Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08DHAKA374
2008-03-25 09:03:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Dhaka
Cable title:  

CONTINUED TWISTS AND TURNS IN SEDITION CASE

Tags:  PGOV PHUM PREL PINR BG 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO3530
RR RUEHCI
DE RUEHKA #0374/01 0850903
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 250903Z MAR 08 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY DHAKA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6523
INFO RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 9616
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 8384
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 2110
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0578
RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 0223
RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ALMATY 0143
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE
RUEHNT/AMEMBASSY TASHKENT 0222
RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 0113
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA 1230
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 DHAKA 000374 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/03/2017
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL PINR BG
SUBJECT: CONTINUED TWISTS AND TURNS IN SEDITION CASE
AGAINST JOURNALIST

REF: 07 DHAKA 1785

DHAKA 00000374 001.3 OF 002


Classified By: Charge d'Affaires a.i. Geeta Pasi, reason 1.4(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 DHAKA 000374

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/03/2017
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL PINR BG
SUBJECT: CONTINUED TWISTS AND TURNS IN SEDITION CASE
AGAINST JOURNALIST

REF: 07 DHAKA 1785

DHAKA 00000374 001.3 OF 002


Classified By: Charge d'Affaires a.i. Geeta Pasi, reason 1.4(d)


1. (C) SUMMARY. Following another postponement of his trial
on sedition charges, Bangladeshi journalist Salahuddin Shoaib
Choudhury was briefly detained by the Rapid Action Battalion
(RAB) on March 18, allegedly on suspicion of drug possession.
He was released without charge later that night. Choudhury
earlier informed POLOFF he has been in discussion with the
Directorate General-Forces Intelligence (DGFI) about how to
get his case dismissed once and for all. END SUMMARY.

DGFI GETTING INVOLVED?
======================


2. (C) Salahuddin Shoaib Choudhury, the Bangladeshi
journalist charged with sedition for attempting to attend a
conference in Israel in 2003, met with POLOFF recently to
discuss the status of his trial. Choudhury informed POLOFF
that his lawyer, Barrister Samarendra Goswami, was approached
in late January by a representative of the Bangladesh
military's Directorate General-Forces Intelligence (DGFI).
The DGFI officer discussed with Goswami on what grounds the
government could dismiss the case. DGFI later told Choudhury
they had recommended to the Chief Adviser the case against
him be dropped. DGFI's preferred method of dismissing the
case would be for the Pubic Prosecutor to tell the court the
government is no longer willing to prosecute the case. (NOTE:
The Embassy has discussed Choudhury's case at length with
senior Bangladesh government officials, including DGFI
officers. END NOTE.)

ANOTHER POSTPONEMENT
====================


3. (C) Choudhury also said the Public Prosecutor had gotten
in touch with Choudhury,s lower court lawyer, Advocate
Govianda Pramanik, and suggested the government would not
move the trial forward. On March 16, the trial court judge
granted another postponement, this time until mid-April.

A LATE-NIGHT RAID
=================


4. (C) On the evening of March 18, POLOFF received a call
from Choudhury,s brother Sohail, who said his brother's

offices were being raided by the RAB, and the RAB officers
were claiming they had found illegal drugs in his desk
drawer. Sohail said his brother was being taken to RAB-3
headquarters for interrogation. Embassy officers contacted
the authorities to determine the nature of the accusation
against Choudhury.


5. (C) A little after midnight, Choudhury was released from
RAB-3 custody and returned home. Choudhury told POLOFF RAB
officers burst into the offices of his newspaper, the Weekly
Blitz, at about 1930hrs on March 18. They held Choudhury and
ten or so other staff present in a back room while the
officers searched the premises. A little over an hour later,
they showed Choudhury some pills they said they found in his
drawer and told him they were taking him in for questioning.
The RAB officers claimed the pills were "yaba," an illegal
methamphetamine. Choudhury reported that he was blindfolded
and brought to RAB-3 headquarters in Dhaka, where he claims
officers questioned him and forced him to sign a document he
did not have a chance to read. Choudhury said the officers
did not physically harm him at any point during the
questioning.


6. (C) Choudhury said that after about two hours, the tone of
the RAB officers changed. They claimed there had been a
"misunderstanding," and he would be free to go. He asked
how, if they suspected him of drug possession, they could
just release him, and why did they go through the whole
exercise in the first place. The officers repeated that it
had been a mistake. They asked him if he would become an
informer for them, which he declined. Choudhury,s brother
picked him up at 0045hrs on March 19 and took him home.


7. (C) The next morning, Choudhury called to thank the

DHAKA 00000374 002.2 OF 002


Embassy for our assistance. He said he believed that only
speedy action by the Embassy prevented him from prolonged
detention. He added he had no idea why the government had
done this, given earlier indications by DGFI it wanted to see
his case dismissed. Choudhury said the RAB did not file any
charges against him or place conditions upon his release.

AN OPAQUE GOVERNMENT EXPLANATION
================================


8. (C) In conversations with senior Bangladesh government
officials, CDA a.i. asked about the March 18 incident. Home
Secretary Abdul Karim, said RAB, acting on information from

SIPDIS
undercover police work, raided Choudhury,s office and
discovered a significant quantity of "yaba" as well as "blue"
(pornographic) films. Nevertheless, Karim said the RAB
released Choudhury on the condition this not happen again.
CDA a.i. asked why, given the apparently serious nature of
the drug possession charge, the RAB had released Choudhury.
Karim did not answer directly, though he admitted that only a
few people had ever been prosecuted for possession of
pornographic material. Foreign Adviser Iftekhar Chowdhury
provided a similar account of the charges to CDA a.i. in a
subsequent conversation.

COMMENT: CONTINUED TWISTS AND TURNS
===================================


9. (C) It is unclear why the RAB decided to go after
Choudhury at this moment, right as DGFI was showing some
indications that the case against him would might be
dismissed. RAB has been actively pursuing cases of drug
possession among Dhaka's elite. (Reftel) Choudhury has been
involved in questionable business deals in the past, but has
never been implicated in crimes like drug possession. If
this was an attempt somehow to damage his credibility, it
seems to have fallen flat; if it was a legitimate bust, the
readiness to let him off with just a warning is likely the
result of senior officials understanding that the arrest
would become a public relations nightmare for the government.


10. (SBU) Post continues to monitor this case closely.
Pasi