Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08AMMAN2965
2008-10-28 11:49:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Amman
Cable title:  

IMPLEMENTING MUGHRABI GATE PROJECT REMAINS

Tags:  PREL SCUL UNESCO KWBG IS JO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHAM #2965 3021149
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 281149Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY AMMAN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3740
INFO RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV PRIORITY 1370
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM PRIORITY 5206
C O N F I D E N T I A L AMMAN 002965 

SIPDIS

DEPARMENT FOR NEA/ELA, NEA/IPA,

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2018
TAGS: PREL SCUL UNESCO KWBG IS JO
SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTING MUGHRABI GATE PROJECT REMAINS
JORDAN'S PRIORITY

REF: A. PARIS 1944

B. AMMAN 2632 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: Ambassador R. Stephen Beecroft,
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L AMMAN 002965

SIPDIS

DEPARMENT FOR NEA/ELA, NEA/IPA,

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2018
TAGS: PREL SCUL UNESCO KWBG IS JO
SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTING MUGHRABI GATE PROJECT REMAINS
JORDAN'S PRIORITY

REF: A. PARIS 1944

B. AMMAN 2632 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: Ambassador R. Stephen Beecroft,
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (C) The MFA's Director of Policy Planning and Research,
Omar Nahar - Post's primary GOJ contact on the matter of
planned construction of a new ascent to the Mughrabi Gate
entrance to the Haram Al-Sharif/Temple Mount - gave PolOff a
readout of the GOJ's latest views on October 21. The meeting
took place against the background of a highly contentious
UNESCO Executive Board Session on the subject in Paris (Ref
A),but Nahar did not offer any further substance on Jordan's
view of those developments. He reiterated that Jordan sees
the ascent to the Mughrabi Gate as part of the Muslim Waqf
and is thus part of Jordan's responsibility - based on the
historical status quo, international conventions, and
reinforced by the 1994 Jordan-Israel peace treaty (Refs B and
previous).


2. (C) In describing Jordan's ideal regarding the project,
Nahar preferred using the word "implementing" rather than
"controlling." Jordan wants the Waqf to physically handle
any construction with its own people doing the work, said
Nahar, who argued that considerable precedent exists for Waqf
oversight of such projects in Jerusalem. Nahar recognized
that Israel likely sees the Mughrabi Gate ascent as separate
from the Haram Al-Sharif and therefore not part of the Waqf,
but he asserted that Jordan does not draw that distinction.
Jordan would be open to Israeli input regarding the planning
and construction of the new ascent, but it would want that
input to be offered behind the scenes, he concluded.


3. (C) Nahar said Jordan resubmitted a request to Israel
seeking access to the site several weeks ago, but there had
been no response. He was unaware of revisions to the Israeli
plans - which PolOff noted were modified so that the prayer
area in front of the Western Wall was not expanded as Jordan
feared - but opined that if this were the case "it would be
great news, positive." PolOff observed that there is an
apparent contradiction between dwelling on Israel's perceived
freezing Jordan out of the planning and decision-making
process on one hand, and adhering to a more fundamental
objection that the Jordanian Waqf should oversee the whole
project on the other. Nahar was coy, however, when asked to
lay out Jordan's bottom line: "I cannot give you an answer to
the question of whether, if Israel implemented the Jordanian
design, would we be happy. We would be happier if we did it
(ourselves)."


4. (C) Comment: The King, who has told us he cannot be seen
to abdicate his custodial role over the Holy Sites, fears
domestic questions about his legitimacy were he to back down
on this issue. Indeed, over the past several days both
Foreign Minister Salah Al-Bashir and Advisor to the King on
Religious and Cultural Affairs Prince Ghazi have raised this
point with the Ambassador. Ghazi became quite emotional and
animated as he warned that "this is not only destabilizing,
it is delegitimizing." The Mughrabi Gate issue is taking on
greater urgency in the face of a lack of visible progress in
the Annapolis process, and a widespread perception that
Israel continues to assert itself in Jerusalem and the
Palestinian territories by building the separation barrier,
expanding settlements, and restricting Palestinian movement.
The increasing symbolism of "control" may make it less likely
that Jordan would be open to a hypothetical practical
solution to the Israeli-Jordanian competition on this matter,
such as establishing greater Jordanian input into or
influence over the design of the ascent. End Comment.

Visit Amman's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/amman
Beecroft