Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08TOKYO956
2008-04-08 07:33:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tokyo
Cable title:  

METI SIGNALS OPPOSITION TO TCI INVESTMENT IN

Tags:  EINV ENRG PGOV OECD JA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5914
PP RUEHFK RUEHGH RUEHKSO
DE RUEHKO #0956/01 0990733
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 080733Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3239
INFO RUEATRS/TREASURY DEPT WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 2689
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 2004
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 6040
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 8716
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE 7149
RUEHFT/AMCONSUL FRANKFURT 0473
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 7139
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 6482
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 0808
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 7733
RUEHGH/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 0381
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TOKYO 000956 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EAP AND EEB/OIA
DEPT PASS USTR FOR CUTLER AND BEEMAN
TREASURY DEPT FOR DAS NOVA DALY, AND IA/CARNES
USDOC FOR 4410/ITA/MAC/OJ
NSC FOR TONG

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/08/2013
TAGS: EINV ENRG PGOV OECD JA
SUBJECT: METI SIGNALS OPPOSITION TO TCI INVESTMENT IN
J-POWER CASE

REF: A. TOKYO 828

B. TOKYO 408

C. TOKYO 402

D. TOKYO 317

E. 07 TOKYO 2688

F. 07 TOKYO 454

Classified By: Ambassador J Thomas Schieffer. Reason 1.4(b)(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TOKYO 000956

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EAP AND EEB/OIA
DEPT PASS USTR FOR CUTLER AND BEEMAN
TREASURY DEPT FOR DAS NOVA DALY, AND IA/CARNES
USDOC FOR 4410/ITA/MAC/OJ
NSC FOR TONG

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/08/2013
TAGS: EINV ENRG PGOV OECD JA
SUBJECT: METI SIGNALS OPPOSITION TO TCI INVESTMENT IN
J-POWER CASE

REF: A. TOKYO 828

B. TOKYO 408

C. TOKYO 402

D. TOKYO 317

E. 07 TOKYO 2688

F. 07 TOKYO 454

Classified By: Ambassador J Thomas Schieffer. Reason 1.4(b)(d)


1. (C) Summary: The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
(METI) signaled again April 5 it opposes the proposal by
UK-based Children's Investment Master Fund (TCI) to increase
its investment in electricity wholesaler Electric Power
Development Company (known as J-Power.) In January, TCI,
which is already J-Power's largest investor, applied to
double its stake in the firm to 19.9 percent. The GOJ has
asked TCI representatives to appear at an April 11 meeting of
the Ministry of Finance's (MOF) Council on Customs, Tarrif,
Foreign Exchange and Other Transactions, to explain why it
wishes to increase its investment and to address a list of
METI concerns, most of which would not be under the power or
authority of a minority investor. A lawyer for TCI believes
METI officials have already made up their minds about the
case. End Summary


2. (SBU) Under Japan's Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade
Control Law (FEFTC),foreign investment exceeding 10 percent
in companies operating critical infrastructure, such as
J-Power, requires prior notification and government approval
(refs E-F). The GOJ has never rejected a proposed investment
under the law. According to J-Power's most recent annual
report, non-Japanese now own approximately 40 percent of the
firm's shares.


3. (C) METI has sent TCI's representatives a list of its
concerns about the proposed investment. They include a
potential threat to a cheap and stable electricity supplies
if TCI were to force J-Power to increase its dividend; the
risk of a disruption in the nuclear fuel cycle if TCI were to
force J-Power to suspend a planned nuclear power project;
damage to "public order" as a result of leak of sensitive

high technology to foreign counties; and damage to Japanese
consumers from a rise in electricity charges. The Ministry
has asked TCI to address these concerns in an hour-long
presentation to the MOF Council April 11. Except for the
first point above, none of the concerns METI raises are
potentially within the authority of a minority shareholder, a
status TCI would retain even if the government approves its
application.


4. (SBU) J-Power operates over 60 thermal and hydropower
generating plants, accounting for seven percent of Japan's
power generating capacity. It is the sole owner of trunk
electricity transmission lines between Japan's main island of
Honshu and Hokkaido, Kyushu, and Shikoku. TCI begun
accumulating J-Power shares in 2006 and since March 2007 has
been the firm's largest shareholder. In June 2007, at
J-Power's annual general shareholder meeting, the Fund made a
shareholder proposal to increase the company's dividend,
claiming J-Power held excessive assets in cash and its return
on assets and equity were below those of comparable firms in
the Japanese power sector, including Japan's nine regional
power utilities. Shareholders defeated TCI's proposal, but
the former state-owned enterprise has worked since to improve
its financial indicators. J-Power executives also insist the
company needs a larger than normal cash cushion to deal with
unexpected contingencies arising from construction of its
first nuclear power station in Oma Township, Aomori
Prefecture. To allay GOJ fears that the Fund's investment
threatens that project, TCI has made written commitments it
would not vote its shares on any matters related to the

TOKYO 00000956 002 OF 002


development of the Oma plant.


5. (U) Since TCI announced its intention to raise its stake
in J-Power, senior METI officials have expressed repeated
suspicion of TCI's motives. METI Minister Akira Amari told a
December 4 press conference, "I personally cannot conceive
that the rights to manage this company would be transferred
to foreign hands." METI Vice Minister Kitabata was quoted in
the press April 8 saying TCI's investment could have an
impact on the stable supply of electricity as well as the
GOJ's policies on nuclear power.


6. (C) An attorney for TCI reports METI officials have made
up their minds about TCI's application and are now seeking to
convince the rest of the government. The Fund also has
sharply criticized METI's lack of transparency in handling
the case. The Ministry's concerns are quite broad -- in the
words of TCI's lawyers, "almost theological" -- but the law
does not limit the GOJ to objecting to a proposed investment
only on national security grounds. TCI already has stated
publicly, if its proposed investment is rejected, it will
advise other foreign funds to disinvest from the Japanese
market.


7. (C) Comment: Despite press headlines, the GOJ has made no
final decision on this case, but this latest development
demonstrates deep suspicions within METI towards TCI's
intentions (refs B-D.) METI also believes the country's
electricity grid is a "strategic asset" that must be kept in
Japanese control, a position reinforced by the ministry's
long history of regulatory control of the power sector,
including J-Power before the firm's 2003 privatization.
However, METI's concerns appear excessive since TCI's
proposed investment would not give the Fund control of the
company. Nevertheless, the USG's interest in the case, as we
made clear in our discussion with METI at last month's
Investment Working Group (ref A),is limited to ensuring
security reviews under the FEFTC are fair and transparent.
British Embassy sources here have also told us HMG is taking
a low-key approach, pushing the GOJ to be transparent and
noting the value of foreign investment in general rather than
pushing this individual investment effort.
SCHIEFFER