Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08USNATO185
2008-05-29 05:39:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Mission USNATO
Cable title:  

NORWAY PROPOSES SPLITTING NATO MISSIONS IN KOSOVO;

Tags:  PREL MOPS NATO KFOR KV 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5539
PP RUEHBW
DE RUEHNO #0185/01 1500539
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 290539Z MAY 08
FM USMISSION USNATO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1919
INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHPS/AMEMBASSY PRISTINA PRIORITY 3271
RHMFISS/USNMR SHAPE BE PRIORITY
RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH PRIORITY
RUFDTFA/CDR TASK FORCE FALCON PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 USNATO 000185 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/28/2018
TAGS: PREL MOPS NATO KFOR KV
SUBJECT: NORWAY PROPOSES SPLITTING NATO MISSIONS IN KOSOVO;
U.S. CALLS IT A "TRAP"

Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Richard G. Olson for reasons 1.4
(b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 USNATO 000185

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/28/2018
TAGS: PREL MOPS NATO KFOR KV
SUBJECT: NORWAY PROPOSES SPLITTING NATO MISSIONS IN KOSOVO;
U.S. CALLS IT A "TRAP"

Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Richard G. Olson for reasons 1.4
(b) and (d).


1. (C) SUMMARY AND COMMENT. Norway has proposed that NATO
create a stand-alone mission in Kosovo, separate from KFOR,
to implement the Ahtissari tasks relating to new security
structures in Kosovo. Supported by Hungary and Italy, Norway
argued that keeping these tasks separate from the existing
KFOR mission would preserve KFOR's good working relationship
and credibility with Serbia, which opposes the new tasks.
The U.S. strongly opposed the idea, saying it would allow
opponents of the new tasks to kill off the separate mission,
and was wasteful. France, Germany, Belgium, the UK,
Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, and Slovenia all expressed doubts
about the Norwegian proposal. The Chairman of the NATO
Military Committee also said he could not support the
proposal from a military perspective. Perm Reps agreed to
have a follow-on discussion May 29 when Perm Reps visit
SHAPE. The proposal is problematic on numerous levels and
USNATO will continue to oppose it and urge other Allies to do
the same. END SUMMARY AND COMMENT.


2. (C) At an informal May 27 NATO Perm Reps' meeting on
Kosovo, Norwegian Perm Rep Traavik said that at a recent
meeting with several NATO Perm Reps, Serbian Army Chief of
General Staff Ponos warned that KFOR's high credibility with
Serbs would be undermined if it proceeded with plans to take
on new tasks contained in the Ahtissari Plan to stand down
the Kosovo Protection Corps and stand up the new Kosovo
Security Force. Ponos reportedly said that if NATO must take
on these new tasks, they should be done by a separate,
stand-alone NATO mission so KFOR would not be tainted by
them. Traavik said that creating a separate mission would
also be a service to the "good guys" in Serbia. The new
mission would have a different name -- he proposed the
Security Sector Reform Mission -- with a different command
structure and badge. Norway's proposal was supported by
Hungary and Italy, who argued that Serbs see NATO and KFOR as
different entities, and so a separate mission was an idea
worth exploring in order to preserve KFOR's contact with the

Serbs.


2. (C) Ambassador Nuland responded that it did not make
sense to separate KFOR from its ultimate exit strategy, which
was to build up a credible, multi-ethnic Kosovo Security
Force of limited scope to take its place. In any case, the
new mission would still be part of NATO, as would KFOR, so
the benefits of a separation were unclear and would
complicate unity of command and logistics. A separate
mission would also greatly complicate U.S. contributions
toward the new tasks. She said that Washington "hated" the
proposal and the more the proposal was described the more it
looked like a trap set by the Serbs to later kill the
separate mission by arguing it was illegitimate. The
proposal was designed to split NATO and ensure NATO's exit
strategy failed.


3. (C) Several countries expressed skepticism over the
proposal. German Perm Rep Brandenburg said he "did not buy"
the argument in favor of a second mission, could not see what
it would gain, and had the "strongest reservations" about it.
Belgium said creating a separate mission risked opening a
debate about UNSCR 1244, since a separate mission would have
no legal basis because the tasks it would perform were not
called for in UNSCR 1244. The Slovenian Perm Rep objected to
the idea of creating a "good" and "bad" NATO mission in the
eyes of Serbs and asked whether the proposal's proponents had
checked with Kosovar Albanians for their views. UK Deputy
Perm Rep Kidd said KFOR still would presumably provide force
protection for the separate mission, which would blur any
distinction between the two missions. France expressed
hesitation and said it did not think the distinction between
NATO and KFOR was large enough to make separate missions
worthwhile. Bulgaria backed comments of other skeptics and
said NATO should not go down a path that would allow Serbia
to divide NATO. Romania said it was cautious and Poland
objected to Norway's characterization of "good guys' and "bad
guys" in Serbia.


4. (C) Chairman of the NATO Military Committee General
Henault commented that, from a military perspective, he could
not support the proposal, which was "hugely problematic."

USNATO 00000185 002 OF 002


Henault said a separate mission would harm unity of command
in Kosovo. In addition, Allies would have to negotiate a new
Initiating Directive and revise the Balkans Operations Plan,
both of which have already been difficult under the current
construct. Positions have also already begun to be filled in
KFOR to execute the new tasks.


5. (C) Following a Dutch suggestion not to come to a final
decision that day, but rather hold a second discussion, Perm
Reps agreed to discuss the proposal again on May 29 when the
NAC visits SHAPE and meets with SACEUR.
NULAND