Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ZAGREB265
2007-03-19 14:55:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Zagreb
Cable title:  

NATO ROUNDTABLE REFLECTS ENTIRE NGO SPECTRUM

Tags:  PREL MARR NATO HR DEFENSE REFORM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO9218
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHVB #0265 0781455
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 191455Z MAR 07
FM AMEMBASSY ZAGREB
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7426
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 3447
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS ZAGREB 000265 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SCE, EUR/RPM
USNATO FOR D.JONES

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL MARR NATO HR DEFENSE REFORM
SUBJECT: NATO ROUNDTABLE REFLECTS ENTIRE NGO SPECTRUM

UNCLAS ZAGREB 000265

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SCE, EUR/RPM
USNATO FOR D.JONES

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL MARR NATO HR DEFENSE REFORM
SUBJECT: NATO ROUNDTABLE REFLECTS ENTIRE NGO SPECTRUM


1. SUMMARY AND COMMENT: Nearly 20 local NGOs and a dozen leading
academics debated the pros and cons of Croatia's NATO candidacy at a
March 13 roundtable organized by DEFIMI, a scientific research NGO
focused on defense and security issues which receives some
government funding. Participating NGOs ranged from defense and
peace-related organizations to broad-based human rights groups. The
gathering provided a lively and at times provocative audience for
Croatia's Ambassador to NATO Davor Bozinovic, who focused on the
humanitarian and economic benefits of NATO membership. Anton Tus, a
retired general and former ambassador to NATO, provided the day's
the most eloquent defense of the Alliance, outlining how membership
will protect key Croatian national interests. While the agenda of
many in the audience was anti-membership, the gathering kicked off a
public debate and forced opponents to defend their often
loosely-reasoned arguments against NATO. Organizers will hold
similar roundtables in the coming months in Osijek, Rijeka, and
Split. END SUMMARY AND COMMENT.

AMBASSADORS PROMOTE NATO MEMBERSHIP
--------------


2. Bozinovic served as the main GoC spokesperson for NATO alongside
several pro-NATO academics. He presented NATO as a political and
defensive alliance rather than a military organization, stressing
the need to defend our common democratic values not just on our
doorstep but elsewhere in the world. "We are not joining NATO to
become involved in wars, but rather to escape war," he said. Among
economic benefits, he pointed to the enormous trade relationship
among NATO members, amounting to 1.3 billion euros per day. He also
noted that U.S. investment in the Netherlands is higher than in
Mexico and eight times higher than in China.


3. Tus, who served as Chief of the General Staff from 1991-92 and
Croatia's first ambassador to NATO in 2001, focused on the
Alliance's role in defending key Croatian national interests:
territory, sovereignty, identity, and prosperity. He pointed to
international terrorism as the leading threat to these interests and
argued against those who continue to promote the Yugoslav model of
non-alignment. "Political neutrality is no longer possible in
today's world," he said. Non-alignment actually leads to less
security, he argued, "and we lived through the results of such
'independence' in the 1990s."

NGOS CALL FOR CONSIDERATION OF POLICY ALTERNATIVE
-------------- --------------


4. NGO participants represented the full spectrum of Croatian civil
society, included defense-related organizations such as the Atlantic
Council and the Croatian Officers' and Generals' Assemblies,
anti-war groups such as the Center for Peace, Non-violence, and
Human Rights, and broad-based human rights organizations such as the
Croatian Helsinki Committee and the women's NGO B.A.B.E. Key
questions posed by NGOs included:
- From what do we need to defend ourselves?
- What is the policy alternative to NATO membership? (and why
doesn't the GoC talk about it?)
- What are the costs of NATO membership?


5. Several participating academics criticised U.S. operations in
Iraq as a means of attacking NATO, playing on an oft-repeated myth
that the USG will force Croatia to send troops to Baghdad once it is
inside the Alliance. PolOff reminded them that Operation Iraqi
Freedom was not a NATO mission and that NATO missions are
established through consensus of all member states.

BRADKTE