Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08BERLIN821
2008-06-20 15:51:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Berlin
Cable title:
(C) GERMANY RELUCTANT TO SUPPORT NTI NUCLEAR FUEL
VZCZCXYZ0017 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHRL #0821 1721551 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 201551Z JUN 08 FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1507 INFO RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 9067 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 1939 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 9632 RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE 1164 RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA 0930 RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0343
C O N F I D E N T I A L BERLIN 000821
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS, STATE FOR ISN AND EUR
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/20/2033
TAGS: KNNP TRGY ENRG KSTC IAEA PARM GM
SUBJECT: (C) GERMANY RELUCTANT TO SUPPORT NTI NUCLEAR FUEL
BANK INITIATIVE AT THIS TIME
REF: BERLIN 558
Classified By: Global Affairs Unit Chief Don L. Brown for
reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
C O N F I D E N T I A L BERLIN 000821
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS, STATE FOR ISN AND EUR
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/20/2033
TAGS: KNNP TRGY ENRG KSTC IAEA PARM GM
SUBJECT: (C) GERMANY RELUCTANT TO SUPPORT NTI NUCLEAR FUEL
BANK INITIATIVE AT THIS TIME
REF: BERLIN 558
Classified By: Global Affairs Unit Chief Don L. Brown for
reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C) In a meeting on June 11, a German MFA official told
Global Affairs officer Germany is reluctant to support the
Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) nuclear fuel bank initiative
at this time. The reasons stem from a perceived a lack of
interest from Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) countries and an
unclear definition of the NTI fuel bank structure.
2. (C) Dietrich Becker, the MFA Head of Unit for Nuclear
Energy and Non-Proliferation, said before Germany could
seriously consider supporting the proposal, "we first need to
see real interest from NAM countries." Becker did offer a
hint of optimism, noting that at the last Non-Proliferation
Treaty (NPT) PrepCom conference in Geneva key NAM countries
seemed to be warming to the idea of an international fuel
bank. Becker cautioned, however, that Germany feels there is
still not enough NAM support for the NTI proposal. Becker
said the major sticking point is NAM countries' insistence
that no strings be attached to any nuclear fuel supply
guarantees that might infringe on countries' NPT rights to
pursue peaceful nuclear energy, including all aspects of the
fuel cycle. (COMMENT: The German position stems from
concerns voiced by some NAM countries (see reftel) who feel
"the West" will use control of nuclear fuel supply as a means
of political leverage. German officials, including Becker,
are well aware the NTI no longer requires countries to forego
enrichment and reprocessing. Nonetheless, Germany continues
to give NAM concerns more weight than they perhaps deserve.
END COMMENT.)
3. (C) Becker said the NTI nuclear fuel bank initiative's
structure is not yet clearly defined. For instance, he
asked, whether the fuel bank will be real, virtual, or purely
financial. Becker expressed a preference for storage of
"real" nuclear fuel under the control of the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (COMMENT: This thought is
consistent with the philosophy behind German FM Steinmeier's
Multilateral Enrichment Sanctuary Project (MESP) proposal,
which aims to establish an IAEA-controlled nuclear fuel
enrichment facility. END COMMENT.)
4. (C) Becker emphasized that in principle Germany is
supportive of nuclear fuel assurances but cautioned this path
needs to carefully approached, otherwise there will be no
forward traction.
TIMKEN JR
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS, STATE FOR ISN AND EUR
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/20/2033
TAGS: KNNP TRGY ENRG KSTC IAEA PARM GM
SUBJECT: (C) GERMANY RELUCTANT TO SUPPORT NTI NUCLEAR FUEL
BANK INITIATIVE AT THIS TIME
REF: BERLIN 558
Classified By: Global Affairs Unit Chief Don L. Brown for
reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C) In a meeting on June 11, a German MFA official told
Global Affairs officer Germany is reluctant to support the
Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) nuclear fuel bank initiative
at this time. The reasons stem from a perceived a lack of
interest from Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) countries and an
unclear definition of the NTI fuel bank structure.
2. (C) Dietrich Becker, the MFA Head of Unit for Nuclear
Energy and Non-Proliferation, said before Germany could
seriously consider supporting the proposal, "we first need to
see real interest from NAM countries." Becker did offer a
hint of optimism, noting that at the last Non-Proliferation
Treaty (NPT) PrepCom conference in Geneva key NAM countries
seemed to be warming to the idea of an international fuel
bank. Becker cautioned, however, that Germany feels there is
still not enough NAM support for the NTI proposal. Becker
said the major sticking point is NAM countries' insistence
that no strings be attached to any nuclear fuel supply
guarantees that might infringe on countries' NPT rights to
pursue peaceful nuclear energy, including all aspects of the
fuel cycle. (COMMENT: The German position stems from
concerns voiced by some NAM countries (see reftel) who feel
"the West" will use control of nuclear fuel supply as a means
of political leverage. German officials, including Becker,
are well aware the NTI no longer requires countries to forego
enrichment and reprocessing. Nonetheless, Germany continues
to give NAM concerns more weight than they perhaps deserve.
END COMMENT.)
3. (C) Becker said the NTI nuclear fuel bank initiative's
structure is not yet clearly defined. For instance, he
asked, whether the fuel bank will be real, virtual, or purely
financial. Becker expressed a preference for storage of
"real" nuclear fuel under the control of the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (COMMENT: This thought is
consistent with the philosophy behind German FM Steinmeier's
Multilateral Enrichment Sanctuary Project (MESP) proposal,
which aims to establish an IAEA-controlled nuclear fuel
enrichment facility. END COMMENT.)
4. (C) Becker emphasized that in principle Germany is
supportive of nuclear fuel assurances but cautioned this path
needs to carefully approached, otherwise there will be no
forward traction.
TIMKEN JR