Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08CANBERRA1141
2008-11-13 05:32:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Canberra
Cable title:  

INTERVENTION REVIEW FUELS POLITICAL AND SOCIAL

Tags:  AS PGOV PHUM SOCI 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO9564
PP RUEHPT
DE RUEHBY #1141/01 3180532
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 130532Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY CANBERRA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0503
INFO RUEHBN/AMCONSUL MELBOURNE PRIORITY 5755
RUEHPT/AMCONSUL PERTH PRIORITY 4025
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY PRIORITY 3964
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 001141 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AS PGOV PHUM SOCI
SUBJECT: INTERVENTION REVIEW FUELS POLITICAL AND SOCIAL
DEBATE

REF: CANBERRA 956

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 001141

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AS PGOV PHUM SOCI
SUBJECT: INTERVENTION REVIEW FUELS POLITICAL AND SOCIAL
DEBATE

REF: CANBERRA 956


1. (U) Summary: Sixteen months after the Australian
government mounted a controversial intervention in indigenous
communities in the Northern Territory to combat reported
widespread sexual abuse of Aboriginal children, a review
panel has concluded that the emergency remains acute and has
endorsed continuation of the intervention. The review board
has recommended ending a blanket income management system,
reinstating the permit system used to restrict access to
native land, reinstating the Racial Discrimination Act and
compensating traditional owners for compulsory acquisition of
their land. The report also recommended a health service
delivery initiative for child and family health be made
permanent with urgent priority given to ongoing treatment of
children with health and dental issues identified by
mandatory child health checks. Indigenous leaders and other
opponents of the intervention have accused the government of
watering-down criticism in the report while adding statements
endorsing continuation of the intervention. The government
denies interference. Indigenous leaders are bitterly divided
over the recommendations. End Summary.

The Review Process and Result


2. (U) Established by bipartisan agreement in 2007 to
conduct an independent and transparent review of the first 12
months of the intervention -- known formally as the Northern
Territory Emergency Response (NTER) - the NTER Board was
tasked with assessing progress in improving the safety and
well-being of children and laying a sustainable basis for
improvement of conditions in remote communities in the
Northern Territory. For approximately three months the Board
traveled throughout the Northern Territory, visiting 31
Aboriginal communities and speaking with representatives of
56 communities together with government representatives and
service delivery agencies. They received over 200 public
submissions. The reviewers said they focused heavily on
these consultations because of the absence of sound baseline
data upon which to judge progress. Despite rumors the
original draft of the report was highly critical of the
intervention, the final report states: "The situation in
remote communities and town camps was - and
remains- sufficiently acute to be described as a national
emergency. The NTER should continue."


The Debate


3. (U) The review drew an immediate attack from some
prominent Aboriginal leaders who said a tough approach needs
to be maintained to reverse entrenched problems in Indigenous
communities. Recommendations of the NTER include an end to a
blanket income management system, under which all Aboriginal
welfare payments are heavily controlled, the reinstatement of
the Racial Discrimination Act, and for traditional owners to
be compensated for the compulsory acquisition of their land.
The architect of the intervention, previous indigenous
minister Mal Brough, attacked the report, arguing that he had
always predicted the Rudd government would go soft on the
intervention. Brough warned that the watering-down of
compulsory income management would be dangerous for children.
Northern Territory Deputy Chief Minister Marion Scrymgour
said she was concerned about plans to make income management
voluntary citing a positive effect by income management on
school attendance in bush communities . Arnhem Land leader
Galarrwuy Yunupi
ngu criticized the report for failing to give "any real
direction". On the other side are leaders such as Northern
Qdirection". On the other side are leaders such as Northern
Land Council chairman Wali Wunungmurra who supported the
recommendations of the review board, arguing the Howard
government's approach to the intervention breached human
rights.

The Government View


4. (SBU) Prime Minister Rudd appears to have no appetite for
the polarized nature of the debate, stating the government
has no "ideology" on this but rather "is driven by one thing:
how do you close the gap between indigenous and
non-indigenous Australians and what in practical terms makes
that work". Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin said
the government would base its decisions on the future of the
intervention not solely on the review but on "a number of
pieces of evidence" including the NTER Review Board report.

Comment


5. (SBU) The Australian and Northern Territory governments
endorse the need to "reset" the relationship with Aboriginal
communities and move to develop and maintain a community

CANBERRA 00001141 002 OF 002


development framework. The reality of implementation,
divided leadership, competing priorities, funding questions,
and lack of quantified outcomes make this a political hot
potato that has landed squarely in the lap of Minister
Macklin. Indigenous people make up approximately 2.5 percent
of the total population in Australia but 30 percent of the
population of the Northern Territory. If successful, the
direction the NTER intervention takes will determine how the
government supports other state efforts to close the gap
between living conditions for indigenous and non-indigenous
Australians.

MCCALLUM