Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08COPENHAGEN478
2008-09-08 11:15:00
SECRET
Embassy Copenhagen
Cable title:
GETTING TO YES WITH DENMARK ON AIR MARSHALS
how-toVZCZCXYZ0000 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHCP #0478 2521115 ZNY SSSSS ZZH O 081115Z SEP 08 FM AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4440 RUEILB/NCTC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY RUEALC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANS WASHDC PRIORITY RHMFISS/TSA HQ WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
S E C R E T COPENHAGEN 000478
SIPDIS
FROM AMBASSADOR CAIN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/05/2018
TAGS: PREL PTER EAIR ECON DA
SUBJECT: GETTING TO YES WITH DENMARK ON AIR MARSHALS
Classified By: Ambassador James P. Cain, reasons 1.4b,d
S E C R E T COPENHAGEN 000478
SIPDIS
FROM AMBASSADOR CAIN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/05/2018
TAGS: PREL PTER EAIR ECON DA
SUBJECT: GETTING TO YES WITH DENMARK ON AIR MARSHALS
Classified By: Ambassador James P. Cain, reasons 1.4b,d
1. (S) Overcoming deep-seated Danish opposition to U.S.
Federal Air Marshals on flights to and from Denmark will
require a coordinated, long-term effort from all U.S.
agencies. Danish officials continue to evince skepticism
about the severity of the threat, concerns about the
implications of FAMs for public safety, and anxiety about the
possible political and national sovereignty consequences.
Despite a greater public appreciation here for the terrorist
threat and the need for effective counter-measures, the Danes
remain reluctant to revisit our FAM request. My country team
and I recommend that we move forward with a new strategy for
ultimately convincing the Danish government to accept U.S.
air marshals.
2. (S) Our approach should be to engage the Danes in a
dialogue aimed at addressing their concerns on multiple
fronts, gradually raising their comfort level over time. A
sustained effort to develop and share new threat intelligence
will reinforce the position of FAM proponents within the
Danish government and blunt the arguments of those who insist
that the threat is insufficient to justify the risks. Visits
by Danish officials to FAMS training facilities and further
briefings on our procedures and record may allay concerns
about the professionalism and competence of our officers. We
should brief the Danes, in as much detail as possible, about
our success in dealing with the issues raised by other
partners who have since opted for air marshals. Being
reminded that Denmark is among the last holdouts in Europe
may encourage Danish officials to reevaluate the political
risk. Discussions about measures to ensure the
confidentiality of FAM deployments could also prove
productive.
3. (S) Denmark is one of our closest and most reliable allies
in Europe, an excellent partner on counter-terrorism from
here to Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa. As we have seen
in previous exchanges on the FAM issue, however, the Danes
also retain a fierce devotion to civil liberties and national
sovereignty, and have a long tradition of consensus-based
politics that can delay action on controversial issues. The
upcoming fall debate on alleged U.S. rendition flights
through Danish airspace also argues for a low-key,
deliberative approach in the months ahead. I am convinced
that engagement with the Danes to support an evolution of
their position on air marshals offers the best chance of
success over time, and I strongly recommend that the U.S.
government move forward together in this way.
CAIN
SIPDIS
FROM AMBASSADOR CAIN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/05/2018
TAGS: PREL PTER EAIR ECON DA
SUBJECT: GETTING TO YES WITH DENMARK ON AIR MARSHALS
Classified By: Ambassador James P. Cain, reasons 1.4b,d
1. (S) Overcoming deep-seated Danish opposition to U.S.
Federal Air Marshals on flights to and from Denmark will
require a coordinated, long-term effort from all U.S.
agencies. Danish officials continue to evince skepticism
about the severity of the threat, concerns about the
implications of FAMs for public safety, and anxiety about the
possible political and national sovereignty consequences.
Despite a greater public appreciation here for the terrorist
threat and the need for effective counter-measures, the Danes
remain reluctant to revisit our FAM request. My country team
and I recommend that we move forward with a new strategy for
ultimately convincing the Danish government to accept U.S.
air marshals.
2. (S) Our approach should be to engage the Danes in a
dialogue aimed at addressing their concerns on multiple
fronts, gradually raising their comfort level over time. A
sustained effort to develop and share new threat intelligence
will reinforce the position of FAM proponents within the
Danish government and blunt the arguments of those who insist
that the threat is insufficient to justify the risks. Visits
by Danish officials to FAMS training facilities and further
briefings on our procedures and record may allay concerns
about the professionalism and competence of our officers. We
should brief the Danes, in as much detail as possible, about
our success in dealing with the issues raised by other
partners who have since opted for air marshals. Being
reminded that Denmark is among the last holdouts in Europe
may encourage Danish officials to reevaluate the political
risk. Discussions about measures to ensure the
confidentiality of FAM deployments could also prove
productive.
3. (S) Denmark is one of our closest and most reliable allies
in Europe, an excellent partner on counter-terrorism from
here to Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa. As we have seen
in previous exchanges on the FAM issue, however, the Danes
also retain a fierce devotion to civil liberties and national
sovereignty, and have a long tradition of consensus-based
politics that can delay action on controversial issues. The
upcoming fall debate on alleged U.S. rendition flights
through Danish airspace also argues for a low-key,
deliberative approach in the months ahead. I am convinced
that engagement with the Danes to support an evolution of
their position on air marshals offers the best chance of
success over time, and I strongly recommend that the U.S.
government move forward together in this way.
CAIN