Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08STATE52042
2008-05-15 22:40:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

KOSOVO: RESPONSE TO UNSYG ON UNMIK TRANSITION

Tags:  UNSC PREL PGOV UNMIK KO YI 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0004
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHC #2042 1362248
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 152240Z MAY 08
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 0000
C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 052042 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/13/2018
TAGS: UNSC PREL PGOV UNMIK KO YI
SUBJECT: KOSOVO: RESPONSE TO UNSYG ON UNMIK TRANSITION

REF: USUN 429

Classified By: IO PDAS James Warlick for reasons 1.4(b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 052042

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/13/2018
TAGS: UNSC PREL PGOV UNMIK KO YI
SUBJECT: KOSOVO: RESPONSE TO UNSYG ON UNMIK TRANSITION

REF: USUN 429

Classified By: IO PDAS James Warlick for reasons 1.4(b) and (d).


1. (C) This is an action request for a demarche to UN SYG
Ban Ki-moon in response to reftel request for guidance. See
paragraphs 4 and 5.


2. (C) The objective of this demarche is to underscore to
UNSYG that the Quint is unified in its position that UNMIK
must reconfigure after June 15, that the UN must not hold
non-transparent, substantive negotiations with Belgrade, and
that the UN should work immediately with Brussels on a policy
framework for transition in Kosovo's rule of law sector.


3. (C) Background: Phase out of UNMIK and ramp-up of the EU
Rule of Law Mission (EULEX) is hampered by Secretariat
confusion and UNSYG Ban's hesitancy vis--vis Russia and
Serbia. New York officials report inaccurately to Ban that
the Quint is divided on this transition. Quint Balkan
Directors provided our views to DPKO on May 2 and the Quint
provided DPKO U/S Guehenno with a non-paper on this issue on
May 7. On May 9 Quint Political Directors reiterated their
position to U/S Guehenno. The Quint has made clear that
UNMIK administration of Kosovo must end June 15 when Kosovo's
new constitution comes into force. Quint also made clear
that the UN should not be renegotiating aspects of the
Ahtisaari Plan with Belgrade. Quint and Kosovo must be
involved in consideration of any changes. DPKO promised to
begin discussions with the EU and NATO on this security
arrangement, and we understand that these institutions have
begun discussions on the ground in Kosovo and will meet at
senior level next week in Vienna. Ban's insistence, however,
that he must have Russian and Serb buy-in for this transition
is unrealistic.


4. (C) The United States along with other members of the
Quint are not rigid on provisions of the Ahtisaari Plan. We
have already made adjustments to the Plan to take into
account changed circumstances surrounding Kosovo's
independence and will continue to do so. That said, the
Quint cannot support the negotiations DPKO planned to launch
with Belgrade, which radically changed provisions of the plan
without consultations with the Kosovar leaders or major
stakeholders. DPKO's proposals would have created a separate
police force and courts for all Serb areas; the UN itself has
worked hard over the last nine years to build multi-ethnic
institutions in Kosovo. To reverse this achievement now
would go against the principles that guided the international
community since UNSCR 1244 was adopted in 1999. DPKO
proposals would lead to ethnic partition of Kosovo and cause
greater instability.


4. (C) USUN may draw on the following points to respond to
Ban's reftel suggestion that the USG sit down with the
Secretariat to "draft a common understanding of the details
of the fade in/fade out process, drawing from relevant Quint
and UN papers."

--- We appreciate your offer to continue to discuss with U.S.
representatives the way forward on UNMIK transition in
Kosovo. We have outlined our common position with France,
Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, EU Council and NATO
Secretariat in the non-paper given to U/S Guehenno on May 7.

--- This non-paper outlines political/administrative measures
that UNMIK should take to reduce its presence in a
reconfiguration. The key element is that UNMIK should no
longer govern Kosovo after June 15 when Kosovo's constitution
comes into effect. The paper also provides a framework for
EU deployment. Specifics of the EU deployment, EU-UN
cooperation and EU relations to the UN remain to be worked
out.

--- It is vital that any discussion of this issue involve all
key stakeholders that are contributing to stability on the
ground in Kosovo. The EU and NATO, in particular, must be
involved. The United States cannot work out plans for a
transition with the UN alone.

--- We are grateful that you have authorized technical
discussions to begin on the ground among the UN, EU and NATO.
We also understand that a meeting of senior officials will
take place next week in Vienna to discuss the issue further.

--- We urge that the UN move forward expeditiously to begin
policy-level negotiations with us, the EU and NATO on all
transition and reconfiguration issues, including EULEX, based
on our non-paper.

--- We understand your desire to achieve Russian and
particularly Serb support for any reconfiguration. But we
stress that the details must be worked our first with the US,
France, Italy, Germany, United Kingdom, EU and NATO since
these stakeholders will be responsible for security in Kosovo
and further Kosovo's development.
RICE