Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08BRUSSELS1587
2008-10-14 15:03:00
UNCLASSIFIED
USEU Brussels
Cable title:  

EU MIGRATION PACT: WHAT'S IN, WHAT'S OUT

Tags:  PREF PREL SMIG EUN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5392
RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV
DE RUEHBS #1587/01 2881503
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 141503Z OCT 08
FM USEU BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC
INFO RUCNMEU/EU INTEREST COLLECTIVE
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BRUSSELS 001587 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREF PREL SMIG EUN
SUBJECT: EU MIGRATION PACT: WHAT'S IN, WHAT'S OUT

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BRUSSELS 001587

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREF PREL SMIG EUN
SUBJECT: EU MIGRATION PACT: WHAT'S IN, WHAT'S OUT


1. Summary: EU heads of state are expected to approve the
European Pact on Immigration and Asylum at the Oct. 15-16
European Council summit. Not a legally-binding document, the
Pact gives overarching policy direction. Member states will
then pass national legislation to operationalize the goals of
the Pact. The Pact commits the EU to: sending illegal
immigrants back to their home countries; attracting
highly-skilled labor migrants through the new EU Blue Card;
strengthening border protection; creating a uniform set of
asylum regulations; and expanding development partnerships
with migrant-sending countries. Dropped from earlier drafts
are integration contracts between immigrants and governments,
bans on mass amnesties, and common asylum processing. End
summary.

The Purpose of the Pact
--------------


2. The 27 EU heads of state/government are expected Oct.
15-16 to approve the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum,
a broad political statement outlining EU goals to restrict
illegal immigration while simultaneously attracting legal,
highly-skilled labor immigrants. The Pact, which has
undergone numerous iterations and has been significantly
watered down from its original form, was one of the main
goals announced by France at the start of its six-month EU
Presidency. Dismissed by some critics as "nothing new," the
Pact pulls together numerous provisions previously approved
by the EU in piecemeal fashion. As a statement of political
will, however, it puts the collective stamp of approval at
the highest level (heads of state) on an overarching EU
policy direction on migration, an area of sovereignty that
member states historically have been reluctant to cede to the
EU institutions. The Pact is non-binding, which means that
each of the 27 member states will now have to develop and
implement its own enabling legislation. EU Justice and Home
Affairs ministers have approved the Pact twice (July and
September),and heads of state are expected to approve it
this week without objection.

What's Out: Mass Amnesty Ban, Integration Contracts
-------------- --------------


3. One of the more controversial early provisions in the
Pact was a French proposal to implement integration contracts
between individual immigrants and the government of the
receiving country. Such a contract would have given the

immigrant certain government benefits in return for a
commitment to accept and embrace European values. It was
based on a French program, and French Minister of Immigration
and Integration Brice Hortefeux traveled to several EU
capitals to campaign for its inclusion. Several member
states, most notably Spain, opposed the idea and lobbied
successfully for its removal.


4. The French also failed to gain unanimous support for a
common asylum agency that would rule on asylum applications
union-wide. Germany was at the forefront of opposition to
that provision. Although the Pact still includes a new
asylum agency, it will not have the power to make asylum
decisions. It will serve as an advisory agency for the
member states, but cannot force them to accept asylum
seekers. In the final hours of negotiations at the September
JHA Council, however, Malta succeeded in adding language that
allows some burden-sharing of asylum applicants. Malta,
which has long complained about its inability to process the
large numbers of immigrants who arrive at its shores, had
previously obtained financial and technical support from the
EU. Now, however, the European Commission, in consultation
with UNHCR, can facilitate voluntary and coordinated
reallocation of asylum beneficiaries from one member state to
another in instances where one member state is clearly
receiving a disproportionate number of migrants.

5. Another controversial element in early drafts of the Pact
called for bans on mass amnesties or regularizations of
illegal immigrants. Spain, in particular, has come under
fire from other EU member states for regularizing the status
of some 600,000 illegal immigrants in recent years, many of
whom then migrate further within the EU. Both Spain and
Italy opposed bans on amnesties, saying they are important
tools for governments faced with large undocumented
populations. Instead of a ban on amnesties, the final Pact
says that all immigration decisions must be made on a
case-by-case basis. In terms of tone, the final document
also reflects a softening from its original version. The
first draft of the Pact included a quote from Nicolas Sarkozy
stating, "Europe does not have the means to welcome with
dignity all those who see it as an Eldorado," but this was
downgraded to, "The European Union, however, does not have
the resources to decently receive all the migrants who hope
to find a better life here."

BRUSSELS 00001587 002 OF 003


Critics Fear Fortress Europe
--------------


6. Even with these changes, the Pact was not well received
in all quarters. The reaction from Africa was one of
concern. Le Pays, a newspaper in Burkina Faso said "we
thought the time of walls was over, but we did not count on
the strong desire of Europe to protect itself against the
'threat' of illegal immigration." Raddho, a Senegalese NGO
for human rights, was concerned the Pact "will accentuate the
vulnerablity and the criminalization of immigration and
asylum rights." CIMADE, an immigrant righs group, said the
Pact was based more on Euroean security concerns than on
human rights, or economic needs. The Centre for European
Policy Studies (CEPS) is also critical of the document,
claiming the Pact does not add anything new to European
immigration policy. It also complains the Pact does not even
mention the Commission's proposal on a Common Framework of
Rights, and has few references to the rights and liberties of
third country nationals. Finally, CEPS claims the Pact
prioritizes national competence over EU competence in
relation to immigration and asylum.

What's In: Send Illegals Home, Attract Skilled Workers
-------------- --------------


7. The Pact begins with a preamble stating the inevitability
of migration, and its importance to the economic growth of
the European Union, as well as to the migrants and their home
nations. It states that while the EU is committed to forging
close partnerships with countries of origin, transit and
destination, it does not have the resources to receive
everyone who seeks a better life here. Therefore, the EU
will focus on Europe's reception capacity in terms of labor
market, housing, health, education and social services, and
providing protection against possible exploitation by
criminal networks. Jean-Christophe Peaucelle, the Head of
the French European Affairs Office, said the preamble is
intended to remind the reader of the values of the EU. After
this preamble, the Pact has five sections setting out basic
commitments for EU migration policy.

8. The first section asks the EU to organize legal
immigration, taking account of the priorities, needs, and
reception capacities of each Member State as well as
encouraging integration. The Council recognizes that the
member states have the power to set the conditions of
admission for migrants, but it will continue to encourage
member states to devise uniform policies for economic
migration as well as increasing the attractiveness of the EU
for highly qualified workers, and giving priority to
temporary, or circular migrants to help combat "brain drain."
A key aspect of this is the new EU Blue Card which will
provide legal status for highly-skilled workers. Finally,
the Council will encourage member states to "promote
harmonious integration in host countries of immigrants who
are likely to settle permanently." This integration should
include promotion of language skills, respect for national
identities, and fundamental values such as human rights,
freedom of expression, tolerance, and equality between men
and women.

9. The second section asks the EU to control irregular
immigration by ensuring the return of undocumented aliens to
their countries of origin. The Council will try to foster
greater cooperation between the EU and countries of origin to
control illegal migration. This will include readmission
agreements, and law enforcement agreements to combat
trafficking operations. In addition, the Council will
encourage member states to return illegal immigrants
currently in the EU, and to recognize return orders made by
other member states.

10. The third section calls on the EU to make border
controls more effective. The Council will require biometric
visas for entry into the EU by January 1, 2012. In addition,
the Council wants to improve cooperation among consulates
issuing visas into the EU. The Council also agreed to deploy
modern technology to help protect the border, and provide
Frontex (the EU border security coordination agency) with the
necessary resources to fulfill its mission of coordinating
border control among member states.

11. The fourth section asks the EU to synchronize EU asylum
regulations. The Council states it is committed to providing
the protection required under the 1951 Geneva Convention and
the 1967 New York Protocol for persecuted foreigners. While
respecting the rights of the individual member states to make
decisions regarding asylum or refugee status, the Council
hopes to establish a system that will harmonize the asylum
policies of the member states. The Council will establish,
by 2009, a European support office to "facilitate the
exchange of information, analyses and experience among member
states." This office will not have the power to examine
applications for asylum; it will only be available to

BRUSSELS 00001587 003 OF 003


coordinate national practices, procedures, and decisions on
asylum and refugees. This is one of the few actual requests
for EU action in the Pact. However, most commentators have
noted that the new agency would have little power, and would
still leave all asylum decisions to the member states. The
Council will also ask the Commission to present proposals for
establishing a single asylum procedure in 2012. This is a
change from the original goal of having a single asylum
system by 2010, a deadline the Council now believes is too
ambitious.

12. The fifth section asks the EU to create a comprehensive
partnership with the countries of origin and transit to
encourage "synergy" between migration and development. The
Council reaffirms its commitment to the Global Approach to
Migration, and as such will work to conclude EU-level, or
bilateral agreements with countries of origin to help
facilitate legal migration, and returns for illegal
migration. In addition, the Council will try to provide
capacity-building programs for countries of origin to help
prevent or deter illegal migration to the EU.

13. Jean-Christophe Peaucelle offered an explanation of the
Pact at the Informal JHA Troika on July 30. He described the
Pact as a political commitment, not a legal agreement, that
represents a new "EU consensus" on how to approach
immigration holistically and in cooperation with source and
transit states for immigrants. He said the Pact allows
member states to make their own rules, but sets out a
guideline to encourage a community-wide view of immigration.
The Pact reflects EU values such as dignity of the
individual. While the EU will leave the legislation to the
member states, the Council and Commission will strengthen
Frontex's border protection capabilities and create an asylum
support office to help member states with coordination of
asylum claims as well as fostering agreements with third
countries to create better cooperation to encourage legal
immigration and fight illegal immigration. The EU Council
will use the Pact as a starting point to harmonize EU
migration law through better cooperation among Member States
and between the EU and third countries, and serve as a guide
for the "Post-Hague" Program of Justice and Home Affairs
priorities to be negotiated in 2009.
MURRAY
.