Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09AMMAN2227
2009-10-05 11:53:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Amman
Cable title:  

JORDAN: CONVICTED POET DEMARCHE DELIVERED

Tags:  PGOV PHUM KIRF KJUS KWMN KTIP JO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1732
RR RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHDH RUEHKUK RUEHROV
DE RUEHAM #2227 2781153
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 051153Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY AMMAN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6060
INFO RUEHEE/ARAB LEAGUE COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L AMMAN 002227 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/04/2019
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KIRF KJUS KWMN KTIP JO
SUBJECT: JORDAN: CONVICTED POET DEMARCHE DELIVERED

REF: A. STATE 95503

B. AMMAN 1529

C. 08 AMMAN 2973

Classified By: Ambassador R. Stephen Beecroft for reasons 1.4 (b) and (
d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L AMMAN 002227

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/04/2019
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KIRF KJUS KWMN KTIP JO
SUBJECT: JORDAN: CONVICTED POET DEMARCHE DELIVERED

REF: A. STATE 95503

B. AMMAN 1529

C. 08 AMMAN 2973

Classified By: Ambassador R. Stephen Beecroft for reasons 1.4 (b) and (
d).


1. (C) Post delivered reftel points to Prime Minister Nader
Al-Dahabi, Justice Minister Ayman Odeh, and Ministry of
Foreign Affairs Americas Bureau Chief Samer Naber. In advance
of reftel, the Ambassador stressed to Royal Court Chief
Nasser Lozi the need to find a suitable solution as the
poet's imprisonment would be unacceptable internationally and
damage Jordan's interests and reputation, including in the
U.S. Lozi was familiar with the case and understood that
Samhan's conviction sends the perception that freedom of
speech and religion are severely limited in Jordan. The
Ambassador also raised reftel with PM Dahabi, who was
familiar with the case. Dahabi asserted that the case places
the government between a rock (conservative elements of
society) and a hard place (international and local civil
society, media, and foreign governments). Both officials,
however, promised to look for solutions in properly resolving
the case.


2. (C) Naber was familiar with the case and acknowledged the
potential for international criticism if the ruling against
Samhan is affirmed on appeal. He agreed that Jordan "has to
watch out on this case" and fully consider the public
relations implications. Naber was also frustrated at the
lack of information sharing on the particulars of the case
between MFA and other parts of the Jordanian government.


3. (C) Poloffs reviewed the case at length with Justice
Minister Odeh and explored ways to resolve the case without
violating Jordanian laws or the integrity of the judicial
process. In doing so, Odeh found a judicial irregularity
that must be addressed. The Court of First Instance sentenced
Samhan to one-year imprisonment based on Penal Code article
that prohibits insulting religious sentiment. The Court also
fined Samhan $14,000 for violating a Press and Publications
Law article that prohibits the slandering of Islam. Odeh
indicated that an individual cannot be punished twice, using
two different laws, for the same alleged offense. In this
instance, Odeh thought an Appellate Court could easily throw
out one of the punishments even without ruling on the case
itself. Odeh stressed the sensitivities in the case and that
he would not, or should not, interfere with court
proceedings. Odeh did state, however, that the case would be
followed closely and the Ministry would become involved to
address any irregularities.


4. (C) Odeh also discussed confusing language in the court's
decision that made it unclear who is responsible for payment
of the $14,000 fine -- Samhan, or his publishing house.
Poloffs were informed that the publishing house lodged an
objection before the Court of First Instance. Odeh explained
that the publishing house is unable to appeal any part of the
court's decision as they were not a defense party or present
at any of the trials but that they could lodge an objection.
The publishing house was scheduled to present their objection
before the court on September 30. Odeh also explained to
Poloffs that Samhan has not yet been "served" the verdict, as
he was not present when the court made its ruling, and that
the attorney general's office is in "no rush" to do so. As
such, there is no appeals process to discuss yet. Once the
appeal process is initiated, the appellate court's decision
will be final with no further possibility to appeal. (Note:
Samhan confirmed that the verdict has not been served. End
Note)


5. (C) Comment: The meeting with Odeh was very open and
informative. A major step forward would be the elimination
of either the penal code or press and publications law
conviction -- Odeh thought the prison sentence should be the
one eliminated as the case revolves around a publication but
that such a decision would be up to the court. What is clear
is that a final outcome may not come for a year or more.
Even once Samhan is served and an official appeal lodged,
Odeh confirmed that the Appellate Court would probably not
start proceedings for at least six months. Post will
continue to discuss this case with relevant interlocutors and
use it as an opportunity to push for enhanced freedom of
speech and religion in Jordan. End Comment
Beecroft