Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09AITTAIPEI174
2009-02-17 09:45:00
UNCLASSIFIED
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Cable title:  

MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS, OBAMA'S

Tags:  OPRC KMDR KPAO TW 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0174/01 0480945
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 170945Z FEB 09
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0917
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 8921
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 0370
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000174 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS, OBAMA'S
FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000174

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS, OBAMA'S
FOREIGN RELATIONS


1. Summary: Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused their
February 14-17 news coverage on the possibility of signing a
Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement between the two sides
of the Taiwan Strait, on the Taiwan government's efforts to fight
the island's mounting unemployment rate, and on the ongoing probe
into former President Chen Shui-bian and his family's legal cases.
Almost all Chinese-language and English-language papers reported on
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's speech delivered at the
Asia Society Friday, and on the remarks by U.S. Deputy Secretary of
State James Steinberg and National Intelligence Director Dennis
Blair, respectively, Thursday on the developments of cross-Strait
relations. The pro-unification "United Daily News" front-paged a
banner headline Saturday reading "U.S. Intelligence Director Blair
'Applauds Both Sides of the [Taiwan] Strait,'" while the
pro-independence "Liberty Times" ran a banner headline on page four
Saturday reading "U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair:
the United States Needs to Assist Taiwan in Maintaining
[Cross-Strait] Military Balance."


2. Several editorials and commentaries over the weekend discussed
the U.S.-China-Taiwan relations in the light of the remarks made by
National Intelligence Director Blair and Deputy Secretary Steinberg
on cross-Strait relations. A "United Daily News" analysis singled
out Blair's statement that Taiwan's "long-term security lies in some
sort of agreement with China" and posed the question regarding if
this is the 'real story' for both sides of the Strait that has yet
to be polished by the Obama Administration. An editorial in the
conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post,"
however, called on Blair that "it's time to let the two sides deal
with their differences peacefully." An editorial in the
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" said the "support
for Taiwan has been expressed by the head of the U.S. intelligence
apparatus rather than by a president speaking off the cuff and
apparently without institutional backup - as Bush did in his first
term - bodes well for Taiwan's immediate future." A separate
"Taipei Times" op-ed piece, written by an Australia-based freelance
writer, discussed the overall U.S.-China relations and concluded by

saying that "U.S.-China relations are not likely to have an easy
ride under the Obama administration." An editorial in the
pro-independence, English-language "Taiwan News," on the other hand,
discussed Secretary Clinton's trip to Asia and urged her to reaffirm
the statement made by former President Bill Clinton in February 2000
that "issues between Beijing and Taiwan must be resolved peacefully
and with the assent of the people of Taiwan." With regard to the
Obama Administration's foreign policy, a column in the centrist,
KMT-leaning "China Times" said the Obama Administration has yet to
come up with a new policy toward North Korea. A separate "China
Times" op-ed piece, on the other hand, said Israel and Iran are like
two vicious dogs dragging the United States in different directions.
A third "Taipei Times" op-ed piece, written by Hawaii-based
freelance writer Richard Halloran, said security issues are high on
Secretary Clinton's Asia agenda." End summary.


3. U.S.-China-Taiwan Relations

A) "Taiwan's Security Relying on China -- Are These Words Truly
Meant by the United States?"

Washington correspondent Vincent Chang noted in an analysis in the
pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000] (2/14):

"Judging from the February 12 remarks made by two major national
security team members of the Obama Administration ... on
cross-Strait issues, one can tell that stability and maintaining the
status quo continue to dictate the cross-Strait policy direction of
the new U.S. Administration. ... Both [U.S. National Intelligence
Director Dennis] Blair and [U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James]
Steinberg called recent warming ties between the two sides of the
Taiwan Strait 'very encouraging,' and Blair further approved of
recent practices by leaders on both sides of the Taiwan Strait by
addressing them as 'the most positive development over the past few
years.' It is thus evident that the Obama Administration strongly
supports the way that both sides of the Taiwan Strait are resuming
dialogue and reaching agreement on resolving issues of real
substance.

"Yet there were some ambiguous statements in Blair's remarks. For
example, when he said that Taiwan's long-term security lies in 'some
sort of an arrangement' with China, and that it does not lie in
military defense, he seemed to suggest that Taiwan needs to 'beg'
for security from China. ... Perhaps Blair was not very precise
when he replied [to inquiries] on sensitive cross-Strait issues.
But could it be that he was simply straightforward and told the
'real story' that has yet to be polished by the Obama
Administration? This is something that deserves careful observation
by both sides of the Taiwan Strait."

B) "To Maintain Peace, Prepare for Peace"


The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post"
[circulation: 30,000] editorialized (2/17):

"'Taiwan has to realize that its long-term security lies in some
sort of an arrangement with China. It does not lie in military
defenses,' Dennis Blair, director of the U.S. National Intelligence
Agency, said in his answer last week to congressional inquires. ...
By calling recent warming ties between China and Taiwan 'very
encouraging' and then saying 'we're going to have to help [Taiwan]
some more in order to maintain a balance,' Blair seems to be
swimming upstream. If President Ma Ying-jeou has already been able
to defuse tensions and expand economic ties with China in the past
nine months without using one bullet from the U.S. arms deal, what
then would be the rationale for a race to arm this island? ...
Since you've observed that the two sides of the Strait are already
on the right track, it's time to let the two sides deal with their
differences peacefully, Mr. Blair."

C) "A 'Status Quo' Boost for Taiwan"

The pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation:
30,000] editorialized (2/14):

"'Taiwan should not be so defenseless that it feels it has to do
everything that China says ... China cannot be so overwhelming that
it can bully Taiwan.' These words, uttered by US National
Intelligence Director Admiral Dennis Blair at a US Senate committee
hearing on Thursday, are intriguing. ... But by implying that
Taiwan is at risk of defenselessness and that China seeks
unmatchable power in the region, Blair - and his hard-nosed
intelligence apparatus - represents the 'bad cop' of US President
Barack Obama's fledgling China policy against the 'good cop' of
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the traditionally more
congenial State Department. Blair's immediate support for closing
the growing gap in cross-Strait military capability and his
identification of Chinese military strategy as an ongoing and
unequivocal 'threat' to Taiwan is a very welcome tonic after years
of obfuscation and scapegoating under former president George W.
Bush. Blair's statement can only irritate China, though it is
likely that Beijing will hold its collective tongue until its
officials meet Clinton on Chinese soil next week. Blair's comments
also offer a degree of relief to the Taiwanese military and
opposition politicians who fear that cross-Strait detente would
jeopardize military ties with the US and hurt future arms sales.
...

"Some people in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) - those who
negotiate with China, in particular - will be greatly irritated at
Blair's unequivocal assessment of Chinese intentions and
capabilities. But for most, Washington's regrouping on cross-strait
military matters will provide a boost in confidence. The 'status
quo' that so many people place faith in was looking quite ragged
there for a while. Now, with election season over and Washington
looking to fortify policy over the next four years, this strange
slogan has had some life breathed into it at a time of considerable
symbolic value. That support for Taiwan has been expressed by the
head of the US intelligence apparatus rather than by a president
speaking off the cuff and apparently without institutional backup -
as Bush did in his first term - bodes well for Taiwan's immediate
future."

D) "China Uneasy with New US Regime"

Sushil Seth, a freelance writer based in Australia, opined in the
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation:
30,000] (2/15):

"... However much China might want to deflect the issue of currency
valuation and use the buying of US debt instruments as a pressure
tactic, the issue will not go away. Its undervalued currency,
causing trade distortion and imbalance to US disadvantage, will thus
be a thorn in US-China relations under the Obama administration. ...
As China specialist Kenneth Lieberthal has said: 'The Chinese are
probably one of the few people in the world who were sorry to see
President Bush go, and are nervous about his successor.' They are
also 'uneasy about [US Secretary of State] Hillary Clinton. She has,
in their assessment, not been a friend of China.' And they might as
well be, as Clinton is seeking to broaden the agenda of US-China
relations beyond the economy. She has said that the US needed 'a
more comprehensive approach.' In her view, the strategic dialogue
of the Bush administration 'turned into an economic dialogue,' with
China benefitting from it.

"Clinton didn't specify the issues that might feature in her
strategic dialogue. But in any list, Taiwan and Tibet will feature
prominently where China would like to buy US silence/support. And
that will remain a problem. Looking at it, US-China relations are

not likely to have an easy ride under the Obama administration. Both
sides, though, will be keen not to let things get out of control,
especially in the midst of an ongoing global economic crisis."

E) "Why Hillary's Trip Matters to Taiwan"

The pro-independence, English-language "Taiwan News" [circulation:
20,000] editorialized (2/16):

"... Clinton's decision to make her first overseas visit to Japan,
Indonesia, South Korea and the People's Republic of China is clearly
aimed to explain Obama's priorities and respond to Asian worries
that regional needs will be neglected due to the preoccupation of
the new Democratic government with the festering legacy of the war
against Iraq and simmering crises in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran
left by the preceding neoconservative administration of ex-president
George W. Bush. ... Her choice of Japan as her first stop may aim
to smooth feathers ruffled during the Democratic primary campaign
when she highlighted the importance of the U.S.-China relationship,
while her stop in Jakarta will highlight the importance placed by
Obama, who spent much of his childhood in Indonesia, on links with
Southeast Asia. Clinton's last stop in Beijing will unveil the
Obama administration's concept of 'strategic stakeholder' to guide
its relations with the PRC and its focus on frank dialogue with
Beijing on pressing issues such as climate change, currency policy
and human rights, including the question of Chinese persecution of
religious freedom in Tibet.

"The intention of the Obama administration to introduce a new
approach to the PRC merits closer attention from Taiwan, especially
since the new concept is likely to boost the intensity and expand
the scope of dialogue between Washington and Beijing. ... Beneath
the current surface calm lie currents of uncertain possibilities for
diverse or even conflicting lines of authority involving the
departments of State, Defense and Treasury, the NSC and even the
office of Vice President Joseph Biden, but ultimately Obama himself
will have the final say. ...

"The transformation of the cross-strait relationship into an
asymmetric game heavily weighted in the PRC's favor has finally
sparked concern in the U.S. defense community, as shown by Director
of National Intelligence Dennis Blair who said last week that
Washington will continue to supply necessary and defensive-oriented
arms sales to Taiwan in line with the Taiwan Relations Act to
"balance" Beijing's military buildup. Nevertheless, Clinton's call
for the restoration of U.S.-PRC military exchanges suspended by
Beijing after Bush sent a bill authorizing arms sales to Taiwan to
the Congress last October is a worrisome sign that the Obama
administration may follow in Bush's neo-conservative footsteps.

"During the current 'window,' the KMT government and the opposition
Democratic Progressive Party should intensify efforts to engage in
dialogue with the State Department, other Cabinet level agencies and
associated think tanks to encourage closer examination of the
underlying problems in the recent cross-strait developments and urge
the Obama administration to forge a balanced policy toward Taiwan
that rejects Bush's 'false choice' between short-term expediency and
America's democratic ideals by reaffirming Washington's commitments
to Taiwan's security, democracy and rightful international space.
We also strongly urge Secretary of State Clinton to reaffirm the
statement made on Feb. 24, 2000 by former president Bill Clinton
that the U.S. should 'make absolutely clear that the issues between
Beijing and Taiwan must be resolved peacefully and with the assent
of the people of Taiwan.'"


4. Obama's Foreign Policy

A) "Obama Has Yet to Come up with a New Policy toward North Korea"

The "International Lookout" column in the centrist, KMT-leaning
"China Times" [circulation: 150,000] wrote (2/15):

"... South Korean President Lee Myung-bak has totally handed over
his North Korean policy to Washington. How is the United States
going to respond? Judging from the current situation, it appears
that [U.S. President Barack] Obama has yet to come up with any new
ideas. If Obama were to repudiate the [former] Bush
Administration's policy toward the Korean Peninsula, he will have to
have a substitute policy. Outgoing U.S. chief negotiator to the
'Six-Party Talks' Christopher Hill indicated that there will be a
change in [Washington's] policy, but no one knows how it is going to
change. Newly sworn-in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the
Six-Party Talks will remain a resolution, except that the United
States will have to put on a tougher hat [Ed. Note: take a tougher
negotiating stance]. It seems that she has not put full
consideration as to whether the [new] hat will be tough enough to
intimidate Pyongyang. ..."

B) "Obama Being Dragged around by Israel and Iran"

Deputy Editor-in-Chief Kuo Chen-lung wrote in the "International
Column" of the centrist, KMT-leaning "China Times" [circulation:
150,000] (2/17):

"Israel and Iran are like two vicious dogs, which are not only
dragging the U.S. foreign policy in different directions but are
growling at and fighting with each other, giving the Obama
Administration a headache. ... The Obama Administration is now
evaluating its Iran policy, but it appears that Washington is
[trying to] resolve Iran's nuclear problem by following the same
pattern of the Six-Party Talks. Six nations -- the United States,
Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- met in Berlin
in early February and negotiated their strategies. Not only did
Obama want to [take advantage of such an opportunity to] pull back
the two vicious dogs, but he also hoped to resolve the core problem
in the Middle East -- Israeli-Palestinian problem -- at one stroke.
... [The realization of] such a distant but beautiful dream must be
built on direct contact and negotiations between the United States
and Iran. But will Iran try to postpone [the talks] in order to
strive for more time to develop nuclear weapons? ..."

C) "Security Issues High on Clinton's Asia Agenda"

Richard Halloran, a freelance writer based in Hawaii, opined in the
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation:
30,000] (2/15):

"US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton embarks on her first trip to
Asia today, with security issues high on the agenda. The public will
be treated to lots of pretty diplomatic words as she confers with
Chinese, Japanese, Indonesian and South Korean leaders. Those suave
utterances, however, will mask stark underlying realities that
affect the security posture of the US in Asia. ... Clinton has
indicated she plans to take a firm line with the Chinese. ... Not
on Clinton's itinerary is North Korea, but it will be lurking in the
background. It has become clear that North Korean leader Kim Jong-il
has no intention of giving up nuclear weapons. Moreover, he may
order the test of another ballistic missile soon. And he has renewed
his belligerence toward South Korea. Indonesia, the world's most
populous Muslim nation, may turn out to be the brightest stop on
Clinton's journey. ..."

YOUNG