Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09BANGKOK2286
2009-09-09 04:24:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bangkok
Cable title:  

EXECUTIONS RESUME IN THAILAND AFTER SIX YEAR

Tags:  PGOV PHUM DRL TH 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1109
RR RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHBK #2286/01 2520424
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 090424Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8183
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7430
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 9937
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 5756
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 1885
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 0087
RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI 6950
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RHEFDHS/DIA DHS WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 002286 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 9/9/2019
TAGS: PGOV PHUM DRL TH
SUBJECT: EXECUTIONS RESUME IN THAILAND AFTER SIX YEAR
BREAK: TWO METHAMPHETAMINE DEALERS DIE BY LETHAL INJECTION

BANGKOK 00002286 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: POL Counselor George Kent, reason 1.4 (b,d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 002286

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 9/9/2019
TAGS: PGOV PHUM DRL TH
SUBJECT: EXECUTIONS RESUME IN THAILAND AFTER SIX YEAR
BREAK: TWO METHAMPHETAMINE DEALERS DIE BY LETHAL INJECTION

BANGKOK 00002286 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: POL Counselor George Kent, reason 1.4 (b,d)


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: On August 24, the Royal Thai Government
(RTG) executed two Thai drug traffickers by lethal injection
after their request for a King's pardon was rejected; these
were the first executions in Thailand since 2003. The
overall Thai reaction was a shrug; there remains high
societal support for the death penalty in Thailand,
particularly for large-scale drug traffickers. In contrast,
human rights groups and the European Union immediately
registered their disappointment with the news, having clearly
perceived the intervening six years since Thailand's last
executions -- of four drug traffickers -- as a moratorium
building towards possible abolishment of the death penalty.
Neither the prisoners themselves nor other interested parties
were given much notice prior to their execution, a result of
the applicable Thai death penalty provisions. END SUMMARY

DEAD MEN WALKING
--------------


2. (SBU) Convicted drug traffickers Bundit Charoenwanich and
Jirawat Phumpruek were executed by lethal injection in
Bangkok's Bang Kwang prison on August 24th. These executions
were the first judicially-sanctioned killings in Thailand
since 2003, and only the fifth and sixth lethal injections in
the country since Thailand switched from execution by firing
squad earlier that year. The two men were first arrested for
large-scale trafficking of methamphetamines in 2001; given
the lengthy mandatory appeals process associated with death
penalty cases, the Supreme Court did not uphold their
conviction until June 28, 2007. Following the Supreme
Court's decision, the prisoners exercised their right to
submit a petition for royal pardon.


3. (SBU) The Thai Constitution gives the King the discretion
to grant a pardon, and in practice the King can also decide
whether to release the prisoner, commute the sentence, or
reduce the punishment. In this instance, the King rejected
the petition for pardon of the two male defendants on August
10, 2009, but commuted the death sentence of their female
co-defendant, who remains in a women's prison. (Note: There
was no mention of the female defendant's pardon, let alone

her identity, in local or international media coverage. End
Note.)

LOCAL APPROBATION; NGO, EURO CONDEMNATION
--------------


4. (SBU) Aside from the criticism from the usual suspects,
the overall reaction to the executions in Thailand was
relatively muted. Longtime Thailand observers and human
rights lawyers believe that not only is there overwhelming
support for the death penalty in Thailand, but the execution
of drug traffickers in particular is perceived as especially
justified.


5. (SBU) Local NGOs and Amnesty International quickly joined
the EU in condemning the resumption of executions in
Thailand. Citing UN conventions, they not only took issue
with use of the death penalty writ large, but also questioned
its application in conjunction with drug crimes. The NGOs
also condemned the fact that the prisoners were reportedly
given as little as one to two hours notice before their
executions.


6. (SBU) Most Thai believe that while a murder only has an
impact on the victim's family, drug trafficking has a
detrimental effect on Thai society and the nation as a whole,
according to longtime Thailand observer Bill Klausner. That
said, the resumption of executions was not intended to send a
particular message to drug traffickers, Director General of
the Department of Corrections (DOC) Nathee Chitsawang
suggested to us, but rather a function of statistics.
According to the DOC, 92 of the 128 prisoners on death row
who have exhausted the appeals process were convicted of
drug-related crimes (including 12 of the 13 women).


7. (SBU) As to the issue of the short notice provided to
prisoners, DG Nathee and other DOC officials did not perceive
that as a deprivation of human rights, but rather as a
humanitarian gesture. According to DOC representatives,

BANGKOK 00002286 002.2 OF 002


shortening the timeframe prevents suffering associated with
waiting, which can lead to escape attempts, suicide, or
mental distress. In this instance, the condemned prisoners
spent their final two hours praying with Buddhist monks,
calling family members, and putting their final affairs in
order. Legally speaking, the DOC views its mandate as
relatively straightforward: the law requires the execution
immediately after the rejection of the petition for pardon by
the King. In this case, after the petition was rejected on
August 10th, it took approximately two weeks for it to pass
from the King through government channels to the DOC. As
soon as the DOC received the petition on August 24th, the
executions were swiftly carried out.

PARDON ME...
--------------


8. (C) The mechanics of the royal pardon are just as opaque
as most other aspects of Palace affairs. Human rights
attorney Thongbai Thongpao recalled that the King in the past
has issued pardons even in controversial cases. In the 1960s
for example, the King pardoned a Communist Party member who
killed a police officer during fighting in the jungle after
the Communist had already served 13 years in prison.


9. (C) But the Thai system has always treated drug cases
differently. Director General Nathee and others within DOC
did not speculate why this particular pardon petition -- as
opposed to the other 33 dealth penalty petitions currently
before the King -- was addressed first. As far as the
two-year deliberation process was concerned, the DOC would
only say that each case required different levels of
investigation by the King's private office, and that the
King's fragile health slowed down the process even more.
Also contributing to the six-year gap between executions was
the King's royal amnesty collectively pardoning approximately
28,500 prisoners on the occasion of his 80th birthday in
December 2007.


10. (C) Many government and civil society members speculate
the King will use the occasion of his 84th birthday (December
5, 2011) to issue another collective Royal Pardon, if he
lives that long (Note: An 84th birthday would be an
especially auspicious occasion for Buddhists, marking the end
of his seventh 12-year life cycle. End Note.) Citing rumors
of his declining health, Chulalongkorn University professor
Suthachai Yimprasert speculated that the King might issue a
collective pardon on his birthday this December in order to
"make merit."

...ACCEPTING ONE'S KARMA
--------------


11. (SBU) Anti-death penalty activists like Thongbai argue
that the death penalty contravenes Buddhist teaching, which
requires that its adherents refrain from taking life.
However, as Bill Klausner related to us, Thai society has
long reconciled itself to these contradictions. Klausner
noted that in 1918, as a Thai contingent headed to Western
Europe to join the World War I fight on the side of the
Allies, a patriarch gave a famous sermon in which he
explained why Thai soldiers could kill and still adhere to
Buddhist principles. This also reflected an acknowledgment,
even in this overwhelmingly Buddhist populace, that state
security is paramount in the secular world.


12. (SBU) The Union for Civil Liberty in Thailand completed a
campaign for death penalty abolition in Buddhist learning
centers in 2009. While some Buddhist monk participants
agreed that the death penalty was inconsistent with Buddhist
prohibitions of killing and the idea of making restitution,
another participant articulated the more dominant view of
Thai Theravada Buddhism and karma as practiced: "All
creatures on the earth are subject to Fate and are ruled by
its outcome and circumstances. Those who do what is right
will achieve good, those who do what is evil will suffer
evil."
JOHN