Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09ATHENS240
2009-02-24 05:29:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Athens
Cable title:  

MFA PRESSES U.S. TO WITHDRAW FROM NAVAL EXERCISE

Tags:  MARR PREL PARM TU GR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0002
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTH #0240/01 0550529
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 240529Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY ATHENS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3270
INFO RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA IMMEDIATE 5433
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON IMMEDIATE 1465
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE 0983
RHMFISS/COMSIXTHFLT IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/COMUSNAVEUR NAPLES IT IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L ATHENS 000240 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/23/2019
TAGS: MARR PREL PARM TU GR
SUBJECT: MFA PRESSES U.S. TO WITHDRAW FROM NAVAL EXERCISE

REF: A) ANKARA 278 B) GOODMAN-SPECKHARD E-MAIL
2/21/2009

Classified By: AMBASSADOR DAN SPECKHARD. REASON: 1.4 (B) AND (D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L ATHENS 000240

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/23/2019
TAGS: MARR PREL PARM TU GR
SUBJECT: MFA PRESSES U.S. TO WITHDRAW FROM NAVAL EXERCISE

REF: A) ANKARA 278 B) GOODMAN-SPECKHARD E-MAIL
2/21/2009

Classified By: AMBASSADOR DAN SPECKHARD. REASON: 1.4 (B) AND (D).


1. (C) SUMMARY AND COMMENT: On February 23, MFA Secretary
General Agathocles summoned Ambassador Speckhard to tell him
that, in the GOG's view, the U.S. should not to participate
in the upcoming naval exercise "Egemen." Non-participation
would send an important signal to Turkey that it needed to
work with Greece to work through Aegean issues. The two
countries needed to get back to resolving their differences
through negotiations which had become dormant following the
failure of the Annan plan in 2004. Ambassador Speckhard
underscored that it was normal for the U.S. to participate in
multilateral exercises and the Greeks should not see this as
an effort to take sides in Aegean disputes. The U.S.
respected Greece's sovereign territory and would do so in any
exercise we were involved in. The Ambassador urged the GOG
to raise its concerns directly with the exercise co-planners,
Turkey and the UK. Ambassador Speckhard urged Agathocles not
to define "success" as U.S. non-participation; rather,
success should be defined as insuring that Greece's
legitimate concerns were addressed. Agathocles agreed.


2. (C) Agathocles' swift acceptance of our definition of
success suggests that, by getting the details right, they
would have no objection to the exercise going ahead. We
continue to believe that, on SAR, it would be a mistake to
exercise a procedure that would undermine the principle of
coordination that is important in real cases. While we
understand the exegencies of military planning, we should
ensure that the details are in place and in line with our
principles -- even if it were to delay the exercise until all
the fine points are worked out. We agree with Ankara that
cancellation would only heighten tensions in the Aegean. END
SUMMARY AND COMMENT.

GREECE URGES U.S. WITHDRAWAL FROM EGEMEN . . .

3.. (C) Agathocles avoided technical details ("which you
know very well"),focusing instead on the exercise's
political impact. He argued that Turkey was taking the
opportunity to get the U.S. and others involved in a dispute
over sovereighty in the Aegean. There had been little
progress on these issues, and this exercise would only make
it harder in future. As it was not a NATO exercise, he urged
the U.S., UK, and Dutch not to participate. Their withdrawal
would send a signal to Turkey that it needed to discuss
Aegean issues with the GOG. He bemoaned the fact that the
progress made in the past was all but halted following the
failed Annan effort in Cyprus in 2004. Agathocles noted that
he had also called the UK and Dutch ambassadors and would see
them later in the day.

. . . BUT AGREES THAT THE GOAL IS GETTING THE KEY ISSUES RIGHT


4. (C) Ambassador Speckhard relayed ref b points, stressing
respect for Greece's sovereign territory and that Greece's
concerns were most appropriately raised with the exercise's
co-planners, Turkey and the UK. He urged Agathocles not to
create a scenario where anything short of cancellation or
withdrawal was perceived as a GOG failure. It would be more
productive to work with the exercise planners to ensure that
Greece's two key concerns with the exercise -- sovereignty
and SAR issues -- were addressed. That might mean delaying
the start of the exercise until the details were right.
Cancelling altogether could simply heighten tensions, and
have a destabilizing effect in the Aegean.


5. (C) Agathocles took the point, stressing the importance
of not violating Greek sovereignty or moving forward with the
SAR portion of the exercise without coordination with Greece
given its FIR responsibility. He reiterated the need to
"send a signal" to Turkey that Greece was prepared to
negotiate in a serious way. If things went on as they were,
it would be difficult for Greece to take a positive approach
to EU decisions on Turkey's accession at the end of the year.
On the SAR portion of the exercise, Agathocles questioned
whether a U.S. helicopter was involved, which would be a
problem. Ambassador Speckhard agreed to check, but thought
no U.S. air assets were involved. Agathocles seemed resigned
to Turkish violations of the disputed 6-10 nm Greek
defination of their airspace, but would be more upset if
other allies took the opportunity of this exercise to
reinforce differences on this point.

6. (C) Ambassador Speckhard again urged Agathocles not to
have "non-participation" by the U.S. be the goal. The goal
should be to get the details of the exercise right.
Agathocles agreed, and belived he could convince Bakoyiannis
that they would have achieved "success" if the exercise
respected Greece's territorial integrity and coordinated
appropriately on SAR/FIR issues.

MCCARTHY