Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08VIENNA463
2008-04-04 07:56:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Vienna
Cable title:  

AUSTRIA NOT INCLINED TO BE HELPFUL ON BELARUS

Tags:  PREL PHUM BO AU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO3210
RR RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHVI #0463 0950756
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 040756Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY VIENNA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9886
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L VIENNA 000463 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/01/2023
TAGS: PREL PHUM BO AU
SUBJECT: AUSTRIA NOT INCLINED TO BE HELPFUL ON BELARUS

REF: (A) STATE 30007 (B) STATE 32535 (C) MINSK 236

Classified By: Econ/Pol Counselor Dean Yap. Reason: 1.4(b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L VIENNA 000463

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/01/2023
TAGS: PREL PHUM BO AU
SUBJECT: AUSTRIA NOT INCLINED TO BE HELPFUL ON BELARUS

REF: (A) STATE 30007 (B) STATE 32535 (C) MINSK 236

Classified By: Econ/Pol Counselor Dean Yap. Reason: 1.4(b) and (d)


1. (C) Summary. In a disappointing meeting, MFA Director for
the East and Southeast Europe indicated that Austria was not
inclined to engage directly or through Brussels in active
diplomacy in support of the U.S. in Belarus. Noting that
Austria had no Embassy in Minsk and arguing that U.S. policy
was not in line with that of the EU, he allowed the
possibility that COEST might, given the latest Belarusian
demand for a reduction to 5 staff at the Embassy, reconsider
the EU's policy. End Summary.


2. (C) Econ/Pol Counselor met April 1 with MFA Director
Kuglitsch to review latest developments in Minsk and press
for GoA support bilaterally and through the EU. Kuglitsch
asked for details (e.g., dates of meetings and names of
contacts) of U.S.-EU consultation, noting that while the U.S.
"claimed" to have consulted the EU on its actions, he had no
direct information from Brussels about such contacts.
Pointing to the U.S. sanctions against Beneftekhim, Kuglitsch
also maintained that U.S. policy was at odds with the EU's
approach, which was to offer relief from sanctions if all
prisoners are released, rather than to impose new sanctions.
E/P Counselor took strong exception to this characterization.


3. (C) On specific Austrian/EU responses to Belarusian
demands on the U.S. and its possible violation of the Vienna
Convention, Kuglitsch was not forthcoming. Absent an
Austrian Embassy in Minsk, no direct Austria-Belarus options
were available. He acknowledged that COEST might reconsider
the EU's policy in light of Belarusian demands that the U.S.
reduce its staff to 5. Kuglitsch said that Austria
understood the EU was not delaying the opening of the new
Commission office in Minsk for political reasons, but only
because of technical problems. He reported that the new
office is supposed to open April 18 or 19. E/P Counselor
stressed the extremely bad signal such a step would send.
Kuglitsch was also not aware of any U.S.-EU "block" on
Belarus' WTO accession talks; he argued that Belarus' own
failure to institute necessary reforms had caused a
suspension of negotiations. Asked if Austria would support
demarches in Minsk by EU members or by the EU as a whole,
Kuglitsch demurred, referring to the EU Presidency
Declaration of March 28 ("... the recent treatment of the US
Ambassador to Minsk and many of her staff who have been
obliged to leave Belarus at very short notice ...(is)...
particularly worrisome") as an appropriate response.


4. (C) On broader human/civil rights issues, Kuglitsch was
more positive, but gave the clear impression that the issue
was not an Austrian priority. He had expected, before the
latest news, the EU to simply renew its existing sanctions
despite Belarusian efforts to obtain some softening by
promising the release of Kazulin before the net elections in
Belarus.
Kilner