Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08TUNIS712
2008-06-30 12:50:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tunis
Cable title:  

MFA SAYS FSI WRITTEN AGREEMENT WOULD CODIFY THE

Tags:  ABLD AMGT PGOV AFSI TS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0019
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTU #0712/01 1821250
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 301250Z JUN 08
FM AMEMBASSY TUNIS
TO RUEHFSI/DIR FSINFATC IMMEDIATE
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5259
C O N F I D E N T I A L TUNIS 000712 

SIPDIS

FSI FOR DIRECTOR WHITESIDE AND SLS DEAN MORRIS
NEA FOR FRONT OFFICE AND NEA/MAG
L FOR L/DL
OBO FOR ADNAN KANUN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/17/2018
TAGS: ABLD AMGT PGOV AFSI TS
SUBJECT: MFA SAYS FSI WRITTEN AGREEMENT WOULD CODIFY THE
STATUS QUO

REF: TUNIS 705

Classified By: Amb. Robert F. Godec for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L TUNIS 000712

SIPDIS

FSI FOR DIRECTOR WHITESIDE AND SLS DEAN MORRIS
NEA FOR FRONT OFFICE AND NEA/MAG
L FOR L/DL
OBO FOR ADNAN KANUN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/17/2018
TAGS: ABLD AMGT PGOV AFSI TS
SUBJECT: MFA SAYS FSI WRITTEN AGREEMENT WOULD CODIFY THE
STATUS QUO

REF: TUNIS 705

Classified By: Amb. Robert F. Godec for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (C) Summary: On June 28, three senior MFA officials
assured the DCM and FSI school director that the GOT wishes
to simply put in writing the existing arrangements for the
presence of the FSI Arabic Language Field School in Tunisia.
They said the prospective move onto the Embassy compound gave
FSI's presence a more permanent nature and that Article 3 of
the Vienna Convention did not contemplate the school facility
as a normal arrangement. Acknowledging the time limit that
we face to obligate funds for the construction of a new
school, they urged rapid action to put a document together
that would place in writing existing practice so that the
building permit we seek could be released by the end of July.
They asked for language from the U.S. side that lists the
current situation no later than Thursday morning (although
ideally earlier) so that a document could be quickly put
together. The assurances by the Foreign Minister to the
Ambassador (reftel) together with the presence of three
Directors General (for Americas and Asia, Protocol and Legal
Affairs) for this one meeting suggests the Tunisians want to
move forward quickly. We have drafted proposed language for
Washington's review to pass to the Tunisians containing those
elements we believe would safeguard the current status of the
field school and the USG personnel assigned to it. Rapid
action will be required to prevent the loss of this fiscal
year's building funds. End Summary


2. (C) The DCM and FSI field school director met with
Director General for Asia and the Americas Ilyas Kasri,
Director General for Protocol Moncef Hajeri and Director
General for Legal Affairs Mondher Dheraief June 28 to discuss
the recent diplomatic note (reftel) seeking a written
agreement on the future of the FSI Arabic Language Field
School. The Tunisian request came in light of our desire to
move FSI onto the Embassy compound into a purpose built

facility.


3. (C) In his remarks, Kasri said that the primary
motivation for the information meeting was to review the
status of the school. He noted that there had been
"diplomatic tolerance" of the school since 1975 but that the
planned construction gave its presence a permanent nature.
He also noted that the activities of the school were not
contained within the normal definition of a diplomatic
function as contained in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic
Relations. The DCM replied with a detailed description of
the current status of the FSI school as an integral part of
the Embassy's activities under the authority of the Chief of
Mission, an explanation of FSI Washington as an integral part
of the Department of State, and clearly delineated FSI Tunis
from private organizations such as AMIDEAST.

No Change in the Status Quo Sought
--------------


4. (C) In response, Kasri and Dheraief stated that they are
not seeking any change in the current status of FSI but they
do wish to put in writing the current rights and obligations
of each side to include whatever expectations that the U.S.
might have. Acknowledging that FSI Tunis is a small part of
the training activities of the Department, they said they
were not wedded to the language "accord de siege"
(headquarters agreement),nor were they concerned about the
number of personnel that FSI might train. They said that
their goal was the rapid creation of a text that describes
the current situation or even possibly makes it better while
clarifying all points related to FSI's operation. Dheraief
asked many practical questions to verify the fact that FSI
trained only USG personnel and whether such personnel needed
or received different treatment from other diplomats. DCM
replied that the diplomats studying Arabic currently received
the same treatment internally within the USG in terms of
administrative support as other Embassy personnel and only
needed to receive the same treatment from the GOT as the rest
of the Embassy's diplomatic personnel. The only difference
is that their tours of duty are shorter than other Embassy
personnel since they normally stay no longer than one year.
Hajeri pointed out to Dheraief that all the personnel have
diplomatic status (something accorded to FSI students in
December 2006 by the Tunisians since they hold diplomatic
passports and for which we received concurrence from the
Department). Dheraief noted that from a legal point of view
the move of the FSI students into the Embassy compound
clearly adds to the validity of current practice that they be

treated as diplomatic personnel since their activities would
no longer be in a separate location but within the Embassy's
walls.

We Should Move Ahead
--------------


5. (C) Given the strongly positive nature of the meeting,
especially the assurances received that there is no desire to
degrade the status of FSI Tunis, we believe we should accede
to the request at the meeting to provide language that would
describe the status of FSI Tunis and receive written
confirmation of that status. Given that FSI Tunis has
functioned since 1975 without any written guarantee on
keeping its operations, under the circumstances we believe
that such a document, if agreed to by the end of July as
urged by Kasri, would remove the current obstacle and serve
as a legal guarantee for our pending $40 million investment
in the planned training facility. We would suggest that any
eventually agreed document be implemented through an exchange
of diplomatic notes. Below we suggest a text for such a note.

Text of Suggested U.S. Document
--------------


6. (SBU) (Complimentary Opening) and has the honor to refer
to the Ministry's notes No. 228/19463 dated June 23, 2008 and
193/16691 date May 29, 2008 and seeks the Ministry's written
acknowledgement of the current status of the Foreign Service
Institute Arabic Language Field School (FSI-Tunis),an
indivisible part of the American Embassy that has provided
Arabic language and cultural affairs training for American
diplomatic officials in Tunis since 1975, thanks to the
hospitality of the Government of Tunisia. The Foreign
Service Institute in Washington is the training division of
the United States Department of State.

FSI-Tunis is a section of the American Embassy that consists
of American government personnel, who manage or are trained
at the institute, Arabic language teachers who are Tunisian
or of other nationalities who have residence status in
Tunisia or are able to obtain legal permits to work in
Tunisia, and administrative support personnel who are hired
locally in Tunisia. In 1985, FSI-Tunis moved to its current
location in a rented villa in Sidi Bou Said. As noted in the
Embassy's note No. 529 of April 15, 2008, the Embassy wishes
to move the functions of FSI-Tunis into a new building on the
Embassy's compound that would permit modernization and growth
of FSI-Tunis' operations and provide a more secure facility
than the one currently being occupied. The move would permit
FSI-Tunis to be physically co-located with the rest of the
Embassy of which it is a part, and diminish the need for the
Government of Tunisia to provide separate security support in
Sidi Bou Said.

The Embassy proposes that both governments agree that the
American personnel assigned to manage or study at FSI-Tunis
will continue to have diplomatic status. The Government of
Tunisia currently accords the same rights and priviledges to
USG personnel at FSI-Tunis as it does to all other personnel
covered by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and
we propose that it continue to do so. The Embassy proposes
that the Ministry agree to continue to treat the training
activities of FSI-Tunis as an acceptable activity that would
be treated equally to those activities listed under Article
Three of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

The Embassy wishes to state for the record that the training
activities of FSI-Tunis are designed only for United States
Government personnel and their dependents, have no commercial
purpose and are not open to the general public of any
nationality. The typical training period for United States
Government personnel assigned to FSI-Tunis is 11 months
during which time they receive instruction in advanced
Arabic, including language and culture lectures, media
training, immersion field trips within Tunisia and interim
and end of year testing. In individual cases the training
period is at times shorter or longer depending on specific
pedagogical needs. American personnel assigned to FSI-Tunis
receive the same administrative support and are treated by
the American Embassy in the same manner as all other American
personnel assigned thereto. All personnel are under the
authority of the American Ambassador in the same manner as
the rest of the Embassy.

The Embassy requests that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
confirm by return diplomatic note its agreement to the above.


Complimentary close.


7. (SBU) We request a rapid reply from the Department so
that we can engage as quickly as possible with the GOT on
creating an acceptable document.
GODEC