Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08USNATO91
2008-03-10 16:15:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Mission USNATO
Cable title:  

NRC: RUSSIA CHIDED KFOR AND ISAF WHILE OFFERING

Tags:  NATO PREL MARR PTER RU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0539
OO RUEHBW RUEHDU
DE RUEHNO #0091/01 0701615
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 101615Z MAR 08
FM USMISSION USNATO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1700
INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING IMMEDIATE 0373
RUEHBW/AMEMBASSY BELGRADE IMMEDIATE
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA IMMEDIATE 0280
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL IMMEDIATE 0854
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 5914
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 0289
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 0604
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON IMMEDIATE 0132
RUEHDU/AMCONSUL DURBAN IMMEDIATE 0002
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL IMMEDIATE
RUEHPS/USOFFICE PRISTINA IMMEDIATE 3260
RHCUAAA/USTRANSCOM SCOTT AFB IL IMMEDIATE
RUEHNA/DEA HQS WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/USNMR SHAPE BE IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 USNATO 000091 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/05/2017
TAGS: NATO PREL MARR PTER RU
SUBJECT: NRC: RUSSIA CHIDED KFOR AND ISAF WHILE OFFERING
SUPPORT IN AFGHANISTAN

Classified By: Ambassador Victoria Nuland for reasons 1.4 (b),(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 USNATO 000091

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/05/2017
TAGS: NATO PREL MARR PTER RU
SUBJECT: NRC: RUSSIA CHIDED KFOR AND ISAF WHILE OFFERING
SUPPORT IN AFGHANISTAN

Classified By: Ambassador Victoria Nuland for reasons 1.4 (b),(d)


1. (C) SUMMARY: Russian Ambassador Dmitriy Rogozin accused
KFOR of overstepping its bounds in Kosovo and called for
impartiality and strict adherence to KFOR's UNSCR 1244
mandate in the February 27 NATO-Russia Council (NRC).
Ambassador Nuland, other Allies, and NATO Secretary General
(SYG) de Hoop Scheffer strongly rebuffed Rogozin,s
accusations. Rogozin also launched into a gloom and doom
security assessment of Afghanistan, which was refuted by many
Allies. A majority of Allies supported a NRC joint statement
at the upcoming NATO Summit in Bucharest and expressed
satisfaction with the list of potential deliverables for the
Summit (e-mailed to EUR/RPM). Ambassador Nuland expressed
caution about an NRC joint statement, arguing that a three
minute video highlighting practical NRC cooperation may be
more press-friendly than a joint statement. Rogozin did not
directly address a joint statement; Russian Mission told us
separately that they did not yet have guidance on it. When
Allies pressed Russia for the transit agreement as a
deliverable for Bucharest, Rogozin expressed optimism that
negotiations were on track to achieve it. END SUMMARY.

--------------
KFOR'S MANDATE
--------------


2. (C) During the February 27 meeting of the NATO-Russia
Council, Russian Ambassador Rogozin warned the Alliance not
to direct KFOR beyond its UNSCR 1244 mandate and to be
"impartial." Referring to his February 22 letter to NATO SYG
de Hoop Scheffer, Rogozin accused NATO of exceeding its 1244
mandate by assisting in the formation of Kosovo armed forces
on the basis of Alliance standards. Rogozin called for the
Alliance to use political and diplomatic channels rather than
the use of force. The SYG uncharacteristically jumped in
first to forcefully refute Rogozin's accusations. The SYG
asserted that KFOR had not exceeded its mandate and had acted
in an impartial and professional manner. The Chairman of the
Military Committee backed up the SYG with a strong overview

of KFOR's deployments, emphasizing its focus on the
protection of minorities and patrimonial sites. The U.S.
joined the UK, Germany, Italy, the Czech Republic, Poland,
Hungary, France, and Canada in pushing back against Rogozin's
claims. The UK pointed out that 1244 did not rule out
additional tasks for KFOR. Ambassador Nuland emphasized that
there had been no inter-ethnic violence or refugees since
Kosovo's independence. She also assured Rogozin that any
possible NATO-trained Kosovo Defense Force would be
multi-ethnic.

--------------
PREPARATION FOR NRC SUMMIT
--------------


3. (C) The UK, Germany, France, Turkey, Portugal, and Greece
advocated strongly for a NRC joint statement at the Bucharest
Summit. They all argued for an over-arching political
statement that notes the NRC is working together on the
difficult issues facing NRC nations, while not dwelling on
the disagreements. Russia did not comment directly on a
joint statement, but noted that although fulfillment of the
NRC program is hard to achieve, there has been lots of
disagreement, and time is short. (Note: The Russian Mission
told us they do not yet have instructions on the joint
statement and are hesitant to jump into a drafting exercise
until there are positive indications it could be successfully
completed. End note). Ambassador Nuland expressed caution
about a joint statement, suggesting instead that the NRC put
together a three minute video on NRC practical cooperation.

USNATO 00000091 002 OF 002


Similarly, the Czech Republic noted the difficulties involved
in drafting a joint statement and suggested an NRC press fact
sheet.


4. (C) Many Ambassadors praised the NRC Preparatory Committee
for its work on potential deliverables. Noting that the list
had been on the table since before the NRC Anniversaries
event in June 2007, Ambassador Nuland urged completion of
work on them in time for Bucharest. She pushed for
acceleration of the Cooperative Airspace Initiative and
agreement to begin Phase III of the Theatre Missile Defense
as Bucharest deliverables.


5. (C) Rogozin said there "was no negative reaction" to the
Proposed NRC Public Forum (a network of think tanks, NGOs and
academics) in Moscow, but said the operational and funding
modalities needed to be worked out. Nuland seized upon
Rogozin's policy reversal to call for a tasking to the Prep
Com to flesh out the concept paper for a possible decision at
Bucharest. (Note: Under Ambassador Totksiy, Russia had
opposed the Public Forum. End note)

-------------- --------------
AFGHANISTAN - SECURITY SITUATION AND CAN RUSSIA LEND A HAND?
-------------- --------------


6. (C) Rogozin open the NRC by reading a 20 minute diatribe
apparently provided by Moscow in which he concluded that the
security situation in Afghanistan was deteriorating. He
argued that the Taliban was growing stronger, extremism was
on the rise, and infiltration from Pakistan was increasing.
Rogozin made a plea for cooperation between NATO and the CSTO
on counter-terrorism and counter-narcotics efforts. He noted
the success of CSTO counter-narcotics operation (KANAL) in
which three tons of narcotics were seized. In response,
Allies disputed his assessment of the Afghanistan security
situation and noted signs of tangible progress.


7. (C) Rogozin expressed confidence that a transit agreement
could be completed as a deliverable for Bucharest. He asked
that NATO provide a detailed list of what would be shipped to
ISAF in order to facilitate next week's negotiations with the
NATO International Staff (IS) (NOTE: Russia has agreed in
principal to include non-military goods, but the IS reports
that Russia may include additions of certain military goods.
Transit through the "Northern Route" would also go through
Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan; the IS is working on separate
agreements with these countries. End note). Allies strongly
encouraged the completion of the agreement before the Summit
and graduation of the NRC counter-narcotics project from its
pilot phase. In a change from its previously stated
position, France also agreed to graduate the
counter-narcotics program and said that it might also
announce a contribution to the project at Bucharest. (Note:
If the counter-narcotics project becomes a Bucharest
deliverable, USNATO would like to announce the contribution
of fully-funded DEA teams to lead the mobile training in
2007-08. End note.) Poland thanked Russia for allowing ISAF
overflights over Russian territory and said this was going
well.


8. (U) MINIMIZE CONSIDERED.

NULAND