Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08STATE21209
2008-02-29 22:59:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

GUIDANCE FOR AZERBAIJANI UNGA RESOLUTION

Tags:  UNGA PREL AM AJ RU GE UP PBTS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHC #1209 0602303
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 292259Z FEB 08
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 0000
INFO RUEHKB/AMEMBASSY BAKU IMMEDIATE 0000
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 0000
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS IMMEDIATE 0000
RUEHPS/USOFFICE PRISTINA IMMEDIATE 0000
RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI IMMEDIATE 0000
RUEHYE/AMEMBASSY YEREVAN IMMEDIATE 0000
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV IMMEDIATE 0000
C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 021209 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/27/2018
TAGS: UNGA PREL AM AJ RU GE UP PBTS
SUBJECT: GUIDANCE FOR AZERBAIJANI UNGA RESOLUTION

REF: A. USUN 178

B. BAKU 129

Classified By: IO PDAS James B. Warlick, for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 021209

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/27/2018
TAGS: UNGA PREL AM AJ RU GE UP PBTS
SUBJECT: GUIDANCE FOR AZERBAIJANI UNGA RESOLUTION

REF: A. USUN 178

B. BAKU 129

Classified By: IO PDAS James B. Warlick, for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (U) This is an action request. See Para. 2.


2. Action request: Department requests that USUN urge
Azerbaijan's mission to the UN to work on an UNGA resolution
that stresses that Kosovo is not a precedent for
Nagarno-Karabakh (NK) or any other conflict. In order to
secure U.S. support, such a resolution should be
appropriately balanced, noting support for Azerbaijan,s
territorial integrity while stressing that the future status
of NK is a matter for negotiations. The resolution should
also express support for the current OSCE Minsk Group
process. Post should draw from the background below and
points in para 3 and background as necessary. Post should
also consult with the French mission. Since a resolution
text that addresses legal issues may have implications in
other contexts (including in connection with claims of rights
asserted by groups with respect to the USG),Department
wishes to review any text before the USG commits to support
it. End action request.


3. (SBU) Department requests USUN draw on the following
points in discussions with the Azerbaijani Mission:

-- In an expression of strong support for Azerbaijan,s
territorial integrity, the United States issued a statement
immediately after we announced our recognition of Kosovo's
independence stressing that Kosovo is not a precedent for NK
or any other conflict.

-- We are willing to help secure a similarly worded
resolution in the UN.

-- Such a resolution should be appropriately balanced, noting
support for Azerbaijan,s territorial integrity while
stressing that the future status of NK is a matter for
negotiations and must take into account relevant principles
of international law. The resolution should also express
support for the current OSCE Minsk Group process.

-- We recognize Azerbaijan,s sovereign right to pursue
resolutions on NK at the UN and in any other international
fora, but we cannot support the current Azerbaijani draft, as

it would damage our Minsk Group negotiating process that has
brought us close to agreement on the Basic Principles of an
NK settlement. We most likely will be compelled to vote
against it.

-- As in the case of Azerbaijan,s draft resolution on
wildfires in 2006, we would prefer to work together to
reshape your draft into a constructive resolution, which
bolsters Azerbaijan,s territorial integrity without
jeopardizing the Minsk Group process.


4. (SBU) (if pressed on why Kosovo is a special case and not
a precedent) Kosovo,s special circumstances include, among
others, the following points:

- In 1999, NATO,s 19 allies reached the consensus decision
to take collective action to remove Milosevic,s police and
military forces from Kosovo.

- Kosovo is administered by the United Nations under U.N.
Security Council resolution (UNSCR) 1244, unanimously adopted
(with China abstaining) June 10, 1999, to address
Milosevic,s actions. Elements of UNSCR 1244 include:
denying Serbia a role in governing Kosovo; setting up an
interim UN administration; providing for local
self-government; and envisioning a UN-led political process
to determine Kosovo,s future status.

--------------
Background
--------------


5. (C) In response to ref A, Department concurs with
Embassy Baku that the Government of Azerbaijan's resolution
on "the situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan"
is driven by two factors. First, Azerbaijan has long sought
to broaden support for its position on NK in a variety of
international fora, especially in the UN, in the hope of
increasing its leverage in Minsk Group negotiations. Second,
Azerbaijan's concern about Kosovo is a genuine (albeit
short-term) driver. When Ambassador Derse demarched FM
Mammadyarov on Kosovo independence, he made it clear that,
for domestic political reasons, he would have to take
immediate action to show that Azerbaijan would not accept
Kosovo as a precedent for NK. He said explicitly that
Azerbaijan would consider an UNGA resolution to this effect
) &either the GUAM resolution or our own8 (reported in ref
B). Azerbaijan also has announced its intent to withdraw its
peacekeepers from Kosovo.


6. (C) The resolution as drafted presents only the
Azerbaijani positions on the Nagorno Karabakh, including
territorial integrity, refugees, and territories without
parallel reference to self-determination or Armenian
equities.


7. (C) Department seeks to work with Azerbaijan to
transform this problematic resolution into a more helpful (or
at least less objectionable one) that reiterates our support
for Azerbaijan,s territorial integrity by declaring that
Kosovo is sui generis and not a precedent for other
conflicts. Department and Embassy Baku agree that Azerbaijan
probably would support such a resolution if:

-- it embraces the principle of territorial integrity
without stressing the principle of self-determination of
peoples, (which we cannot accept); and

-- explicitly refers to NK.


8. (C) FM Mammadyarov and DFMs Azimov and Khalafov have
asked that USG public statements explicitly note that Kosovo
is not a precedent for NK. Embassy Baku issued such a
statement, cleared by the Department, immediately after U.S.
recognition of Kosovo's indepedence. The Department concurs
with the Embassy's judgment that Azerbaijan probably would
initially seek to maintain its draft resolution alongside a
separate resolution on Kosovo not being a precedent,
particularly if the Azerbaijani delegation to the UN judges
it can get its resolution passed. The MFA reported to the
Embassy that it believes it has strong support for its draft
resolution, and has clearly been working hard over the past
year to build support internationally. Department recommends
that USUN ascertain the level of support for this resolution.
Azerbaijan likely has strong support for its position within
the OIC and NAM, with which it has coordinated on many issues
over the last few years to swap votes in pursuit of support
on NK.


9. (C) Department notes that the Under Secretary Burns
pledged to Armenian FM Oskanian in September 2006 that the
U.S. would not support any UN resolution on NK that was
unbalanced with regard to embracing the principle of
territorial integrity of states to the exclusion of the
principle of self-determination of peoples. Russian and
French Minsk Group Co-Chairs are also strongly opposed to the
current draft resolution and have urged us to show solidarity
within the Minsk Group by telling Azerbaijan we will vote
against it. Please note that the Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign
Minister told Embassy Baku that the proposal of a resolution
that makes it clear Kosovo is not a precedent for NK is "not
acceptable." Azimov said the words "self-determination and
territorial integrity" are extremely important for the UNGA
resolution.
RICE