immigration officers of
the difference between trafficking cases and voluntary migration
(both legal and illegal.) Frequent rotation among police and
immigration officers requires continual training efforts.

The Ministry of Labor's Department of Labor Protection and Welfare
Development (LPWD) inspected workplaces to ensure that worker rights
are protected in accordance with the Labor Protection Act (LPA). In
FY 2008, labor inspectors from LPWD inspected 51,375 workplaces that
were found to employ 55,003 migrant workers; 48,741 from Burma,
1,367 from Laos, 1,530 from Cambodia, and 3,365 from other nations.
Out of the 51,375 workplace inspected, 44,850 were found to be fully
compliant with the LPA, while LPA violations were found in 6,161.
LPWD found serious violations in 5 of the 6,156 workplaces and
initiated court proceedings in response.

Sensitive to Thailand's international image, immigration police
officers monitor outgoing passengers at Bangkok's international
airport for Thai female sex workers. Departure clearance is often
denied in suspect cases. Chinese nationals and South Asians using
Bangkok as a transit stop to travel illegally to third countries are
not intercepted unless they possess fraudulent travel documents and
attempt to enter Thailand. In both the cases of Thai sex workers

BANGKOK 00000499 030.2 OF 032


and illegal migrants, the participants are usually voluntary during
this point in the trafficking continuum. Various forms of force,
fraud and coercion are generally encountered only when the
destination country is reached.

-- C. IS THERE A MECHANISM FOR COORDINATION AND COMMUNICATION
BETWEEN VARIOUS AGENCIES, INTERNAL, INTERNATIONAL, AND MULTILATERAL
ON TRAFFICKING-RELATED MATTERS, SUCH AS A MULTI-AGENCY WORKING GROUP
OR A TASK FORCE?

Collaboration between government officials and NGOs has
progressively improved in Thailand as reflected in the MOUs on
collaboration in the different domestic regions. The RTG and
provincial-level governments increasingly enjoy close collaborative
relationships with civil society on anti-TIP activities. Key NGOs
sit on national committees related to TIP. MSDHS, responsible for
coordinating the RTG's anti-TIP efforts, maintains a full list of
all NGOs working on TIP-related issues nationwide. The 2008
anti-TIP law called for the establishment of two national committees
to focus ministerial-level political decision-making with regard to
anti-TIP efforts: an Anti-Trafficking in Persons Committee (ATP)
chaired by the Prime Minister and a Coordinating and Monitoring of
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Committee (CMP) chaired by the Deputy
Prime Minister. MSDHS also created a CMP sub-committee to develop
subordinate regulations to the new TIP Law, essential to its
implementation. The sub-committee consists of government officials
from relevant agencies, academics, and representatives from civil
society.

In 2008, MSDHS reported collaborating with international
organizations on the following activities:

- International Organization for Migration (IOM): provided financial
support for returning TIP victims home, developed standard
guidelines among relevant agencies to assist in the rescue of
trafficked victims, and produced publications regarding prevention
activities.

- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes (UNODC): provided "train
the trainer" activities on victim rehabilitation.

- Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA): provided capacity
building to multidisciplinary teams through regarding TIP victim
protection.

- International Labor Organization (ILO): provided activities to
promote life and occupational skills of Thai women and children
victims.

-- D. DOES THE GOVERNMENT HAVE A NATIONAL PLAN OF ACTION TO ADDRESS
TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS? IF THE PLAN WAS DEVELOPED DURING THE
REPORTING PERIOD, WHICH AGENCIES WERE INVOLVED IN DEVELOPING IT?
WERE NGOS CONSULTED IN THE PROCESS? WHAT STEPS HAS THE GOVERNMENT
TAKEN TO IMPLEMENT THE ACTION PLAN?

The National Policy and Plan on Prevention and Resolution of
Domestic and Cross-border Trafficking in Children and Women
(2002-2007) was approved by the Cabinet on July 1, 2003. Political
turmoil in 2008, with frequent changes of government and
corresponding delays to policy-making, precluded the RTG from
finalizing a new Plan of Action, following passage of new
legislation. In 2008, the RTG focused on the implementation of the
new anti-TIP law and conducted an evaluation of the first Plan with
input from NGOs and international organizations.

-- E: WHAT MEASURES HAS THE GOVERNMENT TAKEN DURING THE REPORTING
PERIOD TO REDUCE THE DEMAND FOR COMMERCIAL SEX ACTS?

Thai government efforts to reduce customer demand for illegal
prostitution services have been limited to occasional police raids
to shut down openly operating brothels and awareness-raising
campaigns targeting tourists. These efforts are principally
conducted to reduce the prevalence of child prostitution.

BANGKOK 00000499 031.2 OF 032



According to the RTG, in 2008, the Tourism Authority of Thailand and
Ministry of Tourism and Sports initiated awareness campaigns to
prevent sex tourism, which involved travel and transportation
agencies. The campaigns were geared to warn tourists of the
severity of penalties for engaging in commercial sex acts with
children. The RTG also paired with NGOs and a large hotel
corporation to implement a "Code of Conduct for the Protection of
Children from Sexual Exploitation in Travel and Tourism." Through
this program, training was conducted for provincial-level travel
agencies and members of a private tourism association on how to
adopt prevention activities and deal with suspected and actual cases
of child sex tourism. Approximately 6,000 employees have been
trained so far in this initiative.

-- F. REQUIRED OF ALL POSTS: WHAT MEASURES HAS THE GOVERNMENT TAKEN
DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD TO REDUCE THE PARTICIPATION IN
INTERNATIONAL CHILD SEX TOURISM BY NATIONALS OF THE COUNTRY?

With regard to sex crimes again children, including by offenders who
travel to Thailand to commit crimes as well as those who come
fleeing justice elsewhere, Thai law enforcement authorities have
been increasingly cooperative with Embassy officials in a range of
areas. RTG law enforcement officials collaborated with USG law
enforcement agencies (and those from other governments) in the
investigation, arrest, prosecution, and deportation or extradition
of child sex offenders, as well as in the provision of victim
assistance. CWD police officers were designated to carry out
surveillance and investigation and to notify the Tourist police of
any suspected cases of child-sex tourism, including those involving
Thai nationals.

The RTG sponsored multiple TIP prevention activities, including
campaigns to warn tourists of any nationality (including Thai) of
the severity of penalties for engaging in commercial sex acts with
children.

The RTG's new anti-TIP law, which came into force in June 2008,
provides strict penalties for Thai citizens who engage in any form
of human trafficking, including child sex tourism:

- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child between 15
to 18 years old, penalties are 6-12 years imprisonment and a fine of
120,000 to 240,000 baht (3,429-6,857 USD).
- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child below 15
years old, penalties are 8-15 years imprisonment and a fine of
160,000 to 300,000 baht (4,571 - 8,571 USD).

In addition, various sections of Thai law (including the Thai
Criminal Code as amended, the Prevention and Suppression of
Prostitution Act, and the Money laundering Act) provide severe
penalties for Thai citizens (and others) who engage in child sex
tourism (see Section III, Question A above).

-- G. REQUIRED OF POSTS IN COUNTRIES THAT HAVE CONTRIBUTED OVER 100
TROOPS TO INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING EFFORTS: WHAT MEASURES HAS THE
GOVERNMENT ADOPTED TO ENSURE THAT ITS NATIONALS WHO ARE DEPLOYED
ABROAD AS PART OF A PEACEKEEPING OR OTHER SIMILAR MISSION DO NOT
ENGAGE IN OR FACILITATE SEVERE FORMS OF TRAFFICKING OR EXPLOIT
VICTIMS OF SUCH TRAFFICKING?

Per ref. A, paragraph 27 (G),not applicable.

VI) NOMINATION OF HEROES AND BEST PRACTICES

HEROES: TRAFCORD
Established in 2002 in response to a marked rise in cases involving
the trafficking of women and children from the Mekong region,
TRAFCORD, the Anti-Trafficking Coordination Unit, was set up in
upper Northern Thailand. TRAFCORD acts as a coordination center
between government and non-government agencies active in addressing
human trafficking (TIP) cases, particularly involving women and
children. Sponsored by the USG, the Asia Foundation, and UNICEF, the

BANGKOK 00000499 032.2 OF 032


unit has been at the forefront of the successful
"multi-disciplinary" approach to trafficking cases in the region.
When TRAFCORD employees suspect the presence of child prostitutes
(often in a brothel or karaoke bar),they work with police, social
workers (public or private),prosecutors, and other relevant
government and NGO officials to rescue, rehabilitate, and repatriate
them. By coordinating government and private agencies prior,
during, and after raids on suspected establishments, they help
ensure that victims receive improved treatment and access to
services, and that criminal cases have a better chance of being
successfully prosecuted.

TRAFCORD's multi-disciplinary approach has been adopted by other
organizations in Thailand, including through formal memorandums of
understanding (MOUs) signed with relevant officials representing
seventeen Northern provinces in Thailand. As such, TRAFCORD has
catalyzed the updating of procedures for dealing with TIP cases and
coordinated their implementation, often providing training in the
process. TRAFCORD's work therefore also informed the key change to
Thailand's national anti-trafficking legal framework: a new,
comprehensive anti-TIP law that came into force in June 2008.

TRAFCORD's multi-disciplinary team approach, as explained in various
international forums (from Hawaii to Rome to Geneva),has generated
positive international attention in support of the most effective
ways to fight against child prostitution and other TIP crimes.
Many, such as the Director General of the International Organization
for Migration, have praised the unit and its staff for "providing
useful insights and guidance." Similarly, TRAFCORD's comprehensive
anti-child labor/TIP activities, including its public relations and
media efforts, have raised awareness about the worst forms of child
labor and inspired other organizations and individuals (within
Thailand and beyond) to adopt more effective multidisciplinary
strategies to end them.

BEST PRACTICES: Post may report on best practices septel.

3. (SBU) Per ref a, paragraph 22, Embassy Labor officer (FS-02)
spent approximately 45 hours in the preparation of this report. The
Economic Counselor (FE-OC) and DCM (FE-OC) spent approximately 4
hours and 3 hours on the report, respectively. Likewise, Economic
Section FSN (Grade 11-02) spent approximately 95 hours on compiling
information for the report. These estimates do not include
contributions made indirectly in the regular course of work.
Embassy Bangkok POC is Econ/Labor Officer Lawrence Petroni: tel.
02-205-4639, fax 02-254-2839, email PetroniLJ@state.gov.