Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08BAKU187
2008-03-04 13:55:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Baku
Cable title:  

DFM AZIMOV REQUESTS USG SUPPORT ON

Tags:  PGOV PREL PBTS UN AZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0659
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKB #0187 0641355
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 041355Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY BAKU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4855
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0271
RUEHPS/USOFFICE PRISTINA PRIORITY 0202
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE PRIORITY 0834
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0486
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA 2672
C O N F I D E N T I A L BAKU 000187 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FOR EUR/CARC AND IO

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/21/2018
TAGS: PGOV PREL PBTS UN AZ
SUBJECT: DFM AZIMOV REQUESTS USG SUPPORT ON
NAGORNO-KARABAKH UNGA RESOLUTION

REF: STATE 21209

Classified By: Ambassador Anne E. Derse for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L BAKU 000187

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FOR EUR/CARC AND IO

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/21/2018
TAGS: PGOV PREL PBTS UN AZ
SUBJECT: DFM AZIMOV REQUESTS USG SUPPORT ON
NAGORNO-KARABAKH UNGA RESOLUTION

REF: STATE 21209

Classified By: Ambassador Anne E. Derse for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (C) Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov
requested a meeting with Ambassador Derse on February 29 to
discuss Azerbaijan's pending UNGA resolution "on the
situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan" (other
topics septel). European embassies were similarly summoned
to a group meeting. Azimov formally handed the Ambassador a
letter to the Secretary presenting the resolution and seeking
U.S. support (faxed to EUR/CARC on 2/29.) The Ambassador
stated that the U.S. was prepared to work with the GOAJ on a
UNGA resolution underscoring that Kosovo is not a precedent
for Nagorno-Karabakh. However, the Ambassador said the U.S.
"could not support, and may oppose" the Azerbaijani
resolution in its current unbalanced form. Azimov said that
Azerbaijan,s resolution was "maybe in reaction" to the
Kosovo,s unilateral declaration of independence from Serbia,
and expressed surprise that the USG may oppose the resolution.


2. (C) Azimov said that a resolution simply stating that
Kosovo was not a precedent for Nagorno-Karabakh was "not
acceptable." He said that Azerbaijan sought to make it clear
that "self-determination is the mechanism through which NK
status is determined within the territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan" and that the result of self-determination was not
independence. Azimov also reiterated Azerbaijan's opposition
to the "unilateral" secession of Kosovo from Serbia.


3. (C) Azimov said that "based on what the Co-chairs have
said on the record, the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan
is the conceptual basis for the Minsk Group." However, based
on what has happened in Kosovo, "we cannot take this for
granted now." He said that "Azerbaijan's draft resolution in
the UNGA is a moment of truth where the GOAJ is "trying to
find answers." Azimov stated twice that the resolution was
not an attempt on the part of Azerbaijan to "move NK to the
UN," and added that Azerbaijan may, in the end, appeal to the
wider Minsk Group. Azimov also said that two points in the
Minsk Group principles needed to be improved: first, that
the Lachin corridor cannot be under unilateral control.
Azimov worried that, under the Kosovo precedent, the Lachin
corridor would be quickly taken out of Azerbaijan. Second
the right of return must be included.


4. (C) In addition, with reference to the NK negotiations,
GOAJ hard line on Kosovo is intended to heavily underscore
their position that the principle of territorial integrity is
absolute and governing in the NK dispute, and that
independence for NK is not a possible outcome from the GOAJ
point of view ) a key point for them which they believe is
under pressure in the Minsk Group talks. Azimov said that
Kosovo has forced the issue; it is a "moment of truth" on NK
-- the UNGA resolution they have put forward is intended to
make clear that the principle of territorial integrity
governs, and that self-determination is "a mechanism by which
NK determines its status within the territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan." Azimov said that the Minsk Group has been vague
on this and they want it clarified. They are also concerned
about Russia applying Kosovo example to Georgian conflict and
what that could portend for NK, even if Russia does not apply
Kosovo example to NK directly.


5. (C) Azimov provided background on how Azerbaijan would
push the resolution forward. The resolution would be pushed
forward on three levels. Azerbaijan,s first approach would
be to all countries in the UNGA; its second approach would be
to countries that have regional interests, and third would be
to the co-chairs of the Minsk Group. He opined that
Azerbaijan,s resolution "relied on what the co-chairs said
several times" with respect to territorial integrity being
the conceptual basis for the NK negotiations.
DERSE