Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08CANBERRA102
2008-02-07 01:55:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Canberra
Cable title:  

GLOBAL INITIATIVE TO COMBAT NUCLEAR TERRORISM -

Tags:  PARM KNNP PTER EAIR ETRD EWWT PREL AS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1284
PP RUEHKR
DE RUEHBY #0102/01 0380155
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 070155Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY CANBERRA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8932
INFO RUEHAB/AMEMBASSY ABIDJAN PRIORITY 0001
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 0367
RUEHAN/AMEMBASSY ANTANANARIVO PRIORITY 0003
RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT PRIORITY 0025
RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA PRIORITY 0004
RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS PRIORITY 0263
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 8921
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 0989
RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 1514
RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK PRIORITY 0018
RUEHSL/AMEMBASSY BRATISLAVA PRIORITY 0062
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS PRIORITY 3552
RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST PRIORITY 0276
RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST PRIORITY 0262
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO PRIORITY 0642
RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN PRIORITY 1112
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE PRIORITY
RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PRIORITY 0594
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 1427
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 0211
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 0267
RUEHKR/AMEMBASSY KOROR PRIORITY 0029
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV PRIORITY 0004
RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON PRIORITY 0988
RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA PRIORITY 0067
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1757
RUEHLS/AMEMBASSY LUSAKA PRIORITY 0063
RUEHLE/AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG PRIORITY 0498
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY 1118
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1454
RUEHNC/AMEMBASSY NICOSIA PRIORITY 0316
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA PRIORITY 0258
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 000102 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

DOS FOR ISN/WMDT DEXTER INGRAM AND T TIM KATSAPIS AND EAP
DHS FOR TOM MCILVAIN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM KNNP PTER EAIR ETRD EWWT PREL AS
SUBJECT: GLOBAL INITIATIVE TO COMBAT NUCLEAR TERRORISM -
AUSTRALIAN RESPONSE ON MODEL GUIDELINES WORKSHOP

REF: 2007 STATE 156602

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 000102

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

DOS FOR ISN/WMDT DEXTER INGRAM AND T TIM KATSAPIS AND EAP
DHS FOR TOM MCILVAIN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM KNNP PTER EAIR ETRD EWWT PREL AS
SUBJECT: GLOBAL INITIATIVE TO COMBAT NUCLEAR TERRORISM -
AUSTRALIAN RESPONSE ON MODEL GUIDELINES WORKSHOP

REF: 2007 STATE 156602


1. (U) Australia's plan to participate in the March GI Model
Guidelines Document Workshop in Washington was confirmed to
Poloffs by Mohan Mathews, Executive Director,
Counter-Terrorism Chemical, Biological, Radiological and
Nuclear Section, International Security Division, DFAT,
during a February 6 meeting. The exact composition of the
delegation has not yet been finalized, but participants
likely will include the relevant agency representatives from
the Australian Embassy in Washington, including Australian
Customs, DFAT, and ASIO. Katherine Smith from the Australian
Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO),who was
recently assigned to Washington, is also likely to
participate.


2. (U) Mohan also provided GOA views on the draft model
nuclear detection guidelines document that we had shared with
Australia in November (Reftel). The GOA interagency group
that studied the document suggested that a drafting process
using a sub-group of the GI member nations might be easier to
manage than soliciting inputs from the entire membership and
asked if that was anticipated. It recommended the document
provide general guidance which can be used as a checklist and
to avoid prescriptive guidelines. The group had concerns
that the guidelines may limit implementation to specific
equipment or manufacturers to achieve interoperability or
compatibility, for example specifying use of specific
instruments to measure radiation. It cautioned the
guidelines should not be so restrictive as to discourage or
discontinue opportunities to share field experience or
laboratory evaluations.


3. (U) The interagency group stressed the importance of
avoiding duplication of related efforts in other
international organizations. Australia specifically wishes
to ensure that the current revision process for the IAEA's
"The Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear
Facilities" document (INFCIRC/225) continue unencumbered.
QFacilities" document (INFCIRC/225) continue unencumbered.
They also observe that IAEA's recent publication "Combating
Illicit Trafficking in Nuclear and other Radioactive
Material" (IAEA NSS No 6, 2007) covers similar issues
including radiation detection equipment and response
measures. It also underlined the importance of leaving the
role of setting standards to established bodies such as the
IAEA and the World Customs Organization, with the guidelines
simply referencing those standards.


4. (U) Mohan requested more information about the referenced
U.S. regional partnership with Canada and Mexico as a basis
for working with Pacific regional partners to enhance
radiological/nuclear detection capabilities. He also

CANBERRA 00000102 002 OF 002


inquired if we were aware of any similar efforts that have
been initiated by the EU. Post would appreciate further
information on these issues.

MCCALLUM