NIGER: FORMER PRIME MINISTER REACTS TO CORRUPTION CHARGES

UNCLAS NIAMEY 000607

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KCOR NG
SUBJECT: NIGER: FORMER PRIME MINISTER REACTS TO CORRUPTION CHARGES

REF NIAMEY 603


1. Summary: Former Prime Minister Hama Amadou held a press
conference on Saturday, June 14, regarding the GON's request for a
National Assembly resolution to indict him on charges of misusing
the national press support fund. He dismissed allegations regarding
corruption at the education ministry and with the press funds, as
well as the burning of a political opponent's car, as part of a
political conspiracy to disqualify him as a potential candidate for
the 2009 presidential elections. End Summary.


2. Amadou said that the plot to remove him from office began in
2004, when President Tandja, his "political companion," insisted
that Amadou remain prime minister to build the ruling MNSD party and
his "political destiny." Hama stated that he had intended to resign
from his position as prime minister and run for the presidency in
2004, but Tandja pressed influential MNSD members to "beg" him not
to do so. He ultimately withdrew his candidacy to the legislative
elections, abandoned his plans for the 2004 presidential election,
and worked for Tandja's reelection to a second term. He realized
that he had made a mistake when he discovered that his "political
companion's" ulterior motive was to undermine his political
ascension and seek a third term for himself.


3. Amadou claimed that the Education Ministry (MEBA) case was aimed
at tarnishing his political image. He apologized to former education
ministers Ari Ibrahim and Harouna Hamani for the ordeal they went
through in this case, because he thought they were only "collateral
victims" of this political manipulation. He claimed that because he
was so popular, he stood in the way of other potential candidates,
including "those who dream of a third term or of getting an
extension of some sort," and therefore he had become the man to get
rid of.


4. Concerning the burning of MNSD youth leader Moussa Keita's car,
Amadou indicated that political rivals within and outside the MNSD
had been dogging him since the motion of no confidence that ousted
him from power. He dismissed the charges of "complicity to arson" as
another political ploy to undermine his image. He wondered why he
would be charged with complicity while no other accomplices had been
identified.


5. Regarding the press support fund, Hama mentioned that President
Tandja instructed him to lead a media campaign to praise the
government's policies and to promote Niger's image abroad. He
acknowledged having received CFA 100 million (about $240,000 at the
current exchange rate),which he said he used for those purposes. He
stressed that he did not know that it was taken from the press
support fund. He mentioned that the law on the High Council on
communication (which includes provisions on the press fund) was only
passed in May 2000, and the legislation implementing it was not
passed until 2006. Under these circumstances, he claimed that he
could not have given the money to the media regulating body which is
charged with distributing funds to the various media. Amadou further
said that the 2001 budget expenditure (which includes the funds in
question) was approved by the Audit Chamber of the Supreme Court and
therefore any funds were considered as legally used. Amadou claimed
that this was also a political move to find a legal pretext to get
rid of him.


6. Comment: Amadou's defense strategy appears to be to attack
Tandja, whom he sees as being behind the charges. He strongly
criticized the president's special development program. He
speculated that Tandja intends to seek a third term, and warned that
Nigeriens would take to the streets to denounce and counter these
attempts. Amadou's attack on the president may backfire if the
president takes the issue personally and ensures Amadou's
prosecution. He threatened that if he goes to jail, others will soon
follow.


7. If the National Assembly votes a resolution of indictment, it
will refer the case to the Supreme Court's prosecution department.
The Supreme Court will set up an investigative commission made up of
three judges. The investigative commission will either determine
that there are grounds for prosecution and refer the case to the
High Court of Justice for trial, or dismiss the charges for lack of
evidence. There is no legal deadline for the Supreme Court to
complete its investigation.

ALLEN