Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08NEWDELHI1934
2008-07-11 12:08:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:  

KABUL EMBASSY BLAST UNLIKELY TO SPARK HARSH INDIAN

Tags:  PREL PARM PTER PGOV PN ID 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4872
OO RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHLH RUEHPW
DE RUEHNE #1934 1931208
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 111208Z JUL 08
FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2620
INFO RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L NEW DELHI 001934 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/10/2018
TAGS: PREL PARM PTER PGOV PN ID
SUBJECT: KABUL EMBASSY BLAST UNLIKELY TO SPARK HARSH INDIAN
RESPONSE

REF: NEW DELHI 1921

Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Ted Osius for Reasons 1.4 (
B and D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L NEW DELHI 001934

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/10/2018
TAGS: PREL PARM PTER PGOV PN ID
SUBJECT: KABUL EMBASSY BLAST UNLIKELY TO SPARK HARSH INDIAN
RESPONSE

REF: NEW DELHI 1921

Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Ted Osius for Reasons 1.4 (
B and D)


1. (C) SUMMARY: Indian reaction thus far has been muted to
the July 7 attack on the Indian Embassy in Kabul, which
killed four Indian personnel and at least 37 others, and the
implication by President Karzai and others that Pakistan's
Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency was behind the
blast. There has been a strong show of sympathy for those
killed in the attack, but as Pakistani High Commissioner
Shadid Malik told the Ambassador in a July 10 meeting
(reftel),it does not appear to have derailed the ongoing
warming in the India-Pakistan bilateral relationship. End
Summary.


2. (C) Pakistani High Commissioner Shadid Malik shared with
the Ambassador on July 10 that he believes the July 7 attack
on the Indian Embassy in Kabul and subsequent fingerpointing
by President Karzai and others towards Pakistan's ISI will
not have a negative effect on the overall India-Pakistan
relationship. The HC observed that Foreign Secretary Bashir
will visit India for the fifth round of Composite Dialogue
talks on July 21-22. In short, said the HC, "We are going
through the best phase of our bilateral relationship." The
July 17th meeting on the Kashmir Line of Control Confidence
Building Measures will also go ahead as scheduled. Referring
to Prime Minister Gilani's statement that Pakistan was not
responsible for the attack, Malik stressed that both Pakistan
and India realize it is not in anyone's interest to
destabilize Afghanistan.


3. (SBU) The High Commissioner's views track with those of
our contacts in the political and media spheres. No senior
officials have leaped to make public statements referring to
murky "regional actors," as they might readily have done in
the case of past terrorist incidents. Our contacts in
Parliament, academia, and the media have postulated in
private conversations that Pakistan would not have a reason
to wreak such havoc, but some have speculated that India's
rise economically and politically and its arrival in the "big
league" might be enough to spur some individuals to try to
poison the regional environment. One senior editor's
response to us was, "I think this is high time that both
countries should stop this blame game." Nevertheless, a
number of contacts believe there should be an investigation
by the international community.



4. (SBU) Press: There has been considerable sympathic
media coverage of the officials killed in the blast, Defense
Attache R.D. Mehta and Indian Foreign Service Officer
Venkateswara Rao, as well as Indian security personnel H.A.S.
Pathania and Roop Singh. Most official statements have
concentrated on assurances that India will continue to
maintain a strong presence in Afghanistan. The press
coverage also highlighted the United States' offer to help in
the investigations. In general, however, press coverage of
the Left parties' withdrawal from the ruling coalition in the
wake of the government's proceeding with the Civil Nuclear
Agreement with the United States has pushed speculation about
who orchestrated the embassy attack off India's front pages.
Most editorials touching on the tragedy held the Afghan
government at fault for failing to protect the Embassy, and
speculated that the attackers and their supporters were
trying to stop Afghanistan's development and India's role in
it.

MULFORD