Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08KIGALI624
2008-09-12 08:37:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kigali
Cable title:  

"CONTROLLED DEMOCRACY" - THE RULING RPF DOMINATES

Tags:  PREL PGOV PHUM KDEM RW 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0006
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHLGB #0624/01 2560837
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 120837Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY KIGALI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5606
INFO RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 0300
RUEHJB/AMEMBASSY BUJUMBURA 0397
RUEHDR/AMEMBASSY DAR ES SALAAM 1210
RUEHKM/AMEMBASSY KAMPALA 1981
RUEHKI/AMEMBASSY KINSHASA 0536
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0313
RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI 1311
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0571
C O N F I D E N T I A L KIGALI 000624 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/20/2018
TAGS: PREL PGOV PHUM KDEM RW
SUBJECT: "CONTROLLED DEMOCRACY" - THE RULING RPF DOMINATES
THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN

REF: KIGALI 521

Classified By: CDA Cheryl J. Sim for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L KIGALI 000624

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/20/2018
TAGS: PREL PGOV PHUM KDEM RW
SUBJECT: "CONTROLLED DEMOCRACY" - THE RULING RPF DOMINATES
THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN

REF: KIGALI 521

Classified By: CDA Cheryl J. Sim for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (C) Summary. President Paul Kagame's Rwandan Patriotic
Front (RPF) has dominated the Chamber of Deputies election
campaign, with several prQdural assists from the National
Electoral CommissiQ The RPF has far surpassed the efforts
of the two small parties also contesting thQelection -- the
Liberal Party (PL) and Social Democratic Party (PSD) -- the
RPF mounting a large media campaign and extensive
door-to-door canvassing of votes. Scattered reports continue
of local officials interfering with PL and PSD meetings and
rallies. Of two local human rights organizations that
produced critical reports on the 2003 national elections,
one, the Great Lakes Human Rights League (LDGL),has
observers in the field, while LIPRODHOR has been denied
permission to observe. Although a sizable RPF victory does
not appear to be in doubt, the two small parties do hope to
increase their vote totals and parliamentary representation.
End summary.


2. (C) On September 15-17 Rwanda will elect 80 members of
the Chamber of Deputies, 53 seats by direct election on the
15th, 24 seats reserved for women in non-partisan indirect
elections on the 16th, and 3 disabled and youth seats on the
17th. The real contest is for the 53 directly-elected seats,
in a battle between the RPF (and six minuscule coalition
parties) and the PL and PSD, each of whom gained just over
ten percent of the vote in 2003. (Note: the 24 women's seats
are elected by women's councils, which are heavily populated
with RPF sympathizers -- these 24 seats constitute a safe
bank of seats for the RPF. End note). The RPF has dominated
the two-week campaign season, holding large rallies around
the country, mounting an extensive door-to-door canvassing of
votes, and swamping the airwaves with large media buys. The
PSD and PL have told us they have campaign budgets of
approximately 50 to 60 million Rwandan francs (about USD
110,000),while the RPF has a campaign budget of at least 600
to 700 million francs -- more than ten times the amount of
the other parties. There has been a wide disparity of

coverage in both the public and private media.
Government-controlled radio, television and newspapers are
mainly covering the RPF, while private radio stations are
carrying 60 RPF-paid campaign spots a day, compared to one or
two a day for the PSD and PL. Long-term monitors of the
European Union, the Civil Society Platform (Platform) and
LDGL have found PL and PSD weakly organized in the
countryside ("almost invisible in many places"),where 85
percent of Rwandans live. There are continuing scattered
reports of local officials interfering with PL and PSD
rallies and meetings: both have found meeting halls suddenly
rented to other organizations, for example, disrupting their
campaign schedules. There are also reports of one or two
brief arrests of PSD campaign workers, and some intimidation
of PL and PSD supporters by RPF members.


3. (C) The National Electoral Commission has by most
accounts done an adequate job of preparing for the elections,
both in terms of the logistics and training of its own large
temporary staff (to man the 15,000 polling stations),and in
reaching out to voters in education campaigns -- although
reaching out to voters in education campaigns -- although
there are reports of RPF proselytizing at NEC voter education
meetings. However, the NEC issued two rulings that obstruct
opposition parties' efforts to attract voters and offer
alternatives. First, the NEC has ruled that no campaign
literature may be distributed in the streets, but only in
campaign meetings, meetings which must be announced to local
authorities. NEC officials explained to diplomats that this
was done to keep political parties from "bothering" citizens.
This while the RPF has reportedly been dropping campaign
literature by helicopter in the countryside (by one account,
this ceased after several days). Secondly, the NEC has ruled
that no party or its representatives may criticize other
parties, effectively reducing campaign rallies and messages
to anodyne announcements of good intentions. The PSD
reportedly has in the past several days taken to staging
meetings and rallies at short notice, to avoid cancellations
and petty interference from local government officials.


4. (C) Three local NGOs sought accreditation for the
elections -- the Civil Society Platform (Platform),LDGL, and
LIPRODHOR. With serious doubts expressed among donors about
the independence of the Platform (reftel),which appears to
have several senior officers with close ties to the
government and RPF, donors sought to also channel resources
to LDGL and LIPRODHOR. After much administrative wrangling,
LDGL did receive accreditation for its observers and they are
in the field. However, the NEC denied LIPRODHOR's
application to observe the elections outside the Platform,
and the Platform subsequently declined to accept LIPRODHOR's
monitors, ostensibly for budgetary reasons.


5. (C) Comment. When small and resource-poor political
parties are denied the right to distribute their pamphlets in
the streets, the least expensive means of putting one's
message across, while the ruling party is blanketing the
countryside with radio messages, dropping leaflets from
helicopters, and going door-to-door to drum up votes, it is
not exactly a level playing field. The prohibition on
criticism of opposing parties also plays into the hands of
the RPF's core message of unity and national purpose -- we
are all in this together, so no need for dissenting voices.
The two small parties contesting the elections have no real
hopes of winning the election, but they do hope to increase
their vote totals and their number of Deputies in Parliament.
The U.S. Embassy and other observer missions will monitor
the actual voting on September 15. End comment.



SIM