Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08USOSCE142
2008-05-28 17:12:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Mission USOSCE
Cable title:  

CFE: MAY 27 JCG PLENARY: ALLIES CONFIRM NAC

Tags:  KCFE OSCE PARM PREL RS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHVEN #0142/01 1491712
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 281712Z MAY 08
FM USMISSION USOSCE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5748
INFO RUCNCFE/CONVENTIONAL ARMED FORCES IN EUROPE PRIORITY
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 1669
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUESDT/DTRA-OSES DARMSTADT GE PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5-DDPMA-IN/CAC/DDPMA-E// PRIORITY
RUEAHQA/HQ USAF WASHINGTON DC//XONP// PRIORITY
RUEADWD/DA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEASWA/DTRA ALEX WASHINGTON DC//OSAE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L USOSCE 000142 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR VCI/CCA, EUR/RPM
NSC FOR DOWLEY
JCS FOR J5/COL NORWOOD
OSD FOR ISA (PERENYI)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/27/2018
TAGS: KCFE OSCE PARM PREL RS
SUBJECT: CFE: MAY 27 JCG PLENARY: ALLIES CONFIRM NAC
COMMITMENTS; BELGIUM/HUNGARY REFUSED INSPECTIONS

Classified By: Chief Arms Control Delegate Hugh Neighbour,
for reasons 1.4(b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L USOSCE 000142

SIPDIS

STATE FOR VCI/CCA, EUR/RPM
NSC FOR DOWLEY
JCS FOR J5/COL NORWOOD
OSD FOR ISA (PERENYI)

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/27/2018
TAGS: KCFE OSCE PARM PREL RS
SUBJECT: CFE: MAY 27 JCG PLENARY: ALLIES CONFIRM NAC
COMMITMENTS; BELGIUM/HUNGARY REFUSED INSPECTIONS

Classified By: Chief Arms Control Delegate Hugh Neighbour,
for reasons 1.4(b) and (d).


1. (SBU) Summary: At the May 27 JCG Plenary, Russia asked
JCG delegations from NATO to confirm the Alliance's current
position on the 8 December 1998 NAC Statement on CFE, as well
as the NATO-Russia Founding Act. Germany, the U.S., the
U.K., the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic told Russia
that Allies continue to support commitments contained
therein, that they had not been superseded nor renounced.
The U.S. also noted the NAC Statement was reaffirmed in PP9
of the CFE Final Act, observed that Allies continue to
respect their CFE Final Act commitments, and urged Russia to
respect its commitments, including regarding host nation
consent. Other delegations stressed that the NAC Statement
on 28 March 2008 contains the key for resolution of the
ongoing CFE impasse. In addition, Hungary and Belgium
announced recent rejections by Russia of their requests to
conduct CFE inspections. The U.S. supported these Allies and
reminded Russia that its "suspension" had no legal basis and
urged it to resume Treaty implementation.


2. (C) At the JCG-T plus 4, some Allies expressed
frustration at the slow pace of activities in the JCG.
Luxembourg said it plans to urge the June 24 HLTF to allow
the JCG to negotiate technical aspects of the definition of
"substantial combat forces." End Summary.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ALLIANCE COMMITMENTS ARE UNCHANGED
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


3. (C) The JCG (Joint Consultative Group) met on May 27
under Italy's Chairmanship. As promised in the last meeting,
Russia (Ulyanov) asked JCG delegations from NATO to reaffirm
the Alliance's position on the 8 December 1998 NAC Statement
on CFE, as well as the NATO-Russia Founding Act; specifically
related to deployment of substantial combat forces. Russia
is seeking confirmation because it believed one delegation
would like to revise an element of the statement. (Note:

during last week's meeting, Germany (Richter) immediately
reaffirmed this statement, but other Allies were silent.
Russia (Ulyanov) said that Moscow had reasons to believe that
at least one State Party no longer supported these
committments. End Note).


4. (SBU) Germany (Richter) responded by quoting passages
from three NATO declarations; the 14 March 1997 NAC
Statement, the 8 December 1998 NAC Statement on CFE, and the
NATO-Russia Founding Act. In quoting the various passages,
Richter told Russia that the three documents are interlinked
and are related to each other. He said the documents
remained valid and that each contained substance that would
help resolve the current CFE crisis. He specifically quoted
paragraphs 9, and 10 in the 8 December 1998 statement that
refer to "...substantial ground or air combat forces..."


5. (SBU) The U.S. (Neighbour) reassured Russia that the
commitments contained in the three statements have never been
superseded or contradicted and that the Alliance stands by
its commitments. He added that the commitments contained in
the 8 December 1998 statement were also reaffirmed in the CFE
Final Act in Istanbul. Neighbour also drew attention to
paragraphs 9 and 10 of the 8 December 1998 NAC Statement on
CFE pointing out that the U.S. and its Allies continue to
honor the commitments in these paragraphs. Neighbour stated
that the Alliance has kept its CFE Final Act commitments and
urged all others to do the same, in full, including those
regarding host nation consent.


6. (SBU) The U.K. (Gare) and the Netherlands (Kleinjan)
also voiced their support for the U.S. and German
interventions. Gare reminded all that the 28 March NAC
Statement added to the three documents referred to by
Germany. Kleinjan noted that all Allies, including those who
have joined after the statements were made, stand by the

statements.


7. (SBU) Russia (Ulyanov) thanked Allies for the
clarification of continued support on previous NAC
statements, asserting that Germany, the UK, the U.S., and
Netherlands spoke on behalf of all Allies. In particular,
Ulyanov told the JCG that the Russia was satisfied with the
Alliance's confirmation of its support of elements in
paragraph 10 of the 8 December 1998 NAC Statement, and that
Russia,s concerns have been addressed.


8. (SBU) The Czech Republic (Reinohlova) recalled that the
parallel actions package is currently on the table awaiting a
response from Russia. The parallel actions package is the
path out of the current CFE situation and that discussion of
various elements couldn't go further until Russia agrees to
the package. Reinohlova appealed to Russia to give a
positive concrete response to the parallel actions package.


9. (SBU) Russia (Ulyanov) replied that there is a package
of decisions made at the Sochi Summit and those decisions
formed the basis of negotiations with US and consultations
with others. He claimed that there were no expectations that
Russia will come up with a proposal. He complained that
while the parallel actions package had some positive aspects,
but was not sufficient and does not cover all issues
concerning the current crisis. Ulyanov pointed out that
since the Madrid Ministerial there have only been two U.S -
Russia bilateral meetings. He bemoaned that the dialogue has
not been "intensive." Ulyanov offered to work with the Czech
Republic on a bilateral level and asked all delegations to
continue the dialogue in all forums to resolve the current
situation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
RUSSIA REFUSES MORE CFE INSPECTIONS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


10. (SBU) Hungary and Belgium announced the recent
rejections by the Russian Federation of their requests to
conduct (separate) CFE inspections. Belgium sent their
inspection request on 19 May and Hungary sent their
inspection request on 23 May. Hungary "deeply regretted"
Russia's refusal and continue "suspension" of Treaty
implementation. Belgium voiced its support for the parallel
actions package as a way out of the current impasse.
(Comment: the Belgian delegation was very reluctant to make
this statement, and after initially stating last week that it
would not do so, make this basic statement after direction
from capital. End comment).


11. (SBU) The Netherlands, the U.K., Germany, and the U.S.
voiced support for Hungary and Belgium's statements. The
U.S. (Neighbour) reminded Russia that its "suspension" had no
legal basis and urged Russia to resume Treaty implementation.
Russia called for enhanced contact between Washington and
Moscow to continue discussion of the parallel actions package
as this was the only way for inspections to resume. Ulyanov
opined that if the U.S. were to accept Russia,s proposal to
use all possible avenues to enhance contacts between our
capitals, then the prospect of moving forward on (resuming)
inspections would be underway.


12. (SBU) As JCG Chairman, Italy proposed postponing the
JCG meeting on June 24 (due to the HLTF meeting) to Friday,
June 27. This was accepted.

- - - - - - - - - - -
SHOW ME THE...BRIEF!
- - - - - - - - - - -


13. (C) The Czech Republic chaired the JCG-T plus 4 on May

26. The focus of the discussion was on how to respond if
Russia brought up elements of previous NAC statements on CFE
for discussion. Allies reaffirmed their support for the 28
March 2008 NAC Statement on CFE as well as all commitments in

previous NAC declarations. The group generally agreed to use
this as basis for any response to Russia - to tell Russia
that previous NATO commitments are still valid and that they
support all previous NATO commitments.


14. (C) Some allies (Germany, Luxembourg, and Greece)
expressed frustration at the slow pace of the activities in
the JCG, but acknowledged that delegations must work within
the guidance from their capitals and NATO. Luxembourg
(Pilot) wants to be allowed to negotiate in the JCG and plans
to urge the HLTF to agree to negotiation on the technical
aspects of the term "substantial combat forces." Germany
swiftly replied that this would not be accepted. He added
that all Allies should attempt to convince Russia that the
parallel actions package was the only way out of the current
situation.


15. (C) As in previous JCG-T and JCG, however, Germany
(Richter) continued to suggest that the JCG could somehow
have substantive discussions. In the meantime, he offered to
brief the JCG on the historical definitions of various CFE
terminologies (e.g. headroom, temporary deployment, permanent
stationing, and "substantial combat forces"). The U.S. and
other delegations insisted, and Germany agreed, to allow
Allies to preview the brief well in advance of any
presentation in the JCG, including a full dry run in the
JCG-T.


16. (U) The next JCG-T will be on June 2. The next JCG
will be on June 3.
FINLEY