Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08CONAKRY24
2008-01-09 14:24:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Conakry
Cable title:  

LAWYERS TAKE SIDES IN GUINEA,S POWER STRUGGLE

Tags:  PGOV KDEM PHUM ASEC GV 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7968
PP RUEHMA RUEHPA
DE RUEHRY #0024/01 0091424
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 091424Z JAN 08
FM AMEMBASSY CONAKRY
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2032
INFO RUEHZK/ECOWAS COLLECTIVE
RHMFISS/HQ USAFRICOM STUTTGART GE
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CONAKRY 000024 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KDEM PHUM ASEC GV
SUBJECT: LAWYERS TAKE SIDES IN GUINEA,S POWER STRUGGLE


-------
SUMMARY
-------

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CONAKRY 000024

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KDEM PHUM ASEC GV
SUBJECT: LAWYERS TAKE SIDES IN GUINEA,S POWER STRUGGLE


--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (SBU) SUMMARY. Two public declarations allegedly coming
from Guinea,s Bar Association show that the Bar is just as
divided internally as most of the other actors in Guinea,s
emerging political drama. The President of the Bar
Association came out in strong support of President Conte and
undermined the prime minister,s legitimacy. Although he
criticized union plans to resume a nationwide strike on
January 10 and implied that the strike has no legal basis, he
did not directly come out and declare it illegal. Other
lawyers came out with their own declaration saying that the
President of the Bar Association acted independently and that
his legal opinion does not reflect the position of the Bar
Association. END SUMMARY.

--------------
BAR ASSOCIATION AFFIRMS PRESIDENTIAL POWERS
--------------


2. (U) The President of the Guinean Bar Association,
Boubacar Sow, issued a declaration on January 8 supposedly
representing the legal opinion of the entire Bar Association.
In principle, the Bar Association is an independent
organization outside government jurisdiction. Six pages in
length, the document details a number of legal arguments
essentially affirming that Guinea,s constitution clearly
provides for a strong presidential regime. Sow emphasized
that the prime minister position has no constitutional basis.
Further, Sow wrote that the president has sole authority
over cabinet ministers and reserves the right to delegate
executive powers as he deems fit.


3. (U) On the subject of the January 27 Accords, a
tripartite agreement signed in early 2007, Sow wrote that
although the agreement says that the president accepted to
nominate a prime minister and consensus government, the
agreement does not define the consensus government nor say
that it is irreversible., According to Sow, the president
can change his cabinet at will and is not required to justify
his actions to the population. Furthermore, Sow wrote that
if the population wants to change the political regime, they
must do so through their elected representatives in the
National Assembly who can amend the constitution or issue a
referendum.

--------------
...AND CRITICIZES PLANNED LABOR STRIKE
--------------


4. (U) Turning to the unions, plan to resume a nationwide
labor strike on January 10, Sow criticized the labor unions,
claiming that the strike is inappropriate and damaging to the
country as a whole. According to Sow, this is the first time
in Guinea,s history that the labor unions have planned to
strike for purely political reasons. Pointing to Article 18
of Guinea,s legal code, Sow affirmed that unions have the
right to strike, but that they do not have any legal right to
protest a presidential cabinet appointment.

--------------
WAIT A MINUTE ) THAT,S NOT WHAT WE SAID
--------------


5. (SBU) Pol LES met with a contact at the Ministry of
Justice on January 8 who recently participated in a USG
training program on intellectual property rights. Contact
reportedly said that Sow,s declaration did not represent the
opinion of the Bar Association and that member lawyers were
not consulted. According to contact, Sow acted entirely on
his own. When asked about possible reasons for doing so,
contact reportedly said that a number of high-level
presidential insiders had been seen visiting Sow recently,
including Chief of Protocol Idrissa Thiam. Contact told LES
that he suspected Sow was hoping to position himself for a
ministerial position. Contact also said that Sow did not
report to work after issuing the declaration and could not be
reached by telephone.


6. (U) On January 8, a small group of Bar Association
members were heard on Radio Familia denouncing Sow,s
declaration as non-representative of the Bar Association. In
addition, the lawyers of the Guinean Bar Association,
issued a follow-on declaration stating that Boubacar Sow had
acted independently and the Bar Association did not support
Sow,s declaration.


CONAKRY 00000024 002 OF 002


--------------
OH SORRY, YES WE DID SAY THAT
--------------


7. (SBU) USAID LES later heard from other sources that the
majority of the Bar Association does in fact support Boubacar
Sow and agrees with his legal argument. Contacts told LES
that the group on Radio Familia represented only a small
faction of the Bar Association and that the Bar Association
as a whole will issue another declaration on January 9
affirming Sow,s legal argument.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


8. (SBU) So...the Bar Association seems to be just as
divided as all the other Guinean organizations and
associations. Every time one turns around, someone or
another is issuing a new declaration. Guineans appear to be
quickly drawing lines in the sand and then looking up to see
who stands where.


9. (SBU) At the same time, Sow,s statement has generated a
bit of a stir since a number of groups are beginning to
question whether the unions even have a legal ground to
strike this time around. Sow reinforced the absolute power
of the presidency and undermined the legitimacy of the PM.
Although he criticized the unions and implied that the
upcoming strike is illegal, he did not actually make a
definite legal determination. The issue of the strike and
its legality is a tricky one. The strike does not seem to
have the same level of popular support it had at this time
last year, but that does not necessarily mean that the unions
themselves lack support. If a legitimate judicial body or
association officially determines that the strike is illegal,
and if the strike goes forward on January 10, union members
could risk arrest. Whether people support the strike or not,
they may react very strongly to such arrests. END COMMENT.
CARTER