Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08LUANDA248
2008-03-28 13:26:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Luanda
Cable title:  

UN HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE ORDERED TO CLOSE

Tags:  PGOV PHUM PREL AO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7392
PP RUEHDU RUEHMR RUEHRN
DE RUEHLU #0248/01 0881326
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 281326Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY LUANDA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4688
INFO RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 0017
RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LUANDA 000248 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/27/2018
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL AO
SUBJECT: UN HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE ORDERED TO CLOSE


Classified By: AMB DAN MOZENA FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LUANDA 000248

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/27/2018
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL AO
SUBJECT: UN HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE ORDERED TO CLOSE


Classified By: AMB DAN MOZENA FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)


1. (U) This is an action request, please see paragraph 9.


2. (SBU) SUMMARY: Post recently learned that on March 4th,
2008, the GRA sent a note verbale to the Office of the High
Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR) - Geneva, declaring that
Angola will not sign an MOU formalizing the status of the
Human Rights Office in Angola (HROA). The GRA called the
HROA's presence "inappropriate," given the country's peace
and stability. Foreign Minister Miranda later ordered the
office closed within 30-45 days. Closure of the office is a
negative development, fueling concern about GRA commitment to
addressing human rights problems and contradicting Angola's
written commitment to strengthen its relationship with the
HROA as a part of its bid last year for a seat on the UN
Human Rights Council. The focus now is on sustaining HROA's
ongoing programs beyond the office's closure. Post seeks
guidance on how best to contribute to any international
response to this step by the GRA. END SUMMARY


3. (C) On March 4, 2008, the Angolan mission in Geneva
informed the OHCHR that the GRA will not sign an MOU
formalizing the HRO's status in Angola (text of note verbal
emailed to AF/S.) Given the policy of the High Commissioner
on Human Rights (HCHR) that offices without full mandates
will be closed, this move effectively forces closure of the
HROA. Scant reasons for the decision were given. The note
verbale sent to OHCHR called the HROA's presence
"inappropriate," given the country's peace and stability. In
a meeting between the HCHR and Angola's mission in Geneva,
the GRA expressed interest in continued cooperation on an
ad-hoc basis, citing the examples of OHCHR activities in
China and Russia.


4. (C) Subsequently, Minister of Foreign Affairs Joao Miranda
ordered a rapid shutdown of the HRO. In a March 7 phone call
to acting Resident Coordinator Gita Welsh, Miranda said the
office should close within 30-45 days. This phone call was
not followed by written notification to close, nor has the
OHCHR directly notified the Angola UN Country Team of the

closure.

HRO Angola Background
--------------


5. (SBU) The HRO in Angola was established following a 2003
meeting between President Dos Santos and then HR High
Commissioner Sergio Mello, in which Dos Santos verbally
authorized the office's creation. A formal legal agreement
between the UN and GRA regarding the office's mandate was
never made. MOU negotiation, giving the office a full
mandate to report on and monitor human rights abuses and
autonomy from the UN country team, began over a year and a
half ago. In December 2007 the HROA believed it was close to
finalizing the agreement. This belief was bolstered by the
GRA's written pledge to increase cooperation with the HROA in
May 2007, as Angola promoted its candidacy for the UN Human
Rights Council (letter e-mailed to AF/S).

Reaction from Geneva, EU
--------------


6. (C) According to HROA Head Vegard Bye, OHCHR is sending a
delegation to Angola next week. Bye said he will work
through the acting resident coordinator to call a meeting of
the diplomatic community upon their arrival in country. Bye
suggested two likely courses of action for the OHCHR: simply
shut down the office and its programs, or negotiate with the
GRA to delay the office's closure to allow for a managed
transition in which UNDP could assume responsibility for the
HROA's programs and activities.


7. (C) The EU Ambassadors to Angola included the issue on the
agenda of its March 28, 2008 meeting. According to
participants, some EU countries believe that no grounds exist
for international action, as the HROA never had a legal
mandate. Other countries, however, suggested that an EU
stance is appropriate given the GRA's written commitment to
the HROA and donor support for its programs, but that action
must first be requested by the UN. Resident European
Commission Head Joao Ferreira told Ambassador Mozena before
the meeting that additional information on what the Human
Rights High Commissioner is or is not saying/doing in
response to this GRA action is necessary before the EU can
take any action. He doubts there will be any "pro-active EU
intervention" here before and until the High Commissioner has
spoken out. Similarly, the UN mission in Angola is also
waiting for OHCHR to take the lead in any response to the
GRA.


8. (C) COMMENT: The GRA's decision to close the UN Human

LUANDA 00000248 002 OF 002


Rights Office here is a negative step, and fuels concern
about the government's commitment to addressing the country's
many human rights problems, as detailed in the
recently-released Country Report on Human Rights Practices.
Furthermore, the government had given a written commitment
last year to the international community to "promote and
protect human rights at the national level by( continuing to
support a constructive dialogue and increased cooperation
with the Office of the United National High Commissioner on
Human Rights in Angola." Closing that very office
precipitantly is not consistent with that commitment. In
Post's view, the international community, led presumably by
the High Commissioner for Human Rights, should convey to the
GRA that closure of the HROA contradicts the commitment it
had made when advocating its candidacy last year for a seat
on the UNHRC. We would think it unlikely that the Angolans
would reverse their decision, but perhaps they could make
more space available to ensure ongoing HROA programs. END
COMMENT


9. (SBU) ACTION REQUEST: Please advise how best Post can be
part of any coordinated international response to this step
by the Angolans.
MOZENA