Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08CONAKRY164
2008-03-05 08:53:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Conakry
Cable title:  

UNIONS BLOCK PM ON FUEL - UNION LEADER SAYS

Tags:  PGOV ELAB PREL ASEC GV 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ2450
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHRY #0164/01 0650853
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 050853Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY CONAKRY
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2223
INFO RUEHZK/ECOWAS COLLECTIVE
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHMFISS/HQ USAFRICOM STUTTGART GE
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
C O N F I D E N T I A L CONAKRY 000164 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/04/2018
TAGS: PGOV ELAB PREL ASEC GV
SUBJECT: UNIONS BLOCK PM ON FUEL - UNION LEADER SAYS
PRESIDENT MUST GO

Classified By: POL/ECON CHIEF SHANNON CAZEAU FOR REASON 1.4 B AND D

C O N F I D E N T I A L CONAKRY 000164

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/04/2018
TAGS: PGOV ELAB PREL ASEC GV
SUBJECT: UNIONS BLOCK PM ON FUEL - UNION LEADER SAYS
PRESIDENT MUST GO

Classified By: POL/ECON CHIEF SHANNON CAZEAU FOR REASON 1.4 B AND D


1. (C) SUMMARY. Guinea,s labor unions are attempting to
block GoG efforts to reduce or eliminate the country,s
economically unsustainable fuel subsidy program as they call
for consultations. Despite having a doctorate in economics,
union leader Ibrahima Fofana demonstrated an appalling lack
of understanding of fundamental economic principles. On the
political front, the unions and other political actors have
been holding independent meetings in order to define a
comprehensive strategy to resolve Guinea,s leadership
crisis. According to Fofana, the group is likely to call for
the impeachment of the president due to incompetence based on
physical and/or mental illness. END SUMMARY.


2. (U) On March 4, Poloff met with Dr. Ibrahima Fofana,
leader of the Union of Guinean Workers (USTG) and co-chair of
the Unions-Intersyndicale. Ambassador Carter joined the
meeting for about twenty minutes to discuss concerns over the
Guinean Government,s continued fuel subsidy program.

--------------
THERE,S NO SUCH THING AS A FUEL SUBSIDY
--------------


3. (SBU) Fofana confirmed that union leaders have been
negotiating with the GoG regarding fuel price increases and
pressuring the government to postpone any reductions in
subsidies. Fofana told the Ambassador that the government
subsidy is a specific provision within the January 27, 2007
Accords, which represents the first time in Guinea,s history
that the population negotiated a fixed price for a commodity.
&For that reason,8 Fofana said, &the government cannot
change the price without consulting with us.8


4. (SBU) According to Fofana, in actuality, there is no
government subsidy. He said that what they are really
talking about is a tax and that removing the subsidy is just
another way of imposing a tax. Fofana said that when the
unions sat down to negotiate the fixed price in 2007, it was
clear that the actual cost of fuel at the port was 3000 GnF
per liter. They then added in transportation costs and a

fixed percentage profit for the vendors in order to arrive at
a realistic price. Fofana said that the government is
calling it a subsidy, but that this is just a way to confuse
the public. &It,s just a tax,8 he said. He later told
Poloff that such a tax is an unfair burden for the majority
of the population, and only serves to make the poor poorer
and the rich richer.


5. (U) The Ambassador emphasized that the GoG,s fuel
subsidy program is absolutely unsustainable and that
prolonging the inevitable only jeopardizes the IMF program.
He questioned Fofana on his calculations and pointed out that
the entire international community, including the IMF and the
World Bank, share the same analysis as the Embassy. The
Ambassador added that he would be interested in seeing
Fofana,s calculations.


6. (SBU) Without rancor, Fofana said that he understands
economics very well and in fact holds a doctorate in
economics. He acknowledged the Ambassador,s comments as
&logical,8 but said that such logic only works in a
completely transparent environment. According to Fofana, the
Guinean context does not provide a nurturing environment for
logical economic principles. He added that he is meeting
with the IMF and World Bank on March 5 and will be sure to
discuss the issue further.


7. (SBU) While he did not provide a detailed outline of
union objectives with respect to the fuel subsidy program,
Fofana said that there should be a consultative process with
all parties agreeing to any new price. He did not say it
outright, but he clearly did not support completely
eliminating the subsidy. At one point, he said that the
problem is not only one of pricing, but also of consumption.
When the Ambassador pointed out that consumption is high
because people are smuggling Guinea,s cheaper fuel into
other countries where they can sell it for significant
profits, Fofana said that government is not managing its
supply effectively. He then went on at some length about the
GoG's policy of allowing the importation of cheap, used cars,
which increases fuel consumption, arguing that better
emission standards would address the consumption problem.
Fofana then mentioned rice prices, which have risen
significantly in recent months, as another example of poor
government management.


8. (SBU) At one point, the Ambassador said continuing down
this economic path of ongoing subsidies is the epitomy of
economic stupidity. He pointed out that unsustainable
economic policies will do nothing to advance the country's
development and will undermine progress. Fofana nodded his
head and then continued to explain why basic economics do not
apply in Guinea.

--------------
THE PRESIDENT MUST GO
--------------


9. (SBU) After the Ambassador left, Poloff asked about the
Committee de Suivi and general progress towards a solution
for Guinea,s political problems. Fofana said that the
Committee is one element, but that most political actors are
participating in a separate dialogue in order to develop a
comprehensive political platform and strategy. A February 29
meeting included representatives from unions, opposition
political parties, civil society, religious denominations,
and the civil-military committee. Fofana said that the group
is close to reaching agreement and expects to have clearly
defined objectives before the end of March.


10. (C) Poloff pointed out that the Committee de Suivi was
established to monitor the implementation of the January 27
Accords and asked about the purpose of the second dialogue
group. Fofana agreed, but said that the January 27 Accords
did not actually resolve anything and the dialogue group is
looking at the underlying political crisis and trying to
define how to address it. &The President is clearly ill and
unfit to govern,8 he said, &and that needs to be
addressed.8


11. (C) When Poloff asked Fofana how he thought the group
might address the problem, he said that the answer is clear.
He pointed out that the law permits the National Assembly and
the Supreme Court to declare the president unfit for reasons
of physical and/or mental health, thereby ushering in a 60
day transitional period, under the leadership of the
President of the National Assembly, so that presidential
elections can be organized. &This is essentially the same
situation we had in 2007,8 Fofana said, &but we were
blocked by the Supreme Court, the National Assembly, and the
military.8 Poloff asked if these groups would now support
such an initiative. Fofana said that there is only one way
to find out. He added that the dialogue group is focusing on
defining the agenda and once that is done, will then approach
the various institutions to push it forward. &If they do
not support us, then the population will need to pressure
them to do so,8 he said.


12. (C) When pressed to specify what exactly he was hoping
to achieve, Fofana said &we need the president to leave and
then we will have a clearly defined period of political
transition in which we can organize presidential elections.8
Fofana added that they will demand that the president step
down due to his being medically unfit for the position.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


13. (C) Fofana,s discussion of the fuel subsidies and his
underlying economic analysis was confusing and did not make
sense. At one point, he acknowledged record international
oil prices, but did not seem to make the connection to
Guinea,s internal pricing. Although he claimed to have a
doctorate in economics, none of his analysis could be linked
to standard economic principles. Paradoxically, the unions
have been Kouyate,s staunchest supporters, but their
opposition to fuel price increases threatens to undermine one
of Kouyate,s few indisputable successes ) the return of the
IMF program. When Poloff pointed this out, Fofana seemed
unconcerned.


14. (C) Continuing in this vein throughout the discussion,
Fofana seemed much less interested in the consensus
government. It was not even so much an indication of
diminished support, rather, an almost complete disinterest in
discussing the consensus government as a mechanism for
change. Instead, Fofana was focused on getting rid of the
president. However, it is difficult to imagine the president
and various elements of the government peacefully accepting a
transitional political period of governing. Post will be
following up with other participants in this dialogue process
to see what people are talking about, although Fofana,s
comments appear to echo those of other prominent leaders,

especially within the opposition political parties.


15. (C) Throughout his discussions of Guinea's political and
economic situation, Fofana's arguments were borderline
incoherent. It seemed as if he had assembled a number of
facts together, facts that did not necessarily support his
position, but he was not going to let them get in the way of
advancing his argument. Fofana seems to have lost sight of
the fundamental economic problems plaguing Guinea and
realistic fixes to those problems. In arguing for continued
fuel subsidies, he is in fact only further impoversishing the
country and blocking development initiatives that would
ultimately benefit his support base. The same was true for
his political arguments. His proposed course of action is
unlikely to succeed unless there is a popular uprising behind
it, which would likely result in violence and loss of life.
It is important to note that Fofana speaks for Fofana, and
not necessarily for the unions, but there is no question that
he is one of their most influential leaders and as such, his
almost fanatical convictions are cause for concern. END
COMMENT.
CARTER