Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09ABUJA1761
2009-09-23 18:33:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Abuja
Cable title:  

INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY STRUGGLING TO FIND PROPER

Tags:  PGOV PREL EAID UNDP NI 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2751
PP RUEHBZ RUEHDU RUEHMR RUEHPA RUEHRN RUEHTRO
DE RUEHUJA #1761/01 2661833
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 231833Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY ABUJA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7083
INFO RUEHZO/AFRICAN UNION COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHZK/ECOWAS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHOS/AMCONSUL LAGOS PRIORITY 1999
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUZEJAA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USAFRICOM STUTTGART GE PRIORITY
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ABUJA 001761 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR AF/FO, AF/W, INR/AA;

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/10/2010
TAGS: PGOV PREL EAID UNDP NI
SUBJECT: INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY STRUGGLING TO FIND PROPER
SUPPORT ROLE FOR NIGER DELTA AMNESTY PROGRAM

REF: ABUJA 1669 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: Political Counselor James P. McAnulty
for reasons in Sections 1.4 (B) and (D).

-------
SUMMARY
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ABUJA 001761

SIPDIS

STATE FOR AF/FO, AF/W, INR/AA;

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/10/2010
TAGS: PGOV PREL EAID UNDP NI
SUBJECT: INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY STRUGGLING TO FIND PROPER
SUPPORT ROLE FOR NIGER DELTA AMNESTY PROGRAM

REF: ABUJA 1669 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: Political Counselor James P. McAnulty
for reasons in Sections 1.4 (B) and (D).

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (C) International community representatives continue to
struggle to identify an appropriate way to support the Niger
Delta amnesty program. At recent donor meetings, diplomats
expressed skepticism about various proposals, including those
formulated by United Nations Development Program (UNDP)
technical experts. A UNDP advisor told donors that the GON
had neither funded nor planned adequately for the amnesty's
disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) process.
END SUMMARY.

--------------
UNDP CONSULTANTS DESCRIBE SHORTCOMINGS
--------------


2. (C) Participants at recent meetings of donor nations and
organizations attended by PolOffs in Abuja voiced skepticism
over GON proposals for reintegration and resettlement. UNDP
Peace and Development Advisor Dr. Abiodum Onadipe, overseeing
UN consultations with the GON on amnesty, told donor
representatives at a September 4 meeting that GON Amnesty
Implementation Committee Chairperson and Defense Minister
General Abbe remained highly suspicious of international
involvement in amnesty and the DDR process. According to
Onadipe, Abbe challenged the presence of a U.N.-sponsored DDR
consultant at a recent Amnesty Committee meeting.


3. (U) UN DDR consultant Laurent Banal described various
weaknesses in Nigeria's proposed DDR process. The GON plan,
he said, would not address fundamental political problems
that fomented militancy in the Niger Delta in the first
place. Moreover, the GON lacked capacity for reintegration
training. Banal claimed the GON had not provided a
sufficient legal framework describing exactly what would
happen to militants who disarmed and reintegrated. The GON
Amnesty Committee, he added, continued to view international
support as a "threat" to Nigeria, which Banal attributed to a
belief in GON circles that the DDR process would expose lack
of capacity and other weaknesses within the military. Such

distrust, he said, produced a "total lack of coordination"
among international partners, the Amnesty Implementation
Committee, the Niger Delta Ministry, and the Presidency.


4. (SBU) Banal said, of the estimated 1,000 militants who had
disarmed thus far, some had returned home, others remained in
camps awaiting reintegration training, and still others
stayed at hotels near amnesty processing sites because of
dissatisfaction with their accommodations at camps. Onadipe
added that about 300 ex-militants still live in a handful of
camps in Rivers State with nothing to do. Banal and Onadipe
predicted that tensions would continue to increase as the
amnesty deadline approached and government promises of
reintegration training remained unfulfilled.

--------------
DDR PROCESS "BOOBY-TRAPPED" FROM THE START
--------------
Q --------------


5. (C) Onadipe, opining that various officials in the Niger
Delta Ministry did not care whether the DDR process succeeded
or failed, described the amnesty process as "booby-trapped"
from the start. Defense Minister and Amnesty Committee
Chairperson Abbe told him that the GON preferred
international financial aid for the DDR process "without
strings attached."

--------------
"WISH LIST" ELICITS CRITICISM
--------------


ABUJA 00001761 002 OF 002



6. (C) At a partners meeting in August, international
community representatives characterized the Niger Delta
Ministry's initial, proposed amnesty implementation budget as
amateurish and inadequate. The budget initially contained a
"shopping list" of vehicles, laptop computers, and digital
copiers for ministry staff. The Ministry, in the face of
donor criticism, later withdrew requests for such items. To
address colleagues' concerns, the UK PolCouns suggested
creation of a Niger Delta trust fund to be overseen by an
international board of directors, including Nigerians, to
manage donor contributions to the rehabilitation portion of
the DDR program. Other international representatives
supported the proposal, noting NDDC mismanagement and
outright theft of billions of dollars in funding over the
years. The PolCouns confided to PolOff that her Government's
strategy involved "hiding behind the UN," but if DDR experts
sponsored by the UNDP and DFID succeeded in developing a
workable plan for the GON rehabilitation and reintegration
program, London would consider contributing to an
internationally-administered trust fund.

-------------- --------------
ASPECTS OF UNDP PROPOSALS ELICIT SKEPTICISM AS WELL
-------------- --------------


7. (C) UNDP consultants also briefed donors on their
recommendations, including creation of teams of four to five
consultants with recent experience in the DDR process to work
with the Niger Delta Ministry and Amnesty Implementation
Committee to address capacity issues and develop a workable
plan. They suggested creating a pool of international
experts, funded by international partners, upon which the
consultants could draw support. They also sought
international partner funding for reintegration training,
consisting mostly of international scholarships but also
including some domestic scholarships. Canadian PolOff noted
the potential reluctance of foreign governments to accept
known militants for studies abroad, and admitted to us that
the Canadian government had no money to offer anyway.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


8. (C) Our diplomatic colleagues remain skeptical of the
amnesty process, but some believe it merits qualified support
for lack of a better alternative. The October 4 deadline for
amnesty, for example, would not allow sufficient time to set
up DDR training centers or enlist the 1,000 volunteers that
consultants estimate needed for the DDR process to succeed.
Given GON distrust of international community motives on this
issue, the Amnesty Implementation Committee would not likely
accept the four-to-five-person teams of consultants
recommended by UNDP. The proposed overseas scholarships
program appears to be a non-starter for most nations that
could fund such scholarships. Moreover, many ex-militants at
camps and hotels awaiting promised reintegration training
could lose patience and decide to rejoin militant groups
after the amnesty deadline passes. END COMMENT.
Qafter the amnesty deadline passes. END COMMENT.

SANDERS