Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08CANBERRA102
2008-02-07 01:55:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Canberra
Cable title:
GLOBAL INITIATIVE TO COMBAT NUCLEAR TERRORISM -
VZCZCXRO1284 PP RUEHKR DE RUEHBY #0102/01 0380155 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 070155Z FEB 08 FM AMEMBASSY CANBERRA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8932 INFO RUEHAB/AMEMBASSY ABIDJAN PRIORITY 0001 RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 0367 RUEHAN/AMEMBASSY ANTANANARIVO PRIORITY 0003 RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT PRIORITY 0025 RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA PRIORITY 0004 RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS PRIORITY 0263 RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 8921 RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 0989 RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 1514 RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK PRIORITY 0018 RUEHSL/AMEMBASSY BRATISLAVA PRIORITY 0062 RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS PRIORITY 3552 RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST PRIORITY 0276 RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST PRIORITY 0262 RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO PRIORITY 0642 RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN PRIORITY 1112 RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE PRIORITY RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PRIORITY 0594 RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 1427 RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 0211 RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 0267 RUEHKR/AMEMBASSY KOROR PRIORITY 0029 RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV PRIORITY 0004 RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON PRIORITY 0988 RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA PRIORITY 0067 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1757 RUEHLS/AMEMBASSY LUSAKA PRIORITY 0063 RUEHLE/AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG PRIORITY 0498 RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY 1118 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1454 RUEHNC/AMEMBASSY NICOSIA PRIORITY 0316 RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA PRIORITY 0258 RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 000102
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DOS FOR ISN/WMDT DEXTER INGRAM AND T TIM KATSAPIS AND EAP
DHS FOR TOM MCILVAIN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM KNNP PTER EAIR ETRD EWWT PREL AS
SUBJECT: GLOBAL INITIATIVE TO COMBAT NUCLEAR TERRORISM -
AUSTRALIAN RESPONSE ON MODEL GUIDELINES WORKSHOP
REF: 2007 STATE 156602
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 000102
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DOS FOR ISN/WMDT DEXTER INGRAM AND T TIM KATSAPIS AND EAP
DHS FOR TOM MCILVAIN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM KNNP PTER EAIR ETRD EWWT PREL AS
SUBJECT: GLOBAL INITIATIVE TO COMBAT NUCLEAR TERRORISM -
AUSTRALIAN RESPONSE ON MODEL GUIDELINES WORKSHOP
REF: 2007 STATE 156602
1. (U) Australia's plan to participate in the March GI Model
Guidelines Document Workshop in Washington was confirmed to
Poloffs by Mohan Mathews, Executive Director,
Counter-Terrorism Chemical, Biological, Radiological and
Nuclear Section, International Security Division, DFAT,
during a February 6 meeting. The exact composition of the
delegation has not yet been finalized, but participants
likely will include the relevant agency representatives from
the Australian Embassy in Washington, including Australian
Customs, DFAT, and ASIO. Katherine Smith from the Australian
Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO),who was
recently assigned to Washington, is also likely to
participate.
2. (U) Mohan also provided GOA views on the draft model
nuclear detection guidelines document that we had shared with
Australia in November (Reftel). The GOA interagency group
that studied the document suggested that a drafting process
using a sub-group of the GI member nations might be easier to
manage than soliciting inputs from the entire membership and
asked if that was anticipated. It recommended the document
provide general guidance which can be used as a checklist and
to avoid prescriptive guidelines. The group had concerns
that the guidelines may limit implementation to specific
equipment or manufacturers to achieve interoperability or
compatibility, for example specifying use of specific
instruments to measure radiation. It cautioned the
guidelines should not be so restrictive as to discourage or
discontinue opportunities to share field experience or
laboratory evaluations.
3. (U) The interagency group stressed the importance of
avoiding duplication of related efforts in other
international organizations. Australia specifically wishes
to ensure that the current revision process for the IAEA's
"The Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear
Facilities" document (INFCIRC/225) continue unencumbered.
QFacilities" document (INFCIRC/225) continue unencumbered.
They also observe that IAEA's recent publication "Combating
Illicit Trafficking in Nuclear and other Radioactive
Material" (IAEA NSS No 6, 2007) covers similar issues
including radiation detection equipment and response
measures. It also underlined the importance of leaving the
role of setting standards to established bodies such as the
IAEA and the World Customs Organization, with the guidelines
simply referencing those standards.
4. (U) Mohan requested more information about the referenced
U.S. regional partnership with Canada and Mexico as a basis
for working with Pacific regional partners to enhance
radiological/nuclear detection capabilities. He also
CANBERRA 00000102 002 OF 002
inquired if we were aware of any similar efforts that have
been initiated by the EU. Post would appreciate further
information on these issues.
MCCALLUM
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DOS FOR ISN/WMDT DEXTER INGRAM AND T TIM KATSAPIS AND EAP
DHS FOR TOM MCILVAIN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM KNNP PTER EAIR ETRD EWWT PREL AS
SUBJECT: GLOBAL INITIATIVE TO COMBAT NUCLEAR TERRORISM -
AUSTRALIAN RESPONSE ON MODEL GUIDELINES WORKSHOP
REF: 2007 STATE 156602
1. (U) Australia's plan to participate in the March GI Model
Guidelines Document Workshop in Washington was confirmed to
Poloffs by Mohan Mathews, Executive Director,
Counter-Terrorism Chemical, Biological, Radiological and
Nuclear Section, International Security Division, DFAT,
during a February 6 meeting. The exact composition of the
delegation has not yet been finalized, but participants
likely will include the relevant agency representatives from
the Australian Embassy in Washington, including Australian
Customs, DFAT, and ASIO. Katherine Smith from the Australian
Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO),who was
recently assigned to Washington, is also likely to
participate.
2. (U) Mohan also provided GOA views on the draft model
nuclear detection guidelines document that we had shared with
Australia in November (Reftel). The GOA interagency group
that studied the document suggested that a drafting process
using a sub-group of the GI member nations might be easier to
manage than soliciting inputs from the entire membership and
asked if that was anticipated. It recommended the document
provide general guidance which can be used as a checklist and
to avoid prescriptive guidelines. The group had concerns
that the guidelines may limit implementation to specific
equipment or manufacturers to achieve interoperability or
compatibility, for example specifying use of specific
instruments to measure radiation. It cautioned the
guidelines should not be so restrictive as to discourage or
discontinue opportunities to share field experience or
laboratory evaluations.
3. (U) The interagency group stressed the importance of
avoiding duplication of related efforts in other
international organizations. Australia specifically wishes
to ensure that the current revision process for the IAEA's
"The Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear
Facilities" document (INFCIRC/225) continue unencumbered.
QFacilities" document (INFCIRC/225) continue unencumbered.
They also observe that IAEA's recent publication "Combating
Illicit Trafficking in Nuclear and other Radioactive
Material" (IAEA NSS No 6, 2007) covers similar issues
including radiation detection equipment and response
measures. It also underlined the importance of leaving the
role of setting standards to established bodies such as the
IAEA and the World Customs Organization, with the guidelines
simply referencing those standards.
4. (U) Mohan requested more information about the referenced
U.S. regional partnership with Canada and Mexico as a basis
for working with Pacific regional partners to enhance
radiological/nuclear detection capabilities. He also
CANBERRA 00000102 002 OF 002
inquired if we were aware of any similar efforts that have
been initiated by the EU. Post would appreciate further
information on these issues.
MCCALLUM