Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08SAOPAULO248
2008-05-16 09:18:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Sao Paulo
Cable title:  

MST "RED APRIL" SHOWS DECLINE IN ACTIVITY

Tags:  EAGR ELAB PHUM PINS EINV PGOV SOCI ASEC BR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6087
PP RUEHRG
DE RUEHSO #0248/01 1370918
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 160918Z MAY 08
FM AMCONSUL SAO PAULO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8229
INFO RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 9357
RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 3394
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 3146
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 2698
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ 3805
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 2394
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 0735
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 4104
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 8717
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 3085
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC 0723
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAO PAULO 000248 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR WHA/BSC, DRL/ILCSR, INR/IAA, INR/R/AA
STATE ALSO FOR DS/IP/WHA, DS/DSS/ITA, DS/DSS/OSAC
STATE PASS USTR FOR KATE DUCKWORTH
NSC FOR TOMASULO
TREASURY FOR JHOEK
USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/WH/OLAC
USDOC FOR 3134/ITA/USCS/OIO/WH/RD
SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD
DOL FOR ILAB
USAID FOR LAC/AA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ELAB PHUM PINS EINV PGOV SOCI ASEC BR
SUBJECT: MST "RED APRIL" SHOWS DECLINE IN ACTIVITY

REF: 07 SAO PAULO 879

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED - PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAO PAULO 000248

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR WHA/BSC, DRL/ILCSR, INR/IAA, INR/R/AA
STATE ALSO FOR DS/IP/WHA, DS/DSS/ITA, DS/DSS/OSAC
STATE PASS USTR FOR KATE DUCKWORTH
NSC FOR TOMASULO
TREASURY FOR JHOEK
USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/WH/OLAC
USDOC FOR 3134/ITA/USCS/OIO/WH/RD
SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD
DOL FOR ILAB
USAID FOR LAC/AA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ELAB PHUM PINS EINV PGOV SOCI ASEC BR
SUBJECT: MST "RED APRIL" SHOWS DECLINE IN ACTIVITY

REF: 07 SAO PAULO 879

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED - PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY


1. (SBU) Summary: The Landless Rural Workers' Movement (MST) is
facing a significant change in its organization. The number of its
members is slowly decreasing, as is the number of land invasions it
carries out. Some observers cite President Lula's "Bolsa Familia"
cash transfer program for the poor as a factor in the decline in MST
activities. In addition, the MST had hoped for greater political
will from the Lula administration to conduct land redistribution.
An apparent unwillingness on the part of Lula's government to do
this may be wearing the MST down and leading it to seek
accommodation rather than confrontation. End Summary.

--------------
BACKGROUND
--------------


2. (SBU) The MST is a national movement (formed around grass-roots
principles) whose goal is to implement land reform in Brazil and
ensure the broad distribution of land to the rural poor. The
movement advocates a model of economic development that gives pride
of place to small family farms and opposes large holdings and
agri-business. Land ownership is disputed in many parts of Brazil
due to fraudulent titles or other historical circumstances. Even
where ownership is undisputed, the government has the right to
appropriate and distribute unproductive land or land which is being
used to the detriment of the environment or the exploitation of the
workers. Accordingly, some MST elements and their allies have
adopted an anti-globalization agenda and specialize in challenging
the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).


3. (SBU) Land invasions (or occupations, as MST members prefer to

call them) are the MST's way of pressuring the government for land
reform. They are designed to raise public consciousness of the
plight of the rural poor and the need for more equitable land
distribution. Many MST members live in temporary but long-term
settlements ("acampamentos") established on or near disputed land.
They live in plastic tents and are organized in collective
communities. Some settlements are five or even ten years old, and
the settlers are waiting to be given a piece of land as part of the
land reform. When the invaded property belongs to the government,
the process of land distribution is quicker than when it involves
private property. The federal and state governments are usually
willing to negotiate an agreement to distribute the land, though
such deals sometimes take years to conclude. Private owners, on the
other hand, usually seek a court order to require the invaders to
leave.


4. (SBU) While the MST is active year-round, the organization
follows a calendar of events. Its members carry out land invasions
over the Christmas, New Year's and Carnival (February) holidays when
government offices and courts are closed, meaning the owners can't
get judicial orders to force their withdrawal until after the
holidays, offering the invaders more of a media spotlight. In
recent years they have also taken to conducting land invasions on
International Women's Day (March 8). Every year they conduct "Red
April" activities -- land invasions, occupations of government
offices, blocking of highways -- throughout the month in observance
of the April 1996 armed confrontation between MST and the police in
Eldorado de Carajas, Para state, which left 19 MST militants dead.


5. (SBU) Although most recent MST invasions have not involved
violence, there have been exceptions. Per reftel, last October some

SAO PAULO 00000248 002 OF 004


200 militants from MST and Via Campesina, an associated
organization, invaded an agricultural research station in Santa
Tereza do Oeste, Parana state, owned by the Swiss-based biotech
company Syngenta. A skirmish between the invaders and security
guards killed two people and wounded eight. MST claims Syngenta's
use of the facility to experiment with varieties of genetically
modified soybeans violates Brazilian law due to the proximity of
Iguacu National Park, an environmentally protected area. Syngenta
maintains it possesses all permits and licenses required by federal
law to conduct research at the facility on genetically modified corn
and soybeans. The situation is complicated by the fact that the
Governor of Parana, Roberto Requiao, is a vocal opponent of GMOs who
has sought to expropriate the company's land and declare the state
GMO-free. He is also one of a very few major Brazilian political
figures to openly support MST and encourage its activities. As a
result, Syngenta and other multinationals cultivating GMOs cannot
count on state police for protection. Attacks on companies
producing GMOs sometimes result in extensive property damage. In
March of this year, Via Campesina militants occupied a Monsanto
biotech research station in Sao Paulo state and destroyed an
experimental facility producing genetically modified corn. One
possible explanation for these incidents is that MST and its
affiliates regard multinational companies as easier targets than
large Brazilian landowners, perhaps considering them easier to
intimidate due to concerns over their corporate image. The fact
that GMOs remain controversial in the public mind in Brazil also
offers MST an opportunity for propaganda victories by taking on
their producers.

--------------
SAO PAULO STATE
--------------


6. (SBU) In Sao Paulo state, one focus of MST activity is the
Pontal do Paranapanema in the southwestern part of the state, where
there remains a long-standing dispute over land titles. During the
first two weeks of February, landless people occupied 16 farms in
the Pontal, and continued this activity sporadically through March
and April. A bill under consideration in the Sao Paulo State
Legislative Assembly (ALESP) would legalize large existing holdings,
but would require owners to turn a portion of them over to the state
to be redistributed. Many owners favor the bill, provided that the
portion to be ceded is small (perhaps 5 percent). The landless and
their advocates in the Pontal are almost unanimously opposed to this
approach on the grounds that the bill would legalize land fraud.


7. (SBU) In the north and northeast of Sao Paulo state, which
produces large amounts of sugar cane, oranges, and coffee, land
titles are clear and the land is undeniably being put to productive
use, the MST accuses the farmers of damaging the environment or
exploiting the rural workers. Such allegations raise complex legal
questions and often result in nearly intractable negotiations. In
some instances, the state buys the land and distributes it.

--------------
MST MILITANT PROFILE
--------------


8. (SBU) Carlos Alberto Feliciano, Ombudsman for the Sao Paulo
State Land Institute (ITESP) Foundation, offered a general profile
of the MST militant. Most landless people are rural workers who
left their jobs on large plantations due to mechanization. Some are
also rural families that lost (or sold) their small farms to large
landowners or private companies. In addition, during periods of
economic slowdown in the 1980s and 90s, some urban workers with low

SAO PAULO 00000248 003 OF 004


levels of education and few opportunities joined the MST in the
hopes of receiving a small plot of land that might enable them to
support their families. Brazil was a largely rural country until
relatively recently, and many Brazilians dream of returning to the
land. As the MST promises land, it has been seen as an attractive
alternative. Some members took temporary jobs in the cities while
at the same time taking part in settlement activities. These are
the people who usually participate in land invasions.


9. (SBU) Feliciano noted that in recent years, the MST has had
difficulty recruiting new members because recent economic growth has
generated new jobs in the cities. An additional factor is the Lula
administration's "Bolsa Familia" cash transfer program for the poor,
which now benefits more than 11 million families. Many Bolsa
Familia recipients are reluctant to join MST for fear of losing
their benefits. It is difficult for them to comply with the
program's conditions - keeping their children in school and ensuring
they are vaccinated on schedule - when living in an MST
"acampamento." Feliciano indicated that Bolsa Familia is but one
among a series of reasons that the MST settlements are emptying.


10. (SBU) The change in the MST members' profile also explains the
changes in the movement's political maneuvers. (Note: According to
the most recent MST figures, there were 103 land invasions in
observance of "Red April" in 2007, but only 46 in April 2008. End
Note.) Instead of land occupations, the MST is now promoting quick
actions designed for high media attention and impact. This past
month, for instance, landless groups blocked highways and invaded
public buildings and banking agencies, in addition to organizing
demonstrations against the mining company Vale (the former Companhia
Vale do Rio Doce - CVRD) and multi-nationals that produce GMOs.
Most of these political actions were carried out near large cities,
required fewer participants, and were less risky than a traditional
invasion of a rural area. The actions against Vale, besides
generating publicity, are also designed to satisfy MST's political
constituency. MST leaders accuse the company of labor exploitation
and environmental degradation, and many on the left have called for
the reversal of its privatization.

--------------
GOVERNMENT EFFORTS
--------------


11. (SBU) According to Ariovaldo Umbelino de Oliveira, a professor
of geography at the University of Sco Paulo and a land reform expert
who was part of the team that prepared the Lula administration's
first land reform plan in 2003, social movements such as MST will
continue to exist so long as Brazil's land problems remain unsolved.
Oliveira noted that Brazil has 850 million hectares of land, but
only half of it is registered by Incra (National Institute for Land
Reform and Colonization),the federal agency that deals with land
issues. Of the land that is registered, there are some 200 million
hectares with insufficient documentation to prove ownership. By law
this land belongs to the state and could be available for
redistribution.


12. (SBU) In Oliveira's view, 40 million hectares would be
sufficient to settle one million families. However, a great deal of
political will is required to overcome all the legal and
institutional obstacles. Oliveira asserts that the Lula
administration lacks this political will, in part because it
believes agri-business and large holdings offer a better economic
model for rural development. While Lula's plan was to resettle
400,000 families over four years, and the Ministry of Agrarian
Development claims to have settled 381,000 families between 2003 and

SAO PAULO 00000248 004 OF 004


2006 (figures for 2007 are not yet available),Oliveira claims the
real figure is 135,000 families settled through 2006. Citing
endemic corruption in INCRA, he described a variety of ways INCRA
categorizes land in order to pad the figures. The slow pace of land
reform under Lula has been a disappointment to MST leaders as well
as members of Lula's own Workers' Party (PT),of which MST is an
autonomous social movement. "If the movement can't get land to
distribute amongst its followers, it loses strength", he explained.
"Many people just gave up and went back to the cities." Like
Feliciano, Oliveira also cited Bolsa Familia as a factor in the
MST's decline and said the group is changing tactics. Instead of
land invasions and confrontations, the movement is turning its
efforts to improving living conditions in existing settlements,
often using government funds distributed through NGOs.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


13. (SBU) Although the MST may be in decline, it is unlikely to
fade away any time soon. Its activities remain a source of concern
to many landowners. However, the growing economy combined with
policies designed to improve living conditions for the poor -- a
rising minimum wage and "Bolsa Familia" cash transfer payments --
appear to offer at least some erstwhile militants an alternative,
and may be forcing the movement's leaders to rethink their tactics.
End Comment.


14. (U) This cable was coordinated with and cleared by Embassy
Brasilia.

WHITE