Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08CANBERRA704
2008-07-11 06:34:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Canberra
Cable title:  

DELAYS IN AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BROADBAND NETWORK

Tags:  ECPS ECON AS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4396
PP RUEHPT
DE RUEHBY #0704/01 1930634
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 110634Z JUL 08
FM AMEMBASSY CANBERRA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9851
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9092
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 5381
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 3119
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE 1489
RUEHBN/AMCONSUL MELBOURNE 5428
RUEHPT/AMCONSUL PERTH 3704
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 3625
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 CANBERRA 000704 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE PLEASE PASS USTR/MCHALE; STATE FOR EEB/CIP AND EAP/ANP

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS ECON AS
SUBJECT: DELAYS IN AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BROADBAND NETWORK

REF: A. A) CANBERRA 401

B. B) CANBERRA 375

C. C) 2007 CANBERRA 449

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 CANBERRA 000704

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE PLEASE PASS USTR/MCHALE; STATE FOR EEB/CIP AND EAP/ANP

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS ECON AS
SUBJECT: DELAYS IN AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BROADBAND NETWORK

REF: A. A) CANBERRA 401

B. B) CANBERRA 375

C. C) 2007 CANBERRA 449


1. (SBU) Summary: Progress on the National Broadband Network
(NBN) has been slower than expected. The original deadline
(July 25) for bids will slip, primarily due to Telstra's
delay in providing network information to the GOA for other
bidders. We expect an announcement that this information has
been provided soon, with bids due perhaps in November and a
GOA decision probable in February or March 2009. A Senate
inquiry organized by the opposition will be critical of the
Rudd Government's handling, but should not delay the tender
process. The request for submissions on regulatory issues
surrounding NBN brought a spate of recommendations from
competitors and most Australian state governments to
structurally separate Telstra. After a warm beginning,
relations between Telstra and the Rudd Government have begun
to deteriorate. Telstra threatens "endless" legal action
over any attempt to impose structural separation. End
summary.

SLIPPING TIMELINES


2. (SBU) Progress has been slower than expected on one of
the top campaign promises of 2007, the establishment of a
National Broadband Network (NBN). Originally, the Department
of Broadband, Communications, and the Digital Economy (DBCDE)
set a July 25 deadline for the submission of proposals from
interested bidders. However, after complaints from bidders
that they would not be able to submit a bid without detailed
technical network data from Telstra (ref A),that deadline
has been set aside, and DBCDE has assured bidders that they
will be given 12 weeks to review the network information from
Telstra - which has yet to be released. Brian Kelleher of
DBCDE told econoff July 10 that"unofficially" he expected an
announcement in the next two-to-three weeks that Telstra has
provided the necessary network information to DBCDE, which
would pass it on to the registered bidders. That would start
the clock, which would see bids due to DBCDE in approximately
mid-November.


3. (SBU) A mid-November date for bids means the GOA will not
meet DBCDE Minister Stephen Conroy's earlier pledge to break
ground on the NBN in 2008. Per Kelleher, it will take DBCDE
at least eight weeks to assess the bids on their technical

and commercial/cost merits, to determine how well they
satisfy the GOA's objectives (including reaching 98% of
premises) and another four-plus weeks for Conroy and the
Cabinet to make a final decision (note: this may be
optimistic since the combined Christmas-and-summer holidays
frequently slow the pace of government in December and
January). That pushes the end of these deliberations to
February or March, when the GOA is in the annual throes of
preparing its budget for release in early May. That deadline
could focus the Rudd Government's attention on getting the
NBN announced and funded quickly, or could possibly cause
further delays because of the all-absorbing budget process.

SENATE INQUIRY


4. (SBU) The Senate (controlled by the Coalition until July
1 when the new Senate, based on the November 24 2007 election
results, was seated) in late June announced a Senate Select
Committee inquiry into the Rudd Government's broadband plans.
Claiming "a background of broken deadline promises, cost
Q Claiming "a background of broken deadline promises, cost
blow-outs, consumer anxiety and regulatory uncertainty,"
Liberal Party shadow minister Bruce Billson wants to "canvas
competing interests and look at the facts to make sure the
right public policy settings are taken." Billson said they
will also talk to the telcom industry, which he describes as
"excessively gagged" by the GOA's tender process. The
Committee is due to report to the Senate in March 2009.
(Comment: that report will not be completed in time to
influence the GOA's decision. That underscores the fact that
this is primarily a point-scoring tactic for the opposition
to use in criticizing Conroy's handling of the NBN; this
ongoing inquiry will be a minor complication for the GOA to
handle.)

GRUMBLING ABOUT TELSTRA AND CALLS FOR STRUCTURAL SEPARATION


CANBERRA 00000704 002 OF 003



5. (SBU) As part of the NBN, DBCDE had called for
submissions on regulatory aspects of the broadband plan. By
the late June deadline, at least 80 submissions had been
received, from state governments, equipment providers, user
associations, interested companies such as Google, Skype, and
Intel, private individuals, and Telstra, Singapore-based
Optus, Primus and other telcoms. Many of the submissions
focused on the merits of structural separation for Telstra,
splitting Telstra's network business from its retail
operations. The state governments of New South Wales,
Western Australia, South Australia, Queensland, and long-time
Telstra critic Tasmania (all states but Victoria) all called
to varying degrees for structural separation, as did Optus,
Primus and the other telcom providers, and others such as
Google and Skype. Telstra characteristically issued a
lengthy and vociferous series of submissions defending its
structure and asserting that its vertically-integrated model
has great benefits for the market.

GRUMBLING BY TELSTRA


6. (SBU) The Telstra-Conroy truce is over. After the
November election there was an era of good feelings between
Telstra and Minister Stephen Conroy. Conroy, in Telstra's
eyes, had the fine quality of NOT being Helen Coonan, the
Howard Government's last Minister for Communications, who had
gone toe-to-toe with Telstra in some extraordinarily nasty
public squabbles about phone and internet services that
helped prompt Coonan to float publicly the idea of imposing
structural separation on Telstra.


7. (SBU) Industry insider David Forman, head of the
Competitive Carriers Coalition and the husband of Senator
Kate Lundy (of the ruling Australian Labor Party) told
econoff that Conroy during recent Senate estimates hearings
declined to say anything about structural separation. But
Forman claimed that Conroy has been "stoking the fires" of
structural separation in private, and Telstra has come to the
realization that this idea is back in play. A CitiGroup
analyst in a note to clients wrote that Telstra's plan as
currently outlined is unlikely to win the NBN bid, and JP
Morgan recently issued a report laying out the benefits of
structural separation and calling it a valid alternative for
the GOA.


8. (SBU) In late June, Telstra chairman Donald McGauchie
fired the first public shots at the Rudd Government.
McGauchie promised "endless litigation" should the GOA ever
try to impose structural separation on the former monopoly
telcom. He also said that Telstra would only bid to build
the NBN if it could both own and operate it. McGauchie also
criticized the GOA for only offering a A$4.7 billion
contribution to the NBN, complaining that to achieve
penetration to 98% of Australian residences would cost A$25
billion. This brought a quick public rejoinder from Conroy,
who dismissed McGauchie's complaints and acidly noted that
just the week before Telstra had estimated the NBN would cost
A$15 billion. In any case, DBCDE says the A$4.7 billion is a
hard limit on what the Australian government will kick in.

THE BIDDERS ARE IN


9. (SBU) Several organizations have put up A$5 million bonds
to be registered as bidders for the NBN, either on a national
or state level. They include Telstra, Optus, Terria (a
Qor state level. They include Telstra, Optus, Terria (a
consortium of smaller telcoms),Macquarie Bank, the Tasmanian
state government, TransACT (an ISP in the Australian Capital
Territory),and Acacia. Macquarie Bank later announced that
it would join Telstra in the bidding, a move seen by one
industry analyst as a ploy to get into the NBN game without
having to commit any of its own resources by convincing
Telstra to buy it out of an independent bid. Telstra, Optus,
and Terria are bidding on the national level; the other bids
are all for within one state or territory. Under the tender,
it is possible for the GOA to award the national contract to
one bidder but give state awards to other bidders, if they
see the state-based bid(s) as competitive on costs and
technically compatible with the national winner. The
TransACT, Tasmanian Government, and Acacia (Victoria) efforts
are seen as compatible with the Terria national bid, and
could possibly merge their proposals into one.


CANBERRA 00000704 003 OF 003


COMMENT


10. (SBU) DBCDE and Conroy's office have been keeping this
entire process very much under wraps. They have conducted a
series of meetings with entities that have ponied up the A$5
million bond to explain technical issues and answer
questions, but have been very cautious to avoid any
appearance of conflict of interest. Even in talking to the
Embassy, DBCDE and Conroy's office have been unwilling to
confirm anything that hasn't been made public already.
Despite the bickering with Conroy, Telstra is still clearly a
strong candidate for the NBN contract, but is no longer seen
as a lock to win. Rumors that they will leave Australia very
soon surround Telstra's controversial American CEO Sol
Trujillo and his even more controversial American director
for public affairs Phil Burgess. Forman, whose professional
distaste for Telstra has probably been strengthened by
Telstra's recent blog attacks on his wife Senator Kate Lundy
for her critical statements and questions (on behalf of
Conroy, Forman said) about Telstra in the Senate, passed on
reports that Trujillo's house in Colorado is being prepared
for his early return, and suggests that Conroy and DBCDE will
wait for new Telstra leadership before making any decision.
In any case, Telstra's renewed public campaign against the
GOA and against its regulator the Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission, could harden attitudes within the Rudd
Government against the dominant telcom.

CLUNE