Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08BRUSSELS1370
2008-09-04 14:03:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
USEU Brussels
Cable title:  

ANTI-PIRACY: UK MISSION TO EU VIEWS ON THE STATE

Tags:  ESDP MCAP PREL PTER FR UK EUN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5286
PP RUEHAG RUEHROV
DE RUEHBS #1370/01 2481403
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 041403Z SEP 08
FM USEU BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHAE/AMEMBASSY ASMARA PRIORITY
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY
RUEHDR/AMEMBASSY DAR ES SALAAM PRIORITY
RUEHDJ/AMEMBASSY DJIBOUTI PRIORITY
RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI PRIORITY
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH PRIORITY
RUEHYN/AMEMBASSY SANAA PRIORITY
RUEHTH/USDAO ATHENS GR PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHRL/USDAO BERLIN GE PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHMD/USDAO MADRID SP PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RUEHRO/USDAO ROME IT PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RUEHTC/USDAO THE HAGUE NL PRIORITY
RUEHLO/USDAO LONDON UK PRIORITY
RUEHFR/USDAO PARIS FR PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 001370 

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/04/2018
TAGS: ESDP MCAP PREL PTER FR UK EUN
SUBJECT: ANTI-PIRACY: UK MISSION TO EU VIEWS ON THE STATE
OF PLAY

Classified By: Classified by USEU POLMINCOUNS Christopher Davis, for re
asons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 001370

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/04/2018
TAGS: ESDP MCAP PREL PTER FR UK EUN
SUBJECT: ANTI-PIRACY: UK MISSION TO EU VIEWS ON THE STATE
OF PLAY

Classified By: Classified by USEU POLMINCOUNS Christopher Davis, for re
asons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. SUMMARY: (C/NF) The UK is deliberately delaying further
formal EU consideration of an anti-piracy mission off the
coast of Somalia according to the UK's Deputy Military
Representative to the EU Military Committee. Air Commodore
Bob Tizard (protect) told USEU on 3 September that the UK had
asked in the Military Committee (MC) for more specific
information regarding costs, coordination, and command &
control be provided before the MC gives its military advice
on the Military Strategic Options (MSO) under consideration
or indeed on additional MSOs. An EU Fact-Finding Mission
will go to the region in the next two weeks and will seek
discussions with US and US-led activities in the area. The
British are perplexed at the French drive to establish an
autonomous ESDP naval operation in this instance as their
behavior is counter to their recent rhetoric in the French
White Book on Defense and their EU Presidency pronouncements.
END SUMMARY


2. (C/NF) Air Commodore Bob Tizard, RAF, Deputy UK MilRep to
the EU (please protect),in a phone conversation in the late
afternoon of 3 Sep 08 (after the EU Military Committee
meeting),told USEU Defense Advisor that the UK was
successful in tabling a Supplemental Paper in the debate on
an ESDP mission to conduct anti-piracy operations of the
coast of Somalia. The Supplemental Paper requires the EU
Military Staff (EUMS) and the Council General Secretariat
(CGS) to develop additional Military Strategic Options (MSO)
for further debate in the Political and Security Committee
(PSC). This action effectively moves any consideration by
the PSC of an ESDP mission to October. Tizard said the
current MSO did not contain any analysis on costs, on
coordination with external actors (e.g. CTF-150),or on
command and control arrangements; failings he attributed to
the heavy hand of Claude-France Arnould, the French director
of the CGS's Defense Aspects of ESDP office.


3. (C/NF) The way ahead for the EU, according to Tizard,

will involve a Fact-Finding Mission going to Djibouti and
Bahrain in the next two weeks where they hope to meet with US
and CTF-150 officials. The EUMS is to have a response to the
Supplemental Paper with draft military advice by 29 Sep 08 so
that it can be sent forward to the PSC for consideration of a
Joint Action and an Initiating Military Directive (IMD) in
October. The UK hopes this delayed process will give more
time for the EU to review the state of play in the area given
that CTF-150's intervention and national contributions (to
include a Malaysian announcement of the dispatching of one
warship and one support vessel to the area) have altered the
conditions upon which the French initially justified an EU
force for the mission (justification which he said started
last March). In addition, the UK hopes that during the lull
concerted British and US efforts in Paris will remove the
French block in NATO, which will then provide even more
rationale for abandoning an autonomous EU effort given the
impending deployment to the region by a Standing NATO
Maritime Group (SNMG). Basically, should the EU see that the
WFP ships are protected and perhaps, that the WFP is able to
use ever larger ships in its operations due to the increased
security provided by other actors, any support for an
autonomous operation will wither.


4. (C/NF) The UK is perplexed by the French position.
According to Tizard, the Elyse, the French MoD, General
Bentegat, the French Chairman of the EU Military Committee,
and Tizard's EU French counterpart, have all told the UK the
French are not/not interested in taking on this additional
task. General Bentegat pointedly said that French can't
afford it. Nevertheless, he said, the French PSC rep

BRUSSELS 00001370 002 OF 002


Christine Rogier continues to push hard for the French
proposal for an autonomous ESDP mission, and the French
delegation at NATO continues to block a tasking to NATO
Military Authorities. The French, he said, also told the UK
that they had pushed for passage of UNSCR 1816 to set the
scene for an autonomous ESDP operation. In Tizard's
seemingly well-informed opinion, there are ambitious people
in Paris who want to see this pre-Georgia crisis goal of the
French presidency through to the end regardless as the French
have shown no overt interest in shelving or reducing this
initiative until after the crisis period has passed. It
seems to Tizard that the French are behaving as if this
initiative is "almost their final act" as EU president. The
UK and Air Commodore Tizard personally, are particularly
perplexed by the French approach given the pronouncements in
the French White Book on Defense and FM Kouchner's speech at
the NATO-EU seminar in Paris exhorting everyone to
complementarity and cooperation between NATO and the EU.


5. (C/NF) Although the Spanish, Germans, Greeks, Dutch and
Italians also support the French initiative, Tizard pointed
out that no one has stepped up to take on the command and
control responsibilities for running and ESDP operation as a
framework nation. Without a framework nation with
significant maritime capabilities to shore up any shortfalls
in the mission, Tizard doesn't see how an autonomous ESDP
operation could go forward. Any Operation Commander working
only out of the EU Ops Center would not have recourse to
other assets and therefore little flexibility in executing
the operation. The UK would, according to Tizard, envision a
small EU coordination cell co-located with other C2
operations working in the area (e.g. CTF-150's) but doesn't
believe the French would accept an EU cell in a NATO
structure. Tizard's bottom line on the internal EU debate on
Command & Control options is that failure here to find a
workable solution could kill the whole initiative.


6. (C/NF) He believes the Spaniard's only concern is their
fishing fleet, which, in his view, is a national not EU issue
and which, in any case, may be protected by the ships already
in or en route. The Italians share the same costs concerns
as the UK. Tizard noted that the UK is already the largest
bilateral donor to Somalia in the EU and has, therefore,
credibility when it says that Georgia is a higher priority
for the EU's focus at this moment.

SILVERBERG
.