Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08ANKARA2158
2008-12-23 08:41:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

OSMANLI CUMHURIYETI: A TURKEY WITHOUT ATATURK

Tags:  EU OSCE PGOV TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO3214
PP RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHAK #2158/01 3580841
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 230841Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8289
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHIT/AMCONSUL ISTANBUL 5141
RHMFISS/EUCOM POLAD VAIHINGEN GE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J-3/J-5//
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC
RUEUITH/ODC ANKARA TU//TCH//
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEUITH/TLO ANKARA TU
RUEHAK/TSR ANKARA TU
RUEHAK/USDAO ANKARA TU
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 002158 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/22/2018
TAGS: EU OSCE PGOV TU
SUBJECT: OSMANLI CUMHURIYETI: A TURKEY WITHOUT ATATURK

Classified By: Acting Pol counselor Christopher Krafft for reasons 1.4(
b,d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 002158

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/22/2018
TAGS: EU OSCE PGOV TU
SUBJECT: OSMANLI CUMHURIYETI: A TURKEY WITHOUT ATATURK

Classified By: Acting Pol counselor Christopher Krafft for reasons 1.4(
b,d)


1. (SBU) Summary: "Osmanli CumhuriYETI," a recently
released comedy film hypothesizes what Turkey would look like
today had its founder, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, not lived past
the age of eight. Its vision is bleak, a combination of
anti-Westernism and nostalgia for a largely-imagined golden
age of Ottoman peace and prosperity, two views that have
become increasingly popular among sectors of Turkey's
intelligentsia in recent years. End Summary.


The Ottoman Republic
--------------

2. (SBU) Fast on the tails of Can Dundar's biopic,
"Mustafa," which boldly explored the hypothesis, "What if
Ataturk were a human being with real human feelings?" comedic
screenwriter-turned-director Gani Mujde released his Osmanli
CumhuriYETI (Ottoman Republic),which imagines a world in
which Ataturk died of a fall at the age of eight. In this
world, the Ottoman Empire has lost World War One, has been
subjected to the Treaty of Sevres, and, has been put under a
US mandate by the League of Nations (building, perhaps, on an
American Mandate over "Western Armenia" that was originally
envisioned, but never enforced, in the Treaty of Sevres). In
the year 2008, Sultan Osman VII rules over Istanbul and
Western Anatolia (the Eastern half having been given to the
French) from Dolmabahce Palace. He himself is ruled in
political matters by an American governor and, at home, by
his domineering, fashion-driven wife. After falling in love
with an activist art student, Osman awakens to the fact that
Turkey has been enslaved and his life of luxury (replete with
Prada shoes and Segways) is empty. His efforts to raise a
rebel army to evict Turkey's American overlords come to
naught, however, through the manipulations of Ibrahim Pasha,
his conniving, sniveling advisor. Osman is sent off to
exile, leaving his young son as the new Sultan in the capable
hands of Ibrahim Pasa and the Americans. The departing
former sultan laments, "If only someone had foreseen all of
this in time to prevent it;" the scene then fades back to the
young Ataturk, who becomes conscious again and runs forward
to meet his destiny.


3. (SBU) Reviewers have largely criticized the movie for

trying to be both a melodrama and a comedy and succeeding in
being neither. A handful of reviews praise it for its
patriotic sentiments; other reviewers see instead nationalist
propaganda. Despite its failure to amuse or (curiously) to
spark controversy, it nonetheless reflects two interesting
aspects of how Turks perceive themselves and the world around
them: swelling anti-American feelings and an increasing
nostalgia for the alleged golden age of the Ottoman Empire.
The first of these is something with which we have grown
increasingly familiar; the second is, perhaps, more worrying.

Against the West
--------------

4. (SBU) On surface, Osmanli CumhuriYETI seems sharply
anti-American. The American occupiers in the film are
universally shown to be arrogant and disrespectful of the
Turks, casually causing grievous harm to Ibrahim Pasa in a
baseball game, for example, all the while calling him,
condescendingly, "My Little Ibo". The Americans break up
peaceful protests violently with rifle-toting marines, throw
protesters (and, once, the Sultan) in prison without recourse
to any legal process, and dispassionately sell off bits of
the Empire to Greece. In the end, it is the Americans who
slaughter the nascent rebel force in a palace coup and exile
the Sultan. But the Americans are villains of convenience in
this film; absent the Second Gulf War, the film would most
likely still have been made, only with cricket-playing
British colonels pulling the strings behind the throne, not
baseball-playing Americans. The Europeans in the movie --
who play a lesser, but significant role, in the form of EU
ambassadors dangling EU membership before the sultan to
extract concessions from the Ottomans -- are just as
arrogant, conniving, and condescending. The foreign
occupiers are cardboard villains, stand-ins for what one
Turkish film critic called "our nation's current mixture of
inferiority and superiority complexes."

ANKARA 00002158 002 OF 002



Misplaced Nostalgia
--------------

5. (SBU) It is, instead, a nostalgia for the Ottoman Empire
that is the main message of this movie. Superficially, it
recognizes that without Ataturk, Turkey would have suffered
at the hands of its occupiers. But underneath is the
assumption that modern politics is the source of all the
problems of modern Turkey. In Mujde's imagined world, the
Kurds in eastern Anatolia are clamoring to be united with the
Turks, not to be divided from them. Various ethnic types --
a Bosnian bodyguard, a Kurdish chauffeur, a group of Turkish
friends from the rural hamlet of Ankara -- band together to
stand against the foreign occupiers. Said Mujde in an
interview with Zaman newspaper: "If only we could accomplish
in republican Turkey what Mehmet the Conqueror
accomplished... we would not have secularism or headscarf
issues, etc."


6. (C) Comment: Unlike the 2006 smash hit, "Valley of the
Wolves," Osmanli CumhuriYETI's anti-Americanism has not
sparked the public's imagination. Its simplistic view of
Ottoman history, however, is not uncommon amongst our
interlocutors or in press outlets, particularly those of a
nationalist or a religious bent. The view glosses over the
failings of not just the Ottoman Empire, but empires in
general -- patent inequality, lack of local political
participation, simmering ethnic and religious tensions --
that made them no longer viable in global politics. The view
also assumes that the Ottoman decline was wholly external,
imposed by crafty European diplomats, completely ignoring the
court intrigues, self-serving rulers and advisors, and
disinterest in the general welfare that made the Ottoman
Empire vulnerable to manipulation and led to its ultimate
demise in the first place. Osmanli CumhuriYETI should be a
warning against Ottoman-style politics, not a longing for
their return: the basic message that Turks of all political
and ethnic stripes should band together for a common cause to
strengthen the Republic is indeed a good one. But Turkey
does not need an Osman VII or even another Ataturk; it needs
a state that can build upon Ataturk's legacy to create fully
transparent state structures, a fully politically active
public, and a responsible political class that works together
constructively for the common good. The Ottoman Empire is no
model for that. End comment.

Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at
http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Turk ey

Jeffrey