Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08OSLO497
2008-09-05 14:08:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Oslo
Cable title:
NORWAY CLAIM NATO ARTICLE FIVE PROTECTION FOR
how-toVZCZCXYZ0000 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHNY #0497 2491408 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 051408Z SEP 08 FM AMEMBASSY OSLO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7034 INFO RUEHXP/ALL NATO POST COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI IMMEDIATE 8016 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 4019 RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM IMMEDIATE 3316 RHMFISS/SECNAV WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE 1527 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 000497
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/05/2018
TAGS: NATO PBTS PREL NO
SUBJECT: NORWAY CLAIM NATO ARTICLE FIVE PROTECTION FOR
SVALBARD
REF: OSLO 489
Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Kevin M. Johnson
for reasons 1.4 b and d
C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 000497
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/05/2018
TAGS: NATO PBTS PREL NO
SUBJECT: NORWAY CLAIM NATO ARTICLE FIVE PROTECTION FOR
SVALBARD
REF: OSLO 489
Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Kevin M. Johnson
for reasons 1.4 b and d
1. (U) In remarks September 4 at a conference on the High
North, Norway's Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere stated
categorically that Svalbard was part of Norway and that
NATO's Article Five protections applied to Svalbard. This is
not a new statement of Norway's interpretation of the
Svalbard treaty but it is noteable, after the events in
Georgia, how forcefully FM Stoere emphasized Norwegian
sovereignty and the applicability of Article Five. The
Russian Ambassador was in the audience. GON officials are
increasingly concerned with raising allied awareness of the
High North and will continue to stress vulnerabilities in the
North in NATO meetings (see reftel).
2. (U) The Svalbard Treaty does grant Norway "full and
absolute sovereignty" over Svalbard. However it also grants
signatories "equal liberty of access and entry for any reason
or object whatever to the waters, fjords and ports of the
territories." The treaty specifies that Norway is not
allowed to establish any naval base or to construct
fortifications and states that the territories "may never be
used for warlike purposes." These clauses significantly
impact the declaration of full sovereignty and have resulted
in varying national interpretations of the treaty,
particularly on fishing rights.
3. (C) Comment: Regardless of legal interpretations, it is a
positive that the GON is stressing NATO's significance. GON
officials stress the continued relevance of Article Five and
the need for NATO to refocus on reassuring its members on
this point. With Russia's recent statement of intent (and
actions) to defend its citizens and interests abroad by
whatever means, ambiguities in interpretation of the Svalbard
treaty take on new significance. The Department may wish to
consider: first, our legal view of Norway's position on NATO
and Svalbard; and second, ways to exploit Norway's stake
politically (whatever our legal analysis) to make the point
that, as GON indicates, NATO will stand firm in the North.
End Comment
WHITNEY
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/05/2018
TAGS: NATO PBTS PREL NO
SUBJECT: NORWAY CLAIM NATO ARTICLE FIVE PROTECTION FOR
SVALBARD
REF: OSLO 489
Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Kevin M. Johnson
for reasons 1.4 b and d
1. (U) In remarks September 4 at a conference on the High
North, Norway's Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere stated
categorically that Svalbard was part of Norway and that
NATO's Article Five protections applied to Svalbard. This is
not a new statement of Norway's interpretation of the
Svalbard treaty but it is noteable, after the events in
Georgia, how forcefully FM Stoere emphasized Norwegian
sovereignty and the applicability of Article Five. The
Russian Ambassador was in the audience. GON officials are
increasingly concerned with raising allied awareness of the
High North and will continue to stress vulnerabilities in the
North in NATO meetings (see reftel).
2. (U) The Svalbard Treaty does grant Norway "full and
absolute sovereignty" over Svalbard. However it also grants
signatories "equal liberty of access and entry for any reason
or object whatever to the waters, fjords and ports of the
territories." The treaty specifies that Norway is not
allowed to establish any naval base or to construct
fortifications and states that the territories "may never be
used for warlike purposes." These clauses significantly
impact the declaration of full sovereignty and have resulted
in varying national interpretations of the treaty,
particularly on fishing rights.
3. (C) Comment: Regardless of legal interpretations, it is a
positive that the GON is stressing NATO's significance. GON
officials stress the continued relevance of Article Five and
the need for NATO to refocus on reassuring its members on
this point. With Russia's recent statement of intent (and
actions) to defend its citizens and interests abroad by
whatever means, ambiguities in interpretation of the Svalbard
treaty take on new significance. The Department may wish to
consider: first, our legal view of Norway's position on NATO
and Svalbard; and second, ways to exploit Norway's stake
politically (whatever our legal analysis) to make the point
that, as GON indicates, NATO will stand firm in the North.
End Comment
WHITNEY