Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08BANGKOK1522
2008-05-16 12:34:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bangkok
Cable title:
MGBM01: HRW ADMITS BISCUIT STORY NOT CONFIRMED
how-toVZCZCXRO6208 OO RUEHCHI RUEHCN RUEHDT RUEHHM DE RUEHBK #1522/01 1371234 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 161234Z MAY 08 FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3060 INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS IMMEDIATE RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA IMMEDIATE 2032 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 5335 RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 5971 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1675 RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 4611 RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 2284 RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 5140 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1527 RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON PRIORITY 0211 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 0887 RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 0990 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 0736 RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI PRIORITY 5258 RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY RHFJSCC/COMMARFORPAC PRIORITY RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 001522
SIPDIS
NSC FOR PHU, EAP/MLS FOR AARON COPE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/16/2018
TAGS: PREL PGOV PHUM EAID TH BM
SUBJECT: MGBM01: HRW ADMITS BISCUIT STORY NOT CONFIRMED
REF: RANGOON 387
BANGKOK 00001522 001.2 OF 002
Classified By: Ambassador Eric G. John, reason 1.4 (b) and (d)
-------
SUMMARY
-------
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 001522
SIPDIS
NSC FOR PHU, EAP/MLS FOR AARON COPE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/16/2018
TAGS: PREL PGOV PHUM EAID TH BM
SUBJECT: MGBM01: HRW ADMITS BISCUIT STORY NOT CONFIRMED
REF: RANGOON 387
BANGKOK 00001522 001.2 OF 002
Classified By: Ambassador Eric G. John, reason 1.4 (b) and (d)
--------------
SUMMARY
--------------
1. (C) Human Rights Watch (HRW) staff based in Thailand
(STRICTLY PROTECT) told us May 16 that the organization's
press statement released May 14 had been a point of
contention between "higher ups" and those on the ground. The
press release claimed that the Burmese military confiscated
internationally donated high-protein biscuits and substituted
them with locally produced, inferior quality biscuits for
distribution to Cyclone Nargis victims. Our source stated
that HRW had not confirmed the story, and that he had not
been comfortable with his headquarters' decision to use the
information. He acknowledged that it was very likely the
story originated from May 10 press reports regarding the
Burmese junta's seizure of a World Food Program (WFP) relief
shipment that included high-protein biscuits, a shipment
which was subsequently released to the WFP. HRW was trying to
follow-up on the story and expected to have more information
within the week. End summary.
--------------
BACKGROUND OF THE PRESS RELEASE
--------------
2. (C) A long-time and trusted Embassy contact based in
Thailand with HRW (STRICTLY PROTECT) revealed to us that the
May 14 press release "Burma: Donor States Must Monitor Aid"
generated a certain amount of internal dissent during its
drafting. Of particular concern to HRW staff on the ground
was reference to a report that the Burmese military
appropriated international relief supplies. The final
version released to the media stated "HRW confirmed an
Associated Press (AP) report in which high-protein biscuits
supplied by the international community had been seized by
the military, and that low-quality, locally produced
substitutes were instead delivered to communities in need."
3. (C) According to our contact, HRW received the story from
a trusted source in Rangoon on May 12. This Rangoon source
stated that a Burmese Ministry official (NFI) had claimed
that the Burmese military confiscated a shipment of
high-protein biscuits and transferred them to a military
warehouse. The Ministry official adamantly believed that the
biscuits were replaced with an inferior version before
distribution to cyclone victims, though he provided no
verification of this claim. The Rangoon source had no
first-hand knowledge of the action by the Burmese military
and had not been able to follow-up with the Ministry official
as to the current whereabouts of the alleged biscuits. HRW
Thailand shared this story with their headquarters in New
York, but couched it as for internal consumption only.
4. (C) When the AP went public with a similar story on May
13, HRW contacted the AP and ascertained that two different
sources had provided the same story. It was at that point
that HRW New York decided to include the biscuit saga in its
own press statement. This was despite warnings from local
staff that felt it was inappropriate to present as evidence a
story that had yet to be confirmed. Our HRW contact in
Thailand stated that he was not comfortable with how this one
sentence had been singled out for intense focus and
speculation. "I wish we had phrased it differently," he told
us. Furthermore, he indicated that many people had been
BANGKOK 00001522 002.2 OF 002
involved in the crafting of the press release, not all of who
were familiar with Burmese politics.
--------------
WHERE THE STORY MAY HAVE ORIGINATED
--------------
5. (U) International media widely reported the May 9
announcement by WFP spokesman Paul Risley that all "the food
aid and equipment that we managed to get in (to Burma) has
been confiscated." The WFP identified the shipment as
including 38 tons of high-energy biscuits. Two days later,
the WFP declared that in "an encouraging development, 38 tons
of high-energy biscuits were on Saturday (May 10) handed to
the WFP. On Sunday (May 11) they were being collected and
transported onwards for immediate distribution to the worst
affected people."
6. (C) When we asked our HRW contact about the possibility of
this story conflating with the information their Rangoon
source received from a Burmese Ministry official, our contact
conceded that was likely the case. He acknowledged that
there were many stories circulating about Burma and that it
was difficult to obtain accurate information from outside the
country. As a result of the amount of interest the HRW press
release had stirred up, our contact had spent the past two
days attempting to verify the biscuit story with fellow
activists, alternate sources inside Burma, journalists, and
others. Thus far our contact had not been able to confirm
the story. He added that the same Rangoon source that
originally passed the biscuit story on May 12 had since come
out of Burma. However, this source planned to return the
week of May 19 with the number one priority of following up
on the location and/or possible substitution of these
high-energy biscuits. Should HRW discover that this story is
false, our contact told us that he expected his organization
would consider issuing a retraction.
--------------
COMMENT
--------------
7. (C) Though the story of the allegedly confiscated biscuits
was just one sentence in a lengthy press release by HRW, it
has caused a stir, as multiple media outlets repeated the HRW
statement, and used it to expand on their own discussion of
possible aid diversion in Burma. (Note: Reftel describes
Embassy Rangoon's rigorous efforts to follow up on stories of
aid diversion; as of May 15, they had not confirmed any of
these reports, although they continue to follow up on more
recent reports of diversions, many of which are vague and
therefore difficult to investigate. End Note.) We will
remain in touch with HRW to see if they are able to provide
more credible support for their allegation, and to encourage
them to report responsibly on this very difficult issue. End
comment.
8. (U) This cable was coordinated with Embassy Rangoon.
JOHN
SIPDIS
NSC FOR PHU, EAP/MLS FOR AARON COPE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/16/2018
TAGS: PREL PGOV PHUM EAID TH BM
SUBJECT: MGBM01: HRW ADMITS BISCUIT STORY NOT CONFIRMED
REF: RANGOON 387
BANGKOK 00001522 001.2 OF 002
Classified By: Ambassador Eric G. John, reason 1.4 (b) and (d)
--------------
SUMMARY
--------------
1. (C) Human Rights Watch (HRW) staff based in Thailand
(STRICTLY PROTECT) told us May 16 that the organization's
press statement released May 14 had been a point of
contention between "higher ups" and those on the ground. The
press release claimed that the Burmese military confiscated
internationally donated high-protein biscuits and substituted
them with locally produced, inferior quality biscuits for
distribution to Cyclone Nargis victims. Our source stated
that HRW had not confirmed the story, and that he had not
been comfortable with his headquarters' decision to use the
information. He acknowledged that it was very likely the
story originated from May 10 press reports regarding the
Burmese junta's seizure of a World Food Program (WFP) relief
shipment that included high-protein biscuits, a shipment
which was subsequently released to the WFP. HRW was trying to
follow-up on the story and expected to have more information
within the week. End summary.
--------------
BACKGROUND OF THE PRESS RELEASE
--------------
2. (C) A long-time and trusted Embassy contact based in
Thailand with HRW (STRICTLY PROTECT) revealed to us that the
May 14 press release "Burma: Donor States Must Monitor Aid"
generated a certain amount of internal dissent during its
drafting. Of particular concern to HRW staff on the ground
was reference to a report that the Burmese military
appropriated international relief supplies. The final
version released to the media stated "HRW confirmed an
Associated Press (AP) report in which high-protein biscuits
supplied by the international community had been seized by
the military, and that low-quality, locally produced
substitutes were instead delivered to communities in need."
3. (C) According to our contact, HRW received the story from
a trusted source in Rangoon on May 12. This Rangoon source
stated that a Burmese Ministry official (NFI) had claimed
that the Burmese military confiscated a shipment of
high-protein biscuits and transferred them to a military
warehouse. The Ministry official adamantly believed that the
biscuits were replaced with an inferior version before
distribution to cyclone victims, though he provided no
verification of this claim. The Rangoon source had no
first-hand knowledge of the action by the Burmese military
and had not been able to follow-up with the Ministry official
as to the current whereabouts of the alleged biscuits. HRW
Thailand shared this story with their headquarters in New
York, but couched it as for internal consumption only.
4. (C) When the AP went public with a similar story on May
13, HRW contacted the AP and ascertained that two different
sources had provided the same story. It was at that point
that HRW New York decided to include the biscuit saga in its
own press statement. This was despite warnings from local
staff that felt it was inappropriate to present as evidence a
story that had yet to be confirmed. Our HRW contact in
Thailand stated that he was not comfortable with how this one
sentence had been singled out for intense focus and
speculation. "I wish we had phrased it differently," he told
us. Furthermore, he indicated that many people had been
BANGKOK 00001522 002.2 OF 002
involved in the crafting of the press release, not all of who
were familiar with Burmese politics.
--------------
WHERE THE STORY MAY HAVE ORIGINATED
--------------
5. (U) International media widely reported the May 9
announcement by WFP spokesman Paul Risley that all "the food
aid and equipment that we managed to get in (to Burma) has
been confiscated." The WFP identified the shipment as
including 38 tons of high-energy biscuits. Two days later,
the WFP declared that in "an encouraging development, 38 tons
of high-energy biscuits were on Saturday (May 10) handed to
the WFP. On Sunday (May 11) they were being collected and
transported onwards for immediate distribution to the worst
affected people."
6. (C) When we asked our HRW contact about the possibility of
this story conflating with the information their Rangoon
source received from a Burmese Ministry official, our contact
conceded that was likely the case. He acknowledged that
there were many stories circulating about Burma and that it
was difficult to obtain accurate information from outside the
country. As a result of the amount of interest the HRW press
release had stirred up, our contact had spent the past two
days attempting to verify the biscuit story with fellow
activists, alternate sources inside Burma, journalists, and
others. Thus far our contact had not been able to confirm
the story. He added that the same Rangoon source that
originally passed the biscuit story on May 12 had since come
out of Burma. However, this source planned to return the
week of May 19 with the number one priority of following up
on the location and/or possible substitution of these
high-energy biscuits. Should HRW discover that this story is
false, our contact told us that he expected his organization
would consider issuing a retraction.
--------------
COMMENT
--------------
7. (C) Though the story of the allegedly confiscated biscuits
was just one sentence in a lengthy press release by HRW, it
has caused a stir, as multiple media outlets repeated the HRW
statement, and used it to expand on their own discussion of
possible aid diversion in Burma. (Note: Reftel describes
Embassy Rangoon's rigorous efforts to follow up on stories of
aid diversion; as of May 15, they had not confirmed any of
these reports, although they continue to follow up on more
recent reports of diversions, many of which are vague and
therefore difficult to investigate. End Note.) We will
remain in touch with HRW to see if they are able to provide
more credible support for their allegation, and to encourage
them to report responsibly on this very difficult issue. End
comment.
8. (U) This cable was coordinated with Embassy Rangoon.
JOHN