Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08UNVIEVIENNA437
2008-08-01 17:56:00
CONFIDENTIAL
UNVIE
Cable title:  

IAEA/INDIA: BOARD ADOPTS INDIA SAFEGUARDS AGREEMENT

Tags:  ENRG IAEA KNNP MNUC PARM TRGY ETTC IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1761
OO RUEHBI
DE RUEHUNV #0437/01 2141756
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 011756Z AUG 08
FM USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8282
INFO RUCNNSG/NUCLEAR SUPPLIERS GROUP IMMEDIATE
RUEHII/VIENNA IAEA POSTS COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI PRIORITY 0062
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 UNVIE VIENNA 000437 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR P,T, ISN, IO/IT
DOE FOR NA24-SCHEINMAN, NA-423 GOUREVICH

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/31/2018
TAGS: ENRG IAEA KNNP MNUC PARM TRGY ETTC IN
SUBJECT: IAEA/INDIA: BOARD ADOPTS INDIA SAFEGUARDS AGREEMENT

REF: A) UNVIE 425 B) STATE 81808

Classified By: Ambassador Gregory L. Schulte for reasons 1.4 b and d

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 UNVIE VIENNA 000437

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR P,T, ISN, IO/IT
DOE FOR NA24-SCHEINMAN, NA-423 GOUREVICH

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/31/2018
TAGS: ENRG IAEA KNNP MNUC PARM TRGY ETTC IN
SUBJECT: IAEA/INDIA: BOARD ADOPTS INDIA SAFEGUARDS AGREEMENT

REF: A) UNVIE 425 B) STATE 81808

Classified By: Ambassador Gregory L. Schulte for reasons 1.4 b and d


1. (C) U.S-led diplomatic efforts in coordination with India
and other key allies paved the way for the consensus adoption
of the India Safeguards Agreement by the Board of Governors
on August 1. A ringing endorsement from IAEA Director
General ElBaradei helped sealed the deal in the Board. In
addition to oral remarks at the beginning of the meeting
highlighting key points from the Secretariat's briefing (ref
a),the Director General made a personal appeal in support of
the agreement just prior to its adoption. His staff told us
he had been deeply offended by criticism of the agreement
leveled by Austria and others and that showed in his public
remarks.


2. (C) Almost the entire Board, 32 of 35 members, made
statements, in addition to six non-Board members (Korea, New
Zealand, Norway, Indonesia, Iran and Malaysia). Ambassador
Schulte delivered the statement in ref b. The UK, France,
Russia and Australia were particularly strong. A consensus
EU statement was agreed just minutes before delivery due
primarily to Austrian resistance. The majority of
interventions was supportive and welcomed this agreement as a
step in the right direction, but most countries urged India
to accede to the NPT and CTBT and to conclude an Additional
Protocol. China delivered an anodyne statement on the
implementation of safeguards strengthening the
nonproliferation regime. Among NAM and G-77 Board members
taking the floor, South Africa, Thailand and Ghana expressed
particular support for bringing India into the
non-proliferation mainstream and Algeria called the agreement
a "watershed." Brazil and South Africa also highlighted
India's disarmament commitments, along with calls by other
Board members for nuclear disarmament and establishment of a
NWFZ in South Asia.


3. (C) Board members appreciated clarifications provided by
the Secretariat and India in their respective briefings with
Germany, Canada, Finland and others citing the DG and
Secretariat's interpretation of key clauses on termination
for the record. Several Board interventions also noted the
Separation Plan and the need for timely declaration of
facilities. Only ten states expressed broader reservations
about the Safeguards agreement, including a joint statement
delivered by Austria on behalf of non-Board members Costa
Rica, The Netherlands and Norway citing corrective measures,
linkage to bilateral agreements and the "empty shell" Annex.
Ireland shared Austrian concerns and noted that had there
been a vote, it would have abstained. Switzerland was by far
the most critical of the agreement, warning that if it and
NSG exception are adopted, it would signify the end of the
nonproliferation regime as we know it. Privately, ElBaradei
characterized the Swiss statement as "out of line" and
suggested the U.S. focus on the NSG, noting concerns
expressed in the debate on the "supplier side" of the
agreement. Austria, Ireland, Norway and New Zealand cited
the importance of the upcoming NSG meeting and Japan called
for a meaningful discussion. The Austrian statement noted
that this was in no way an endorsement under the NSG.


4. (C) Iraq underlined that the agreement should not set a
precedent for non-NPT member Israel and cautioned that it
would cast a shadow over the NPT Prepcom and Revcon while
other Arab Board members also referred to Middle East
safeguards. Speaking as non-Board members, Egypt questioned
the value of the Safeguards agreement and Iran and Malaysia
disparaged the U.S.-India agreement as a double standard
undermining the NPT.


5. (C) Following adoption of the agreement, Indian Atomic
Energy Chairman Kakodkar expressed appreciation and delivered
a statement focused on India's energy needs. Kakodkar
signaled India's intention to move forward with the
separation plan upon entry into force and noted India's work
on an Additional Protocol. India also pledged continued
cooperation with the Agency, including strict compliance with
the provisions of the agreement, and firm commitment to
disarmament and nonproliferation. Privately, Kakodkar and
other members of the Indian delegation expressed satisfaction
with the debate, indicated they could live with the NPT and
CTBT expectations, and noted surprise at the strength of
Brazil's intervention on disarmament. Pakistan, seeking to
open the door for themselves, described the adoption of the
agreement a historic step toward accommodating a non-NPT
state and a new precedent. Pakistan also restated its
National Command Authority's position on the India agreement,

UNVIE VIEN 00000437 002 OF 002


including support for an NSG criteria based approach, and
noted concerns for strategic stability.


6. (U) Individual member state interventions emailed to the
Department.


7. (C) Comment: While Board members Switzerland, Austria and
Ireland made clear the difficulties they will pose in the
NSG, the overwhelming sense from the Board meeting was of
broad international support for India's incorporation into
the nonproliferation regime.
SCHULTE