Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08KATHMANDU1175
2008-11-06 10:18:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

NEPAL: GUIDANCE FOR UNSC DEBATE ON UNMIN

Tags:  UNSC UNMIN PREL NP 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0008
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKT #1175 3111018
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 061018Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU
TO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 3352
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9377
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 6705
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 6232
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 0094
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 2706
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 0135
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS KATHMANDU 001175

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

FOR SCA/INS, IO

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: UNSC UNMIN PREL NP
SUBJECT: NEPAL: GUIDANCE FOR UNSC DEBATE ON UNMIN

REF: STATE 118173

(SBU) Embassy Kathmandu would like to offer the following
comments on the guidance for USUN for the UN Security Council
debate on the UN Mission in Nepal scheduled for November 7
(reftel):

-- In the second paragraph, we would recommend changing the
"peaceful abdication of the king" to "peaceful abolition of
the kingship" or "monarchy." Then-King Gyanendra did not
abdicate, despite being encouraged to do so; he was removed.

-- In the third paragraph, we would recommend revising the
sentence "We also hope to see more progress in ... the
integration of the Maoist and Nepalese army forces" to say
"We also hope to see more progress in ... the integration of
qualified and agreed numbers of Maoist combatants into the
Nepalese army and other government security forces." As
written, the sentence could be read to imply that the U.S.
believes the Maoist People's Liberation Army should be merged
into the Nepal Army. It also does not reflect the reality
that many Maoist combatants will likely join other government
security forces, such as the Nepal Police and the Armed
Police Force.

-- In the fifth paragraph, we would recommend starting a new
paragraph after the first sentence regarding the absolute
necessity for progress on the issue of Maoist combatants. As
currently written, the line between the issue of Maoist
combatants and the separate issue of the Maoist Young
Communist League is somewhat blurred. We would further
recommend taking the last sentence of that paragraph, which
spells out the Special Representative's suggestions, and
adding that to the first sentence.
POWELL