Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08CANBERRA246
2008-03-17 04:52:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Canberra
Cable title:  

UNIONS ASK FOR THE SPOILS OF VICTORY

Tags:  PGOV ELAB AS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6415
PP RUEHPT
DE RUEHBY #0246/01 0770452
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 170452Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY CANBERRA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9178
INFO RUEHBN/AMCONSUL MELBOURNE PRIORITY 5069
RUEHPT/AMCONSUL PERTH PRIORITY 3352
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY PRIORITY 3258
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 000246 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV ELAB AS
SUBJECT: UNIONS ASK FOR THE SPOILS OF VICTORY

REF: CANBERRA 182

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 000246

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV ELAB AS
SUBJECT: UNIONS ASK FOR THE SPOILS OF VICTORY

REF: CANBERRA 182


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Jeff Lawrence, the new Secretary of the
Australian Council of Trade Union (ACTU),the unions'
national umbrella organization, said in a speech March 12
that organized labor would lobby for real wage increases for
low-paid workers, higher retirement contributions from
employers, more collective bargaining rights, and job
security. Lawrence also announced that the ACTU would push
for an AUD $26 per week increase in the minimum wage. While
the Rudd Government has already satisfied a key union demand
by quickly introducing a bill to abolish the Howard
Government's Australian Workplace Agreements (reftel),the
government has called for wage restraint to curb inflation
and it has promised to keep some of the former government's
restrictions on unions' rights of entry. Managing organized
labor's expectations will be a key issue for Prime Minister
Kevin Rudd as he seeks to balance its demands with the
realities of governing. END SUMMARY.

THE UNION AGENDA


2. (U) In a nationally-televised speech to the National Press
Club in Canberra on March 12, Lawrence said the unions would
retain their campaign against the Howard Government's
"WorkChoices" labor market reforms until WorkChoices is
abolished. He said the ACTU would oppose new Australian
Workplace Agreements, push for greater collective bargaining
rights (Lawrence claimed Australia was the only country in
the developed world where employers could ignore the wishes
of employees to collectively bargain),protect workers from
unfair dismissal, argue for the return of an "independent
umpire that has the power to resolve disputes", and fight for
a strong safety net of minimum standards and awards.


3. (U) Lawrence said the unions would "stand up for real wage
rises," seek improved training for workers, promote a better
work/family balance, and campaign to raise employer
retirement contributions from nine percent to 12 percent in
2012 and 15 percent by 2015. "This may seem an ambitious
agenda," he noted, adding that "despite seventeen consecutive
years of economic growth and profits at record highs, the
rights and living standards of many Australians have gone
backwards under the Howard years." Lawrence ruled out a wage
agreement between the ACTU and the ALP Government,

acknowledging that only one in five workers are dependent on
minimum wages and awards, and that for most workers, wages
are a matter between employers, employees and their unions at
the enterprise level. "The relationship we want with the Rudd
Government," Lawrence declared, "will be founded on
constructive communication."

"SHOW ME THE MONEY"


4. (U) Lawrence also announced that the ACTU will seek a AUD
$26 per week increase for Australia's lowest paid workers in
its submission to the 2008 Minimum Wage Review by the
Australian Fair Pay Commission, which by law determines the
minimum wage each July. Lawrence said this would have a
negligible impact on inflation and would barely meet the rise
in the cost of living over the next year. He said that the
ACTU had calculated that almost one million minimum-wage
workers had suffered a decline in their real yearly incomes
of up to $2,200. The Australian Chamber of Commerce and
Industry has called for a $10-11 per week increase and the
Australian Industry Group a $13 increase. The Treasury is
alleged by the Opposition to have recommended an $18 increase
to the Fair Pay Commission, something the Treasury Secretary
Qto the Fair Pay Commission, something the Treasury Secretary
denies. The Rudd Government did not recommend a specific
increase in its submission to the Fair Pay Commission.
Shadow Treasurer Malcolm Turnbull attacked the Government for
failing to back its ACTU allies and not putting Treasury's
advice "front and center" as Rudd had promised. The ALP
pointed out that the former Howard Government had also made
no specific recommendations in its two minimum-wage
submissions to the Fair Pay Commission.

UNIONS WANT PAYBACK


5. (SBU) COMMENT: By not backing the ACTU's wage claim, nor
even specifying an amount, Rudd has almost certainly
disappointed some unionists, although Lawrence said publicly
that he was not concerned. With a booming economy and low
unemployment putting upward pressure on wages, the reality is
that a large proportion of workers' incomes will continue to
grow regardless of what the Fair Pay Commission does.
However, one fifth of Australian workers (1.6 million) still
work for minimum wages and standard conditions, so the Fair
Pay Commission's decision has more than symbolic importance.

CANBERRA 00000246 002 OF 002


Ironically, with the minimum wage currently AUD $522.12 a
week, the increase sought by the unions is only 4.9 percent.
However, with underlying inflation currently estimated to be
running at an annualized rate of 4.2 percent -- above the
Reserve Bank's target limit of two to three percent -- this
increase may be too rich for the Government's blood.


6. (SBU) COMMENT CONTINUED: In his address, Lawrence said:
"The Government does not owe us anything and we are not
seeking any payoffs." The reality is, however, that the ACTU
and individual unions spent an estimated AUD $30 million on
their anti-WorkChoices campaigns, much of it subsidized by
additional levies on union members, and their efforts were a
major factor in Rudd's election victory. Many union members
believe that Rudd, who raised their expectations before the
election, owes them. Given their close relationship, the ALP
and the unions should be able to work out their differences
behind closed doors, but the unions will not be pleased if
the Fair Pay Commission's minimum wage increase, due in July,
is significantly below the ACTU's figure. The Parliament
will likely pass the bill phasing out AWAs by 2010 this week
and it will introduce more union-friendly workplace reforms
later in the year, so Rudd should be able to mollify the
unions for now. They also know that his personal popularity
was a significant factor in the ALP's victory last November.
On the other hand, unlike most of his ALP colleagues, Rudd
does not have a union background and the time may come when
his differences with organized labor become more pronounced
and more vocal.

MCCALLUM