Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08STATE26643
2008-03-13 20:56:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

VOTING INSTRUCTIONS FOR AZERBAIJAN UNGA RESOLUTION

Tags:  UNGA AZ PBTS PREL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0022
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHC #6643 0732101
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 132056Z MAR 08
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 0000
INFO RUEHKB/AMEMBASSY BAKU IMMEDIATE 0000
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 0000
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS IMMEDIATE 0000
RUEHYE/AMEMBASSY YEREVAN IMMEDIATE 0000
C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 026643 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/12/2018
TAGS: UNGA AZ PBTS PREL
SUBJECT: VOTING INSTRUCTIONS FOR AZERBAIJAN UNGA RESOLUTION

REF: STATE 21209

Classified By: IO A/S Kristen Silverberg, for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 026643

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/12/2018
TAGS: UNGA AZ PBTS PREL
SUBJECT: VOTING INSTRUCTIONS FOR AZERBAIJAN UNGA RESOLUTION

REF: STATE 21209

Classified By: IO A/S Kristen Silverberg, for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (C) This is an action request. Department continues to
urge Azerbaijan to consider our proposed changes to the text
of its UNGA resolution "on the situation in the occupied
territories of Azerbaijan" and to delay a vote on the
resolution, in the hope of allowing us (and our Minsk Group
Co-Chair partners) to abstain or perhaps support the
resolution. If Azerbaijan does not agree to delay or alter
its text by March 14 -- the day the resolution is scheduled
to be voted -- USUN should coordinate with our fellow Minsk
Group (e.g., Russian and French) missions to: 1) issue a
joint explanation of vote (EOV) in the name of the Minsk
Group Co-Chairs before voting takes place, and 2) vote "no"
on the resolution. (Note: USUN should not/not support a "no
action" motion that might be proposed by the Russia
delegation because of long-standing U.S. opposition to &no
action8 motions. End note.) See para 2 for specific
guidance. End action request.


2. (C) Failing agreement with Azerbaijan to delay a vote or
reconsider our proposed changes to the text of its UNGA
resolution "on the situation in the occupied territories of
Azerbaijan,8 USUN is authorized to call the vote and join
with the Russian and French missions to vote "no" on the
resolution, stressing Minsk Group solidarity. Specifically,
USUN should:

-- encourage Azerbaijan to withdraw/delay the vote on the
resolution to allow time for collaboration on a redraft;
-- coordinate with Russia and France and call the vote;
-- issue the joint EOV in para 4 below with Russia and
France in the name of the Minsk Group Co-Chairs before the
vote; and
-- vote "no" on the resolution.


3. (C) Background: Azerbaijan has introduced a resolution
concerning Nagorno-Karabakh in the UNGA under the frozen
conflict agenda item. The resolution, as currently drafted,
is one-sided and counter to the spirit and substance of Minsk
Group negotiations on a Nagorno-Karabakh settlement,
selectively focusing on elements of the package on the table
that Azerbaijan supports while ignoring elements Armenia
supports. The resolution marks a maximalist attempt by
Azerbaijan to score tactical points while Armenia faces
domestic political instability, and thereby risks poisoning
the climate of Minsk Group negotiations. The resolution is
likely to pass due to the support that Azerbaijan is
receiving from its OIC colleagues and NAM countries. But a
unified &no8 vote by the Minsk Group Co-Chairs will help
minimize the resolution's damage to the peace process. The
Co-Chairs do wish to underscore their support for
Azerbaijan,s territorial integrity, but also for the
principle that NK,s status is the subject of negotiations.


4. (U) Begin EOV Text.

The political-level representatives of France, the Russian
Federation, and the United States, as Co-Chairs of the OSCE
Minsk Group dealing with the Nagorno-Karabakh (NK) conflict
) jointly proposed a set of basic principles for the
peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh (NK) conflict to
the sides in November 2007 on the margins of the OSCE
Ministerial Council in Madrid. These basic principles are
founded on the provisions of the Helsinki Final Act,
including those related to refraining from the threat or use
of force, the territorial integrity of the states, and the
equal rights and self-determination of peoples. The proposal
transmitted to the sides in Madrid comprises a balanced
package of principles that are currently under negotiation.
The sides have agreed that no single element is agreed until
all elements are agreed by the parties.

Unfortunately, this draft resolution selectively propagates
only certain of these principles to the exclusion of others,
without considering the Co-Chairs' proposal in its balanced
entirety.

Because of this selective approach, the three OSCE Minsk
Group Co-Chair countries must oppose this unilateral draft
resolution. They reiterate that a peaceful, equitable, and
lasting settlement of the NK conflict will require
unavoidable compromises among the parties that reflect the
principles of territorial integrity, non-use of force, and
equal rights of peoples, as well as other principles of
international law.

While the three Minsk Group Co-Chair countries will vote
against this unilateral draft resolution, which threatens to
undermine the peace process, they reaffirm their support for
the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, and thus do not
recognize the independence of NK.

At a time when serious clashes have occurred along the Line
of Contact with loss of life, both sides must refrain from
unilateral and maximalist actions either at the negotiating
table or in the field.

End EOV Text.
RICE