Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ZAGREB167
2007-02-14 14:54:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Zagreb
Cable title:  

PRESIDENTIAL SPARRING IN THE PRESS OVER ANNUAL

Tags:  PREL IT HR REGIONAL ISSUES 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7794
RR RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHVB #0167 0451454
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 141454Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY ZAGREB
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7302
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L ZAGREB 000167 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/14/2017
TAGS: PREL IT HR REGIONAL ISSUES
SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL SPARRING IN THE PRESS OVER ANNUAL
"FOIBE" COMMEMORATION


Classified By: AMB Bradtke for reason 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L ZAGREB 000167

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/14/2017
TAGS: PREL IT HR REGIONAL ISSUES
SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL SPARRING IN THE PRESS OVER ANNUAL
"FOIBE" COMMEMORATION


Classified By: AMB Bradtke for reason 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (SBU) In a sharply worded statement February 12, Croatian
President Mesic expressed "unpleasant surprise" at Italian
President Napolitano's remarks at the annual February 10
Italian commemoration of ugly WWII-era massacres of Italians
by Yugoslav anti-fascist Partisans. The Croatian press
inaccurately reported that Napolitano blamed the events on
"Slavic bloodthirsty hatred and rage" and questioned the
validity of the 1947 peace treaty between Italy and
Yugoslavia. Reacting to a bad translation of the Italian
comments, Mesic told the press that those words had "elements
of open racism, historical revisionism and political
revenge-seeking." The press reported Mesic's reaction and
the counter-reactions of Italian FM D'Alema and PM Prodi, to
which Mesic replied (again in the press) by admitting that
"our forces also committed crimes during WWII and I cannot
justify crime".


2. (C) At a previously-scheduled February 13 meeting with
Ambassador Bradkte, Mesic explained his views with some
emotion, arguing that Napolitano's remarks were unacceptable
and failed to take account of Italian atrocities during WWII.
Mesic further noted that he would propose that a panel of
history and forensic experts investigate the incidents.


3. (C) On February 14, Mesic advisor Tomislav Jakic told
Ambassador Bradtke that Italian Ambassador to Croatia
Graffini had proposed an exchange of letters between
Napolitano and Mesic to ease tensions. According to Jakic,
Napolitano's letter would state that he "had not said" what
he said, while Mesic's reply would agree. Jakic said Mesic
had declined to go along with that course of action,
proposing instead that the Napolitano letter "explain" what
he said. Mesic's reply would accept the "explanation."


4. (SBU) COMMENT: The annual Italian commemoration of the
massacre, during which anti-Fascist, Yugoslav Communist
Partisans killed many Italians (estimates range from several
thousand to more) by throwing them into naturally-occurring
limestone chasms locally known as "foibe", sparks mild
reaction every year. The rhetoric reflects the fact that all
ethnicities in this region have an acutely honed sense of
victim-hood lurking just beneath the "European" surface.
Reaction this year differed in the level and specificity, but
both the Croatians and Italians have too strong a stake in
good bilateral relations to allow this dispute to continue
for long.
BRADTKE