Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08KOLKATA153
2008-05-20 11:53:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Consulate Kolkata
Cable title:
OVER 30 KILLED IN LOCAL BODY ELECTIONS IN WEST BENGAL
how-toVZCZCXRO8519 PP RUEHBI RUEHCI DE RUEHCI #0153 1411153 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 201153Z MAY 08 FM AMCONSUL KOLKATA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2002 INFO RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 1880 RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI PRIORITY 0871 RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI PRIORITY 0876 RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 0587 RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 0574 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC RUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DC RHMFIUU/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA 2444
UNCLAS KOLKATA 000153
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM IN
SUBJECT: OVER 30 KILLED IN LOCAL BODY ELECTIONS IN WEST BENGAL
REF: KOLKATA 148
UNCLAS KOLKATA 000153
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM IN
SUBJECT: OVER 30 KILLED IN LOCAL BODY ELECTIONS IN WEST BENGAL
REF: KOLKATA 148
1. (U) Summary: Voting in West Bengal's Panchayat (local body)
elections concluded May 18. The voting took place in three
separate phases and was marked by violence and intimidation,
resulting in approximately 30 deaths. Compared to the last
Panchayat elections in 2003, where over 70 died, this election
was less violent. However, the importance of these local
elections is that they give West Bengal's political parties
significant control over resources and communities at the
grassroots level. Election results are due May 21. End Summary.
2. (U) Voting in West Bengal's Panchayat elections wrapped up
on May 18. The third phase of voting, however, was particularly
violent. Ruling Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPM)
activists fought with Congress supporters in Malda and
Murshidabad districts, and the news media reported 20 deaths,
with the highest number of casualties occurring in Murshidabad,
a Congress stronghold.
3. (U) The violence was not limited to battles between the CPM
and opposition parties alone. During the second phase of voting
on May 14, armed CPM activists moved freely around the Nandigram
villages intimidating voters and in 24 South Parganas District,
they also fought with supporters of the CPM's Left Front
partner, the Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP). CPM cadres
allegedly bombed and set fire to the house of the West Bengal
Irrigation Minister, an RSP member, killing a relative. Other
media reports claimed that at least three RSP supporters died at
the hands of CPM loyalists.
4. (U) Comment: The intra-coalition fighting, while disturbing
particularly in its use and acceptance of violence as a means of
ensuring political control, does not indicate a schism within
the Left Front. The RSP and smaller Left Front partners do not
have the strength to compete with the CPM. Winning a Panchayat
election does, however, give political parties significant
control over the daily lives of their constituents and
opportunity for economic enrichment (and graft). In that
respect, West Bengal is still very much a state of villages, and
the CPM in particular maintains its control over West Bengal by
exerting its influence at the grassroots level.
JARDINE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM IN
SUBJECT: OVER 30 KILLED IN LOCAL BODY ELECTIONS IN WEST BENGAL
REF: KOLKATA 148
1. (U) Summary: Voting in West Bengal's Panchayat (local body)
elections concluded May 18. The voting took place in three
separate phases and was marked by violence and intimidation,
resulting in approximately 30 deaths. Compared to the last
Panchayat elections in 2003, where over 70 died, this election
was less violent. However, the importance of these local
elections is that they give West Bengal's political parties
significant control over resources and communities at the
grassroots level. Election results are due May 21. End Summary.
2. (U) Voting in West Bengal's Panchayat elections wrapped up
on May 18. The third phase of voting, however, was particularly
violent. Ruling Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPM)
activists fought with Congress supporters in Malda and
Murshidabad districts, and the news media reported 20 deaths,
with the highest number of casualties occurring in Murshidabad,
a Congress stronghold.
3. (U) The violence was not limited to battles between the CPM
and opposition parties alone. During the second phase of voting
on May 14, armed CPM activists moved freely around the Nandigram
villages intimidating voters and in 24 South Parganas District,
they also fought with supporters of the CPM's Left Front
partner, the Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP). CPM cadres
allegedly bombed and set fire to the house of the West Bengal
Irrigation Minister, an RSP member, killing a relative. Other
media reports claimed that at least three RSP supporters died at
the hands of CPM loyalists.
4. (U) Comment: The intra-coalition fighting, while disturbing
particularly in its use and acceptance of violence as a means of
ensuring political control, does not indicate a schism within
the Left Front. The RSP and smaller Left Front partners do not
have the strength to compete with the CPM. Winning a Panchayat
election does, however, give political parties significant
control over the daily lives of their constituents and
opportunity for economic enrichment (and graft). In that
respect, West Bengal is still very much a state of villages, and
the CPM in particular maintains its control over West Bengal by
exerting its influence at the grassroots level.
JARDINE