Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08FREETOWN42
2008-02-01 12:19:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Freetown
Cable title:  

AMBASSADOR MEETS WITH SPECIAL COURT HONORABLE

Tags:  KAWC KJUS PGOV PREL SL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7174
RR RUEHPA
DE RUEHFN #0042 0321219
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 011219Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY FREETOWN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1680
INFO RUEHZK/ECOWAS COLLECTIVE
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0272
C O N F I D E N T I A L FREETOWN 000042 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR S/WCI - WILLIAMSON/GOREY, AF/W - OKEDIJI
USUN NEW YORK - HILLMAN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/01/2018
TAGS: KAWC KJUS PGOV PREL SL
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR MEETS WITH SPECIAL COURT HONORABLE
JUSTICE ITOE

Classified By: Ambassador June Carter Perry for reasons 1.4(b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L FREETOWN 000042

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR S/WCI - WILLIAMSON/GOREY, AF/W - OKEDIJI
USUN NEW YORK - HILLMAN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/01/2018
TAGS: KAWC KJUS PGOV PREL SL
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR MEETS WITH SPECIAL COURT HONORABLE
JUSTICE ITOE

Classified By: Ambassador June Carter Perry for reasons 1.4(b) and (d)


1. (C) SUMMARY: Ambassador and Poloff met with Honorable
Justice Benjamin Itoe, Presiding Justice of Trial Chamber I,
on January 30. Justice Itoe expressed his appreciation for
the support provided to the Special Court of Sierra Leone
(SCSL) by the United States Government, and reiterated his
commitment to seeing justice served to the people of Sierra
Leone. While he generally holds a positive view of the
proceedings to date, he did acknowledge the ongoing criticism
of Court operations and levied some of his own. Justice Itoe
has particular concerns regarding the efficacy and
professionalism of the Appeals Chamber and stated that
rectifying these problems will require a firm hand by the
Management Committee. END SUMMARY


2. (U) Ambassador Perry received Honorable Justice Itoe for a
courtesy visit on January 30. The Ambassador stated the
seriousness with which the U.S. Government approaches the
human rights sphere, and the need to continue to support
endeavors, such as the Special Court, that will bring justice
to those most affected by horrific crimes against humanity.
Ambassador Perry mentioned her meetings in New York with the
Management Committee, and asked Justice Itoe's views on the
delays and completion strategy, as well as the difficulties
associated with justices routinely being absent from the
country.


3. (C) Justice Itoe is conscious of the criticism facing the
Court, especially the criticism related to the myriad delays
that have hindered its efficiency in handing down judgments.
He noted that some delays are the byproducts of a thorough
justice process, and that delays related to the absence of
justices have not occurred in his Chamber. Despite actions he
has taken to ensure that the workings of his Chamber are
smooth, Judge Itoe is of the opinion that other Chambers are
not being run with as firm a hand, and that his colleagues do
not necessarily share his interest in efficiency.


4. (C) Justice Itoe cited a recent letter sent by the
Management Committee, requesting assurances that the Court's
schedule will follow the timeline set by the completion
strategy, and mentioned that his colleagues view this letter
as interference with the justice process. He, however,
disagrees, and expressed his sentiment that the Court must
answer to the donor community with regards to its operations.
Indeed, the Justice drafted a response to this letter for the
President of the Court and the Committee that provides a
thorough explanation of the various delays. A former
politician in Cameroon, Judge Itoe stated that the report was
his "political" response to the letter, a response he felt
necessary to demonstrate to stakeholders that their concerns
had not gone completely unheard.


5. (C) While the delays appeared to be foremost on Judge
Itoe's mind, he brought his personal concerns to the
Ambassador's attention. The Appeals Chamber, in particular,
was a topic of discussion in this regard. The justices'
frequent trips outside the country, in his opinion, impact
the quality of their judgments. He stated that their lack of
residency limits consultation time, and further stated his
belief that recent judgments were written by legal officers
and merely signed by the justices. His disappointment in the
Appeals Chamber as a higher court was plain, and he noted
that his position affords him no power to improve the
situation. Judge Itoe's hope is that the Management Committee
will address the issues related to the Appeals Chamber in
short-order, particularly as the number of cases coming
before it increases.


6. (C) COMMENT: While Justice Itoe has a positive view of the
work being conducted by the Special Court, and was
particularly emphatic in his praise of the U.S. Government
for supporting its mission, he acknowledged that concerns
raised by the Management Committee and donor countries are
not unfounded. Delays, caused in part by absences of
justices, must be addressed to ensure that the current
completion strategy's timeline is met. Justice Itoe's
recognition of these problems was followed closely by
assertions that he and his Chamber should shoulder none of
the blame. Although his assertions regarding the quality of
the Appeals Chamber's decisions are bold, it is clear that
issues with that Chamber, in particular, will need to be
addressed by the Management Committee during their in-country
talks this month. END COMMENT.
PERRY