ARMENIA'S 2008 TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS REPORT

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 13 YEREVAN 000243

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR G/TIP, G, INL, DRL, PRM AND EUR/CARC

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL KCRM PHUM KWMN SMIG KFRD ASEC PREF ELAB
AM
SUBJECT: ARMENIA'S 2008 TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS REPORT

REF: STATE 00002731

YEREVAN 00000243 001.2 OF 013


(U) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE HANDLE ACCORDINGLY.


1. (U) This cable represents Embassy Yerevan's submission for the
2008 Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report. Please see paragraph 5
for responses keyed to reftel request.


2. (SBU) During the reporting period, the government of Armenia
significantly revamped its interagency apparatus that is responsible
for combating TIP. Positive developments included the final adoption
of the 2007-09 National Plan of Action (NPA),the creation of a
ministerial level council headed by the Deputy Prime Minister to
combat trafficking, the development of the draft National Referral
Mechanism, and the first ever -- to post's knowledge -- line-item
allocation of GOAM funding (USD 33,000) for domestic anti-TIP
programs. The new NPA is unique in that most of the activities
described therein are supposed to be financed by the state budget, a
stark contrast to first NPA where the international community
financed virtually all anti-trafficking initiatives.


3. (SBU) Despite this overhaul, however, which now assigns anti-TIP
responsibilities to the ministerial level, room for improvement
remains, particularly in implementing anti-TIP programs. In
addition, prosecution of official complicity from previous
trafficking cases remains a weak area, and the government could
better leverage the expertise of NGOs in the TIP field to bolster
its own efforts.


4. (SBU) Combating TIP in Armenia remains a top mission priority.
Embassy officials met frequently with senior members of the Armenian
government, with concrete results. The USG funded a victims'
assistance program that provided safe-haven and medical, social and
legal services, facilitated the assistance to 14 trafficking
victims, and funded a victim hotline. INL funded a number of
training programs for Armenian law enforcement agencies. Officials
advocated persistently for the revamped government structure that
raises the responsibility for combating TIP to the ministerial
level, and advised the government on TIP funding priorities, which
finally appear to be taking place.


5. (SBU) Post would like to inform G/TIP that information provided
in this report covers only calendar year 2007. Information through
March 2008 is currently unavailable, due to the ongoing political
crisis and declared State of Emergency in Armenia which has hampered
law enforcement agencies' ability to provide requested information.
Post will promptly transmit such data should it become available
before the end of March.

--------------
OVERVIEW
--------------


6. (SBU) This section corresponds to the questions in section A of
reftel paragraph 27.

-- Is the country a country of origin, transit, or destination for
internationally trafficked men, women, or children?

Armenia is a source and, to a lesser extent, a transit and
destination country for women and girls trafficked for sexual
exploitation largely to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Turkey.
It is also a source country for Armenian men and women trafficked to
Russia and Turkey for labor.

-- Provide, where possible, numbers or estimates for each group; how
they were trafficked, to where, and for what purpose.

According to data on pimping and trafficking cases from Armenia's
Prosecutor General's (PG's) Office, 147 people were subjected to
sexual or labor exploitation during calendar year 2007. Of these
147 victims - all of whom were women, two were subjected to labor
exploitation in Turkey.

Of the 147, 36 were classified as trafficking victims under the
Armenian criminal code. Most of the women were trafficked from
Armenia either to Turkey or Dubai for sexual exploitation, and two
were victims of labor trafficking in Turkey.

It remains a challenge to disentangle Armenian criminal justice data
on pimping and trafficking in persons, and to translate that into

YEREVAN 00000243 002.2 OF 013


our own definitional categories. Of the 147 women and girls deemed
by the Government of Armenia to be trafficking victims or to have
been illegally recruited into voluntary prostitution, 36 women
identified in connection with Armenian TIP prosecutions clearly meet
the U.S. definition of trafficking victims. An additional 33 women
or girls also most probably meet the U.S. definition of trafficking
victims, for a total of 69 trafficking victims (32 to the UAE, 34 to
Turkey, and three Russian women exploited in Armenia). The
remaining 78 victims appear not to meet the U.S. definition of
trafficking victims.

There are no accurate figures clearly documenting the scale of
Armenian trafficking victims in any of the destination countries.
Due to poor social conditions and severe poverty in Armenia,
especially outside the capital city of Yerevan, many men and women
seek employment abroad where they can fall victim to sex or labor
trafficking. According to unconfirmed reports, hundreds of Armenian
women engage in prostitution in the UAE and Turkey, and it is
impossible to confirm with certainty what percentage is bona fide
trafficking victims. Tens of thousands of Armenian men travel to
Russia for seasonal construction work, but no data exist to quantify
the numbers (presumably a small but significant minority) who are
exploited as trafficking victims.

In November 2007, the Organization for Cooperation and Security in
Europe (OSCE) published a 2005-07 survey on Labor Migration from
Armenia. The survey revealed that out of the 1500 households
interviewed, 14.5 percent of them had family members who were
engaged in labor migration. 93.5 percent of those involved in labor
migration were males; 93 percent of the labor migrants worked in or
were bound for Russia; and 77.3 worked in the construction industry.
Although approximately 70.4 percent of the migrants had informal job
arrangements prior to travel, the vast majority did not have any
legal agreement/contract with their employers. According to the
survey, the data clearly shows that labor exploitation and violation
of labor regulations are widespread in the destination countries for
Armenians, although migrants as a rule did not complain about it.
The survey recorded cases when the migrants went either unpaid or
underpaid for the job; were subjected to unacceptably harsh working
and living conditions, or were faced with dangers to their personal
security or life; when candidates for migration were enticed into
employment under false pretences; when they suffered deductions from
wages with or without their voluntary consent; and when they worked
overtime and without rest.

In June 2007, the United Nations Development Program (UNDP),with
input from two local NGOs (Hope and Help, and Democracy Today),
published a booklet on "Victims of Trafficking Assisted in Armenia"
that covered the period of October 2003 through March 2007. In the
mentioned period, the two NGOs assisted a total of 87 trafficking
victims. Although the booklet does not provide information relevant
to the current reporting period, the detailed information provides
insights into the overall TIP landscape:

Out of the 87 victims assisted during the mentioned period:

-- 37 were referred to the NGOs by law enforcement agencies, two by
Armenia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA),five by the
International Organization for Migration (IOM),26 by the NGO's
social workers themselves, and 17 were located through the telephone
hotlines run by the NGOs;

-- 41 percent were trafficked to the UAE, 30 percent to Turkey, 14
percent to Russia and in 15 percent of cases Armenia was the
destination country;

-- 80 percent of the victims were subjected to sexual trafficking
and 20 to labor trafficking;

-- 10 were male and the rest female;

-- 69 percent of the victims were aged 18-30 years;

-- and in 61 percent of the trafficking cases, the recruiters of the
victims were their friends;

During the April-December 2007 timeframe, the Hope and Help NGO
assisted two women who were victims of forced marriages and labor
exploitation simultaneously. In both cases the women were
victimized in Turkey, one of whom was 63 years old, the other 25.


YEREVAN 00000243 003.2 OF 013


Trafficking victims are usually recruited by friends (ostensibly),
friends of friends, acquaintances or neighbors. Those trafficked to
the UAE usually fly to Dubai directly from Yerevan, or sometimes via
Moscow. In most cases, the victims use their real documents to
travel to Moscow, where traffickers generally give them false
documents for the final leg to the UAE to evade UAE immigration
restrictions. There have been cases in which UAE law enforcement
agencies had deported victims back to Moscow, at which time
traffickers forged new false documents for them and returned the
victims directly back to Dubai. The trafficking route to Turkey is
generally via bus through Georgia. Here as well, frequently
traffickers recapture victims deported to Georgia, and send them
back to Turkey with new false documents.

The December 2007 "Anti-trafficking Needs Assessment of Armenian Law
Enforcement" written by international experts involved in the UNDP's
Anti-Trafficking Project and a joint project operated by the OSCE,
International Labor Organization (ILO),and the International Center
for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD) contains reports from
Armenian law enforcement agencies which indicate that the
trafficking destination for Armenian victims is shifting away from
the UAE toward other states in the Persian Gulf, namely Qatar,
Bahrain and Kuwait. Such reports have surfaced in the past, but no
specific cases have yet to be registered.

According to the needs assessment, in the case of trafficking of men
for labor exploitation, the traffickers appear to be known locally.
The men are recruited and transported in organized groups (up to 40
persons) and work in Russia for periods of up to two years in the
construction industry. Their freedom of movement is limited,
passports confiscated, conditions of work poor, they receive only a
small percentage of the wages owed, and many are threatened with
retribution against loved ones back home if they reveal their labor
conditions. To reiterate, the information from the needs assessment
provides a more general understanding of the trafficking situation,
but no such cases have been registered in the period covered by this
report. The lack of reported cases is likely due to the
unwillingness of trafficking victims to admit to the perceived
stigma of having been trafficked.

-- Does the trafficking occur within the country's borders?

We have had no indications of internal trafficking within Armenia.
Armenia is geographically small, approximately the size of the state
of Rhode Island, which limits the scope for internal trafficking.

-- Does it occur in territory outside of the government's control
(e.g. in a civil war situation)?

Not applicable.

-- Are any estimates or reliable numbers available as to the extent
or magnitude of the problem?

No. Post suspects the number of criminal cases and victims reported
by law enforcement do not represent the majority of cases. Victims
are still reluctant to report crimes, and there is still a pervasive
though slowly diminishing attitude among law enforcement officials
that prostitutes who are lured abroad with the promise of better
wages for plying the same trade are not "true" victims of
trafficking.

-- What is (are) the source(s) of available information on
trafficking in persons or what plans are in place (if any) to
undertake documentation of trafficking? How reliable are the numbers
and these sources?

The best available statistics on criminal cases have traditionally
been furnished by Armenia's Prosecutor General's Office. As of
December 1, 2007, however, the Anti-Trafficking Unit under the PG's
office was disbanded -- part of a comprehensive restructuring --
and with it post's primary source of trafficking data. (Note: The
disbanding of the unit was the result of changes in Armenian
legislation that transferred all investigative functions from the
PG's office to other law enforcement agencies. Philosophically, the
broader reorganization is a healthy change, aimed at providing more
Western-style institutional checks and balances into the
investigative process. It remains to be seen whether this change
will enhance or detract from law enforcement agencies' capabilities
to investigate and prosecute trafficking cases. End note.)


YEREVAN 00000243 004.2 OF 013


Now the main law enforcement body dealing with trafficking in
persons, which also has jurisdiction for trafficking in illicit
narcotics, is the specialized Anti-Trafficking Unit that falls
organizationally under the Police Department for Combating Organized
Crime that was established in 2003. According to the GOAM, the
authorities will continue distributing trafficking data in the near
future, however it remains to be seen how exactly this will be done.
In the meantime, the chair of the Anti-TIP Working Group from the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has been informally collecting and
providing this information to post.

The main sources of information on specific trafficking cases
usually comprise news articles by the Association of Investigative
Journalists; information from the two organizations that work with
trafficking victims (the Hope and Help NGO and the United Methodist
Committee on Relief, or UMCOR); and materials from criminal cases
and court verdicts. (Note: Due to diminishing funding, the
Association of Investigative Journalists may soon no longer be able
to continue its reporting. End note.)

-- Are certain groups of persons more at risk of being trafficked
(e.g. women and children, boys versus girls, certain ethnic groups,
refugees, etc.)?

The groups most vulnerable to sex trafficking include prostitutes,
young women who have recently "aged out" of orphanages and special
schools, the unemployed, homeless people, refugees, single mothers
and divorced women. Labor traffickers take advantage of unemployed
or seasonal workers from poverty-stricken communities. Trafficking
victims overwhelmingly come from impoverished communities; the
common factor among the vulnerable groups is poverty and a lack of
socio-economic opportunities.


7. (SBU) This section corresponds to the questions in section B of
reftel paragraph 27.

-- Please provide a general overview of the trafficking situation in
the country and any changes since the last TIP Report (e.g. changes
in direction). Also briefly explain the political will to address
trafficking in persons.

Since the 2007 TIP report, there has been a significant
restructuring of responsibilities of government agencies tasked with
combating trafficking, most important of which was the elevation of
the inter-agency anti-TIP commission to a ministerial council
chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister, whose decisions will
henceforth possess a binding instead of advisory nature. In broader
terms, however, TIP issues, like many others, generally receded from
the public spotlight during this reporting period, due largely to
the fact that Armenia held two national elections, parliamentary
elections in May 2007, and a hotly disputed presidential election in
February 2008 which has triggered an unresolved political crisis in
the country.

Some significant, positive developments during the reporting period
include:

A) On December 6, 2007 the GOAM approved its second National Plan of
Action on Combating Trafficking for 2007-2009.

B) On the same date the GOAM created a new ministerial level Council
on Trafficking In Persons chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister and
composed of cabinet-level ministers, thereby creating for the first
time in Armenia an anti-TIP institution with the power to make
binding decisions.

C) The GOAM made a significant breakthrough on developing a National
Referral Mechanism (NRM) for trafficking victims. The draft NRM was
completed for pilot testing by the end of the reporting period.

D) The GOAM hosted a large international conference on trafficking
in September 2007 that generated significant media coverage of
trafficking issues.

E) The PG's office has obligated approximately USD 33,000 in FY08
funds for a.) the filming of a documentary on labor trafficking that
will be aired on Armenian regional networks as well as on national
public television; b.) the production of two public service
announcements which promote trafficking awareness and prevention;
and c.) an organizational map for law enforcement agencies that will
document trafficking trends and incidence in Armenia.

YEREVAN 00000243 005.2 OF 013



-- What kind of conditions are the victims trafficked into?

According to NGO accounts, victims in Turkey and the UAE are
deprived of their documents, cannot leave the places where they are
kept, do not have control or cannot make decisions over their
agencies, are beaten and raped, punished (physical abuse) for
disobedience, and assessed with constantly growing debts that must
be repaid to traffickers. Victims are afraid to go to police
because of their illegal status.

-- Which populations are targeted by the traffickers?

See the last section of paragraph 5 above.

-- Who are the traffickers?

The traffickers are pimps, usually Armenian citizens, in the UAE and
Turkey, each of whom has established networks of recruiters and
other facilitators that help them with various logistics (e.g.
preparing false documents, transportation, etc.). Those pimps,
mainly women, who in some cases had formerly worked as prostitutes
in the destination countries, and who sometimes have one or multiple
convictions for the same crime) have very good connections with the
local populations in the destination and transit countries. In
numerous cases the same recruiters work for various pimps, as do the
people in Moscow who forge the documents.

Armenia law enforcement agencies say the trafficking operations are
loosely associated groups, and not organized criminal structures, a
characterization that international experts have challenged. In
their December 2007 anti-trafficking needs assessment, experts from
UNDP and ILO-OSCE-ICMPD said trafficking operations bore the sign of
organized criminal structures, irregardless of the scale of the
crime and the number of identified victims. Proof of this lay in
the capacity of traffickers to provide forged documents, transport,
and to conduct both the receipt and placement of victims. This
opinion is shared by many local and international experts.

-- What methods are used to approach victims? (Are they offered
lucrative jobs, sold by their families, approached by friends of
friends, etc.?)

The victims are usually approached by "friends of friends,"
neighbors or acquaintances, but seldom on the street. The
recruiters usually lure victims with promises of high wages, either
to engage in prostitution, or, less frequently, for work as nannies,
care-providers and waitresses. Though most trafficking victims know
they are going to work as prostitutes, they are not fully aware of
the exploitative conditions in which they will work. The victims in
the labor trafficking case were promised a reasonable wage, which
they never received.

-- What methods are used to move the victims (e.g., are false
documents being used?).

See paragraph 5 above.

-- Are employment, travel, and tourism agencies or marriage brokers
involved with or fronting for traffickers or crime groups to traffic
individuals?

There have been no reports that indicate this.


8. (SBU) This section corresponds to the questions in section C of
reftel paragraph 27.

-- Which government agencies are involved in anti-trafficking
efforts and which agency, if any, has the lead?

On December 6, the GOAM by decree of the Prime Minister created a
new structure on combating trafficking. The new structure is a
ministerial level council (the highest interagency level entity
possible within the Armenian system of government) chaired by the
Minister of Territorial Administration (the current incumbent
Minister also serves as the Deputy Prime Minister). The high-level
council was created to replace the previously existing governmental
interagency working group, which lacked the political weight to make
and implement binding government policy. The decisions of the new
council will be binding. In addition to the Deputy PM, the council
is comprised of the following officials: Minister of Sports and

YEREVAN 00000243 006.2 OF 013


Youth Affairs, Minister of Justice, Minister of Trade and Economic
Development, Minister of Finance and Economy, Minister of Education
and Science, Minister of Labor and Social Affairs, Minister of
Health, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Prosecutor General, Head of
National Security Council, Head of Police, Head of International
Relations Department of the Staff of the President, Head of the
Migration Agency under the Ministry of Territorial Administration
(secretary of the council). The council has a broad mandate of
implementing, coordinating and monitoring the government's
anti-trafficking efforts. According to the council's mandate it
should hold meetings not less than every three months. The chair
and secretary of the inter-agency working group have an advisory
status at the council; international and local NGOs as well as
diplomatic organizations can be present at the meetings of the
council as observers. The council has not held any meetings since
its establishment, as its chairman was the director of the Prime
Minister's campaign during the presidential race in January and
February, 2008.

The previously existing inter-agency working group has been
reorganized to serve as a supporting working group that will
"organize the ongoing activities of the council." The working group
includes representatives from all of Armenia's law enforcement
agencies (Police, National Security Service (NSS),PG's Office); the
Migration Agency under the Ministry of Territorial Administration;
the Government; the Parliament; Ministries of Foreign Affairs;
Justice; Health; Labor and Social Affairs; Ministry of Trade and
Economic Development; Education and Science; Sports and Youth
affairs; Finance and Economy; and the National Statistical Service.
According to the GOAM, the statistical service will help them track
trafficking-related data. The MFA has the lead in this working
group and is the main point of contact for foreign and local actors.
More specifically, the Head of the International Organizations
Department chairs the group, and the Head of the Human Rights desk
is the secretary. Among other things, the working group is mandated
to hold meetings monthly, ensure that the GOAM fulfills its anti-TIP
commitments under international agreements, develop joint programs
with the international community, carry out public awareness
campaigns, etc. The working group has to present an annual report
on its activities to the Anti-TIP Council by January 15 of each
year.


9. (SBU) This section corresponds to the questions in section D of
reftel paragraph 27.

-- What are the limitations on the government's ability to address
this problem in practice? For example, is funding for police or
other institutions inadequate? Is overall corruption a problem?
Does the government lack the resources to aid victims?

A lack of financial and human resources hamper the government's
ability to address trafficking in persons, which is likewise
hindered by official corruption.

The Police, the PG's Office, and the National Security Service (NSS)
informed post that one of Armenia's main obstacles to investigating
trafficking is the lack of regional cooperation. This is even more
difficult given that the main destination countries are the UAE,
which is plagued by TIP problems and thus hyper sensitive to the
issue, and Turkey, with whom Armenia has no diplomatic relations.


10. (SBU) This section corresponds to the questions in section E of
reftel paragraph 27.

-- To what extent does the government systematically monitor its
anti-trafficking efforts (on all fronts -- prosecution, prevention
and victim protection) and periodically make available, publicly or
privately and directly or through regional/international
organizations, its assessments of these anti-trafficking efforts?

The government's interagency working group is the main monitoring
body. The working group has a reporting mechanism under which every
commission member, as well as local and international organizations,
present summaries of their activities for a specific period. In
practice, parties did not report regularly.
Post's demands for data generally prompted government reporting,
with the exception of that produced by the PG's Office. The PG's
Office kept very good track of cases and published statistics
through the mass media quarterly (see information on changes in the
PG's office in Paragraph 5 above). The interagency working group
published a report on the first National Plan of Action (NPA). The

YEREVAN 00000243 007.2 OF 013


new 2007-09 NPA envisages the possibility of creating a monitoring
system. The interagency working group is now mandated by law to
present annual reports on its activities by mid-January each year
(see above).

--------------
INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKERS
--------------


11. (SBU) This section corresponds to the questions in section A of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- Does the country have a law specifically prohibiting trafficking
in persons -- both for sexual and non-sexual purposes (e.g. forced
labor)? If so, please specifically cite the name of the law and its
date of enactment. Does the law(s) cover both internal and external
(transnational) forms of trafficking? If not, under what other laws
can traffickers be prosecuted? For example, are there laws against
slavery or the exploitation of prostitution by means of force, fraud
or coercion? Are these other laws being used in trafficking cases?
Please provide a full inventory of trafficking laws, including
non-criminal statutes that allow for civil penalties against alleged
trafficking crimes, (e.g., civil forfeiture laws and laws against
illegal debt.

Articles 132 and 132-1 of Armenia's Criminal Code cover all aspects
of human trafficking. Amendments to the trafficking statues enacted
in July 2006 significantly clarified and toughened the penalties.
The Code's two pimping statutes (261 and 262) provide for
prosecution and punishment of those found guilty of organization of
prostitution and recruitment of prostitutes.

Victims of trafficking may obtain restitution during a criminal
case, or in a civil case, after the completion of the criminal case.
In the latter case, the judge may rule that the victim is entitled
to seek civil damages. The Labor Code includes articles prohibiting
forced labor, abuse of workers, and employment of children.


12. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section B of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- What are the prescribed penalties for trafficking people for
sexual exploitation?

Under the Criminal Code the applicable prison term
is three-15 years, depending on the aggravating circumstances.
These sentences are commensurate with those for rape. The
penalties, which were stiffened in July 2006, have also had the
effect of elevating trafficking crimes into the category of "grave"
and "especially grave" crimes. According to the Armenian Criminal
Code, those convicted of "grave" and "especially grave" crimes must
serve at least half of their sentences before parole or release.
Previously, those convicted of trafficking crimes were eligible for
release after serving only one-third of their sentences.

-- What penalties were imposed for persons convicted of sexual
exploitation over the reporting period?

Please see answers provided in paragraph 16 below.

-- Please note the number of convicted sex traffickers who received
suspended sentences and the number who received only a fine as
punishment.

Please see answers provided in paragraph 16 below.


13. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section C of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- Punishment of Labor Trafficking Offenses: What are the prescribed
and imposed penalties for trafficking for labor exploitation, such
as forced or bonded labor and involuntary servitude? Do the
government's laws provide for criminal punishment -- i.e. jail time
-- for labor recruiters in labor source countries who engage in
recruitment of laborers using knowingly fraudulent or deceptive
offers that result in workers being exploited in the destination
country? Are there laws in destination countries punishing
employers or labor agents in labor destination countries who
confiscate workers' passports or travel documents, switch contracts
without the worker's consent as a means to keep the worker in a
state of service, or withhold payment of salaries as means of

YEREVAN 00000243 008.2 OF 013


keeping the worker in a state of service? If law(s) prescribe
criminal punishments for these offenses, what are the actual
punishments imposed on persons convicted of these offenses?

The trafficking statutes of the criminal code do not differentiate
between labor and sex trafficking. The penalties listed in paragraph
11 above apply to both.


14. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section D of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- What are the prescribed penalties for rape or forcible sexual
assault? How do they compare to the prescribed and imposed
penalties for crimes of trafficking for commercial sexual
exploitation?

The prescribed penalties for rape are from three to 15 years of
imprisonment depending on the aggravating circumstance, the same as
for trafficking for sexual exploitation.


15. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section E of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- Is prostitution legalized or decriminalized? Specifically, are
the activities of the prostitute criminalized? Are the activities
of the brothel owner/operator, clients, pimps, and enforcers
criminalized? Are these laws enforced? If prostitution is legal and
regulated, what is the legal minimum age for this activity? Note
that in many countries with federalist systems, prostitution laws
may be covered by state, local, and provincial authorities.

Prostitution is not legal, but is considered a civil, not criminal,
offense, subject to a fine of USD 1.63 -3.27 for a first offense,
and USD 3.27 - 6.55 for repeat offenses in the same calendar year.
(NOTE: The fines are higher than last year only because the dram has
strengthened against the dollar; the fine in local currency has not
changed. 500-1,000 drams for the first offense, and 1,000-2,000 for
the second offense. END NOTE.) Organization of and recruitment
into prostitution are criminal offenses punishable under Articles
261 and 262.


16. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section F of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- Has the government prosecuted any cases against traffickers? If
so, provide numbers of investigations, prosecutions, convictions,
and sentences served, including details on plea bargains and fines,
if relevant and available. Please indicate which laws were used to
investigate, prosecute, convict, and sentence traffickers. Also, if
possible, please disaggregate by type of TIP (labor vs. commercial
sexual exploitation) and victims (children, as defined by U.S. and
international law as under 18 years of age, vs. adults).

(NOTE: Information from January - March 2008 is unavailable given
the ongoing political crisis in the country. Should such data
become available by the end of March it will be promptly
transmitted. END NOTE.)

During calendar year 2007 the GOAM investigated 36 cases of sexual
and labor exploitation; and convicted 32 people under trafficking
statutes (Criminal Code articles 132 and 132-1) and pimping statutes
(articles 261 and 262) on 22 cases. (NOTE: The 36 cases included
more than 32 people; however, the PG's Office included
person-by-person statistics only for the cases that actually made it
to court. The number of defendants involved in postponed cases, and
those still in progress, remains unspecified. END NOTE.)

Article 132: 5 cases. Two cases against three persons were sent to
court. Two cases were suspended pending the location of the
defendants and the remaining case is in progress. Four of the cases
involved victims trafficked to the UAE, and one to Turkey.

Article 132-1: 9 cases. Four cases against five persons were sent
to the courts. Three cases were postponed pending the location of
the defendants. The other cases, one of which was combined with a
different one, are still in progress. Five of the cases involved
victims trafficked to the UAE, and four involved Turkey.

Article 261: 4 cases. Three cases against 10 people were sent to
court. One case was suspended pending the location of the
defendants. Two of the cases ended in Turkey and one ended in the

YEREVAN 00000243 009.2 OF 013


UAE.

Article 262: 18 cases. 13 cases against 15 people were sent to
court. One case was suspended pending the location of the
defendant, one case was transferred to the Russian Federation (since
it involved Russian women) and the remaining are still in progress.
Of these cases, 12 were trafficking cases committed in Armenia, two
were cases in Turkey and four in the UAE.

According to the end of year data a total of 21 suspects involved in
16 criminal cases were wanted: nine persons on charges of Article
132; six - Article 132-1; two - Article 261; and four - Article 262.


During calendar year 2007 Armenian courts heard 24 cases under the
trafficking and pimping statutes. Twenty-eight of the 32 defendants
were women, and four were men. Of the 32 defendants, 28 were
sentenced to prison terms between one and eight years; the sentences
of nine persons out of 28 were suspended. Four people were fined
300,000 to 400,000 AMD (about 1,000 - 1,300 USD).

On August 3, 2007 a Yerevan court handed down the country's most
stringent trafficking sentence to date: eight years' imprisonment
for Gayane Melkonyan for two separate instances of trafficking of
victims to the UAE and Turkey. However, on October 11, 2007 the
review court decreased the sentence to six years.

-- Does the government in a labor source country criminally
prosecute labor recruiters who recruit laborers using knowingly
fraudulent or deceptive offers or impose on recruited laborers
inappropriately high or illegal fees or commissions that create a
debt bondage condition for the laborer? Does the government in a
labor destination country criminally prosecute employers or labor
agents who confiscate workers' passports/travel documents, switch
contracts or terms of employment without the worker's consent, use
physical or sexual abuse or the threat of such abuse to keep workers
in a state of service, or withhold payment of salaries as a means to
keep workers in a state of service?

Armenia is considered a labor source country, but very few
prosecutable cases actually come to light. In these cases the same
trafficking statutes as for sexual trafficking apply. Armenia is
not a destination country for labor trafficking.

-- Are the traffickers serving the time sentenced: If not, why not?
Please indicate whether the government can provide this information,
and if not, why not?

No statistics are available on the length of time served by
traffickers.

As noted above, traffickers are eligible for release from prison
after serving one-half of their prison terms. The courts must
approve the early release of convicted prisoners, but this approval
is routinely granted.

In 2006, Anush Zakharyants, one of the first traffickers sentenced
in Armenia, escaped from prison and then illegally departed the
country. The PG's Office acknowledged that Zakharyants was released
from custody temporarily, for legally-allowed medical attention,
when she took the opportunity to flee the country via the land
border with Georgia. A local journalist has made allegations that
her escape resulted from official complicity. According to the
GOAM, the government has taken all measures legally provided it by
law to apprehend the fugitive, who has been placed on Armenia's
wanted list and now also is on Interpol's look-out list. The MFA
has promised to provide post with an official explanation of the
circumstances surrounding Zakharyants's escape, details of the
post-escape investigation, and information on disciplinary measures
taken by law enforcement agencies to punish personnel involved in
the affair.


17. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section G of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- Does the government provide any specialized training for
government officials in how to recognize, investigate, and prosecute
instances of trafficking? Specify whether NGOs, international
organizations, and/or the USG provide specialized training for host
government officials.


YEREVAN 00000243 010.2 OF 013


Trafficking is included in the PG's Office's general training
curriculum, and a training manual was published on international
best practices and standards. All employees are required to take
the initial course and periodic refresher courses. For its staff
involved in combating trafficking, the PG's office also organized
special training on the legal peculiarities of trafficking as a
crime, and the peculiarities of TIP victims' behaviors.

The Police Academy curriculum does not include a segment on
trafficking in persons. The Police Training School does not have
TIP as a separate subject; however TIP is included within a wide
range of subjects, linked to relevant articles of the criminal code
on human rights violations.

Trafficking is also part of the curriculum of the National Security
Service's Higher School of National Security.

The Ministry of Justice continues to hold training courses on
prevention of trafficking, prosecution, and victims and witness
protection in its Legal Institute which trains civil servants
responsible for enforcement of judicial and criminal acts.

The Judicial school under the Judicial Department also has
trafficking in its curriculum.

Also see answers to paragraph 28 below.


18. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section H of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- Does the government cooperate with other governments in the
investigation and prosecution of trafficking cases? If possible, can
post provide the number of cooperative international investigations
on trafficking?

The absence of diplomatic relations with Turkey, which is one of the
main destination countries for Armenian trafficking victims, makes
it very challenging for Armenian law enforcement agencies to
cooperate with Turkish counterparts. The MFA and the Armenian
police actively cooperate with Interpol in trying to fill that gap.
According to GOAM data, they have located one Armenian trafficker in
Turkey who they are trying to return to Armenia for prosecution.

In October 2007, the GOAM hosted the coordination council meeting of
the Prosecutor Generals of CIS countries, and coordination on
anti-trafficking was one of the agenda items discussed. Armenia's
Prosecutor General made a presentation on TIP and it was decided at
the council to develop a Plan of Cooperation in the field of
Trafficking between CIS Prosecutor Generals.

According to the PG's Office, it cooperates with a number of
countries, including the UAE and countries of the former Soviet
Union. The lack of diplomatic relations with Turkey is the main
obstacle to prosecuting TIP cases in Turkey, which is one of the two
main countries of destination for trafficking in Armenian women.

The GOAM promotes links with foreign governments on TIP issues. In
October 2007, the representatives of the Migration Agency took part
in an international seminar held in Istanbul that was co-organized
by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC),the
Budapest Process and the Organization of the Black Sea Economic
Cooperation (BSEC).


19. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section I of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- Does the government extradite persons who are charged with
trafficking in other countries? If so, can post provide the number
of traffickers extradited? Does the government extradite its own
nationals charged with such offenses? If not, is the government
prohibited by law form extraditing its own nationals? If so, what is
the government doing to modify its laws to permit the extradition of
its own nationals?

Armenia has signed two international agreements with the UAE, one a
Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, and the other
s a treaty on Extradition (both were signed April 20, 2002 and
ratified March 23, 2003). According to international experts, these
agreements do not seem to be operational. Armenia also has
extradition agreements also with the CIS countries.


YEREVAN 00000243 011.2 OF 013


According to the Criminal Procedure Code, foreign citizens or
individuals who have permanent resident status in a foreign county
(but not citizenship) and who have committed a crime in Armenia,
either may be extradited to their country of residency for
prosecution, or may be prosecuted in Armenia if there is a relevant
agreement between the two countries. The Code also stipulates that
Armenian citizens may not be extradited to foreign countries for
prosecution.


20. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section J of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- Is there evidence of government involvement in or tolerance of
trafficking, on a local or institutional level? If so, please
explain in detail.


As in every aspect of Armenian jurisprudence and law enforcement,
rampant petty corruption creates a significant problem, and one that
the government has not to date shown sufficient political will to
address seriously.


21. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section K of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- If government officials are involved in trafficking, what steps
has the government taken to end such participation? Have any
government officials been prosecuted for involvement in trafficking
or trafficking- related corruption? Have any been convicted? What
sentence(s) was imposed? Please specify if officials received
suspended sentences, were given a fine, fired, or reassigned to
another position within the government as punishment. Please
provide specific numbers, if available. Please indicate the number
of convicted officials that received suspended sentences or received
only a fine as punishment.

There were no cases of trafficking-related corruption or complicity
reported during the reporting period. In reference to the case of
the escape of Anush Zakharyants from prison, the MFA has promised to
provide post with an official explanation of the circumstances
surrounding Zakharyants's escape, details of the investigation into
the escape, and information on disciplinary measures taken by law
enforcement agencies to punish personnel involved in the affair.


22. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section L of
reftel paragraph 28.

-- As part of the new requirements of the 2005 TVPRA, for countries
that contribute troops to international peacekeeping efforts, please
indicate whether the government vigorously investigated, prosecuted,
convicted and sentenced nationals of the country deployed abroad as
part of a peacekeeping or other similar mission who engage in or
facilitate severe forms of trafficking or who exploit victims of
such trafficking.

Not applicable.


23. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section M of
reftel paragraph 28.

If the country has an identified child sex tourism problem (as
source or destination),how many foreign pedophiles has the
government prosecuted or deported/extradited to their country of
origin? What are the countries of origin for sex tourists? Do the
country's child sexual abuse laws have extraterritorial coverage
(similar to the U.S. PROTECT Act)? If so, how many of the country's
nationals have been prosecuted and/or convicted under the
extraterritorial provision(s) for traveling to other countries to
engage in child sex tourism?

There is no identified child sex tourism problem in Armenia.

--------------
PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS
--------------


24. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section A of
reftel paragraph 29.

-- Does the government assist foreign trafficking victims, for
example, by providing temporary to permanent residency status, or

YEREVAN 00000243 012.2 OF 013


other relief from deportation? If so, please explain.

During the reporting period there were no clear-cut cases of Armenia
serving as a destination country. There was one case of three
Russian women who had traveled to Armenia to engage in prostitution.
The GOAM did not consider them trafficking victims, even though
local NGOs working with TIP victims identified them as such and
provided them with shelter. Two of the women were repatriated with
assistance from the IOM, and the third decided to stay in Armenia.


25. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section B of
reftel paragraph 29.

-- Does the country have victim care facilities which are accessible
to trafficking victims?

There are two shelters in the country maintained by local NGOs that
are designed to assist trafficking victims.

-- Do foreign victims have the same access to care as domestic
trafficking victims?

Yes.

-- Does the country have specialized facilities dedicated to helping
victims of trafficking? If so, can post provide the number of
victims placed in these care facilities during the reporting period?
What is the funding source of these facilities? Please estimate the
amount the government spent (in U.S. dollar equivalent) on these
specialized facilities dedicated to helping trafficking victims
during the reporting period.

As mentioned above, there are two TIP shelters in Armenia, and they
are exclusively operated and maintained by NGOs.

One is run by UMCOR with the funding of the Norwegian and Belgian
Governments. UMCOR runs a permanent shelter and provides victims
with medical, legal and psychological assistance. UMCOR also
connects victims with training programs to help the victim
reintegrate into society. During the reporting period, UMCOR
provided assistance to eight victims. UMCOR also provided cash
benefits, a monthly allowance to five victims in the amount of
20,000 AMD (approximately USD 65),and facilitated a donation from
the American actress (Andrea Martin, the star of "Big Fat Greek
Wedding") to purchase a home for one of the victims. UMCOR's
implementer, the local NGO "Democracy Today" which resumed its
activities in August, 2007, maintained a hotline that from August
2007 through mid-March of 2008 had received 350 calls, about 15
percent of which were related to trafficking.

UMCOR reported that during the reporting period one of their
victims, a graduate of an Armenian orphanage, received
state-provided housing under a program run by the Ministry of Labor
and Social Affairs (MLSA).

Hope and Help maintains the second shelter with USG funding. Its
does not permanently operate and opens only when a victim needs a
safe haven. Hope and Help also provides legal, medical, social and
psychological assistance to victims. During the reporting period,
Hope and Help assisted 14 victims, and their hotline received 747
calls, of which 11 were real trafficking alerts.

After intervention by Hope and Help NGO, MLSA paid a one-time
poverty allowance to two trafficking victims.

-- Does the government provide trafficking victims with access to
legal, medical and psychological services? If so, please specify
the kind of assistance provided, and the number of victims assisted,
if available.

TIP victims, like all other citizens, enjoy access to complimentary
medical check-ups.

According to the MLSA, regional social centers and state employment
agencies, as well as local government agencies, cooperate with NGOs
to provide possible assistance to trafficking victims and to
distribute information to the public.

Changes have been made in the regulations of MLSA's Division on
Women Issues, which has translated into the formal addition of
trafficking to its wide-ranging mandate.

YEREVAN 00000243 013.2 OF 013



During the reporting period, the MLSA helped UMCOR's TIP victims
find jobs, offered assistance in getting their documents in order,
and in one case helped settle a victim into an elderly home. As
previously mentioned, the MLSA provided an apartment to one TIP
victim under one of its programs which assists graduates of
orphanages.

Armenia adopted a Law on Social Assistance in October 2005. Under
the law, which came into force January 2006, vulnerable persons are
eligible to receive the following social services: counseling,
reintegration assistance, financial assistance, temporary shelter
for up to 60 days, legal assistance, etc. Trafficking victims are
not mentioned specifically, but are covered under this law. The
lack of funding for social issues overall in Armenia hampers the
practical implementation of the law.

In May the Foreign Ministry worked very actively with a local NGO to
secure the release of two Armenian victims of trafficking who were
sentenced in Georgia for illegally crossing the Turkish-Georgian
border.


26. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section C of
reftel paragraph 29.

-- Does the government provide funding or other forms of support to
foreign or domestic NGOs and/or international organizations for
services to trafficking victims? Please explain and provide any
funding amounts in U.S. dollar equivalent. If assistance provided
is in-kind, please specify exact assistance. Please explain if
funding for assistance comes from a federal budget or from regional
or local governments.

The GOAM does not provide such assistance; however, NGOs note
exceptionally good cooperation with their individual counterparts in
the relevant agencies (TIP-designated civil servants in all law
enforcement agencies, but especially those working in the police,
the Ministry of Health and MLSA).


27. (SBU) This section corresponds to questions in section D of
reftel paragraph 29.

-- Do the government's law enforcement, immigration, and social
services personnel have a formal system of proactively identifying
victims of trafficking among high-risk persons with whom they come
in contact (e.g., foreign persons arrested for prostitution or
immigration violations)?

During the reporting period the government registered a significant
breakthrough in completing the drafting of a National Referral
Mechanism. In September 2007, the anti-TIP interagency working
group established a working group to develop the detailed mechanics
of the NRM. It was buoyed in its efforts by working jointly on the
project with IOM, OSCE and the ICMPD. The working group was
comprised of representatives from the Ministry of Labor and Social
Affairs, MFA departments on international organizations and consular
affairs, the Migration Agency under the Ministry of Territorial
Administration, the police, Border Guards, and the NGOs Hope and
Help and Democracy Today. A MLSA representative headed the work of
the group, which, beginning its work in October, subsequently held
12 meetings and one 2-day-long event to flesh out the proposed NRM
in detail. With GOAM prompting, the working group completed the
draft NRM at the end of February 2008, which is now undergoing the
appropriate interagency clearance process within the Armenian
government. Once approved, the NRM will be pilot-tested for six