Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08STATE70801
2008-07-01 21:48:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

DEMARCHE REQUEST ON HUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION --

Tags:  AORC UN NGO PHUM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7621
OO RUEHPA
DE RUEHC #0801/01 1832147
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 012148Z JUL 08
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHAN/AMEMBASSY ANTANANARIVO IMMEDIATE 8196
RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION IMMEDIATE 9364
RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS IMMEDIATE 3455
RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD IMMEDIATE 9312
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA IMMEDIATE 9007
RUEHWN/AMEMBASSY BRIDGETOWN IMMEDIATE 7367
RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST IMMEDIATE 9372
RUEHCH/AMEMBASSY CHISINAU IMMEDIATE 9249
RUEHCO/AMEMBASSY COTONOU IMMEDIATE 2616
RUEHKL/AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR IMMEDIATE 9224
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ IMMEDIATE 0571
RUEHLG/AMEMBASSY LILONGWE IMMEDIATE 1199
RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON IMMEDIATE 5978
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON IMMEDIATE 8330
RUEHLE/AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG IMMEDIATE 4895
RUEHML/AMEMBASSY MANILA IMMEDIATE 7038
RUEHTO/AMEMBASSY MAPUTO IMMEDIATE 2642
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO IMMEDIATE 1266
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA IMMEDIATE 1405
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS IMMEDIATE 9762
RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE IMMEDIATE 8433
RUEHPA/AMEMBASSY PRAIA IMMEDIATE 2961
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK IMMEDIATE 8718
RUEHSN/AMEMBASSY SAN SALVADOR IMMEDIATE 0744
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 7927
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM IMMEDIATE 5544
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE IMMEDIATE 2531
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 4988
RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA IMMEDIATE 5438
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW IMMEDIATE 1380
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON IMMEDIATE 5586
INFO RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA IMMEDIATE 2701
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 2352
RUEHUB/USINT HAVANA IMMEDIATE 5608
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 STATE 070801 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC UN NGO PHUM
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE REQUEST ON HUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION --
UPCOMING ACTION AT ECOSOC JULY 2008.

REF: USUN 516

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 STATE 070801

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC UN NGO PHUM
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE REQUEST ON HUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION --
UPCOMING ACTION AT ECOSOC JULY 2008.

REF: USUN 516


1. This cable contains an action request. Please see
paragraph 3.



2. BACKGROUND. In June 2008, the Committee on NGOs (CNGO)
of the UN Economic and Social Council rejected the
application for ECOSOC consultative status of a U.S. NGO
called the Human Rights Foundation (HRF). Cuba -- with
support from Sudan, China, Guinea, Egypt, Russia, Burundi,
Dominica, and an observer delegation from Venezuela --
alleged that the Chairman of the organization's Board of
Directors, Armando Valladares, had been convicted of
terrorism. The HRF refuted the terrorism allegation in a
letter to the CNGO, saying Valladares had been imprisoned in
Cuba for refusing to place a political placard on his desk
while working as a bank clerk, for which he was charged with
plotting against Cuba's State Security apparatus. HRF also
pointed out that Valladares had been adopted by Amnesty
International as a prisoner of conscience, a fact confirmed
by Amnesty International annual reports for 1977 and 1983.
Amnesty International's 1983 report noted that no conclusive
evidence had been presented against Valladares during his
trial, and that in the later years of his imprisonment he had
been paralyzed. HRF also pointed out to the CNGO that
following his release from prison and departure from Cuba,
Valladares had come to the United States and been appointed
head of the U.S. delegation to the former UN Commission on
Human Rights, with the rank of Ambassador.

At the NGO Committee, the U.S. called for two votes, both of
which we lost. On the first vote, the U.S. sought
unsuccessfully to have a decision on the application deferred
until the Committee could hear from an HRF representative in
person. (The Committee rarely takes action during its first
examination of an application. The hasty manner in which it
took action in this case was all the more surprising because
the Committee traditionally defers action on an application
whenever a member asks that a representative of the NGO
appear in person before it, which in this case could have
been easily accomplished because the HRF is located in New
York City only a few blocks from UN Headquarters.) Colombia,
Israel, Peru, Romania, and the UK voted with the United
States in favor of deferring action on the HRF application,
saying they needed more time to consider the application, to
hear personally from a representative of HRF, and to seek

instructions from capitals. India abstained.

On the second vote, the United States was also unsuccessful
in countering Cuba's motion to have HRF's application
rejected. Colombia, Israel, and Peru voted with the United
States to accept the application, with Romania and the UK
abstaining solely because they had no instructions from
capitals, as the HRF application was so new.

STATE 00070801 002 OF 004


During the current ECOSOC session (June 30 - July 25 in New
York),ECOSOC will review the NGO Committee's report. At
that time, the U.S. will try to have the NGO Committee's
decision overturned and the HRF's application accepted, or at
a minimum sent back to the Committee. We will need the
support of as many as possible of ECOSOC's 54 member states
in order to achieve this.



3. ACTION REQUEST. Action addressees are requested to
approach host governments at the appropriate level and draw
from the following talking points.


BEGIN TALKING POINTS.

-- At the June session of the UN Economic and Social
Council's Committee on NGOs, the application for ECOSOC
consultative status of a U.S. non-governmental organization
(NGO) called the Human Rights Foundation was hastily
rejected.

-- Cuba called for the application's immediate rejection,
although the Committee was reviewing it for the first time
and rarely takes decisions so quickly. Cuba justified its
request by saying that the Chairman of the Human Rights
Foundation's Board of Directors, Armando Valladares, is a
terrorist.

-- This allegation has no basis in fact. Armando Valladares,
who was born in Cuba, was arrested there in 1961 and falsely
convicted of plotting against the Cuban State Security
apparatus. He spent 22 years in prison, and upon his release
in 1983 was allowed to leave the country. Amnesty
International, one of the world's most respected human rights
organizations, adopted him as a prisoner of conscience during
the years of his imprisonment, stating in its annual report
for 1983, following his release, that "he confirmed the
information gathered by Amnesty International, namely that no
conclusive evidence had been presented against him during his
trial and that for several years of the later years of his
imprisonment, he had been paralyzed."

-- After leaving Cuba, Valladares came to the United States.
In 1986 his memoir of the years that he spent as a prisoner
of conscience in Cuba was published in the United States. In
1988 he was appointed U.S. Ambassador to the former UN
Commission on Human Rights.

-- At the recent NGO Committee session, the U.S. called for
two votes. First we asked that the Committee, which was
reviewing the Human Rights Foundation's application for the
first time, defer action on it until a representative of the
Foundation could address Cuba's allegations in person. The
Foundation had already refuted the allegations in writing,
but the Committee traditionally gives NGOs an opportunity to
appear in person as well, in order to answer any questions
the Committee may have. In this case, although the Human
Rights Foundation is located in New York City only a few

STATE 00070801 003 OF 004


blocks from UN Headquarters, the Committee rejected the U.S.
request for deferral, although five of the Committee's 19
members supported the U.S. request and one member state
abstained from voting.

-- Then the United States called for a vote on a motion by
Cuba to reject the application. Three Committee members
joined the United States in voting against the Cuban motion
and two abstained, saying they had no instructions because
the application was so new. Nevertheless, the rejection was
approved.

-- When ECOSOC meets in New York June 30 through July 25, it
will review the NGO Committee's report. At that time, the
United States intends to ask ECOSOC to overturn the
Committee's decision on the Human Rights Foundation and to
grant it consultative status, or at a minimum to send the
application back to the NGO Committee for further
consideration. We urge you to instruct your delegation in
New York to support this decision.

-- The Human Rights Foundation meets all the criteria in the
1996 ECOSOC resolution on the consultative relationship
between ECOSOC and NGOs: the Foundation is concerned with
matters falling within the competence of ECOSOC; its aims and
purposes are in conformity with the UN Charter; and it
supports the work of the United Nations. It is duly
registered in the United States as a non-profit organization
and has a representative structure with an International
Council, a Board of Advisors, and a Board of Directors.

-- The Human Rights Foundation is devoted to defending human
rights and promoting liberal democracy in the Americas by
advocating for fundamental freedoms enshrined in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other UN
instruments. It does this through educational programs and
research and reporting on human rights violations, with a
particular focus on prisoners of conscience. Further
information on the Foundation is available on its website,
www.humanrightsfoundation.org

-- As the preamble to the 1996 ECOSOC resolution on NGOs
points out, ECOSOC needs to take into account the full
diversity of the world's NGOs and to acknowledge the breadth
of their expertise and capacity to support the UN's work. It
is in this spirit that ECOSOC's NGO Committee should have
reviewed and accepted the Human Rights Foundation's
application.

-- The Committee should base its decisions strictly on merit
and the criteria laid out in the 1996 resolution.
Unfortunately, in this case the Committee acted hastily and
in violation not only of the provisions of the 1996
resolution, but also of its own standard operating procedures.

-- We urge your government to instruct your ECOSOC delegation
to join us in supporting ECOSOC consultative status for the
Human Rights Foundation at the ongoing ECOSOC session June 30
- July 25 in New York.


STATE 00070801 004 OF 004


-- If you are not prepared to grant consultative status to
the Foundation at this time, we urge you to instruct your
delegation to support referring its application back to the
Committee on NGOs for further review.


END TALKING POINTS.



4. Please report host government reactions to IO/RHS and
USUN New York.
RICE