Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08USOSCE102
2008-04-18 06:19:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Mission USOSCE
Cable title:  

OPEN SKIES TREATY: UK TO CEASE ACTIVE FLIGHTS DUE

Tags:  PARM PREL OSCE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHVEN #0102/01 1090619
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 180619Z APR 08
FM USMISSION USOSCE
TO RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA PRIORITY 0545
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 0750
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5659
INFO RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 0137
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RHMFISS/HQ USAFE RAMSTEIN AB GE//POLAD/XPXC//
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE//ECJ5-T/ECCS/ECPLAD//
RUEAHQA/HQ USAF WASHINGTON DC//XONP//
RUEASWA/DTRA ALEX WASHINGTON DC//OSAO
RUESDT/DTRA-OSES DARMSTADT GE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5-DDPMA-E/DDPMA-IN/CAC//
C O N F I D E N T I A L USOSCE 000102 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR VCI/CCA, EUR/PRA, EUR/RPM, SCA/CEN
JCS FOR COL NORWOOD
OSD FOR ISA (PERENYI)
NSC FOR DOWLEY

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/14/2009
TAGS: PARM PREL OSCE
SUBJECT: OPEN SKIES TREATY: UK TO CEASE ACTIVE FLIGHTS DUE
TO MOD BUDGET CUTS

REF: MARVIN-VCI/CCA EMAIL 4/4/08

Classified By: AC Chief Delegate Hugh Neighbour
C O N F I D E N T I A L USOSCE 000102

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR VCI/CCA, EUR/PRA, EUR/RPM, SCA/CEN
JCS FOR COL NORWOOD
OSD FOR ISA (PERENYI)
NSC FOR DOWLEY

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/14/2009
TAGS: PARM PREL OSCE
SUBJECT: OPEN SKIES TREATY: UK TO CEASE ACTIVE FLIGHTS DUE
TO MOD BUDGET CUTS

REF: MARVIN-VCI/CCA EMAIL 4/4/08

Classified By: AC Chief Delegate Hugh Neighbour

1.(C) Summary. UK delegation reps in Vienna have informed
the U.S. and many other delegations, including Russia, that
it will no longer be able to participate in active Open Skies
Treaty observation flights due to ongoing MOD budget cuts.
This is a serious development by a leading Ally in the
Treaty, and one which poses several policy-related questions
for Washington,s consideration: Would a bilateral approach
appealing the decision mitigate the outcome? Is the U.S.
able to share some missions using the U.S. aircraft so the UK
can continue to participate? Does the U.S. want to bid on
timeslots that the UK will forfeit by this decision? Request
Washington review and consideration for next steps in Vienna,
and as appropriate, London. Action requests in paras 4, 5,
and 8. End Summary.

Why buy when you can rent?
--------------


2. (SBU) This week, UK reps told USDel that MOD budgets
were forcing a decision to forego any future active
observation flights after the end of April. The UK Open
Skies aircraft (Andover) has reached its lifespan, and is too
expensive to maintain. No replacement aircraft is envisioned
or fiscally feasible at this time. However, this decision
will apparently only net a savings of 400,000 British pounds
(about USD 200,000). Unfortunately, MOD appears unwilling to
even consider leasing another aircraft, such as the Swedish
Saab, which runs about $40K per mission ) which presumbly
would be affordable several times per year. Comment: the
UK aircraft, irrevently called by the Brits a "bucket of
bolts flying in formation," has been on its last legs for
years, so the lifespan issue is not a surprise. Replacement
costs are understandably high, but leasing other aircraft
would appear to be feasible and relatively inexpensive. End
Comment.


3. (SBU) UK reps have stressed that the MOD decision is
purely driven by financial constraints, and does not

represent any policy decisions to withdraw support from the
Treaty. Nor is it in reaction to other arms control
developments in Europe (e.g., current Russian suspension of
the CFE Treaty.) The UK will continue to accept observation
flights from Treaty partners, and will participate in the
OSCC in Vienna.

Demarche to London?
--------------


4. (C) Comment and Action request 1: Even if the decision is
purely a financial one, cessation of flights by a leading
European Ally will nevertheless reflect poorly on the
importance and viability of the Open Skies Treaty. Other
nations may well begin to wonder why they should continue to
participate if it is not important to a country like the UK.
The UK rep (MacLeod) said a demarche to London from
Washington could help mitigate the decision, although she was
uncertain whether even that would be sufficient to reverse it
altogether. We welcome Washington consideration of the UK
suggestion for a demarche. Please advise if Washington
wishes to pursue that action. End Comment and action
request.

Share with UK?
--------------


5. (C) Action request 2: As of May 2008, the UK will not
conduct any of its remaining quota flights for 2008. Per
Reftel, USDel forwarded a request from the UK concerning an
option to share its already scheduled timeslot for a mission
to Russia in week 22 (May 26-30) if the U.S. could provide
the aircraft. If so, we believe it would be possible for the

UK to send a few representatives along in order for it to use
one of its remaining quotas. We have asked the UK del to
confirm this possibility and will update Washington
accordingly. We have not told the UK whether the U.S. could
provide an aircraft. Please provide guidance. End action
request.

How to best use timeslots reserved by the UK
--------------


6. (C) The UK decision will also result in other timeslots
becoming available on the schedule. The UK has reserved week
33 (11-15 August) and week 43 (20-24 October). The October
week would have been a joint mission shared with Slovenia.
Without the UK aircraft, Slovenia will be looking for a new
partner with an aircraft if it hopes to execute this quota
flight over Russia. USDel believes Slovenia would welcome
the chance to share a mission with us. If it does not find
a new partner it will not be able to exercise its quota over
Russia.


7. (C) Comment: This unfortunate UK development offers an
opportunity for the U.S. to support a strong Ally during a
difficult period, as well as a relatively new Ally
(Slovenia). It also offers the U.S. the chance to bid on
several timeslots that would allow us to maximize our quota
flights during optimal weather conditions. Other States
Parties may also be interested in these timeslots, so if we
would like them we should make that known to others sooner
rather than later. There is also the possibility that if we
do not attempt to use these timeslots, others may not step
forward to do so, and the three UK quotas over Russia would
not be utilized this year at all.


8. (C) Action Request 3: Request Washington review the
current planning calendar, U.S. aircraft availability, and
mission planning priorities, in light of this development
with an eye toward supporting our Allies, as well as
maximizing U.S. mission opportunities. Please advise on U.S.
preferences so we can inform Allies in advance of the third
quarter deconfliction meeting in early May. End Action
Request.
FINLEY