Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08USOSCE74
2008-03-21 10:16:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Mission USOSCE
Cable title:  

DAYTON ARTICLE IV: 40TH SRCC IS QUIET BUT BUSY

Tags:  PARM PREL OSCE KCFE XG ZL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1261
PP RUEHAST RUEHFL RUEHLA RUEHMRE RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHVEN #0074/01 0811016
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 211016Z MAR 08
FM USMISSION USOSCE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5614
INFO RUCNOSC/ORG FOR SECURITY CO OP IN EUR COLLECTIVE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0980
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RHMFIUU/HQ USAFE RAMSTEIN AB GE//POLAD/XPXC//
RHMFISS/CDRUSAREUR HEIDELBERG GE
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE//ECJ5-T/ECPLAD/ECCS//
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEASWA/DTRA ALEX WASHINGTON DC//OSAE
RUESDT/DTRA-OSES DARMSTADT GE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5-DDPMA-E/DDPMA-IN/CAC//
RUEADWD/DA WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 USOSCE 000074 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR VCI/CCA, VCI/NRRC, EUR/RPM, EUR/PRA, EUR/SCE,
PM/WRA
JCS FOR J5
OSD FOR ISA (PERENYI)
NSC FOR DOWLEY
USUN FOR LEGAL, POL
CENTCOM FOR CCJ5-C, POLAD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL OSCE KCFE XG ZL
SUBJECT: DAYTON ARTICLE IV: 40TH SRCC IS QUIET BUT BUSY

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 USOSCE 000074

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR VCI/CCA, VCI/NRRC, EUR/RPM, EUR/PRA, EUR/SCE,
PM/WRA
JCS FOR J5
OSD FOR ISA (PERENYI)
NSC FOR DOWLEY
USUN FOR LEGAL, POL
CENTCOM FOR CCJ5-C, POLAD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL OSCE KCFE XG ZL
SUBJECT: DAYTON ARTICLE IV: 40TH SRCC IS QUIET BUT BUSY


1. (SBU) Summary: The Dayton Article IV Parties met in
Sarajevo March 10-13 for the 40th Sub-Regional Consultative
Commission (SRCC). The SRCC was held in a cooperative and
friendly atmosphere, resulting in an impressive list of
decisions, to include: agreement on amending the Agreement,
dates and agenda for the Sixth Review Conference, changing
the number of SRCCs from three to two per year, quotas for
the upcoming inspection year, and the use of additional
inspection equipment. There was no discussion of Kosovo.
The Parties themselves shared many of the same viewpoints
and, when there were differences, were able to reach their
own compromise solutions. End summary.

No Discussion of Kosovo
--------------


2. (SBU) There was little talk of political issues such as
the collapse of governments in Serbia or Macedonia, or of
Kosovo's independence. However, the Contact Group on the
margins informally discussed how Article IV might be impacted
after one or more of the Parties recognize the independence
of Kosovo.


3. (SBU) During earlier separate discussions with Brigadier
General Costanzo Periotto, the Chairman-in-Office's Personal
Representative for Dayton Article IV, German senior military
advisor Colonel Wolfgang Richter, and U.S. representative
(Claus),it was agreed that it would be unwise to raise the
subject of Kosovo at any point during the SRCC and that any
discussion should be kept at the informal level among Contact
Group and Periotto's staff. The Agreement's area of
application includes the entire territory of Serbia, to
include Kosovo. The Croatian military advisor, Colonel
Mijatovic, informally said that Croatia would be the first of
the Parties to recognize Kosovo independence, and that this
recognition would occur by the end of March 2008. (Note:
Croatia recognized Kosovo on March 20. End note.)


4. (SBU) There were some concerns among the Contact Group
that Serbia might reject Assistants from countries that had

recognized Kosovo's independence. USDel met earlier with
Periotto and agreed that U.S. Assistants would not join a
Serbian inspection team until June. On March 20, USDel was
informed by Periotto's staff that Serbia had accepted on its
team an Assistant from France.

SRCC
--------------


5. (SBU) The Permanent Working Group, which met February 5-7,
prepared the drafts for the SRCC, although many of the
documents were altered before final approval. Many agenda
points resulted in SRCC decisions (see para 10). Most of the
documents that did not become decisions were labeled as "SRCC
Conclusions." (Comment: Periotto, along with the Bosnian
chair, did a very good job of trying to keep the SRCC on
task, and with better results than at the 39th SRCC. End
comment.)


6. (SBU) The SRCC was chaired by the head of the Bosnian MFA
peace and security office, Minister-Advisor Momir Brajic.
For the first time in several years, the Contact Group was
fully represented. The U.S. representative was Lt. Colonel
Alan Hester (USOSCE). The Parties were represented by:

- Bosnia: Goran Pranjic;
- Croatia: Mirko Capjak;
- Serbia: Ambassador Branka Latinovic;
- Montenegro: Ambassador Milorad Scepanovic.

Amending the Agreement

USOSCE 00000074 002 OF 003


--------------


7. (SBU) The need to amend the Agreement to note the
separation of Montenegro and the Republic of Serbia (Note:
All were reminded not to use the term, "Republic of
Montenegro." End note.) resulted in a hurried, last minute
push to refine the previous draft's language to include an
amendment for each article instead of one amendment to the
entire Agreement. The SRCC agreed to a silence procedure
ending on April 15. Each Party then would be required to
adopt the formal amendments in accordance with national
requirements.

Inspections
--------------


8. (SBU) Periotto's staff provided a report on inspection
activities conducted during the previous year (March 2007 )
March 2008). The Parties conducted 20 inspections in 2007
and no substantive issues arose. The Parties approved the
draft quota distribution and inspection schedule for
2008-2009 that was proposed by Periotto's staff. The quotas
(19 in all) are: Bosnia (4); Serbia (7); Croatia (5);
Montenegro (3).


9. (SBU) There was discussion on how to set quotas for the
future, which formula to use, and what the minimum number
might be to allow for a balanced inspection regime among the
four Parties. Serbia proposed the following minimum passive
quotas: Bosnia (5); Croatia (5); Serbia (5); and Montenegro
(3). This distribution would allow all Parties to conduct at
least one inspection of all the other Parties; however, no
agreement was reached.

SRCC Decisions
--------------


10. (SBU) The SRCC agenda was quite ambitious, but numerous
decisions were reached:

-- A decision to conduct the Sixth Article IV Review
Conference in Vienna during July 2-4, preceded by an
Extraordinary SRCC for the sole purpose of approving the
minutes of the 40th SRCC.

-- A decision to reduce the number of SRCCs held during a
year from three to two, with target months of March and
October. Permanent Working Groups will be held at least one
month prior to each SRCC.

-- A decision to extend the length of time from one year to
two years that Armaments Limited by the Agreement can remain
in an export status. This was a change from the earlier
draft proposal to eliminate the time limit altogether.

-- A decision on the framework language to be used by the
four Parties in releasing a statement, to be completed at the
42nd SRCC, on voluntary limitation of military manpower.

-- A decision encouraging the Parties to organize and conduct
additional or supplemental training for inspectors and
Assistants within their own countries. This decision has the
practical effect of giving a seal of approval for Bosnian
plans to set up a training center. Croatia, after initially
protesting in favor of training at Zagreb-based Regional Arms
Control Verification and Implementation Assistant Center
(RACVIAC),eventually agreed.

-- A decision that digital cameras, SATCOM satellite systems,
mobile telephones, and GPS would be permitted during
inspections. (Note: This decision did not actually change

USOSCE 00000074 003 OF 003


the Agreement: the Parties used a consensus agreement to
define the above equipment as "other equipment" in accordance
with Paragraph 13, Section VI of the Protocol on Inspection.
End note.)

Handbook for Inspectors
--------------


11. (SBU) Serbia proposed to add "political" elements to a
draft of the Handbook for Inspectors developed by all four
Parties during the November working group. The other Parties
were frustrated with these efforts to add political documents
and elements to what has been proposed and initially
developed as an operational-level handbook. After a two hour
discussion, the SRCC agreed to form an "ad hoc working
group," to be chaired by Latinovic, to complete the handbook.
Additionally, the SRCC approved a standing operation
procedure (SOP) for OSCE Assistants, which will become part
of the handbook. The SOP includes the requirement that all
OSCE supporting nations provide health insurance for their
Assistants.

RACVIAC
--------------


12. (SBU) On the margins, the Croatian delegation passed out
RACVIAC's list of course offerings planned for 2008 (emailed
to State VCI/CCA). (Comment: RACVIAC has continued to
develop, growing in stature in the region. Recommend
Washington consider whether it would be beneficial to
re-engage with RACVIAC, to include increased participation in
courses and provision of guest instructors. End comment.)


Cultural Interlude: Surreal Moments at City Hall
-------------- ---


13. (SBU) On the margins of the SRCC, the Bosnian hosts
organized a visit to the Sarajevo city hall, where the deputy
mayor presented a film that included some propagandistic and
anti-Serb narration. Afterwards, the deputy mayor, speaking
in Serbo-Croatian and asking the Serbian Ambassador
Latinovic to translate into English, spoke on the future of
Sarajevo. Latinovic, while visibly uneasy, translated the
deputy mayor's speech, which related how the people of
Sarajevo were overcoming the effects of the 3-year Serbian
siege and were looking forward to the future. Latinovic was
afterward praised publicly and privately for her graciousness
and demeanor.
SCOTT