Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08MINSK203
2008-03-21 14:54:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Minsk
Cable title:  

REGIME DEMAND FOR STAFF REDUCTION: FRENCH DEMARCHE

Tags:  PREL PHUM ODIP AMGT BO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1490
PP RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHSK #0203 0811454
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 211454Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY MINSK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7044
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
C O N F I D E N T I A L MINSK 000203 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/18/2018
TAGS: PREL PHUM ODIP AMGT BO
SUBJECT: REGIME DEMAND FOR STAFF REDUCTION: FRENCH DEMARCHE
FOREIGN MINISTER ON EU BEHALF

REF: A. MINSK 199 AND PREVIOUS


B. USEU 411

Classified By: Charge Jonathan Moore for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L MINSK 000203

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/18/2018
TAGS: PREL PHUM ODIP AMGT BO
SUBJECT: REGIME DEMAND FOR STAFF REDUCTION: FRENCH DEMARCHE
FOREIGN MINISTER ON EU BEHALF

REF: A. MINSK 199 AND PREVIOUS


B. USEU 411

Classified By: Charge Jonathan Moore for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (SBU) Charge met March 21 with French Ambassador Mireille
Musso, currently representing the Slovenian EU Presidency in
Minsk, to discuss her March 19 demarche to Foreign Minister
Sergey Martynov on the continued demand of the Belarusian
regime (ref A) for the U.S. Embassy to significantly reduce
its diplomatic staff as well as EU plans to observe public
protests to mark the 90th anniversary of the Belarusian
People's Republic March 25.


2. (C) Musso gave a brief account of her March 19 demarche
with Martynov, to whom she delivered points on behalf of the
EU (ref B). She said the Martynov complained about U.S.
moves against Belarus, noting that the GOB interpreted the
March 6 guidance of the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of
Foreign Assets Control as a "major expansion" of sanctions.
Musso added that Martynov showed no enthusiasm for the
current pressure on the U.S. Embassy, but had no regret about
it either. She told Charge that she pressed Martynov for the
release of political prisoner Aleksandr Kozulin, but that the
Minister's only response was to note that Kozulin was causing
problems in jail and -- as his release had to be "in
accordance with Belarusian law" -- Kozulin should "behave
himself." Oddly, Musso -- who knows better -- seemed to have
been swayed somewhat by that argument. (Comment: The regime
has of course cynically manipulated its legal system at every
turn in both creating and releasing political prisoners, a
point she acknowledged when raised by Charge. End comment.)


3. (C) Musso said that Martynov did not offer a timetable
for Kozulin's release. She told Charge that the EU would
renew existing visa sanctions against the Belarusian regime
in April, but asserted that the delay in the opening of the
EU Commission Delegation in Minsk (ref B) was only for
"technical reasons." Martynov apparently asked her to help
get U.S. sanctions pressure lifted. Charge noted to Musso
that only with Kozulin's release would there be any
possibility of progress, and that lifting sanctions would
depend on the regime making further reforms.


4. (C) Charge raised the upcoming public protest scheduled
for March 25, intended by civil society and some members of
the democratic opposition to mark the 90th anniversary of the
founding of the Belarusian People's Republic. Musso noted
that she would not be available to observe the
long-anticipated protest, as she is hosting a "Francophonie"
event that evening, and that her deputy would be away on
holiday; she added that many other EU heads of mission (HoM)
would be away then as well. However, she does anticipate
that there will be an EU presence, and invited Charge to
attend the weekly EU HoM meeting earlier March 25 to
coordinate with European colleagues at that time.

Comment
--------------


5. (C) At least on the ground, the EU is not giving us much
to work with. The statement that the postponement of the
opening of the EU Commission Delegation is not for policy
reasons -- which appears to contradict ref B -- and the
absence of the leading EU Ambassador from the March 25
protest are not signs of solid support for the U.S. position,
either by error or design. We welcome any effort to buck up
EU spirit on Belarus in Brussels or individual capitals, but
the current GOB effort to divide the U.S. and the EU may be
succeeding here.
MOOR