Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09ANTANANARIVO444
2009-06-17 11:52:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Antananarivo
Cable title:  

MADAGASCAR: SADC POSITION MUST CHANGE

Tags:  PGOV MA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1213
PP RUEHBZ RUEHDU RUEHMR RUEHPA RUEHRN RUEHTRO
DE RUEHAN #0444/01 1681152
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 171152Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY ANTANANARIVO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2550
INFO RUEHZO/AFRICAN UNION COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USAFRICOM STUTTGART GE PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANTANANARIVO 000444 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR AF/E - MBEYZEROV
PARIS FOR RKANEDA
LONDON FOR PLORD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/17/2019
TAGS: PGOV MA
SUBJECT: MADAGASCAR: SADC POSITION MUST CHANGE

REF: A. ANTANANARIVO 428

B. STATE 45783

Classified By: AMBASSADOR NIELS MARQUARDT FOR REASONS 1.4 B AND D.

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANTANANARIVO 000444

SIPDIS

STATE FOR AF/E - MBEYZEROV
PARIS FOR RKANEDA
LONDON FOR PLORD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/17/2019
TAGS: PGOV MA
SUBJECT: MADAGASCAR: SADC POSITION MUST CHANGE

REF: A. ANTANANARIVO 428

B. STATE 45783

Classified By: AMBASSADOR NIELS MARQUARDT FOR REASONS 1.4 B AND D.


1. (C) SUMMARY: This is an action request; please see
paragraph 3. International mediators from the African Union,
the United Nations, and the Francophonie (OIF) formally
suspended negotiations between Madagascar's four main
political movements on June 16. They fear that the upcoming
SADC Summit on Madagascar, scheduled for June 21 in South
Africa, may generate another unhelpfully rigid and
unrealistic SADC statement, which we ask that embassies in
SADC capitals again help prevent. The SADC position
continues to be led unhelpfully by Swaziland, whose King
reportedly has rejected the recommendation of his own Envoy
to back away from the March 30 SADC statement calling for the
reinstatement (by force if necessary) of former President
Marc Ravalomanana. In a meeting today with local
representatives of the International Contact Group on
Madagascar (ICG-M),the mediators announced that they have
requested that the AU convene a meeting of the ICG-M in
either Addis Ababa or, more likely, in Paris (to be hosted by
the OIF),before the AU Summit in Syrte meets on July 1, We
recommend that the USG be represented at at the AF/AS or DAS
level, if indeed the meeting is scheduled. END SUMMARY.


2. (C) In a press conference on June 16, the three mediators
stressed their intention to remain engaged in Madagascar's
political crisis, but called on the four intransigent
political movements to reconsider their positions.
Negotiations have been held hostage for over three weeks by
the Ratsiraka delegation's demands for a preliminary amnesty
(reftel A),but the pro-Ravalomanana (TIM/Legalists) and
transition government (HAT) delegations were doing little to
help. Pressured by the Legalists (from within their own
delegation) to reach a settlement, the TIM representatives
had grown desperate to obtain a deal on Ravalomanana's right
to return and his role in the transition, while the HAT
delegation has refused for over a week to consider amnesty
separately from the rest of the Transition Charter. In this
context, the mediators' move to suspend talks was a realistic
assessment of the parties' extremely low chances of reaching

agreement in the near term. It is not clear that this pause
will ultimately result in an increased willingness to
compromise, as the mediators hope, but it does put the
international community on a more honest footing as to the
state of international efforts to resolve this crisis.


3. (C) Action request: SADC heads of state will meet on
Sunday, June 21 in South Africa to discuss Madagascar.
Although recent statements from Swaziland and Zimbabwe
indicate lingering support for a military solution to
reinstate Ravalomanana, we know that SADC is divided: South
Africa, for one, is firmly opposed to such an option. In
support of the ICG-M and the ongoing search for a peaceful
solution, post requests that the Department initiate another
urgent demarche to all SADC member governments, reinforcing
more or less the points previously delivered in reftel B,
from May 5.


4. (U) Following are suggested points for delivery to SADC
member governments, updated from reftel B to reflect the
current situation:

-- Express appreciation for SADC's strong stance against the
unconstitutional change of power in Madagascar.

-- Stress our aim to support SADC, the AU, the Francophonie
and the UN in coordinated efforts to create a consensual,
negotiated process leading to elections before the end of

2009. Emphasize elections as the only legitimate way to
return Madagascar to constitutional order.

-- Note that Ravalomanana still speaks openly about the
possibility of a "SADC Brigade" restoring him to power, a
suggestion which has been reinforced by recent statements
from the leaders of Swaziland and Zimbabwe, and in the recent
COMESA Summit Communique. These statements, expectations and
perceptions are not realistic or helpful and should be
discouraged.

-- Explain our conviction that support for the forceful
reinstatement of Marc Ravalomanana is an impediment to
promoting political dialogue and change in Madagascar, as it
removes any incentive for Ravalomanana or his supporters to
work seriously towards early new elections - as has been

ANTANANARI 00000444 002 OF 002


demonstrated over the past three months since SADC suspended
Madagascar as a member.

-- To support the peaceful resolution of this crisis, suggest
that SADC issue a statement strongly and unambiguously
calling for all Malagasy parties to rejoin the negotiating
table, with no reference to an alternative military option.
This will help unlock the way forward to elections before the
end of 2009.

-- Reinforce our agreement with the June 16 AU/UN/OIF
statement, asserting that the international community will
not support a unilateral solution to end this crisis, and
that any such effort is not likely to succeed. Negotiations
have been suspended temporarily, but the international
community will remain engaged in hopes that each of the four
political movements will use this opportunity to reconsider
their positions, and return to negotiations prepared to
compromise.


5. (C) The mediators have requested that the AU convene a
meeting of the ICG-M before the AU Summit, possibly to be
hosted by the OIF in Paris (and possibly timed to allow
travellers en route to Syrte to attend en route). We
recommend that the USG attend this meeting at the AF A/S ort
DAS level. The goal of the ICG meeting is to reinforce the
message that a consensus-based political solution remains the
only viable option in this crisis. They also hope to shore
up international support before the AU Summit July 1-3. The
experience of successive SADC and AU meetings indicates that
the SADC position from June 21, whatever it is, will weigh
heavily on any subsequent AU discussion or statement. It is
thus crucial to engage key member states on this issue this
week. Mediators today requested such assistance from the
Perm 5, the EU, Germany, and South Africa, as well as from
the UN Secretariat. The mediators intend to visit SADC
countries but clearly will not be able to do so before this
Summit. They also noted, and seem to accept, that SADC has
shown no interest in inviting them to make any presentation
at the Summit. With the Swazi King reportedly having
rejected the report and advice of SADC Special Envoy (and
former Swazi Prime Minister) Absalom Thamba Dlamini, it is
unclear that the heads of state will hear any unbiased,
pro-Ravalomanana views unless they hear them in demarches
from us and any others who decide to engage.
MARQUARDT